Mahmoud Khalil ICE detention case: Federal judge orders release of Columbia protester

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge on Friday ordered the U.S. government to free former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil from the immigration detention center where he has been held since early March while the Trump administration sought to deport him over his role in pro-Palestinian protests. Federal judge has ordered the release of Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil.(REUTERS)
Ruling from the bench in New Jersey, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said it would be 'highly, highly unusual" for the government to continue to detain a legal U.S. resident who was unlikely to flee and hadn't been accused of any violence.
'Petitioner is not a flight risk and the evidence presented is that he is not a danger to the community,' he said. 'Period, full stop.'
Later in the hourlong hearing, which took place by phone, the judge said the government had 'clearly not met' the standards for detention.
Khalil could walk out of the detention center in rural Louisiana by Friday evening, which is when lawyers for the Trump administration said they expect to release him.
He must surrender his passport and can't travel internationally, but he will get his green card back and be given official documents permitting limited travel within the country, including New York and Michigan to visit family, New Jersey and Louisiana for court appearances and Washington to lobby Congress.
Khalil was the first person arrested under President Donald Trump 's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy.
Farbiarz had ruled earlier that the government couldn't deport Khalil on those grounds, but gave it leeway to continue pursuing a potential deportation based on allegations that he lied on his green card application. Trump administration lawyers repeated that accusation at Friday's court hearing. It's an accusation Khalil disputes.
In issuing his ruling Friday, the judge agreed with Khalil's lawyers that the protest leader was being prevented from exercising his free speech and due process rights despite no obvious reason for his continued detention. The judge noted that Khalil is now clearly a public figure.
Khalil's lawyers had asked that he either be freed on bail or, at the very least, moved from Louisiana to New Jersey so he can be closer to his wife and newborn son, who are both U.S. citizens.
Khalil's wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, said she can finally 'breathe a sigh of relief' after her husband's three months in detention.
'We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others,' she said in a statement provided by Khalil's lawyers. 'But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family.'
The judge's decision comes after several other scholars targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another former Palestinian student at Columbia, Mohsen Mahdawi; a Tufts University student, Rumeysa Ozturk; and a Georgetown University scholar, Badar Khan Suri.
Khalil was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
The international affairs graduate student isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. He served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists and wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics.
The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

