Latest news with #NationalGuard
The Mainichi
44 minutes ago
- Politics
- The Mainichi
Appeals court lets Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES (AP) -- An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. "The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows," the court wrote. "The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant." It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a "BIG WIN." He wrote that "all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done." Newsom issued a statement that expressed disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. "The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court," Newsom said. "The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens." The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of "rebellion or danger of a rebellion." "The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'" wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.
Times of Oman
an hour ago
- Politics
- Times of Oman
US: Appeals court permits Trump to keep National Guard deployed in LA for now
Washington, DC: A federal appeals court panel on Thursday permitted US President Donald Trump to keep the National Guard deployed in Los Angeles, for now, The Hill reported. The unanimous order from a three-judge panel for the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals extended its pause of a judge's order finding Trump's deployment illegal and forcing him to return control of the troops to California Governor Gavin Newsom. The three judge appeals panel included two judges nominated by Trump - Eric Miller and Mark Bennett and a judge appointed by former US President Joe Biden - Judge Jennifer Sung. In its unsigned 38-page decision, the appeals panel wrote, "We emphasize, however, that our decision addresses only the facts before us. And although we hold that the President likely has authority to federalize the National Guard, nothing in our decision addresses the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage." The panel said it did not agree with the administration that Trump's decision is not reviewable by the courts. However, the judges said they must be "highly deferential." The opinion reads, "Affording the President that deference, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority." The court's order came after Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops to protect immigration officers due to the recent protests in Los Angeles, which at times resulted in violence. Newsom and the state's attorney general filed a lawsuit against Trump's decision, The Hill reported. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals decision marks a win for Trump in the legal battle. However, the victory may be short-lived as the US District Judge Charles Breyer, who issued last week's decision invalidating the deployment, is set to hold a hearing on Friday on whether to issue an indefinite injunction. Former US President Bill Clinton had appointed Breyer, who is also the brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. Trump deployed troops using a statute that enables him to federalize the National Guard whenever there is a rebellion or when he cannot execute federal laws with regular forces. On Thursday, the appeals panel said it agreed the latter trigger was likely met, so it did not need to reach the question if there was a rebellion. The opinion reads, "Plaintiffs' own submissions state that some protesters threw objects, including Molotov cocktails, and vandalized property. According to the declarations submitted by Defendants, those activities significantly impeded the ability of federal officers to execute the laws," The Hill reported. In addition, the judges rejected argument made by Newsom that Trump failed a statutory requirement to issue his deployment order "through" the governor. Newsom said Trump needed his consent as per the requirement. However, the judges contented that informing the adjutant general of the California National Guard was likely sufficient. The panel said that the statute "does not give governors any veto power over the President's federalization decision."
News24
an hour ago
- Politics
- News24
Newsom vows to continue fight against Trump over California protests: ‘President is not a king'
A US appeals court let Donald Trump retain control on Thursday of California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests in Los Angeles. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on US soil and inflamed political tension in the country's second most-populous city. On Thursday, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals extended its pause on US District Judge Charles Breyer's 12 June ruling that Trump had unlawfully called the National Guard into federal service. Trump probably acted within his authority, the panel said, adding that his administration probably complied with the requirement to coordinate with Governor Gavin Newsom, and even if it did not, he had no authority to veto Trump's directive. 'And although we hold that the president likely has authority to federalise the National Guard, nothing in our decision addresses the nature of the activities in which the federalised National Guard may engage,' it wrote in its opinion. Newsom could still challenge the use of the National Guard and US Marines under other laws, including the bar on using troops in domestic law enforcement, it added. The governor could raise those issues at a court hearing on Friday in front of Breyer, it said. In a post on X after the decision, Newsom vowed to pursue his challenge. The president is not a king and is not above the law. 'We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of US military soldiers against our citizens.' Trump hailed the decision in a post on Truth Social. 'This is a great decision for our country and we will continue to protect and defend law-abiding Americans,' he said. 'This is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should state and local police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.' Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by ruled that Trump violated a US law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor. It also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist. Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel had put the judge's move on hold temporarily. Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on 7 June took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4 000 troops against Newsom's wishes. Trump also ordered 700 US Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps a court hearing on Tuesday on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops. The law sets out three conditions by which a president can federalise state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion' against the government or a situation in which the US government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws. The appeals court said the final condition had probably been met because protesters hurled items at immigration authorities' vehicles, used trash dumpster as battering rams, threw Molotov cocktails and vandalised property, frustrating law enforcement. The Justice Department has said once the president determines that an emergency exists that warrants the use of the National Guard, no court or state governor can review that decision. The appeals court rejected that argument. Taurat Hossain/Anadolu via Getty Images The protests in Los Angeles ran for more than a week before they ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed. In its 9 June lawsuit, California said Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and US laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former US president Joe Biden.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Politics
