Ferrari's luxury game plan takes on Trump's auto tariffs

Luxury automakers like Ferrari (RACE) may be insulated from tariff-fueled price hikes due to their ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) clientele, but even those well-heeled buyers may have their limits.
Typically, UHNW buyers aren't dissuaded by price hikes; when demand for a product is strong or in limited supply — for instance, during the pandemic — they are willing to pay premiums for products like Rolex watches, fine scotches, and of course, Ferrari sports cars.
It's why Maranello-based Ferrari didn't decrease or fully withdraw its profit guidance for the year during its latest earnings report. The Italian automaker did say, however, that profit metrics like EBIT and EBITDA margins could see a potential 50 basis point hit, depending on how President Trump's trade war plays out, though the possibility of 'offsets' in operations may diminish the impact, management said. Currently, foreign auto imports are subject to 25% tariffs.
In response, Ferrari's pricing strategy is noteworthy and two-fold.
For its ultra-premium cars like the $1 million+ Daytona SP3, upcoming F80 hypercar, and the new 12Cilindri coupe, the company will hike prices by a maximum of 10%. The thinking is these buyers will at least pay some of the tariff — in some cases, an additional $100,000 — because this 'marginal' amount won't dissuade them from a purchase of a limited-edition Ferrari. All buyers of these highest-end Ferraris are multi-repeat clientele and generally don't balk when Ferrari comes asking.
For Ferrari's lower-priced cars, such as the Roma coupe, 296 sports car, and SF90 hybrid sports car, the company will hold prices steady. The thinking here is that these buyers are more price sensitive, and Ferrari faces more competitors in the space, including Aston Martin (ARGGY), Bentley (VWAGY), and Ferrari's regional rival Lamborghini (VWAGY).
Ferrari's CEO Benedetto Vigna says his clients appreciate two aspects of Ferrari's pricing strategy.
'No. 1, we've been clarifying right away what we intend to do; and two, that we contribute, OK? We contribute to this price increase,' Vigna said on Ferrari's analyst call on Tuesday, citing talks he's had with customers.
'We don't ask them to pay all the bill, but we were very clear telling [them] that some models will have no price increase, some others up to … a maximum 10%. So they appreciate it a lot.'
Vigna said the company will remain 'vigilant' in response to changes in purchasing behavior, but at the moment the company hasn't seen any shift post-tariffs.
Lamborghini also reported stellar first quarter results, though it noted the 'uncertain' background in international trade remains. The company said it will 'closely monitor the situation and evaluate potential future scenarios and implications for its business,' but at the moment, business remains robust with a 'strong order book' of future sales.
A spokesperson for Lamborghini said the automaker would not discuss pricing at this time, other saying the automaker was "carefully evaluating all possible scenarios."
Compared to Q1 last year, both Ferrari and Lamborghini did quite well, with revenue up 13% and 30%, respectively, as well as 23% and 33% growth in EBIT.
One area that Lamborghini highlighted is the strength of its key commercial regions — the Americas, EMEA (Europe & Middle East), and Asia — which allows it to spread the risk of trade tensions, though the US is still its top market.
Like Lamborghini, Ferrari has a strong presence across a number of key regions, with a big wrinkle in its favor: a smaller dependency on China. Lagging China sales have hit other luxury brands, including Mercedes, BMW, and Audi.
Wall Street is onboard with Ferrari's game plan for fighting tariffs and limiting China exposure.
Morgan Stanley's Adam Jonas reiterated the bank's Overweight rating on the stock, citing Ferrari's 'uniquely positioned, defensive business' with an order book extending well into 2026, relatively low volatility to earnings, and strategic regional exposure, for example, low China risk.
'We are not aware of any other global luxury brand with anywhere near as low exposure to China as Ferrari,' Jonas wrote. 'We believe the company's strong pricing power (ultra-premium luxury consumer) and low exposure to China (1Q Greater China shipments represented 6.6% of total shipments) offer relative safety vs. many other names under our coverage.'
A high-net-worth consumer, low exposure to China, and a surprisingly 'defensive' business in an uncertain economic environment could be Ferrari's key to success.
'Despite the surge of the uncertainty and volatility, our indistinctive business model provides us with solid confidence and the necessary agility for our future,' Ferrari CFO Antonio Picca Piccon said during the earnings call.
Pras Subramanian is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. You can follow him on X and on Instagram.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

