'Look At His Dumb Face!': Stephen Colbert Trolls Trump Over Truly Awkward Moment

'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert on Monday slammed President Donald Trump for sending the National Guard to Los Angeles to deal with protesters.
'What's going on in LA reminds us that, as citizens, it is crucial to speak out against Trump's fascist impulses, his rampant corruption, and his egregious violations of our norms and our laws,' Colbert said, then switched gears: 'But sometimes, it's just as important to say: 'Haha, old man fall down.''
Colbert rolled footage of the president stumbling as he walked up the stairs to Air Force One on Sunday.
'Strongman go boom!' Colbert said, then broke out some fascist puns: Benito Whoopsolini, Adolf Tripsler, Joseph Fallin', and Kim Jong Oops.
'With Trump's shock troops deployed against our fellow Americans, we can't focus on trivial things like that,' he said. 'But look at his dumb face!'
Colbert zoomed in on Trump's face as he fell and tried to read the signs hidden in the president's skin.
Check it out in the Monday night monologue:

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBS News

15 minutes ago

• CBS News

Upper Westside development on Natomas farmland to be considered by planning commission

Farms versus future growth — it's a debate in Sacramento County that will be up for a vote next week. Developers want to build thousands of new homes on property that's outside the designated urban area. The land is on the west side of South Natomas between I-80 and the Sacramento River. Three decades ago, this land, within sight of Downtown Sacramento, was spared from urban development and set aside specifically for farming and wildlife habitat. Now, developers have submitted plans called the Upper Westside to build new homes and businesses on these 2,000 acres. Former Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo is now president of the Environmental Council of Sacramento and is leading opposition to the project. "This project is huge. It's frankly the size of Galt. It is 25,000 people, over 9,000 housing units, 3 million square feet of commercial," Fargo said. Fargo calls the area "prime foraging habitat." Josh Harmatz lives along Garden Highway, which runs parallel to the river, and is concerned that all the new homes and businesses will triple the traffic on the narrow two-lane levee road. "There's just no room and there's no shoulder for this amount of traffic," Harmatz said. Project supporters say the development will create much-needed new housing for the Sacramento region. Plans also include four new schools, 83 acres of new commercial businesses, ten parks, and its signature feature — a tree-lined canal that can be used for recreation. "It's an extraordinary proposal that aligns seamlessly with the county's vision for smart, sustainable planning," said Nick Avdis, Upper Westside land use attorney. Opponents say the development would wipe out decades of efforts to preserve open space, protect wildlife, and support farming in Natomas. "We were doing great plans for 25 years, and this particular project is against all of them," Fargo said. The Sacramento County Planning Commission is scheduled to consider the Upper Westside project at its meeting Monday night. The plan would also need to be approved by the county Board of Supervisors before building could begin.

Yahoo

19 minutes ago

• Yahoo

JD Vance joins Bluesky, and it didn't go well right after he made his first post

Vice President JD Vance made his Bluesky debut recently; his first post got him suspended. Vance quickly became the most blocked user on the app and his account was briefly suspended from the social media platform. More than 110,000 Bluesky users have blocked the VP since he joined the app, dethroning journalist Jesse Singal as the most blocked user in the app's history according to ClearSky data, which shows blocked accounts. His first post on June 18 addressed Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors. Vance's account was suspended just 12 minutes after he published his first post due to verification concerns, but has since been reinstated. Here's what happened. The Ohio native stated that he joined Bluesky to engage in "common sense political discussion and analysis." He attached a screenshot of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's opinion on medical care for transgender youth. The post was met with immediate backlash from respondents, with many users expressing criticism of Vance joining the platform. "You don't belong here," wrote one Bluesky user on Wednesday. "What are you DOING here?!! Jesus, is no space safe anymore?!" another user commented. Vance's Bluesky suspension didn't last long: His account was reinstated within 20 minutes, Newsweek reports. As of this publication, Vance is the most blocked account on Bluesky, followed by journalist Jesse Singal. These are the top five most blocked users, according to Clearsky: JD Vance Jesse Singal Now Breezing Brianna Wu Mark Cuban Bluesky, which launched publicly in February 2024, is a decentralized social media app, according to USA TODAY. It has a similar look and feel as X, formerly Twitter, but has some different features to bring more people into its creation. The Bluesky project was originally started in 2019 by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Bluesky and Twitter formerly parted ways in late 2022. Fox News, in reporting on Vance being briefly suspended on Bluesky, described the platform as a "liberal X competitor." This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: JD Vance is the most blocked person on Bluesky. Here's how it happened

