2027 Chevy Bolt is Coming: Our Best Guesses on Its Radical New Look
Set to be unveiled later this year, Chevrolet's popular subcompact electric hatchback is due to receive a massive overhaul for its upcoming second generation. As one of the most affordable EVs in North America, the Chevrolet Bolt has won over hundreds of thousands of buyers over the course of its lifetime. Hoping to continue the success of the model, Chevrolet has been tasked with enhancing the model's appeal to its loyal fanbase, and critical factors such as increased interior space, enhanced battery range, and modernized style will determine whether the model's appeal continues into its next generation, or if it'll be eaten alive by increasingly competitive rivals.
Using generative text-to-image artificial intelligence software and Adobe Photoshop, we take an imagined look at what the second-generation Chevrolet Bolt might look like. Integrating styling cues from contemporary Chevrolet models, such as the Trailblazer, Blazer EV, and Equinox EV, we can get a sense of what the brand's updated design language might look like when applied to a subcompact hatchback that more closely resembles the size of a Bolt, albeit with a minor increase to reflect enhanced cabin and cargo space.
The 2027 Chevrolet Bolt will likely retain similar proportions to its popular predecessor, keeping things understated and modest in terms of style, and continuing the Bolt's reputation for admirable functionality. At the same time, we can expect the Bolt's design to take plenty of inspiration from its more sizeable siblings, namely the Equinox EV and the Blazer EV, forming a cohesive lineup of up-to-date EV hatchbacks and crossovers. With the reintegration of the Bolt into Chevrolet's all-electric model portfolio, General Motors will have one of the most diverse and respected ranges of electric vehicles available to North American buyers.
Although we don't have much official news from Chevrolet yet, we can safely assume that the second-gen Chevy Bolt will have improved range over its preceding generation, increased size to accommodate a more spacious interior, enhanced cargo space, and, of course, revamped styling. The Bolt's next-gen enhancements will likely aim to make the model more competitive with freshly updated rivals such as the Hyundai Kona EV and incoming additions to the segment, such as the highly anticipated Rivian R3.
According to Car & Driver, production of the second-generation Chevrolet Bolt will begin sometime this year, meaning we should see an official unveiling from the legacy American automaker any day now. Destined to hit showrooms just in time for the 2027 model year, it seems like the Bolt is a serious priority for General Motors at the moment. The 2027 Chevrolet Bolt will be produced at GM's Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City, and the automaker has apparently also teased "another next-generation affordable EV to be built alongside the Bolt in Kansas City, Kansas," according to Car & Driver.
We're left with nothing but guesses at the moment about what this mysterious second affordable EV could be, but our best assumptions suggest that it could be a replacement for the Bolt EUV, a variant of the subcompact electric hatchback with more rugged styling and a raised suspension.
Although the Chevrolet Bolt may not be the most exciting topic of conversation for diehard automotive enthusiasts, the electric subcompact hatchback has proven to be a popular model with North American buyers looking for an affordable EV that can serve as a daily driver for inner-city life. With hatchback practicality, comfortable seating for five, and a fully-electric range of up to 259 miles, the Chevrolet Bolt has cemented its reputation for frugal functionality.