San Francisco Chronicle​

12 minutes ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

NATO leaders are set to agree a historic defense spending pledge, but the hike won't apply to all

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense, except the new and much vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them. Spain has reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5% of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States, only its allies. In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the spending pledge language in NATO's final summit communique — a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs — would no longer refer to 'all allies.' It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance like Belgium, Canada, France and Italy that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars. On Friday, Trump insisted the U.S. has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain.' Trump also branded Canada 'a low payer.' NATO's new spending goals The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2%, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count. A further 1.5% would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks and preparing societies for future conflict. The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5% on core spending is a massive challenge. Last year, Spain spent 1.28% of GDP on its military budget, according to NATO estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sánchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to NATO by spending 2.1% of GDP on defense needs. Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros ($920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022. Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election. Why the spending increase is needed There are solid reasons for ramping up spending. The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3%, NATO experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these. Each country has been assigned 'capability targets' to play its part. Spanish Foreign Minister José Albares said Monday that 'the debate must be not a raw percentage but around capabilities.' He said Spain 'can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organization with 2.1%.' Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday. The Netherlands estimates NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Setting a deadline It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2% target that they agreed in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years. The U.S. insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among NATO envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, NATO diplomats have said. ___ Suman Naishadham in Madrid contributed to this report.

Yahoo

20 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Major U.S. banks poised for massive shift in approach toward cryptocurrency: 'Defend your right to buy'

Despite the instability of cryptocurrency, major U.S. banks are considering a move toward supporting these emerging currencies, Reuters reported. However, they are being rightfully cautious given the shifting legal landscape and how easy it would be to run afoul of laws designed to keep our financial systems honest. Reuters spoke to industry executives about the possibility and revealed that internal discussions are already happening regarding the potential change. However, no bank wants to make the first move. "When I look at the bitcoin universe, the leverage in the system, the misuse in the system, the money laundering issues, trafficking, I'm not a fan of it," said Jamie Dimon, CEO of the largest U.S. bank, JPMorgan Chase, per Reuters. "We're going to allow you to buy it, we're not going to custody it. ... I don't think you should smoke, but I defend your right to smoke. I defend your right to buy bitcoin." It's not surprising that banks have their eye on this move. President Trump has courted cryptocurrency enthusiasts with promises to create a federal cryptocurrency reserve and make other investments as president. However, it's also not surprising that they're hanging back. The risk is high, and anti-money laundering rules and other regulations could sharply limit their activities, with no guarantees yet as to how those rules may change. When banks do enter the game, it will likely be in small ways, as partners to existing organizations. They may also want to create a stablecoin of their own. It's in the best interests of the American public for legal protections regarding cryptocurrency to be strengthened and for banks to be cautious. All the computing power needed is bad for the environment, at least until we switch to a more eco-friendly cryptocurrency. In the meantime, until banking regulators speak up, we're unlikely to see much change in crypto banking. Do you think the federal government should give us tax breaks to improve our homes? Definitely Only for certain upgrades Let each state decide instead No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio

CNBC

24 minutes ago

• CNBC

Treasury yields inch higher after U.S. bombs Iran

U.S. Treasury yields inched higher on Monday after the U.S. bombing of Iran and as investors awaited a batch of key economic data this week. At 5:25 a.m. ET, the 10-year yield was more than 1 basis point higher at 4.387%, and the 30-year yield moved over 1 basis point higher to 4.903%. The 2-year yield also added 1 basis point to reach 3.918%. One basis point is equal to 0.01%, and yields and prices move in opposite directions. Investors are on high alert after the U.S. entered the war between Israel and Iran on Saturday by attacking Iranian nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. "There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left," Trump said from the White House after the strikes. Investors, who were formerly expecting diplomacy, are now bracing for Iran's retaliation. That could include targeting U.S. personnel in nearby bases or closing the Strait of Hormuz, which would disrupt global oil flows. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on social media that the U.S. attacks would have "everlasting consequences," and that "every member of the United Nations must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior." Deutsche Bank analysts said in a note, "In terms of the economic impact, the US has turned into a net energy exporter in the last few years so any negative impact would be through deteriorating financial conditions or through higher for longer rates as the Fed have another reason to delay cuts." Investors will also await a series of economic data this week, including existing home sales data for May on Monday, gross domestic product growth rate on Thursday, and the personal consumption expenditures index on Friday.