logo
Nick Offerman Called Out A Homophobic Internet Troll Who Dared To Use A Ron Swanson GIF In An Anti-Pride Tweet

Nick Offerman Called Out A Homophobic Internet Troll Who Dared To Use A Ron Swanson GIF In An Anti-Pride Tweet

Yahoo03-06-2025

It's Pride month!!! Now, for most everyone, it's a joyful time of year — full of celebration, love, and being unapologetically oneself. It's also a time for LGBTQIA+ people and allies to come together, honor history, and have some serious fun. But like clockwork, as soon as the clock strikes 12:00 a.m. on June 1st, the right-wing outrage machines kick into overdrive.
Case in point: this tweet from Michael Flynn Jr. (if that name sounds familiar, it's because he is the son of far-right conspiracy theorist Michael Flynn), who, yesterday, used a photoshopped GIF of Parks and Rec's Ron Swanson throwing away a Pride flag to show on X (formerly Twitter) that he is having a hissy fit (someone grab this snowflake a fainting chair!) because it's Pride:
NBC / Via Twitter: @realmflynnJR
Now, like I mentioned, this is photoshopped, as in the scene — which has become a popular meme — Ron was throwing away his computer.
Well, earlier today, Ron Swanson himself, Nick Offerman (who is a huge ally of the LGBTQIA+ community), clapped back at Flynn Jr. by calling him a dumb fuck and pointing out that Ron was not a homophobe:
NBC / Via Twitter: @Nick_Offerman
Nick even pointed out that Ron was the best man at Typhoon and Craig's wedding in the series finale.
Related: Let's Talk About How Creepy The Sydney Sweeney Bikini Pics Are
Goes without saying that people online were living for this:
Related: "I Haven't Paid My Rent In 6 Months": Celebrities Are Getting Brutally Honest About What It's Really Like To Be Famous In Hollywood
Netflix/ @LazaterJohn / Via Twitter: @LazaterJohn
NBC/ @jaymurphy110 / Via Twitter: @jaymurphy110
Don't fuck with Nick. Happy Pride, everyone!!!
Looking for more LGBTQ+ or Pride content? Then check out all of BuzzFeed's posts celebrating Pride 2025.
Also in Celebrity: 14 Celebrities Who Have So Many Kids, They're Basically Running Their Own Daycare, And 11 Who Said "Hmm, Hard Pass"
Also in Celebrity: 28 Celebs Who Never Seem To Get Canceled Despite Some Pretty Awful Behavior
Also in Celebrity: I'm Absolutely Losing It Over Miley Cyrus's Theory About "Disney Gays" And "Nickelodeon Gays" That Just Destroyed My Entire Childhood

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA
Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA

Republican Representative Thomas Massie said that President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three nuclear sites in Iran is "unconstitutional" as the president faces stark division within his own party. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email Saturday night for comment. Israel launched attacks against Iran's capital city of Tehran earlier this month in what it called a "preemptive strike" and warned its citizens of retaliatory bombings from Iran. Military tensions between the two countries have rapidly escalated in the days since as Trump continues to double down that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Taking to X, formerly Twitter, after Trump announced the strikes, Massie said, "This is not Constitutional." Trump announced the military move on Truth Social saying the U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan in Iran. The president said all planes are now out of Iran air space and "safely on their way home." Massie has been a staunch opponent of striking Iran, previously saying he would not back a move to get involved in a "regime change war." Other Republican leaders like Lindsey Graham have urged Trump to go "all in" on Iran. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information. Related Articles Trump Says US Bombed Iran's Nuclear Fortress of Fordow and Two Other SitesState Dept Starts Exit Flights From Israel as Trump Mulls War EntryB2 Bombers Move Into Pacific As Israel Hits Iran Radar Near Strait of HormuzSatellite Images Show Israeli Strike Damage to Iranian Nuclear Site 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

AOC Says Trump's Iran Strikes 'Clearly Grounds for Impeachment'
AOC Says Trump's Iran Strikes 'Clearly Grounds for Impeachment'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