Shockingly, when General Motors discontinued the model back in 2023, the automaker had no plans for a replacement. Thankfully, it seems that the executives at GM have changed their minds and recognized that leaving the Bolt without a replacement would only be doing themselves and their loyal buyers a massive disservice. As we eagerly await more news from Chevrolet, we can't help but be glad that the automaker hasn't given up on such a sensible model as the Bolt.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Three 1963 Corvettes Set to Turn Heads at GAA Classic Cars July Auction
⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious Few cars carry the mystique and muscle of the 1963 Chevrolet Corvette Split-Window Coupe—and at this year's GAA Classic Cars July Auction, bidders will have a rare chance to vie for not just one, but three beautifully preserved examples of this American icon. Each of these '63 Corvettes represents a different vision of the groundbreaking C2 generation: a crisp white restomod, a menacing black fuel-injected powerhouse, and a collector-owned red cruiser—all set to cross the auction block in Greensboro. White Corvette (VIN: 30837S118446) For purists and performance fans alike, this white-on-black coupe checks all the boxes. Benefiting from a recent frame-off restoration, it's powered by a 340-horsepower V8 paired to a 4-speed transmission. The factory split-window design, original glass, and redline tires with correct spinner hubcaps preserve its timeless appeal. Modern additions include four-wheel disc brakes, power steering, and a classic car stereo system subtly integrated with the original radio and speaker. Black Corvette (VIN: 30837S108889) This sinister black-on-black example is a true enthusiast's car. Under the hood lies a 327 CID fuel-injected V8, mated to a Muncie M20 with a Hurst shifter and 4.11 rear end—a nod to its aggressive street intentions. Packed with period-correct equipment like deep-groove pulleys, ramhorn manifolds, T-3 headlamps, and a 6500 RPM redline tach, it embodies the raw, mechanical precision of early Corvette engineering. With power windows and polished engine components, it offers both curb appeal and street cred. Red Corvette (VIN: 30837S114661) Rounding out the trio is a red coupe from the respected Jimmy & Julianne Rawls Collection. Powered by a 327 CID Turbo Fire engine producing 300 horsepower, this car takes a more relaxed approach with an automatic transmission, offering an elegant driving experience. Its clean presentation and provenance make it ideal for collectors looking to blend style and investment potential. These three '63s capture the full spectrum of what makes the Split-Window Corvette one of the most sought-after cars in American automotive history. Whether you crave originality, performance, or provenance, GAA Classic Cars is delivering the dream in red, black, and white. The auction takes place this July in Greensboro, North Carolina. Don't miss your chance to own a piece of Corvette legend.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is Tesla a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Elon Musk is turning into a liability for Tesla. But the company would struggle without his hype and energy. The stock's valuation looks high, even in the best-case scenario. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla's (NASDAQ: TSLA) stock has already created plenty of millionaires. After all, its CEO, Elon Musk, is the world's richest man, due in large part to his 13% stake in the company. But past performance doesn't guarantee future success. It's unclear if Tesla still has what it takes to continue its bull run, especially as political pressure and electric vehicle (EV) industry weakness bite. Let's dig deeper to decide if Tesla's pivot to new opportunities, like robotics and self-driving technology, could help it overcome its weaknesses in its legacy automotive operations and its uncomfortably high valuation. Cars have been around for over 100 years, which means the industry is incredibly mature, leading to low margins and stiff competition. For a time, Tesla had been able to buck these dynamics through high levels of vertical integration, economies of scale, and innovations like giga casting, which replaced complex assembled parts with large single-piece structures. But over time, the company's economic moat has eroded. The main challenge has been competition from low-cost Chinese EV rivals like BYD and legacy automakers like Ford and General Motors, which have leveraged their massive production infrastructure and dealership networks to scale rapidly. However, Musk certainly hasn't made things easier through his foray into U.S. politics, with his outspoken support for President Donald Trump. Taking a strong political position on one side or the other will inevitably rub a large portion of potenital buyers the wrong way. Tesla's first-quarter earnings demonstrate its deteriorating brand appeal. Revenue dropped 9% year over year to $21.3 billion, driven by a 20% collapse in the automotive segment, which represents 82% of sales. The collapse was worst in Europe. Sales on the continent slumped by a stunning 37.2%. The good news is that Tesla's U.S. operations have held up much better -- for now. So far, many American consumers appear to be keeping their politics separate from their car-buying decisions. U.S. first-quarter sales were down by a relatively modest 9%, according to data from Cox Automotive. However, it's unclear how much longer Tesla's honeymoon period will last. Musk has had public disagreements with Trump over his Big Beautiful Bill legislation, which is currently being debated in Congress. The bigger threat could come from Trump's legislation, which could strip away the $7,500 tax credit for EV purchases. The loss of government support could undermine Tesla's U.S. business, just as it is facing international weakness