39 minutes ago

• Time of India

Trump's Tulsi problem: Wanted a minion, picked a maverick

After Elon Musk, Tulsi Gabbard has found that US President Donald Trump may pick a maverick when he actually wants a minion. When Gabbard was named Director of National Intelligence by Trump in November 2024, it symbolized one of the most dramatic ideological journeys in recent American politics. A former Democrat who once vocally opposed Trump's foreign policy, Gabbard's trajectory from progressive dissident to a Republican-aligned intelligence chief highlighted not only her political adaptability but also Trump's penchant for tapping unconventional allies. Yet less than a year into her tenure, the alliance appears to be fraying. Trump's public rebuke of Gabbard on Friday, accusing her of being "wrong" about Iran's nuclear ambitions, has cast doubt on her future in the administration and underscored the volatile dynamics within Trump's camp as he navigates his comeback bid. What first riled Trump was a video Gabbard posted on X on June 10 in which she warned that "political elite and warmongers" are "carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers," putting the world "on the brink of nuclear annihilation." A person close to the president told Politico that he viewed the video as Gabbard warning him not to greenlight Israel attacking Iran. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 발톱무좀 고민이신분! 제발 이 글 필독하세요! 홈시네라이프 더 알아보기 Undo Also Read: Nuclear war! US intel chief warns world is on the edge of annihilation From DNC pariah to MAGA ally Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump vs Tulsi Gabbard: Is US President planning to fire US spy chief over provocative anti-war video? Gabbard's departure from the Democratic Party in October 2022 did not come as a shock. Her criticism of the party's 'warmongering elite' and her staunch opposition to interventionist foreign policy had long made her an outsider. Yet few anticipated how quickly she would pivot toward Trump's orbit. By mid-2023, Gabbard was appearing frequently on conservative media, praising Trump-era foreign policy and criticizing President Biden's approach to Ukraine and Iran. Her endorsement of Trump in August 2024 was a significant political moment—particularly as it came while Trump was consolidating his position in the Republican primary. Gabbard's appeal to Trump was multi-dimensional: her military service lent credibility to Trump's America First messaging; her defection from the Democrats reinforced his narrative of a party in disarray; and her rising profile in conservative circles offered a fresh face to appeal to independent voters. Trump's decision to nominate her as DNI in November 2024 surprised many but aligned with his history of installing loyalists in key positions, often outside traditional establishment picks. Trump values loyalty but is also attracted to figures who carry an aura of independence, so long as it doesn't directly challenge his authority. Gabbard was useful to Trump because she legitimized his anti-establishment credentials while also appealing to veterans and libertarian-leaning conservatives. Her appointment as DNI was also tactical: Trump sought to shake up the intelligence community, which he has long viewed with suspicion. She, as an outsider with military gravitas and a maverick reputation, fit the bill. Her initial cooperation and alignment with Trump's broad foreign policy themes -- anti-interventionism, skepticism of the intelligence "deep state," and a focus on China -- made her a valuable asset. But Trump's pattern of burning bridges with appointees who assert independence has a long precedent, and Gabbard may now be next in line. You Might Also Like: Trump says Tulsi Gabbard was 'wrong' about Iran, Israeli strikes could be 'very hard to stop' Is Trump preparing to fire Gabbard? Earlier, a Politico report had said that Trump had increasingly mused about nixing Gabbard's office completely. Trump thought Gabbard did not add anything to "any conversation", the report said citing insiders. A few days ago, reports claimed that he is relying on a high-profile group of Cabinet picks and not those who are supposed to be advising him by the virtue of their posts: Gabbard and Defense secretary Pete Hegseth. The rupture had begun with Gabbard's testimony to Congress in March 2025. She stated that the U.S. intelligence community 'continued to assess that Tehran is not currently pursuing a nuclear weapon,' echoing long-standing assessments from both the Biden and previous Trump-era intelligence reports. Trump, however, has taken a harder line in recent months, arguing that Iran is 'weeks away' from acquiring a nuclear bomb -- statements likely influenced by his desire to project strength in the lead-up to the 2026 midterms and potentially 2028. When Gabbard's testimony was raised in a press gaggle on Monday evening, Trump dismissed her comments, saying, 'I don't care what she says.' By Friday, the rebuke was more explicit. Trump's public rebuke of Gabbard suggests a brewing frustration with her unwillingness to bend the intelligence narrative to align with his political messaging, a pattern seen in past Trump appointments, from James Comey to John Bolton. The public criticism, particularly over an issue as significant as Iran's nuclear program, is a red flag. For Trump, public disagreements with his appointees often precede dismissal. Gabbard's claim that her March testimony was 'taken out of context' suggests she is attempting damage control, but it may not be enough. Behind the scenes, Trump loyalists have reportedly grown uneasy with Gabbard's growing media presence and her continued framing of intelligence assessments in ways that don't always align with Trump's messaging. If Trump believes Gabbard is undermining his narrative, especially on a high-profile national security issue, her tenure may be on borrowed time. A dismissal, however, could come with risks. Firing Gabbard could alienate independent voters and veterans who see her as a voice of reason within the Trump movement. It may also reignite debates over Trump's handling of intelligence during his prior presidency. If removed, Gabbard has a number of options. Her reputation as a principled non-interventionist still holds sway with a segment of the right—and even some independents. She could pivot to a media career, possibly on platforms like Fox News, Newsmax, or a new independent outlet. Politically, she could mount a Senate run or become a prominent surrogate for another faction within the GOP, possibly even challenging Trumpism from within if his grip on the party begins to loosen. Alternatively, she may bide her time, reemerging post-Trump with renewed relevance in a reshaped Republican landscape. The Trump-Gabbard saga encapsulates the volatility of MAGA politics. Their alliance was one of strategic convenience more than ideological cohesion. Trump elevated Gabbard because she was useful; now, as she asserts independence on sensitive intelligence matters, she risks becoming expendable.

