Mom-to-Be Refuses to Agree to Husband's 'Unique' Baby Names from Favorite Fantasy Novel
A pregnant woman says she and her husband are at odds over what to name their baby
In a post shared to Reddit, the woman writes that the couple has been "discussing (arguing about) a name for the last 8 months"
The problem? She wants something classic, while her husband wants something "unique" from one of his favorite works of fictionA soon-to-be mom says she isn't interested in compromising on a baby name with her husband, who wants something "unique."
In a post shared to Reddit, the anonymous 31-year-old writes that she and her husband still don't know the sex of their baby, but have been "discussing (arguing about) a name for the last 8 months."
"Now I'm afraid there is going to be a tug of war at the hospital over the birth certificate," she writes. "Stylistically, we want very different things."
"I like 'classic' names," she explains. "To give a few examples for a boy's name: Martin, Silas, Calvin. My husband prefers more unique names — he suggested both Artemis and Entrari from his favorite work of fiction."
The woman writes that she is not interested in naming the child "after a fictional assassin and he doesn't want to name his child after 'an old man.'"
"Combining one 'old man' name with one 'unique name/fictional reference' seems to create a really weird-sounding combination and we are both arguing over the first name anyway," she continues.
While she would love for them to both be "happy with the child's name," her husband "hates every single name I suggest," and vice versa.
"I do feel as though I should have a little more influence over the name, if only because he automatically gets the child's last name, no questions asked," she continues.
After months of arguing, she presented her husband with a compromise, telling him "that the child could have whatever name he picked out, on the condition that they get my maiden last name."
However, he "refused," which she knew would happen.
"I don't actually expect them to have my last name. I was just trying to express that I understand how important the last name is and I would accept his first name suggestion if I had the privilege of automatically assuming the last name," she explains.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Now, the mom-to-be says she is "getting less and less excited about the arrival of the child, because it is surrounded by disagreement after disagreement."
"I feel like I'm not getting to name the child something that means a lot to me, names that I have had in my notes app since I was in high school," she writes. "He said that he doesn't want to sigh (out of distaste) every time he has to call out this child's name."
Fellow Reddit users weighed in on the baby-naming debacle, with many siding with the poster, emphasizing that they are "naming a person, not forcing the world to play 'guess the reference' with his favorite literary properties."
One person suggested the couple each "create a list of baby names you think the other person would like."
"Emphasize that you get he likes unique names, but he needs to consider your tastes as well," the person explains. "See if you can come up with a list of 'cool names' that you think he would like that aren't distasteful to you, and ask that he do the same."
"Are there characters from books, comics, movies he likes that have more traditional names? Are there 'vintage' or 'classic' names that are more unique and don't sound so old-fashioned?" the commenter continued. "There is definitely room for compromise here if both of you agree that the other's opinions are important as well."
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Imperfect Women's Elisabeth Moss Calls Her Upcoming Apple TV+ Series ‘A Fantastic Palate-Cleanser After Handmaid's' — Everything We Know So Far
Apple TV+'s Imperfect Women doesn't have a release date yet, but that didn't stop us from asking star and executive producer Elisabeth Moss for an update on the new series during a recent interview. 'It's going great,' Moss said of production on the forthcoming limited series based on Araminta Hall's 2020 novel. 'It's pretty early, but it's a project that's been near and dear to my heart for five years now.' She recalled optioning the book years ago through her production company, Love & Squalor. 'Through various boring industry maneuvers, two strikes and a pandemic — and my own schedule, this day job of Handmaid's that I had — it's taken a second to get here,' the Emmy winner added. 'But I'm very glad that it's arrived in this package that it's arrived in, because this cast is insane. It's crazy.' More from TVLine The Handmaid's Tale's Elisabeth Moss Takes Us Inside Directing the Series Finale: Ending Show Without That Big Character Return 'Didn't Feel Right' Did Taylor Swift Have a Secret Handmaid's Tale Cameo?! Elisabeth Moss Gives Us the Scoop (Exclusive) The Handmaid's Tale's Elisabeth Moss, Max Minghella Unpack the 'Divisive' June/Nick Ending to Episode 6 Moss, of course, referred to her work on Hulu's The Handmaid's Tale, where she was star, executive producer and director. The dystopian drama ran six seasons and recently aired its series finale, which she helmed. And the Imperfect Women co-stars that have her so excited include Scandal's Kerry Washington, who also serves as an EP; House of Cards' Kate Mara; Billions' Corey Stoll and For All Mankind's Joel Kinnaman. 