I walked 5,500 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 — here's the winner
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of Garmin's newest AMOLED-screen sporting smartwatches aimed at runners. It boasts loads of training tools, Garmin's best heart rate sensors and a small smattering of smart features.
Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 is perhaps the best full-featured smartwatch on the market today. It's also no slouch when it comes to fitness and wellness tracking.
While the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a tad pricier than the Apple Watch Series 10, both are well equipped to keep tabs on your daily workout efforts, whether you're a runner, walker, hiker or prefer the gym.
Each watch sports an onboard GPS and the best holistic tech offered by Apple and Garmin, respectively. The question is, which one is more accurate when it comes to tracking a basic workout? I decided to find out.
The Apple Watch Series 10 is my favorite full-featured smartwatch in 2025, sporting a thin and attractive design, gorgeous screen, endless apps and loads of useful onboard features. It's also a mighty reliable fitness and sleep tracker.
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is one of the brand's latest smartwatches aimed squarely at runners and outdoor athletes, boasting Garmin's best holistic tech, excellent training and recovery tools, a bright AMOLED screen and a fun, colorful case design.
For this walk test, I wore the Apple Watch Series 10 on my left wrist and the Garmin Forerunner 570 on my right wrist before setting out on my manually-counted jaunt around Seattle, Washington, on the longest day of the year.
To keep track of my steps, I clicked an old-school tally counter every time my count hit 100 before starting over again at one. With my left foot taking only odd-numbered steps and my right foot only making even-numbered ones, I trekked three miles before ending tracking and examining the results.
In addition to the manual count, I also recorded my walk using Strava as a control for distance, elevation and pace data.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
See all the results below:
Apple Watch 10
Garmin Forerunner 570
Control
Step count
5,568 steps
5,542 steps
5,500 steps (manual count)
Distance
2.99 miles
2.98 miles
3.00 miles (Strava)
Elevation gain
216 feet
207 feet
212 feet (Strava)
Average pace
18 mins 23 secs per mile
18 mins 28 secs per mile
18 mins 6 secs per mile (Strava)
Average heart rate
128 bpm
128 bpm
n/a
Max heart rate
163 bpm
164 bpm
n/a
Calories burned
437 calories
375 calories
n/a
Device battery usage
12%
6%
n/a
Both the Garmin and Apple Watch were within 100 steps of my manually-counted total, an impressive showing for sure! However, while the Series 10 overcounted by 68 steps, the Forerunner 570 only overcounted by 42. Strava, meanwhile, calculated my total steps at 5,548.
All three devices measured roughly the same total distance covered and fairly similar elevation gain metrics. Assuming Strava is correct here, both watches are within five feet of the actual total.
Pace data also matches up nicely across the board. It's worth noting that both Garmin and Strava offer two average pace figures, including a moving average and an elapsed average, the latter of which is reported above.
Garmin's average moving pace for my walk was 16 minutes and 4 seconds per mile and Strava's was 16 minutes and 48 seconds per mile.
Despite the Apple Watch being worn on my right wrist and the Garmin adorning my left, heart rate data is a near match between the two, though Apple calculated slightly more calories burned during my roughly 50-minute walk.
Finally, the Series 10 burned roughly twice as much battery using its onboard GPS to track my trek compared to the Forerunner 570.
Before acknowledging our winner, it's worth pointing out that both the Garmin Forerunner 570 and Apple Watch Series 10 did extremely well in this walk test, and I'd gladly reach for either before recording my next adventure.
However, the Garmin Forerunner 570 officially takes the belt in this bout against the Apple Watch Series 10. The margin may be razor thin, but a win's a win.
Which smartwatches or fitness trackers would you like to see me test head-to-head in a future walk test? Let me know in the comments below. Until then, get those steps in!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Apple is reportedly considering the acquisition of Perplexity AI
Apple's executives are thinking of acquiring Perplexity AI both to get more talent and to be able to offer an AI-based search engine in the future, according to Bloomberg . Adrian Perica, Apple's head of mergers and acquisitions, has reportedly already talked about the idea with services SVP Eddy Cue and the company's top decision-makers with it comes to its AI efforts. It's early stages, however: Apple has yet to talk to Perplexity about a bid, and the internal talks may not even lead to a formal offer. The executives also reportedly discussed an alternative, wherein instead of buying Perplexity outright, it'll team up with the AI company instead. Either way, the idea is to develop an AI search engine powered by Perplexity and to integrate Perplexity's technology into Siri. While Apple has yet to make a formal offer, Bloomberg says it met several times with Perplexity over the past few months. In May, Cue revealed that Apple discussed a possible Safari-integration with Perplexity while on the stand for Google's ongoing Search antitrust case. Cue took the stand due to Apple's long-standing deal with Google to make its search engine the default on the iPhone. (In turn, Apple gets billions of dollars a year — $18 billion in 2021 — from the arrangement.) Cue didn't share any definitive plans, however, including the possibility of an acquisition. If regulators order Apple to end its partnership with Google, purchasing Perplexity would make it easier for the company to develop an AI-based search engine. In addition, it would allow the company to acquire talent needed to be able to catch up with other companies when it comes to artificial intelligence. Apple, like Meta, has been scouting for new AI talent. Bloomberg says it's even competing against the Facebook owner to hire Daniel Gross, the founder of AI company Safe Superintelligence Inc. The company does seem to need help to be able to release the AI features it wants to provide its users. A few months ago, for instance, Apple delayed the rollout of a more powerful Siri that was a key component of its original pitch for Apple Intelligence.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Could Nvidia's Projected 9% Annual Returns Through 2030 Be the Smartest Risk-Adjusted Play in Tech?