NDTV

40 minutes ago

• NDTV

US-Iran Nuclear Talks A "Cover Up" For Israel Attack: Iran's Foreign Minister

After Israel launched an attack on Iran just days before scheduled talks with the US, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that the country is uncertain whether to trust the United States in diplomatic talks, in an interview to NBC. When asked if the two-week time frame given by US President Donald Trump is enough to finalise a deal with the United States, Araghchi said that it was up to the Trump administration to "show their determination for going for a negotiated solution." He also accused the US of not being serious regarding the talks and only using it as a cover to justify the attacks by Israel. "So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up," Araghchi said. "We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was, in fact, a betrayal to diplomacy." Trump on Thursday had said, "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks." In Geneva, Araghchi also said that Iran was open to negotiations but only if Israel halts the offensive. "We're not prepared to negotiate with them anymore, as long as the aggression continues," he said. He absolutely negated the US' demand for zero enrichment and said he had made it clear to US envoy, Steve Witkoff. He also added how enriching uranium is the right of every country. "This is an achievement of our own scientists. It's a question of national pride and dignity," he said. Speaking about Witkoff, he said "I think he is a gentleman, somebody you can work with, but unfortunately, he changed his words every time we met. So maybe that was because he couldn't deliver what he promised to us." The foreign minister further clarified that they will "negotiate" but, "negotiate only when it is negotiation and not dictation." He further added that if the US destroys Iran's nuclear facilities, they can rebuild it again, "because the knowledge is here, the technology is there", stating that "the technology cannot be reversed, cannot be destroyed by bombs." Regarding the possibility of the United States joining Israel to strike Iran, he said that his government reserves the right to retaliate. "When there is a war, both sides attack each other. That's quite understandable. And self-defense is a legitimate right of every country." He added that "if the U.S. joins Israel in these attacks, we will do the same." About threats of assassinating Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Aragchi said that "would be the biggest crime they can commit" but "they won't be able to do that." Trump has said in a post on Truth Social that the US knows where Khamenei is, but they are not planning to target him, "at least not for now." Araghchi also said that Iran does not regard Trump's threats as threats, but as insults. "I see it more as an insult. And I'm amazed how the president of the so-called superpower can talk like this. We have always talked about President Trump respectfully." Iran and Israel exchanged fresh attacks early on Saturday, a day after Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear programme while under threat and Europe tried to keep peace talks alive. The developments came as US President Donald Trump on Friday said he may support a ceasefire in the week-old aerial conflict between US ally Israel and its regional rival Iran "depending on the circumstances".

Hans India

an hour ago

• Hans India

Pakistan nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize ‘Ceasefire by Tweet' diplomacy

Pakistan has officially nominated U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his "decisive diplomatic intervention" and "pivotal leadership" in de-escalating the recent India-Pakistan conflict. The nomination, shared on Pakistan's official X (formerly Twitter) account, commended Trump's efforts during the crisis, which Islamabad claims prevented a broader war between the two nuclear nations. The statement praised Trump for "robust diplomatic engagement" with both sides and claimed his mediation led to a ceasefire agreement. Trump himself addressed the issue during a press interaction on Friday (June 20), asserting that he should have already won the Nobel Peace Prize 'four or five times' for various global efforts. These include his claims of resolving the Indo-Pak crisis, brokering a peace treaty between Congo and Rwanda—slated to be signed on Monday—and his past involvement in the Abraham Accords in the Middle East. 'They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals,' Trump said, adding that although he has helped de-escalate multiple global flashpoints, including Serbia-Kosovo, Russia-Ukraine, and Israel-Iran, the recognition continues to elude him. Despite Pakistan's praise, India has firmly rejected any assertion of foreign mediation. India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri clarified that the decision to halt hostilities after Operation Sindoor was reached directly between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both nations, with no involvement from external actors. 'India does not and will never accept third-party mediation,' Misri stated from the G7 Summit venue in Kananaskis, Canada. Trump had claimed earlier in May that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after "a long night" of U.S.-mediated talks. He also suggested that future trade deals with both countries were part of his peace strategy. However, Indian authorities have categorically denied that any trade deal was discussed in this context. The announcement comes on the heels of Trump hosting Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, at the White House for a luncheon. Speaking afterward, Trump thanked Munir for 'ending the war' and confirmed that Washington is working on trade deals with both New Delhi and Islamabad. Former National Security Adviser John Bolton reacted to the development by criticizing Trump's motivations, saying the former president covets the Nobel only because Barack Obama received it in 2009. 'He tried unsuccessfully to claim credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire, and he's now failing in other regions like Iran,' Bolton remarked. Pakistan's statement also emphasized Trump's 'offers' to mediate on the Kashmir issue and credited him with a legacy of 'pragmatic diplomacy' and 'effective peace-building,' especially in light of ongoing global crises such as the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Whether Trump's nomination gains traction with the Nobel Committee remains uncertain. For now, the move has once again spotlighted the contested narratives surrounding foreign influence in South Asian geopolitics.