Yes means yes
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day.
Teenagers having consensual sex is basic human design. This must be decriminalised by GOI
There are countless ways in which adults fail to understand teenagers and let them down. But when a systemic orthodoxy is causing them clear injustice, at least then the adult approaches must be reformed without delay. In the case of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, court reports have been showing for years that blanket criminalisation of teenage sexual activity is deeply oppressive. Now, the Supreme Court has issued notice to GOI to give its views on amici curiae's suggestions regarding POCSO, whose rigid application in cases of adolescent relationships is found to lead to traumatically unjust outcomes.
An analysis of all judgments passed in a case involving rape in Delhi's district courts in 2013 found that around one-third involved couples who had chosen to be together. Their parents pursued the police action. Police often sympathises with the girl's father, families often punish her with a severe beating. He gets jail and a rape conviction. Because her age of consent is 18. The defence is that these families and cops' morality cannot be changed simply by changing the law. It's an untenable defence. Their private morality is immaterial. The issue is adolescents' entitlement to a private life, to coming of age, on their own terms, in perfectly healthy and natural ways.
Refusing to uphold adolescent agency to consent is in a continuum of injustice that wives also suffer. In this context, the phrase 'women and children' rings cruelly apt. GOI has been opposing the criminalisation of marital rape citing concern for 'social and family structure'. Consent, though, is the bedrock of human dignity. By wrenching it away from intimate relationships, lawmakers are enabling a legion of personal torments, and encouraging the worst instincts of adult busybodies. Reform the law, recognise consent, that's where both private and public good lie.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email
This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
India's one move would completely destroy Pakistan in coming days due to...; know Modi govt's complete plan
India suspended the Indus Water Treaty after the Pahalgam terror attack in April this year. (File) India suspended the Indus Water Treaty after the heinous April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, and now the Indian government has devised a complete plan which would bring Pakistan to its knees in the coming months, if not days. As per reports, Pakistan is already facing water troubles in the Kharif season due to low water levels in its dams fueled by the Indus River, but the situation is about to get worse at the Narendra Modi government has foolproof plans are in place in to restrict water from the Indus, Sutlej and Beas rivers to the enemy country. How India plans to use water to destroy Pakistan? According to reports, the Indian government plans to optimize the use of the Indus river system through inter-basin water transfer, which includes the construction of a 113-km-long canal to divert excess water from Jammu and Kashmir to Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan. Additionally, the strategy also involves flushing and desilting of reservoirs at two run-of-the-river hydropower facilities on the Chenab River – Baglihar and Salal, while long-term plans includes accelerating ongoing hydropower projects such as Pakal Dul (1,000 MW), Ratle (850 MW), Kiru (624 MW) and Kwar (540 MW) to utilize more water from the Indus River system. Apart from short-term initiatives, India is also working on a comprehensive plan for inter-basin water transfer, starting with a feasibility assessment for a 113-km-long canal to redirect excess water from Jammu and Kashmir to Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan, according to a report by the Times of India. The proposed canal will link Chenab with Ravi-Beas-Sutlej, ensuring optimum utilization of the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas and Sutlej), and also enable India to completely utilize its allotted share of the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum and Chenab) under the Indus Water Treaty, prevent the flow of excess water to Pakistan, the report said. As per the TOI report, the proposed Chenab-Ravi-Beas-Sutlej link will be integrated with existing canal infrastructure at 13 points in Jammu, Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan, eventually connecting with the Indira Gandhi Canal (Sutlej-Beas). Recently, Home Minister Amit Shah announced Indus river water will reach Sri Ganganagar in Rajasthan through canals 'within three years', which will benefit vast agricultural areas, while limiting Indus water access to Pakistan. Ranbir Canal to be doubled in length According to the reports, there is also a proposal to double the existing length of the Ranbir Canal, from 60 km to 120 km, which draws water from the Chenab River, while a feasibility report is awaited to utilize the Pratap Canal to its full potential, according to officials. Further, there are also plans to restart the Ujh multipurpose project in Jammu and Kashmir's Kathua district, which includes hydropower generation, irrigation, and providing drinking water, and is aimed at maximizing India's share of water from the Eastern Rivers under the Indus Waters Treaty. The plan involves integrating the Ravi-Beas connection below Ujh– which was earlier purposed to collect surplus water flowing to Pakistan through the Ravi through barrage construction– into the broader inter-basin water transfer initiative, enabling diversion of water into Beas basin via a tunnel, as per the TOI report. Water reaches 'dead' level in Pakistani rivers The effects of India's measures to curb Indus waters is already being seen in Pakistan's rivers, many of which are witnessing 'dead' levels as western rivers flowing through India, including the Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum, have depleted considerably. Pakistan has been forced to release more water from its dams to meet its irrigation and drinking water needs, and while this is common in the pre-monsoon season, the situation could worsen in coming days as India India regularly desilts and drains water from dams in Jammu and Kashmir to increase storage capacity. According to reports, water levels in key dams in Pakistan, including the Mangla on the Jhelum river and Tarbela on the Indus river – have already reached close to their respective 'dead levels' (the point beyond which gravity cannot drain water from reservoirs) ahead of monsoon, which likely to reach Pakistan in a month. What options does Pakistan have? Realistically, Pakistan is quickly running out of options as further reduction in water flow from the Indian side will leave the enemy country with tough choices to facilitate agricultural operations before monsoon arrives. While conditions are expected to improve upon the arrival of monsoon in Pakistan next month, yet authorities will face a major challenge to manage regular water discharge without water flow data from India after the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty. Notably, Pakistan has written four letters to India, pleading New Delhi to restore the Indus Water Treaty. However, India has clearly stated the treaty will continue to be held in abeyance till Pakistan takes visible, concrete action against terrorism.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