'I just feel like it came together the way that it was supposed to,' Moss said. 'And it's a fantastic palate-cleanser after Handmaid's. It's super different. It's fun, it's sexy. It's obviously a drama, but it's got this thriller element to it.' She added: 'It came around at the right time.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Kerry Washington (@kerrywashington) Scroll down to find out everything we know so far about . We'll make sure to update this post as soon as there's new intel, so come back often! In addition to Moss, Washington, Mara, Stoll and Kinnaman, Imperfect Women's cast includes Rome Flynn (Godfather of Harlem), Sherri Saum (The Fosters), Ana Ortiz (Ugly Betty), Wilson Bethel (All Rise), Keith Carradine (Madam Secretary) and Jackson Kelly (The Pitt). The series is based on Araminta Hall's 2020 novel, published by Picador. According to the show's official logline, 'After a murder shatters the lives of three friends, their decades-long bond is tested when an investigation reveals shocking truths.' Imperfect Women does not yet have a release date. We'll be sure to update this post with that information as soon as it does. Imperfect Women will stream exclusively on Apple TV+. Apple TV+ has not yet released a trailer for Imperfect Women, but we'll add the video to this post as soon as one is released. Best of TVLine 20+ Age-Defying Parent-Child Castings From Blue Bloods, ER, Ginny & Georgia, Golden Girls, Supernatural and More Young Sheldon Easter Eggs: Every Nod to The Big Bang Theory (and Every Future Reveal) Across 7 Seasons Weirdest TV Crossovers: Always Sunny Meets Abbott, Family Guy vs. Simpsons, Nine-Nine Recruits New Girl and More
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tyler Perry Slams $260M Sexual Assault Suit By ‘The Oval' Actor As A 'Scam'
A former longtime regular on Tyler Perry's White House drama The Oval is accusing the Madea star of sexual assault, sexual harassment and retaliation in a $260 million lawsuit — claims that Perry vehemently denies. 'Using his influence, Mr. Perry provided vulnerable men with acting positions, roles, show contracts, cars, and money,' a lawyer for Derek Dixon says of Perry's M.O. to their client and others in the 10-claim complaint filed June 13 in Los Angeles Superior Court. 'Once the object of his desire was hooked, Tyler Perry would then put them in fear of losing it all unless they engaged in Mr. Perry's perverted desire for sexual gratification. Mr. Perry would easily 'kill off' a character in a show of an actor who failed to indulge Perry's sexual fantasies.' More from Deadline Juror Tossed Out Of Sean 'Diddy' Combs Trial For Perceived 'Lying'; Judge Admonishes Defense For Claiming Racial Bias Judge Rejects Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Latest Motion For Mistrial In Sex-Trafficking Case — Update Kanye West's Very Short Visit To Sean "Diddy" Combs' Trial Proves More Photo-Op Than Support For Pal Invoking the names of 'Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, R. Kelly, Sean 'P-Diddy' Combs, Kevin Spacey, Roger Ailes, and many others in the industry,' Dixon's action details how allegedly 'on multiple occasions, Mr. Perry sexually assaulted Mr. Dixon, including one instance where he forcibly pulled off Mr. Dixon's clothing, groped his buttocks, and attempted to force himself on Dixon.' In response, Perry's representatives call BS on Dixon and his accusations. 'This is an individual who got close to Tyler Perry for what now appears to be nothing more than setting up a scam,' said Matthew Boyd, attorney for the mogul and his TPS Production Services, LLC. 'But Tyler will not be shaken down, and we are confident these fabricated claims of harassment will fail.' Such claims of harassment by Dixon are very specific and widespread at the same time, it should be noted. For instance, at one point Dixon says Perry promised the actor that he had 'greenlit' the 'pilot that Perry knew Mr. Dixon had desperately wanted to produce.' The Oval vet says that even with a call from one of Perry's lawyers affirming that the pilot was moving ahead, the promise turned out to be empty. In a format reminiscent of the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni lawsuits, text messages — some more suggestive than others — pepper the 46-page filing from L.A. attorney Jonathan J. Delshad. Included is at least one from an October 2020 trip the two and others took to the Bahamas, where Dixon claims Perry got loaded and assaulted him, again. The filing also notes that Perry supposedly repeatedly threatened 'that if Dixon ignored Perry or failed to engage with the sexual innuendos, Dixon's character would 'die' in the next season.' It goes on to add: 'Indeed, Dixon's character 'Dale' was shot four times in the chest at the end of his first season on The Oval and Perry always held this over Mr. Dixon's head, implying that 'Dale' would survive if Dixon kept Perry 'happy.'' According to Dixon, after he complained about Perry's alleged misconduct and 'Defendants did not make any investigation into the complaint and did not take any steps to prevent further harassment from occurring,' he 'had to quit his job working on the last season of The Oval.' Dixon and his attorneys claim that decision cost him around $400,000 in lost wages. 'Dixon did not want to be sexually harassed or be placed in danger of a sexual assault again,' the filing states as his reason for leaving the show and giving up the money. The Oval debuted on October 23, 2019, on BET, and saw its sixth season kick off on January 25 this year. A Ruthless spinoff premiered on BET+ on March 19, 2020. Best of Deadline 'The Buccaneers' Season 2 Soundtrack: From Griff To Sabrina Carpenter 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘How to Train Your Dragon' Leads Box Office With $37 Million; ‘Elio' Sinks to Pixar-Worst $21 Million Opening
