CM Revanth Reddy offers 1,580 tmcft deal to Andhra Pradesh, seeks NOC for Telangana projects; warns of legal fight over Godavari-Banakacherla (GB) link project
HYDERABAD: Chief minister A Revanth Reddy Wednesday made an open offer to his Andhra Pradesh counterpart N Chandrababu Naidu: If the AP govt believes that over 3,000 tmcft of surplus or floodwater from the Godavari flows into the sea every year, then it should issue a blanket no objection certificate (NOC) allowing Telangana to use 1,000 tmcft from the Godavari and 580 tmcft from the Krishna for its ongoing and future irrigation projects.
In return, Revanth said, Telangana would not oppose AP's use of surplus waters from either river.
"If AP believes 3,000 tmcft of water is going waste every year, we are ready to cooperate. Let both states use the river water without objecting to each other's projects," he said, addressing the media after an all-party meeting on the Godavari-Banakacherla (GB) link project.
Revanth accused the AP govt of unilaterally proceeding with the GB link project in violation of norms.
"We will fight this through every constitutional means-complaints to central agencies, legal recourse, and finally taking the matter to the people," he said.
CM: BRS Never Objected To AP Water Diversion From Srisailam
After making an open offer to his Andhra Pradesh counterpart on sharing Godavari and Krishna water, chief minister A Revanth Reddy on Wednesday criticised BRS chief K Chandrasekhar Rao.
Revanth alleged that former CM K Chandrasekhar Rao gave AP the reason to justify Banakacherla project.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gentle Japanese hair growth method for men and women's scalp
Hair's Rich
Learn More
Undo
'During the Apex Council meeting in 2016, KCR claimed that 3,000 tmcft of water flows waste into the sea annually. That statement has now become AP's basis for pushing the project,' he said.
The CM also played video clips of KCR publicly stating that he would support AP, as a 'big brother,' in supplying water to drought-hit Rayalaseema. 'KCR repeatedly said 'no basins, no ego'. He even met then CM YS Jagan Mohan Reddy four times.
Following those meetings, the Rayalaseema Lift Irrigation Scheme was taken up and BRS never objected to Krishna water diversion from Srisailam,' he pointed out.
He also lashed out at former irrigation minister T Harish Rao for 'spreading misinformation' against the Congress govt on the Banakacherla issue. 'They ruled for 10 years, yet didn't complete a single major project on Krishna or Godavari. They built only Kaleshwaram project and it has collapsed,' he said.
Revanth also criticised Union minister G Kishan Reddy for not attending the all-party meeting. 'Kishan Reddy did not come to the meeting but he met jal shakti minister on Wednesday as we are meeting him on Thursday. He must have informed the Union minister not to give any assurance to us,' the CM alleged.
The all-party meeting was attended by Congress MPs, BJP MPs DK Aruna and M Raghunandan Rao, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi, and BRS MP Vaddiraju Ravichandra.
Meanwhile, responding to CM Revanth Reddy's allegations, Harish Rao accused him of twisting facts. Harish Rao said Revanth quoted only point No. 1 from the meeting, while ignoring other key portions where KCR had clearly stated that the Centre should not proceed with the Godavari-Krishna linking project without consulting the Telangana govt.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mahmoud Khalil ICE detention case: Federal judge orders release of Columbia protester
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge on Friday ordered the U.S. government to free former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil from the immigration detention center where he has been held since early March while the Trump administration sought to deport him over his role in pro-Palestinian protests. Federal judge has ordered the release of Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil.(REUTERS) Ruling from the bench in New Jersey, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said it would be 'highly, highly unusual" for the government to continue to detain a legal U.S. resident who was unlikely to flee and hadn't been accused of any violence. 'Petitioner is not a flight risk and the evidence presented is that he is not a danger to the community,' he said. 'Period, full stop.' Later in the hourlong hearing, which took place by phone, the judge said the government had 'clearly not met' the standards for detention. Khalil could walk out of the detention center in rural Louisiana by Friday evening, which is when lawyers for the Trump administration said they expect to release him. He must surrender his passport and can't travel internationally, but he will get his green card back and be given official documents permitting limited travel within the country, including New York and Michigan to visit family, New Jersey and Louisiana for court appearances and Washington to lobby Congress. Khalil was the first person arrested under President Donald Trump 's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. Farbiarz had ruled earlier that the government couldn't deport Khalil on those grounds, but gave it leeway to continue pursuing a potential deportation based on allegations that he lied on his green card application. Trump administration lawyers repeated that accusation at Friday's court hearing. It's an accusation Khalil disputes. In issuing his ruling Friday, the judge agreed with Khalil's lawyers that the protest leader was being prevented from exercising his free speech and due process rights despite no obvious reason for his continued detention. The judge noted that Khalil is now clearly a public figure. Khalil's lawyers had asked that he either be freed on bail or, at the very least, moved from Louisiana to New Jersey so he can be closer to his wife and newborn son, who are both U.S. citizens. Khalil's wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, said she can finally 'breathe a sigh of relief' after her husband's three months in detention. 'We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others,' she said in a statement provided by Khalil's lawyers. 'But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family.' The judge's decision comes after several other scholars targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another former Palestinian student at Columbia, Mohsen Mahdawi; a Tufts University student, Rumeysa Ozturk; and a Georgetown University scholar, Badar Khan Suri. Khalil was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The international affairs graduate student isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. He served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists and wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Muslim A ‘Language', Urdu, Bangla Missing