20 minutes ago

Judge asks if troops in Los Angeles are violating the Posse Comitatus Act

SAN FRANCISCO -- California's challenge of the Trump administration's military deployment in Los Angeles returned to a federal courtroom in San Francisco on Friday for a brief hearing after an appeals court handed President Donald Trump a key procedural win. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer put off issuing any additional rulings and instead asked for briefings from both sides by noon Monday on whether the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits troops from conducting civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil, is being violated in Los Angeles. The hearing happened the day after the 9th Circuit appellate panel allowed the president to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed in response to protests over immigration raids. California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in his complaint that 'violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is imminent, if not already underway' but Breyer last week postponed considering that allegation. Vice President JD Vance, a Marine veteran, traveled to Los Angeles on Friday and met with troops, including U.S. Marines who have been deployed to protect federal buildings. According to Vance, the court determined Trump's determination to send in federal troops 'was legitimate' and he will do it again if necessary. 'The president has a very simple proposal to everybody in every city, every community, every town whether big or small, if you enforce your own laws and if you protect federal law enforcement, we're not going to send in the National Guard because it's unnecessary,' Vance told journalists after touring a federal complex in Los Angeles. Vance's tour of a multiagency Federal Joint Operations Center and a mobile command center came as demonstrations have calmed after sometimes-violent clashes between protesters and police and outbreaks of vandalism and break-ins that followed immigration raids across Southern California earlier this month. Tens of thousands have also marched peacefully in Los Angeles since June 8. National Guard troops have been accompanying federal agents on some immigration raids, and Marines briefly detained a man on the first day they deployed to protect a federal building. The marked the first time federal troops detained a civilian since deploying to the nation's second-largest city. Breyer found Trump acted illegally when, over opposition from California's governor, the president activated the soldiers. However, the appellate decision halted the judge's temporary restraining order. Breyer asked the lawyers on Friday to address whether he or the appellate court retains primary jurisdiction to grant an injunction under the Posse Comitatus Act. California has sought a preliminary injunction giving Newsom back control of the troops in Los Angeles, where protests have calmed down in recent days. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops have been necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said their presence on the streets of a U.S. city inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The demonstrations appear to be winding down, although dozens of protesters showed up Thursday at Dodger Stadium, where a group of federal agents gathered at a parking lot with their faces covered, traveling in SUVs and cargo vans. The Los Angeles Dodgers organization asked them to leave, and they did. On Tuesday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass lifted a downtown curfew that was first imposed in response to vandalism and clashes with police after crowds gathered in opposition to agents taking migrants into detention. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. Title 10 allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service when the country 'is invaded,' when 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government,' or when the president is otherwise unable 'to execute the laws of the United States.' Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said allows presidents to control state National Guard troops only during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,' ' wrote Breyer, a Watergate prosecutor who was appointed by President Bill Clinton and is the brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration argued that courts can't second-guess the president's decisions. The appellate panel ruled otherwise, saying presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, but the panel said that by citing violent acts by protesters in this case, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for federalizing the troops. For now, the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit proceeds. It is the first deployment by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since troops were sent to protect Civil Rights Movement marchers in 1965. Trump celebrated the appellate ruling in a social media post, calling it a 'BIG WIN' and hinting at more potential deployments.