A live-action remake triumphed decisively over original animation at the box office this weekend as Universal/DreamWorks' 'How to Train Your Dragon' held on to the No. 1 spot with a $37 million second weekend, easily clearing Disney/Pixar's 'Elio,' which has fallen to the worst opening weekend in Pixar history with just $21 million domestic and $35 million worldwide. Not only that, 'Elio' is opening in third place on the charts, falling behind the $30 million opening of Sony's R-rated horror legacyquel '28 Years Later.' A low start for Pixar's latest original film was expected given the performance of its last non-sequel, 'Elemental,' which started poorly yet stands as the highest grossing original film of the past five years with $154 million domestic and $496 million worldwide. But there had been hopes that 'Elio' could at least open closer to the $29.6 million opening of 'Elemental' despite the competition from 'How to Train Your Dragon.' The bright spot is that there's still a chance that 'Elio' could have as long legs as 'Elemental' given its very high audience scores, which include an A on CinemaScore, 4.5/5 on PostTrak, and Rotten Tomatoes scores of 85% critics and 91% audience. 'Elio' will also be the only animated film in theaters until Paramount's 'The Smurfs' arrives in mid-July so that gives it an even more fertile environment to draw in families, including perhaps some who opted to see 'Dragon' this weekend. Overseas, the film still has releases to come in China, Japan and Spain, with more kids getting out of school internationally in the coming weeks. But as it stands, 'Elio' would need to have legs as long as 'Elemental' just to reach $100 million in North America, let alone the $154 million of that film. It's a testament to how challenging it has been to drum up buzz for original family titles and how it takes overwhelming post-release word-of-mouth just to score a decent theatrical number. And while Disney and Pixar have gotten the most press on this front for their multiple mixed attempts at original releases — including Disney's flops 'Strange World' and 'Wish' — they aren't the only ones that have had to fight to make originality work. Illumination's sole original title of the last five years, 'Migration,' needed a month to turn its $17 million Christmas weekend opening into a $127.6 million domestic run and $300 million worldwide. Paramount's live-action/animated original hybrid 'IF' opened last year to $33.7 million for a $111 million domestic and $190 million global run. For 'Elio,' which carries a much larger $150 million budget, that's probably the best it can hope for. As for the rest of the charts, 'How to Train Your Dragon' added $53.5 million overseas along with its $37 million domestic total this weekend, bringing it to a 10-day total of $160.4 million domestic and $358 million worldwide. In second is '28 Years Later' with a $30 million domestic and $60 million worldwide opening, giving it the best opening ever for an R-rated zombie film. The legacyquel to the 2002 classic '28 Days Later' sees the director-writer team of Danny Boyle and Alex Garland reunite for what they hope to be a trilogy set in a dystopian future where the deadly Rage Virus has caused the collapsed U.K. to be quarantined from the rest of the world. With a $60 million budget, '28 Years Later' will be a summer success for Sony Pictures, and we will see in the theatrical run ahead — as well as this winter with the film's follow-up, 'The Bone Temple' — whether there's enough audience appetite for a third film to be greenlit. Critics have praised '28 Years Later' with an 89% Rotten Tomatoes score, while audience reception is somewhat less enthusiastic with a B on CinemaScore and a 65% RT score. Disney's 'Lilo & Stitch' is in fourth with $9.7 million, bringing its total to $386.7 million domestic and $910 million worldwide. In fifth is Paramount's 'Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning,' which has now reached $540 million worldwide after earning $6.5 million in its fifth weekend for a total of $178 million domestic. That's enough to pass the domestic run of 'Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning,' which made $172 million in 2023. Finally, A24's 'Materialists' sits just outside the top 5 with a $5.8 million second weekend, giving the $20 million romance drama from Celine Song a $23.9 million 10-day total. The post 'How to Train Your Dragon' Leads Box Office With $37 Million; 'Elio' Sinks to Pixar-Worst $21 Million Opening appeared first on TheWrap.