and higher costs from tariffs. CNN also reports that under the current language, support may remain for smaller EV companies like Rivian and Lucid, allowing them to maintain lower prices and eat away at Tesla's market share. With a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 186, Tesla stock is abnormally expensive for a business with declining sales and profitability. The valuation seems to price in the expectation of dramatic operational growth from its self-driving and robotics ambitions. There is some reason to be excited. Analysts at McKinsey & Company believe autonomous driving could generate $300 billion to $400 billion in revenue by 2035. Tesla seems to be an early leader in the opportunity, with plans to launch automated taxis in Austin, Texas this month. The company's focus on low-cost cameras and "computer vision" could give it an edge over rivals like Waymo (a subsidiary of Alphabet), which relies on pricey LiDAR and must source its vehicles from expensive third-party suppliers, adding cost and complexity to its operations. But while Tesla definitely has the potential to make more millionaires, success is already priced into its valuation. So, the downside risk seems to outweigh the upside right now -- especially considering the immense political uncertainty Musk has brought upon the company. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $377,293!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,319!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $659,171!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Will Ebiefung has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Tesla a Millionaire-Maker Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ford, GM battery tech battle intensifies as Michigan plant faces political headwinds
The electric vehicle fight between rivals Ford Motor Co. and General Motors is turning bitter — and a politically fraught battery factory in Michigan is the latest battleground. Even as EV sales fall far short of expectations for now, Detroit automakers are racing for battery supremacy in hopes of locking up market share for electric vehicles, which are still widely believed to be the future of the industry. The latest leg of the battery supply chain race is all about affordability, and that's where Ford's BlueOval Battery Park in Marshall, Mich., comes into play. The $2.5 billion factory is being geared up to launch production next year of lower-cost lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, a pillar of the automaker's strategy to expand market share with more affordable EVs. But the plant is a lightning rod for controversy because Ford is licensing technology from Chinese battery behemoth CATL. The first-of-its-kind deal, announced in 2023, was structured in a way that would allow the factory to receive production tax credits under the Biden-led Inflation Reduction Act. That is, until lawmakers sought to change the rules. Future Product Find our what powertrains, redesigns and freshenings are planned for the next four years. View the list Brand future product timelines A proposed budget bill by the U.S. House would make the factory ineligible for the subsidy and 'imperils' the project and its 1,700 jobs, Ford Executive Chairman Bill Ford said at the Mackinac Policy Conference in May. The plant — a key economic development project for Gov. Gretchen Whitmer — has been targeted by anti-China politicians and 'not in my backyard' local activists from the outset, but Bill Ford told reporters on the sidelines of the conference that industry competitors are now piling on. Sign up for the quarterly Automotive News U.S. Sales report to get data and news sent to your inbox as soon as it's compiled. 'We do know that others in our industry are trying to submarine it to hurt us,' Ford said. 'That's just sour grapes, frankly.' Ford stopped short of naming names, but four people familiar with the matter told Automotive News affiliate Crain's Detroit Business that GM is behind lobbying efforts for tighter rules around 'foreign entities of concern' and language in the budget bill that targets licensing agreements such as the Ford-CATL deal in Marshall. Ford views it as an attack by its longtime rival. To GM, it's nothing personal, just a bid to shore up its business strategies. The behind-the-scenes battery feud comes as automakers look to outdo each other through 'made in the USA' marketing campaigns amid Trump tariffs and pressure to increase U.S. production. While Ford boasts an industry-leading final assembly footprint in the U.S., its business with CATL in Marshall is a political vulnerability. A GM source familiar with its lobbying activity said the company's support of the tighter restrictions on business ties to China is about ensuring a level playing field. GM officials have touted battery investments in North America and the automaker's partnerships with battery manufacturers in allied countries, such as South Korea's LG Energy Solution. 'GM has been investing in a resilient critical minerals and battery supply chain to support American innovation, manufacturing and economic security,' GM spokeswoman Liz Winter said in an email to Crain's. The company declined to comment on specific lobbying efforts. Other automakers have not pushed for the tighter controls on EV production incentives like GM has, the sources told Crain's. Stellantis and Toyota Motor North America, which have been slower in their electrification approaches, declined to comment about their stance on the proposed rule changes. GM is, by far, the biggest spender among automotive companies on Capitol Hill this year, racking up a record $8.2 million in lobbying expenditures in the first quarter, according to Open Secrets, which compiles online government records. That's more than the company has spent on lobbying in a single quarter since recordkeeping started in 1998, and it's more than six times that of the next highest-spending automaker, Toyota. While GM has sought to build out a battery supply chain not dependent on China, the automaker has previously explored options to procure CATL battery technology in the U.S. GM had considered setting up a plant with CATL in Illinois mirroring the Ford-CATL licensing deal, according to two people who were involved in the talks, but it was scrapped in 2023 after the political backlash from the Ford-CATL plant in Marshall. GM declined to comment on the previously unreported project or about talks with CATL. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the trade group representing major auto companies including the Detroit 3, has been mum about the proposed legislation to tighten restrictions on EV incentives even though it has spoken regularly on other major issues including tariffs and emission rules. The group did not respond to requests for comment. The House bill must first be reconciled by the Senate before it is signed into law. The Senate is weighing even more dramatic rollbacks of EV tax credits, according to text from the Senate Finance Committee. U.S. Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Mich., who represents Michigan's 2nd District, said he is pleased to see his 'No Gotion' bill advance in the House budget, referring to the controversial Chinese battery manufacturer planning a factory near Big Rapids, Mich. Moolenaar said any project with ties to China is concerning, including the Ford battery plant in Marshall. 'I've been very clear. I am a strong supporter of Ford,' Moolenaar said. 'I do think the relationship with CATL is problematic because CATL has been proven to work with Chinese military companies and their supply chain is also connected to the CCP's (Chinese Communist Party) genocide of Uyghurs.' That Ford would stick by its partnership with CATL despite years of political blowback — and that a crosstown competitor would also take aim at the project — underscores just how much of a competitive advantage it could be. Nickel-manganese-cobalt, or NMC, is the predominant chemistry powering EVs on the road today. However, the batteries are costly and connected to a troublesome supply chain, with materials sourced and refined in countries such as China and the Congo. LFP batteries do not contain nickel or cobalt and thus are 20 to 30 percent less costly to produce than NMC batteries. Coupled with an up to $45 per kilowatt-hour subsidy as allowed for in the Inflation Reduction Act, Ford's plant in Marshall is set to produce batteries that are hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars cheaper than those of competitors. LFP is largely seen as an interim solution on the way to superior technology, such as lithium manganese rich (LMR) batteries. Ford and GM each announced last month LMR breakthroughs and plans to go to market with the technology by the end of the decade. Until then, it's a race for market share with current technologies. LFP had long been ignored by many in the industry because of its power capacity and range constraints, but tech advancements have vastly improved energy density in recent years. GM is reportedly working with South Korean battery makers LG and Samsung SDI to produce LFP batteries in the U.S. as well. But CATL is leagues above the competition. 'Where CATL is much more superior is the fact that they can eke out more efficiency from that same size battery versus anyone else in the market,' said Tu Le, founder of consultant Sino Auto Insights. 'They have much more scale, and they are the leaders in this particular chemistry.' That's why outside of the U.S., CATL's client roll is a who's who of the automotive industry. Almost all the major automakers doing business in China, including GM, partner with CATL on EVs in the Far East. 'So why wouldn't it make sense for Ford to partner with them in Marshall, outside of politics?' Le said. 'They're the only game in town at that price, at that quality level, at that level of innovation. The Koreans and the Japanese are good at using batteries that need a lot of cobalt, need a lot of nickel, and really drive the price of the vehicles much higher.' At the root of the Ford-GM divergence in battery strategy appears to be a difference in ideology. Ford CEO Jim Farley, who has called China the industry's greatest threat, has leaned into the competition by seeking to learn from the Chinese. To gain access to the lucrative China market in the early 1980s, Detroit automakers were forced to partner with Chinese companies, which eventually hoovered up the manufacturing know-how of the West to set the foundation for their EV dominance today. As Ford sees it, a CATL partnership is about more than cheap batteries; it's also about soaking up the Chinese expertise to become EV industry leaders. GM is striving for that same outcome, but through different means. CEO Mary Barra has downplayed China's supposed tech prowess and indicated that lower costs, driven by government subsidies, are the biggest advantage of Chinese EV companies. 'We're scaling U.S. production, securing a resilient North American supply chain, and advancing technology to drive down costs and compete globally,' Kurt Kelty, vice president of battery, propulsion and sustainability for GM, said in a recent blog post. At the Mackinac Policy Conference, Bill Ford said it is 'unfair' for politicians to change the rules after the investment has been committed. Construction on the Marshall plant, which was scaled back last year, is about 60 percent complete, and manufacturing equipment is set to arrive and be installed this summer, according to the company. Whether production lines will be powered with CATL technology and receive government subsidies remains to be decided by lawmakers. Said Moolenaar: 'As a business strategy, relying on China creates tremendous vulnerabilities.' Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