AOC Says Trump's Iran Strikes 'Clearly Grounds for Impeachment'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, ripped President Donald Trump for his military attack against Iran on Saturday saying the move is "absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." Democrats are splintered on Trump's move to strike the Middle Eastern country amid days of back-and-forth strikes between Israel and Iran as tensions catapulted amid nuclear concerns. Newsweek previously reached out to the White House via email for comment on the strikes. Why It Matters Over the past few days, the conflict between Israel and Iran has escalated dramatically, with Trump calling for the evacuation of Tehran, Iran's capital city home to over 9.5 million people. Israel initially struck Tehran and several other cities in "Operation Rising Lion," a campaign it said was meant to preempt a planned Iranian attack and disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities. Iran, which has said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, has since retaliated, though Israeli defense systems—bolstered by U.S. military technology—have intercepted about 99 percent of incoming missile fire, according to Israeli officials in Saturday morning in an X, formerly Twitter, post. Iran hit a hospital in southern Israel on Thursday, and local reports noted that buildings in Tel Aviv were on fire from Iranian missiles on Friday. The United States is Israel's closest ally, providing billions of dollars in military aid annually. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday that Trump was expected to make a decision about whether to directly support Israel in its attacks against Iran within the next two weeks. What To Know Trump announced the military action on Truth Social on Saturday evening saying the U.S. attacked sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan in Iran. The president said all planes are now out of Iranian air space and "safely on their way home." The president addressed the nation at 10 p.m. ET regarding the strikes. In response to the attacks, Democrats are either slamming the president for pulling the U.S. into "another endless" war or praising the commander-in-chief for the military move. Ocasio-Cortez ripped the president's action on X, formerly Twitter, and wrote, "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 22, 2025 Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, also ripped Trump on X, writing that he "struck Iran without any authorization of Congress. We need to immediately return to DC and vote on @RepThomasMassie and my War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war." On the other hand, Representative John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, came to Trump's side and wrote on X, "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." Fetterman has been a strong supporter of Israel amid the ongoing war in Gaza and has recently called for the U.S. to provide the country with weaponry, intelligence and military assistance to strike Iran. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, can be seen speaking during a stop on the "Fighting Oligarchy" tour on April 12 in Los Angeles. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, can be seen speaking during a stop on the "Fighting Oligarchy" tour on April 12 in Los Angeles. Photo byOther lawmakers like Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, have called Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities a "blatant violation of our Constitution." Responding to a post on X that said, "Nothing unites U.S. elites & politicians more than war - especially against Muslims in the Middle East," Tlaib replied, "Yep, and it's so f**king sick." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, released a statement calling out Trump for failing to deliver peace to the Middle East and added that now "the risk of war" has "dramatically increased." Jeffries said he is praying for the safety of U.S. troops "who have been put in harm's way." The House minority leader also warned Trump now bears "complete and total" responsibility for any consequences that may arise from the strikes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, has remained silent in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. Newsweek reached out to his office via email for comment. My statement on Donald Trump's unilateral military action in Iran. — Hakeem Jeffries (@RepJeffries) June 22, 2025 What People Are Saying D. Stephen Voss, a political science professor at the University of Kentucky, in an email to Newsweek Saturday when asked if the division over the strikes could cause additional fractures for Democrats: "The opposition party likely gains from internal division when the country faces a foreign-policy challenge. That way, no matter which way the crisis resolves, they have leaders who can say they were on the right side." Voss added: "Immediately after a foreign-policy conflict, Americans rally around the flag, including members of the opposition party. It would be costly for them to seem unsupportive of the country's security interests. Yet if the conflict goes sour, they benefit from having party members who can flout their opposition to the engagement. Example: Democrats mostly supported the War on Terror despite, despite it being the initiative of a Republican president, yet they still had politicians like Obama able to take advantage of the war's unpopularity later on." Political analyst and Florida Atlantic University professor Craig Agranoff to Newsweek via text message Saturday: "Their split over Iran's strikes is a symptom of deeper fault lines; exposed and widened by their 2024 election loss. On one hand, progressives are pushing for restraint, wary of escalation; on the other, moderates fear looking weak on national security." He added: "This isn't just tactical risks entrenching a broader ideological divide. With the party already on shaky ground, failing to coalesce on a clear stance could erode their ability to challenge Republican narratives or rebuild voter trust ahead of the midterms." This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.

