I tried this '5-2-4 fartlek' walking workout for a week — and it's a game-changer
Walking workouts are all the rage at the moment — from silent walking for your mental health, to the military-inspired rucking technique to build muscle. But one form of walking workout making headlines is the Japanese Interval Walking Training (IWT), which promises to burn more fat and lower your blood pressure by alternating your pace. Unlike walking 10,000 steps, this science-based method raises your heart rate and boosts your cardiovascular fitness in less time.
This isn't an entirely new phenomenon, however. "Fartlek" walking has been around for a while, and translates to 'speed play' from the native Swedish. It's all about varying the pace and difficulty throughout your walk, mixing intervals of faster-paced walks with slower rambles, allowing you to catch your breath. A study found that alternating periods of brisk and slow walking speeds can improve cardiovascular fitness, boost your overall fitness, and help control blood sugar spikes.
Keen to give a new workout a try, I built my own fartlek walking session, and repeated it every morning for seven days. Read on to find out more.
Ready to get walking? Here's the workout:
Even with the warm-up, this workout took me around 30 minutes every morning. I programmed the workout onto my Apple Watch 10 to avoid having to look at my wrist every few minutes — my watch would buzz when it was time to switch pace.
While this workout is suitable for all levels, as you're walking speed will be based on your exertion levels, if you're new to fitness, or you're returning to exercise following an injury or pregnancy, it's always a good idea to speak to your doctor before taking on a new routine.
Here's my verdict after a week of walking:
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
For those who haven't tried it, the Japanese Interval Walking Training method involves three minutes at a low intensity, then three minutes walking at a high intensity for 30 minutes. This was a slight step up, as the high-intensity part of the workout was longer, and the recovery blocks were shorter. I found that I didn't have long to catch my breath before I was picking up the pace again.
I personally loved the extra challenge of walking at a brisk pace for five minutes. I thought about my walking technique — engaging my core so my abs were working, keeping my chest open and shoulders down, and swinging my arms as I moved.
If you're new to fartlek walking, or you're getting back into fitness, it might be a good idea to try the three-minute intervals first and build up to five minutes.
Like all working parents will appreciate, I have a lot to juggle, and despite writing about fitness for a living, sometimes it's my workouts that suffer.
Despite only being 30 minutes long, I felt like I'd worked hard with this interval walk. I'd raised my heart rate higher than I would typically do on a dog walk, and I've found interval walking is a great option for those who want to reap the benefits of walking, without the time to take a longer stroll.
Walking can help improve your overall fitness, build muscle, strengthen your bones and joints, and help boost your mood and lower stress. You'll also burn more calories doing a fartlek walk than you typically would walking at the same pace for the same time.
If you are walking for weight loss, remember the key is to be in a calorie deficit, burning more calories than you consume. One of the easiest ways to keep an eye on your pace, heart rate, and calorie burn is to strap one of the best fitness trackers to your wrist.
I was instantly hooked after a week of the Japanese walking method, and I equally enjoyed this fartlek workout. As a runner, I use my walks as a form of active recovery, but this was a great way to work on my cardiovascular endurance, without the impact of running.
It also helped me de-stress and boost my mood, plus, it gave me the excuse to take a break from my laptop and spend 30 minutes outdoors in nature — something we should all do more of.
If fitting long workouts into your routine feels overwhelming, this can be done with no equipment, on your lunch break, in your local park or even on the treadmill at the gym.
Plus, the joy of fartlek is the freedom to play with your pace — if structured intervals feel too much, just walk faster for two blocks, then slower for a block, or use street lights as your markers. However fast or slow you walk, you're getting fitter and healthier with every step.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I walked 5,500 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 — here's the winner
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of Garmin's newest AMOLED-screen sporting smartwatches aimed at runners. It boasts loads of training tools, Garmin's best heart rate sensors and a small smattering of smart features. Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 is perhaps the best full-featured smartwatch on the market today. It's also no slouch when it comes to fitness and wellness tracking. While the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a tad pricier than the Apple Watch Series 10, both are well equipped to keep tabs on your daily workout efforts, whether you're a runner, walker, hiker or prefer the gym. Each watch sports an onboard GPS and the best holistic tech offered by Apple and Garmin, respectively. The question is, which one is more accurate when it comes to tracking a basic workout? I decided to find out. The Apple Watch Series 10 is my favorite full-featured smartwatch in 2025, sporting a thin and attractive design, gorgeous screen, endless apps and loads of useful onboard features. It's also a mighty reliable fitness and sleep tracker. The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of the brand's latest smartwatches aimed squarely at runners and outdoor athletes, boasting Garmin's best holistic tech, excellent training and recovery tools, a bright AMOLED screen and a fun, colorful case design. For this walk test, I wore the Apple Watch Series 10 on my left wrist and the Garmin Forerunner 570 on my right wrist before setting out on my manually-counted jaunt around Seattle, Washington, on the longest day of the year. To keep track of my steps, I clicked an old-school tally counter every time my count hit 100 before starting over again at one. With my left foot taking only odd-numbered steps and my right foot only making even-numbered ones, I trekked three miles before ending tracking and examining the results. In addition to the manual count, I also recorded my walk using Strava as a control for distance, elevation and pace data. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. See all the results below: Apple Watch 10 Garmin Forerunner 570 Control Step count 5,568 steps 5,542 steps 5,500 steps (manual count) Distance 2.99 miles 2.98 miles 3.00 miles (Strava) Elevation gain 216 feet 207 feet 212 feet (Strava) Average pace 18 mins 23 secs per mile 18 mins 28 secs per mile 18 mins 6 secs per mile (Strava) Average heart rate 128 bpm 128 bpm n/a Max heart rate 163 bpm 164 bpm n/a Calories burned 437 calories 375 calories n/a Device battery usage 12% 6% n/a Both the Garmin and Apple Watch were within 100 steps of my manually-counted total, an impressive showing for sure! However, while the Series 10 overcounted by 68 steps, the Forerunner 570 only overcounted by 42. Strava, meanwhile, calculated my total steps at 5,548. All three devices measured roughly the same total distance covered and fairly similar elevation gain metrics. Assuming Strava is correct here, both watches are within five feet of the actual total. Pace data also matches up nicely across the board. It's worth noting that both Garmin and Strava offer two average pace figures, including a moving average and an elapsed average, the latter of which is reported above. Garmin's average moving pace for my walk was 16 minutes and 4 seconds per mile and Strava's was 16 minutes and 48 seconds per mile. Despite the Apple Watch being worn on my right wrist and the Garmin adorning my left, heart rate data is a near match between the two, though Apple calculated slightly more calories burned during my roughly 50-minute walk. Finally, the Series 10 burned roughly twice as much battery using its onboard GPS to track my trek compared to the Forerunner 570. Before acknowledging our winner, it's worth pointing out that both the Garmin Forerunner 570 and Apple Watch Series 10 did extremely well in this walk test, and I'd gladly reach for either before recording my next adventure. However, the Garmin Forerunner 570 officially takes the belt in this bout against the Apple Watch Series 10. The margin may be razor thin, but a win's a win. Which smartwatches or fitness trackers would you like to see me test head-to-head in a future walk test? Let me know in the comments below. Until then, get those steps in!
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
Couple lied about cancer-detecting machine, then sold fake cure, feds say
A third person has been charged after authorities say they lied to patients about being able to detect and cure cancer. Mary Blakley and Fred Blakley were each charged in January with several counts of mail fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy to violate the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. In a superseding indictment filed June 5, Janmarie Lanzo was charged with conspiracy to violate the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and defraud the Food and Drug Administration, according to court records and a June 17 news release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. McClatchy News reached out to attorneys for Mary Blakley, Fred Blakley and Janmarie Lanzo but did not immediately hear back. Mary Blakley and Fred Blakley are accused of running a medical clinic business where they charged patients across the U.S. for 'full body scans,' according to prosecutors. Lanzo was a business associate who worked at the clinics and sold products to patients, officials said. Mary Blakley and Fred Blakley typically charged patients $300 for a scan by an ultrasound machine, officials said. They told the patients that Mary Blakley invented a 'smart chip technology' that when added to the ultrasound machine, could detect 'a wide variety of human diseases and medical conditions, including cancers,' prosecutors said. The couple and their employees told patients that this technology could 'treat and cure a wide range of human diseases, illnesses and conditions, including by: 'driving' a substance known as Aetheion into the body to kill cancer,' the indictment said. 'Based on the results of these 'full body scans,' the defendants falsely and fraudulently prescribed to their human clients various supplements, creams, and veterinary products,' officials said. The three sold Aetheion, a cosmetic cream, to patients, according to the release. They also sold them fenbendazole, a veterinary antiparasitic, and told them it could treat cancer, officials said. Fenbendazole is not approved for human use by the FDA, court records said. It is typically used to treat worms in animals. The three also prescribed ProArgi9+ and told patients it was used to treat multiple sclerosis and diabetes, court records said. ProArgi9+ is not approved by the FDA to treat diseases and is used as a dietary supplement. Mary Blakley carried out the scheme by lying about having a Ph.D. in radiation nuclear physics, having dual U.S./Swedish citizenship and working as a cancer specialist and part of a research team that developed fenbendazole, according to court records. If convicted, Mary Blakley and Fred Blakley face 165 years in prison and Lanzo faces five years in prison.
Tom's Guide
5 days ago
- Tom's Guide
IKEA just issued urgent product recall over this kitchen gadget — danger of parts being ingested with food
IKEA has identified 'a risk of small metal pieces detaching during use and subsequently being ingested with food.' IKEA is asking customers who bought a kitchen gadget from the home store to stop using it immediately due to safety concerns. The Swedish home retailer is recalling its 365+ VÄRDEFULL Garlic Press, available in black, due to a risk that small metal pieces may detach and potentially be ingested. IKEA warns that any customers who own an affected garlic press should stop using it immediately and contact IKEA for a full refund. No proof of purchase is required. The company states that the product's recall follows a product error that was identified during an internal investigation, which indicated 'a risk of small metal pieces detaching during use and subsequently being ingested with food.' Batches sold in Canada have article numbers 305.781.89 and 201.521.58, while products sold in other countries can be identified by article number 601.636.02. The product can also be detected by date stamps from 2411 to 2522, which indicate the year in the first two digits and the week in the last two digits. Customers are urged to check the markings on the IKEA logo on the upper handle of the product, as shown below. If customers are unable to identify the product, they can still return any IKEA 365+ VÄRDEFULL Garlic Press for a refund. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. IKEA also urges customers to spread the word about the product recall, especially if the garlic press was gifted, sold or lent to someone else. For further advice regarding the recall, please visit or call IKEA toll-free at 1-800-661-9807.