Nvidia, the dominant platform provider, offers excellent risk-adjusted returns with its expanding ecosystem moat. The company's transition from chip supplier to full-stack platform mirrors Apple's evolution from hardware to ecosystem dominance. A 9% annual return from a $3.5 trillion company beats speculative moonshots when considering the certainty of execution and multiple growth drivers. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Forget chasing the next artificial intelligence (AI) unicorn. While venture capitalists funnel billions into speculative start-ups, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) continues to dominate the infrastructure powering the entire industry. A projected 9% annual return may not sound thrilling, but it could be the smartest risk-adjusted investment in tech this decade. According to Coatue Management, an American technology-focused investment firm, Nvidia's market cap could grow from $3.5 trillion today to $5.6 trillion by 2030, implying a 9.6% compound annual growth rate from current levels. That's a far cry from its recent hypergrowth, but it reflects a business that's maturing into its role as the backbone of the AI economy. Here's why Nvidia remains a compelling buy -- even as its pace of growth slows. Think of Nvidia as the Apple of AI. Just as the iPhone represents great hardware backed by an impenetrable ecosystem, Nvidia has built something far more valuable than fast chips -- it has created the core operating system for AI. The company's Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) software platform has become the default language for AI development, with over 4 million developers now embedded in the ecosystem. Switching to a competitor means rewriting years of code, creating a switching cost that grows stronger every day. But Nvidia isn't stopping at software dominance. The company has systematically expanded into every layer of the AI stack. DGX Cloud lets companies rent AI supercomputers by the hour, democratizing access to massive computing power. New enterprise platforms help businesses deploy AI without armies of data scientists. The Omniverse platform powers everything from factory simulations to digital twins of entire cities, while the majority of automakers now rely on Nvidia's DRIVE platform for autonomous vehicle development. This isn't diversification for its own sake. Each new product strengthens the core GPU business. A company using Nvidia for robotics simulations naturally gravitates toward Nvidia chips for its data centers. The network effects compound with each customer. Yes, 9% annual returns sound pedestrian compared to Nvidia's recent rocket ride. But consider the mathematical reality -- when you're already generating $44 billion in quarterly revenue from a $3.5 trillion base, hypergrowth becomes virtually impossible. What matters is that this 9% comes with something venture-backed AI start-ups can't offer: Certainty. The company's Blackwell architecture was fully booked within months of launch, with shipments stretching into late 2025. In its most recent quarter, data center revenue surged 73% year over year to $39.1 billion, while gross margins -- excluding one-time charges -- hover above 70%. That's the kind of pricing power that competitors can only dream about. And with $54 billion in cash and marketable securities, Nvidia can weather any storm while continuing to invest aggressively. But here's what growth projections might be missing: Nvidia isn't just selling more chips to the same customers. It's expanding the entire AI market. Right now, AI remains largely confined to tech giants and cutting-edge enterprises -- not because of cost, but because of complexity. Nvidia's push to simplify deployment through easier tools, pre-trained models, and plug-and-play solutions removes the technical barriers. When every small business can implement AI without a team of engineers, the addressable market doesn't just grow -- it explodes. Think of local governments optimizing traffic patterns, small manufacturers predicting equipment failures, or family doctors using AI diagnostics. The market expansion opportunity dwarfs any competition concerns. Yes, Nvidia trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 34 -- a premium by traditional standards. And yes, Advanced Micro Devices is gaining ground while cloud giants like Microsoft and Alphabet are building their own AI chips. Meanwhile, U.S. export restrictions have cut off a significant portion of China-related revenue, removing an estimated $8 billion in near-term sales. But what's the alternative? Betting on early stage AI start-ups with no profits, no moat, and unproven demand? Nvidia's valuation isn't cheap, but it reflects something rare in tech: Dominance with durability. Wall Street keeps searching for the next big thing. But the best tech investment of the next decade may not come from a stealth start-up or a buzzy IPO. It's already here, hiding in plain sight. Nvidia, with its projected 9% annual returns, offers what's become rare in technology: Scale, certainty, and sustained innovation. While others gamble on speculative AI plays, Nvidia continues to compound wealth with the dependability of a utility and the velocity of a start-up. The AI revolution isn't slowing. It's accelerating. Every breakthrough, from autonomous vehicles to digital twins, reinforces Nvidia's grip on the infrastructure that powers it all. Sometimes the smartest move isn't chasing the next Nvidia. It's owning the one that already reshaped the future -- and is still just getting started. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. George Budwell has positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Nvidia's Projected 9% Annual Returns Through 2030 Be the Smartest Risk-Adjusted Play in Tech? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Vanguard Growth ETF Is a Great Choice for Most, But I Like the Invesco QQQ Trust Better