- Euronews
US appeals court allows Trump to keep control of National Guard in LA
A US appeals court has allowed President Donald Trump to maintain control of the National Guard in Los Angeles, following a challenge to their deployment by the state's governor. Trump called in the troops following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found the president acted illegally in doing so. The National Guard deployment was the first by a US president without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalising control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. 'The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers," the court wrote in an explanation of its decision. "Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows," the court added. "The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant.' It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify California Governor Gavin Newsom before federalising the National Guard as required by law, he had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a 'big win.' He wrote that 'all over the United States, if our cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should state and local police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.' Newsom issued a statement expressing disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the National Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. 'The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court," Newsom said. " The president is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of US military soldiers against citizens.' The court case could have broader implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the US after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritise deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Day 7 closes out the individual competition at the OTP Bank World Judo Championships and it's time for the heavyweights to take centre stage in Budapest. Before the finals, IJF President Mr. Marius Vizer awarded diplomas recognising achievements in judo. And the traditional flag-passing ceremony was held to commemorate the closing of the event, as Hungary passed the IJF flag to Azerbaijan — with Baku set to host the World Championships in 2026 where judo would return to the land of fire. At +78kg, Hayun KIM had been making her mark on the international stage, and in Budapest she delivered her best performance yet. Could she take the title? Facing her was Japan's Mao ARAI who had managed to secure her place in the final after a fantastic performance in the preliminaries. ARAI looked every bit a contender for the World title. The final was a tight, tactical battle taken into Golden Score. It was Hayun KIM who would wear the red backpatch for the Republic of Korea's first gold medal! OTP Bank Chairman & IJF Honorary President Dr Sandor CSANYI awarded the medals. At +100kg, Guram TUSHISHVILI was on fire — storming his way through the preliminaries with explosive throws and unstoppable momentum. The Georgian powerhouse looked focused and fearless. He was here to reclaim the title he first won in 2018. Facing him in the final was Inal TASOEV, the 2023 World Champion. TASOEV had delivered a solid performance and was aiming to add a second World title to his collection. In the final, TUSHISHVILI led with a yuko, but it was TASOEV who came back with a waza-ari and managed to keep the Georgian at bay, claiming his second World title! 5 time Olympic and 12 time World Champion, Mr Teddy RINER awarded the medals. Join us tomorrow in Budapest where the Mixed Team competition kicks off. 3 men 3 women, one team, one goal. Don't miss it!
Roya News
an hour ago
- Politics
- Roya News
Appeals court allows Trump to keep control of California National Guard
A US federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that President Donald Trump may retain authority over California's National Guard, at least temporarily, as a legal challenge by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom continues. The decision, handed down by a three-judge panel from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, extends a freeze on a lower court ruling that found Trump had overstepped his legal authority when he federalized the state's National Guard to respond to unrest in Los Angeles. The legal dispute began after US District Judge Charles Breyer ruled on June 12 that Trump's June 7, 2020, decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles violated federal law. Breyer found that Trump failed to coordinate with the state governor and did not meet the legal criteria that allow a president to assume control over state troops, such as an invasion or rebellion. 'The conditions set out under the statute to allow this move… did not exist,' Breyer concluded in his ruling, ordering Trump to relinquish command back to Newsom. However, within hours, the appeals court temporarily blocked that order and has now extended the pause. The case stems from a June 9 lawsuit filed by California, which argued that Trump's decision infringed on state sovereignty and contradicted laws prohibiting federal military involvement in civilian law enforcement. The state emphasized that while the protests in Los Angeles included scattered violence, they did not amount to a 'rebellion,' and local authorities were capable of managing the situation. The deployment of federal troops, including 700 US Marines sent after the National Guard, sparked a nationwide debate about the domestic use of the military. While the Trump administration insists the troops are not involved in law enforcement, California officials argue otherwise, especially in the context of immigration raids that inflamed tensions. At a recent hearing, the 9th Circuit panel, which includes two Trump appointees and one appointed by former President Biden, questioned the extent to which courts should intervene in presidential decisions related to military deployments. The Department of Justice has maintained that a president's decision to federalize the National Guard in an emergency is not subject to judicial or gubernatorial review.