India builds 4-lane FTA roadmap: US and EU in sight, minerals and neighbours next
India has prepared a four-part strategy for its free trade agreements (FTAs), targeting developed countries, nations rich in minerals, developing economies, and its neighbours. The first phase of this approach is expected to materialise by the end of the year, with potential deals involving the United States and the European Union. According to Times of India, negotiations are already underway with several countries, including Chile, Peru, Australia, and New Zealand. In parallel, the commerce department is ramping up its negotiating teams and is also working to ensure that exporters are actually using the available preferential tariffs. Recent data points to improved utilisation of such tariffs, especially in the case of the UAE. However, detailed numbers for each country are still being collated by the commerce department. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo The Modi government, which had previously taken a cautious approach towards FTAs, is now moving with a more structured plan. This shift came after India opted out of the China-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) a few years ago. The first pillar of the new FTA framework is focused on complementarities. "If we are competing for the same set of products, it does not make sense to have an FTA," ToI cited an official. Live Events As a result, the government's initial focus has been on developed nations. These countries, due to their higher cost structures, are not seen as direct competition in labour-intensive sectors. But this strategy also requires India to move away from its usual reluctance to reduce tariffs on sectors previously considered sensitive. These include automobiles and products like wine and alcohol. The UK trade deal has already been finalised, while agreements with the EU and US are in progress. India and Canada have also agreed to restart discussions. Among neighbouring countries, some are off the table, such as China and Pakistan. But India is open to moving ahead with talks involving nations like Sri Lanka and Mauritius. At the same time, the government is trying to secure critical minerals and resources through its trade discussions. These include countries such as Australia, where a chapter on this issue is proposed in the expanded trade pact, as well as Chile, Peru, and nations in the Gulf region. Many of these also fall under the category of developing countries, a segment expected to gain more attention in coming years. While trade negotiations are ongoing, the commerce department is also reinforcing the structure and continuity of its teams. In nearly all talks, a team led by a chief negotiator—at the rank of additional secretary—is being constituted. This is supported by two joint secretaries. Other ministries are also involved in the discussions, since trade agreements have sectoral implications. These include the ministries of agriculture, labour, and various departments handling industrial goods. To build the necessary expertise, the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade has been asked to develop training modules. These are not only for government negotiators but also for private sector participants, a senior official said. All lessons from the ongoing negotiations are being documented, and standard operating procedures (SOPs) are now being prepared to guide future talks.
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
SUN TV family feud explodes: What Dayanidhi Maran's legal notice to brother Kalanithi reveals
In a high-stakes family dispute, former Union Minister Dayanidhi Maran has issued a legal notice to his elder brother, Kalanithi Maran, accusing him of violating regulations and unlawfully transferring lakhs of shares of the Chennai-based Sun TV Group to himself. These shares are reportedly worth several thousand crores of rupees. Dayanidhi alleged that Kalanithi received ₹ 5,926 crore in dividends up to 2023 and an additional ₹ 455 crore in 2024. He alleged that 'the offences committed by you are continuous in nature and continue as on date.' Meanwhile, Sun TV Network Ltd, the company at the center of the dispute, reported a turnover of ₹ 4,544 crore and a net profit of ₹ 1,654.45 crore for the financial year 2024–25. Dayanidhi Maran has warned that he will approach regulatory and enforcement agencies—including the SFIO, SEBI, and ED—to initiate civil, criminal, and regulatory proceedings against his brother Kalanithi Maran and associates, including Kalanithi's wife, Kaveri Kalanithi. He has demanded that the ownership structure of M/s SUN TV Network Limited and all related entities be restored to their original form as of September 15, 2003, Times of India reported. Specifically, he called for the reinstatement of shares to their rightful owners: M.K. Dayalu Ammal, wife of the late Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi, and the legal heirs of the late S.N. Maran (Murasoli Maran). He has given a one-week deadline for compliance. Dayanidhi Maran recalled that the original parent company, M/s Sumangali Publications Private Limited, was incorporated on December 12, 1985, with only two promoters—M.K. Dayalu Ammal and Mallika Maran, wife of Murasoli Maran. At the time of incorporation, each held a 50% share in the company, according to a report by Times of India. When Murasoli Maran was critically ill in Sept 2003, and when it was clear he would pass away any moment, Kalanithi Maran allotted 12 lakh equity shares of M/s SUN TV Private Limited to himself without sufficient, proper valuation and fair consideration, and without obtaining consent from all other existing shareholders — the family of Maran and the family of Karunanidhi — at a face value of ₹ 10 each, it said. The offences committed by you are continuous in nature and continue as on date. Referring to Kaveri Kalanithi's remuneration, Dayanidhi Maran alleged that she unjustly enriched herself by drawing a salary of ₹ 87.5 crore annually. 'This reflects your deceptive scheme to siphon off and misappropriate company funds,' he stated in the legal notice. He further demanded that Kalanithi Maran and his wife, Kaveri Kalanithi, immediately return all monetary benefits, dividends, assets, and any form of income unlawfully received or appropriated from 2003 to the present, according to the TOI report. The legal notice was addressed to Kalanithi Maran, Kaveri Kalanithi, Ravi Ramamoorthy, Natarajan Sivasubramanian (chartered accountant), Sridhar Swaminathan (financial consultant), Swaminathan, and Sharad Kumar. Key Takeaways Family disputes can escalate into significant legal battles impacting large corporations. Regulatory bodies may become involved in personal disputes when financial misconduct is alleged. Ownership structures in family-owned businesses can be contentious and lead to long-term consequences.