The Vanguard Growth ETF has been a strong performer over the years. However, the Invesco QQQ Trust's performance has been even better, and its holdings are less top-heavy. That said, investing consistently in these exchange-traded funds is just as important as picking the right one. 10 stocks we like better than Invesco QQQ Trust › The Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEMKT: VUG) is one of the most popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs) around, and it's a great choice for many investors. The ETF tracks the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, which includes stocks representing the growth side of the S&P 500. Notably, the ETF holds around 166 stocks, while its value counterpart, the Vanguard Value ETF (NYSEMKT: VTV), carries 331 stocks, since fewer large-cap stocks are classified as growth stocks. Stocks will also sometimes bounce between the growth ETF and the value ETF. For example, last year, Broadcom was one of the top stocks in the value index, but it has since shifted to being a top-10 holding in the growth ETF. The Vanguard Growth ETF is very tech-heavy, with such stocks accounting for 58.5% of its portfolio. Its top three -- Microsoft, Nvidia, and Apple -- represent almost 32% of its holdings. Growth and technology stocks have been helping lead the market higher for a long time, which can be seen in the outperformance of the Vanguard Growth ETF compared to both the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) and the Vanguard Value ETF. Over the past decade, as of the end of May, the Vanguard Growth ETF has produced an average annual return of 15.3% versus 12.8% for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and 10% for the Vanguard Value ETF. Overall, the Vanguard Growth ETF is a great option for investors; however, there is one growth-focused ETF I like even more. The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) has been one of the best-performing non-leveraged or sector-specific ETFs around. This ETF has outperformed both the Vanguard 500 ETF and the Vanguard Growth ETF over the past decade. As of the end of May, it has generated an average annual return of 17.7%, outpacing its rivals. ETF 5-Year Average Annual Return 10-Year Average Annual Return Vanguard Value 13.9% 10% Vanguard S&P 500 15.9% 12.8% Vanguard Growth 17.2% 15.3% Invesco QQQ Trust 18.1% 17.7% Source: Vanguard and Invesco websites. The Invesco QQQ Trust's outperformance against the S&P 500 isn't just due to a couple of big years. It has been able to consistently outdo the benchmark index over the past decade. In fact, during this period, it has outperformed the S&P 500 more than 87% of the time on a rolling-12-month basis. That's impressive. Like the Vanguard Growth ETF, the Invesco QQQ Trust is also heavily weighted toward tech, with 57.2% of its portfolio classified in that sector as of the end of March. However, the Invesco ETF is actually less top-heavy than the Vanguard Growth ETF, with its top three holdings representing less than 25% of its portfolio (versus almost 32% in the Vanguard ETF). While they share many of the same top holdings, they are more spread out in the Invesco QQQ, which is another reason I prefer it. Here are the two ETFs' top 10 holdings and their weightings: Vanguard Growth Weighting Invesco QQQ Weighting 1. Microsoft 11.3% 1. Microsoft 8.8% 2. Nvidia 10.3% 2. Nvidia 8.7% 3. Apple 10.1% 3. Apple 7.3% 4. Amazon 6.3% 4. Amazon 5.6% 5. Alphabet 5.8% 5. Alphabet 5% 6. Meta Platforms 4.4% 6. Broadcom 4.8% 7. Broadcom 4% 7. Meta Platforms 3.8% 8. Tesla 3.3% 8. Netflix 3.2% 9. Eli Lilly 2.2% 9. Tesla 2.9% 10. Visa 2.2% 10. Costco 2.7% Note: VUG holdings are as of May 31, and QQQ holdings are as of June 17. Growth investors can't go wrong with either the Vanguard Growth ETF or the Invesco QQQ Trust, although I prefer the latter due to its track record of outperformance and its currently being less top-heavy. That said, regardless of which ETF you pick, the key to creating long-term wealth will be consistently investing in it using a dollar-cost averaging strategy. In the long run, this is just as important -- or perhaps even more so -- than trying to pick which is the better ETF right now. Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Alphabet, Invesco QQQ Trust, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Costco Wholesale, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia, Tesla, Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF, Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Value ETF, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, and Visa. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Vanguard Growth ETF Is a Great Choice for Most, But I Like the Invesco QQQ Trust Better was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