New Delhi: Delhi University's recently launched undergraduate admission form on its Common Seat Allocation System portal has sparked outrage after glaring errors were discovered in its mother tongue section. Among the most shocking discrepancies was the inclusion of Muslim as a language option—a misclassification that left students, parents and educators baffled. The controversy deepened as some prominent languages, such as Bangla and Urdu, were missing from the list, leaving many applicants in a state of confusion. To make matters worse, terms like Bihari and mochi were listed as languages, which led to questions being raised about the form's accuracy, cultural sensitivity and the competence of those who prepared it. Parents and students struggled to select an appropriate option, unsure of how to proceed in the absence of their actual mother tongue. Sharing her ordeal, an 18-year-old DU aspirant from Kolkata, who was raised in Delhi, expressed her frustration. "I was trying to fill the form, but I can't proceed because Bangla is not listed. I tried multiple times until Friday morning, but the option still wasn't available. I will try again later in the day, and I hope the issue is rectified by then," she said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo In response to the growing backlash, DU officials said it was a "clerical error" and claimed to have rectified the errors later in the day. However, the issue triggered strong reactions from within the university community. Abha Dev Habib, associate professor at Miranda House and general secretary of Democratic Teachers' Front, highlighted the dangerous "communal" implications of the error. "Under mother tongue, the form omits Urdu entirely while listing Muslim as a language. Is it beyond the university's understanding that Muslims speak the same languages as others from their regions? Urdu is officially recognised under Eighth Schedule of Indian Constitution. This must be condemned, accountability fixed and corrections made with an apology," she said. Mithuraaj Dhusiya, an elected member of DU's Executive Council, echoed similar concerns and condemned the lapse. "It is extremely sad and unfortunate that a premier central university like Delhi University is committing such mistakes. These errors must be rectified immediately. The rich diversity and multilingualism of our country need to be acknowledged and respected," he said. T he controversy quickly spilled onto various chat groups, where screenshots of the form went viral. Students, teachers and concerned citizens took to various platforms, demanding immediate correction and an official apology from the university administration. Rudrashish Chakraborty, associate professor at Kirori Mal College and an elected member of Delhi University Teachers' Association, also criticised the administration. "This is a brazen attempt to create an 'other' out of the largest minority community in the country and poison the minds of innocent applicants. It is a serious threat to Constitution of India, violating both Eighth Schedule and the inclusive ethos of a central university," he said. Chakraborty further argued that even the terminology used was inappropriate for official documentation. "The term mother tongue is imprecise; native language would be more suitable in administrative contexts," he suggested.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC judge calls for deeper engagement with law
Dimapur: Justice Y Longkumer, judge of Gauhati High Court, Kohima bench, on Friday called for deeper engagement with law, greater professional development and renewed commitment to justice by the lawyers. She said the panel lawyers, who often serve as the first line of access to justice for the marginalised and under-represented, now play a unique and essential role as educators, advisors and counsellors for common citizens at a time when the Indian legal system is undergoing a pivotal transition with the introduction of new criminal laws. Longkumer was speaking at the one-day orientation programme organised by the Nagaland State Legal Services Authority on new criminal laws — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) — for panel/retainer lawyers and Legal Aid Defence Counsel System lawyers in Kohima. She said the Indian criminal justice system is undergoing significant reforms with the introduction of the BNS, BNSS and BSA, replacing the IPC, CrPC and Indian Evidence Act. "These new legislative reforms are not just mere cosmetic changes but represent a new way of thinking on how the justice system is perceived, delivered and experienced by the common citizens," Longkumer said. She said the lawyers, who serve in the legal services panel, are often the first line of access to justice for the marginalised and under-represented, and their role now is more important than ever. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Cardiologist Says This Food Can Do Wonders For Your Health Gundry MD Learn More Undo "You have to learn to adapt to changes with professionalism and as it is with any legal transition, there will be challenges and uncertainties in the interpretation," the judge said. On existing practical difficulties, Longkumer cited the existence of different interpretations and sources, questions and the practical burden of unlearning and relearning while observing that now they have to change their mindset and start to unlearn the IPC, CrPC and learn the new laws.