In his own words: Trump's Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars
In his own words: Trump's Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

In his own words: Trump's Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars

During his campaigns for president, Donald Trump spoke of the need to stop engaging in 'endless' or 'forever wars,' and said removing 'warmongers and America-last globalists' was among his second-term foreign policy priorities. Trump's move to strike Iranian nuclear sites risks embroiling the United States in the sort of conflict he once derided. Like other recent American presidents, Trump said he would not permit Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon. In recent months, he had held out hope that diplomacy could avoid the strike he announced Saturday. Trump's consideration of military action had opened a schism among his 'Make American Great Again' movement and drew criticism from some of its most high-profile members. Here's a look at some of Trump's rhetoric before his announcement Saturday about the strikes: 2024 campaign Trump often drew lines of contrasts with his Republican primary opponents. In January 2024, at a New Hampshire rally, he referred to former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley , who was U.N. ambassador during Trump's first term, as a 'warmonger' whose mentality on foreign policy is, 'Let's kill people all over the place and let's make a lot of money for those people that make the messes.' During a Jan. 6, 2024, rally before the Iowa caucuses, Trump told supporters that returning him to the White House would allow the country to 'turn the page forever on those foolish, stupid days of never-ending wars. They never ended.' Rolling out his foreign policy priorities during that campaign — something Trump's orbit called ' Agenda 47 ' — he posted a video online in which he talked of how he was 'the only president in generations who didn't start a war.' In that video, Trump called himself 'the only president who rejected the catastrophic advice of many of Washington's Generals, bureaucrats, and the so-called diplomats who only know how to get us into conflict, but they don't know how to get us out.' First term In his first term, Trump often referenced his anti-interventionist pledge. During his 2019 State of the Union address, he said, 'As a candidate for president, I loudly pledged a new approach. Great nations do not fight endless wars.' There were frequent clashes with some of his advisers over whether or not the United States should take a more involved stance abroad. That included his hawkish national security adviser John Bolton, with whom Trump had strong disagreements on Iran, Afghanistan and other global challenges. As Turkey launched a military operation into Syria targeting Kurdish forces, Trump in October 2019 posted a series of tweets citing his anti-interventionist stance. 'Turkey has been planning to attack the Kurds for a long time. They have been fighting forever,' Trump posted Oct. 10, 2019, on the platform then known as Twitter. 'We have no soldiers or Military anywhere near the attack area. I am trying to end the ENDLESS WARS.' A week later, he reiterated his position: 'I was elected on getting out of these ridiculous endless wars, where our great Military functions as a policing operation to the benefit of people who don't even like the USA.' 2016 campaign Candidate Trump was vociferous in his disdain for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, calling them both mistakes. 'We made a terrible mistake getting involved there in the first place,' Trump told CNN in October 2015, referencing Afghanistan. 'We spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives, we don't even have the oil,' he said of the Iraq War during a March 2016 town hall hosted by the same network. During a primary debate, Trump engaged in a terse exchange with Jeb Bush particularly over U.S. military action in Iraq, launched by President George W. Bush, the Florida governor's brother. 'We should have never been in Iraq,' Trump said in February 2016. 'They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none and they knew that there were none.' What about earlier? Trump's press secretary said Wednesday that the president's beliefs that Iran should not achieve nuclear armament predated his time in politics. And his earlier writings indicate that, while candidate Trump has said he opposed the Iraq War, those sentiments were different before the conflict began. In his 2000 book 'The America We Deserve,' the businessman wrote that he felt a military strike on Iraq might be needed, given the unknown status of that nation's nuclear capabilities. 'I'm no warmonger,' Trump wrote. 'But the fact is, if we decide a strike against Iraq is necessary, it is madness not to carry the mission to its conclusion. When we don't, we have the worst of all worlds: Iraq remains a threat, and now has more incentive than ever to attack us.' ___ Kinnard can be reached at Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store