Princess Beatrice's Husband's Ex Just Sent Telling Message About Their Relationship: ‘There's Always…'
When we think about the British Royal family and the drama that always seems to be surrounding them, we usually focus on the same people. There's a lot to focus on there, after all. King Charles is sick. Succession plans are reportedly underway. Prince William and Kate Middleton have had to contend with divorce rumors, and then reconciliation rumors, and then reports that Middleton was trying to intercede in the relationship between her husband and Prince Harry. And then there's Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who are no longer working royals and whose relationship with the rest of the family is strained at best.
But there are other members of the royal family, and other issues. One of those examples comes from Prince Andrew's daughter, Princess Beatrice. Prince Andrew has remained mostly out of the public eye since reports of his close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, but his daughters have continued with their royal duties. And people remain very interested in Prince Beatrice in particular, due to her unusual family dynamics.
More from StyleCaster
Princess Beatrice Was 'In Tears Every Day' After Prince Andrew's Disastrous Interview-Here's If He Still Talks To His Daughters
Looks Like Beatrice & Eugenie Have Picked Sides in Harry & William's Drama
Related: Did William really cheat on Kate?
Beatrice married Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi in 2020 and has two daughters with him, Sienna and Athena. Mapelli Mozzi, however, has an older son, a nine-year-old son, Christopher Woolf 'Wolfie' Mapelli Mozzi. He shares Wolfie with ex-fiancée Dara Huang.
But who is Dara Huang? And what are the family dynamics in this blended family?
Huang is a successful American architect who is now based in London, where in 2013 she founded the architecture and design firm Design Haus Liberty. Huang is also the co-founder of a furniture and interiors brand with J. Christopher Burch, called Dara Maison. By all reports, Huang, Mapelli Mozz,i and Princess Beatrice get along very well, and have successfully co-parented Wolfie for the last few years without any issues.
Speaking to Harper's Bazaar UK, Huang said about co-parenting, 'Wolfie has had two sets of parents trying to help him on both sides, and I just think, 'The more, the merrier,'' adding, 'I feel lucky to have such positive people around him, who really embrace him, because it didn't have to be so easy.'
For Huang, your kids should come first. 'It's all about your point of view. I don't understand people who are divorced and then hold their children as collateral; that doesn't make any sense. It's about creating a happy home and lifestyle.'
The single mom recently spoke about just that, being a single mom, in an Instagram post alongside a friend, Bella Koenig, who got married in Tuscany. 'Single moms rock! Here's one for all the single moms out there,' she said, adding, 'There's always going to be a wonderful man who will love your baby as much as you do and will take responsibility for all of your lives together as a blended family. Proof to never give up on love!'
Princess Beatrice, meanwhile, has referred to herself as a 'bonus mum' to Wolfie and spoken about how it's a 'great honour' to be in his life.
Huang just split from Spanish investor Filippos Kodellas de la Morena. She previously dated Mapelli Mozzi from 2015 to 2018. Their son, Christopher 'Wolfie' Mapelli Mozzi, was born in 2016.
Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi and Princess Beatrice married in 2020. The two had known each other since childhood, as his family is close friends with her parents, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and Sarah, Duchess of York.
Best of StyleCaster
The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like
These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier
BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer Faces Brewing Rebellion Over £5 Billion Benefit Cut
(Bloomberg) -- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is less than 10 days away from the biggest parliamentary challenge to his authority in his not-yet year-long tenure. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown Unpopular cuts to disability benefits unveiled earlier this year as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' efforts to balance the country's books are due before the House of Commons for their first vote on July 1, with a large-scale rebellion brewing on the Labour back benches. So far, at least 150 of the governing party's Members of Parliament have indicated concerns about the cuts in two letters to the government. Other non-signatories have told Bloomberg they also intend to vote against the bill. While Starmer's attention this week was centered on the escalating tensions in the Middle East, the domestic threat was laid bare on Thursday when Vicky Foxcroft, a government whip who would have been tasked with helping quell the revolt, quit, citing her own objections. The rebellion threatens to bruise Starmer's and Reeves' credibility and further damage their stock with the left of their party. In order to avoid falling to what would be an unprecedented defeat for a government enjoying such a large majority so early in its tenure, ministers could at worst be forced into major concessions that reduce the bill's expected cost savings, forcing the Treasury to conjure up money from other cuts or tax rises at the budget in the fall. 'It's a test of Starmer's authority and the way he and Rachel Reeves are running the economy,' Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary University London, said in a phone interview. 'If the rebellion is too big, you start to run into questions about the loyalty of your backbenchers and even perhaps the future of your leadership.' The welfare reforms allowed Reeves to save about £5 billion ($6.5 billion) a year by 2030 by making it harder for disabled people to claim a benefit called the personal independence payment, or PIP. The chancellor factored them into a spring statement as part of spending cuts designed to help meet her self-imposed fiscal rules. Reeves says the changes are necessary because an extra thousand people a day have been signing on for PIP, creating an 'unsustainable' impact on the public finances. PIP payments had been projected to almost double to £41 billion by the end of the decade, within overall spending on disability and incapacity benefits that the Office for Budget Responsibility — the government's fiscal watchdog — sees rising to £100 billion from £65 billion last year. The government has also says there is a moral case for supporting people back into work. But Labour lawmakers are concerned the government announced changes in a rush to deliver savings, without thinking through the impact on vulnerable people. 'There are alternative and more compassionate ways to balance the books, rather than on the backs of disabled people,' one Labour backbencher, Debbie Abrahams, told the House of Commons. There are particular concerns about a new requirement for claimants to score four or above in one of the daily living components of the PIP assessment, meaning people who can't wash half their body or cook a meal will be denied the payments if they have no other impairments. One Labour MP describing the process as letting the OBR tail wag the government dog. Some 45 Labour MPs signed a public letter objecting to the measures, while another letter — arranged in secrecy so that even signatories couldn't see who they were joining — garnered 105 signatures and was sent to the chief whip. While some of the would-be rebels have indicated they could be swayed by the government whips, one of them told Bloomberg they are confident that more than 80 MPs will commit to voting against the government. Given Starmer's working majority is 165, if all opposition parties vote against the bill, it would take 83 Labour rebels to defeat the government. The main opposition Conservative Party is planning to vote against the changes, Danny Kruger, one of the party's work and pensions spokespeople, told parliament in May. Its reasons are different: the Tories argue the measures don't go far enough. One Labour MP told Bloomberg that concerned lawmakers plan to put forward a procedural challenge to the bill. While they don't expect the speaker to select that amendment for debate, the aim is to force further changes from the government, and organize would-be Labour rebels into a coherent group which could eventually vote down the bill. Many in Labour had been waiting to see the bill before making up their minds. When the text was published on Wednesday, the concessions to their concerns were minimal, largely amounting to a 13-week transition period for those losing their PIP. Foxcroft — the whip who had previously served for four years as Starmer's shadow disability minister in opposition — quit within hours of the publication, saying she didn't believe cutting the disability benefits should be part of the solution to tackling ballooning welfare costs. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said Friday that Foxcroft's resignation wasn't a sign of a major rebellion, while conceding that 'of course' there are dissenting voices on such a big reform. 'Vicky is the only front-bencher that I've had a conversation with about resigning,' she said. Nevertheless, many so-called 'red wall' Labour MPs in northern and central England face a tough decision. Health Equity North, a public health institute, found that all the places most affected financially by the PIP reforms are Labour constituencies in northern England. In several areas, the number of people affected by the welfare changes exceeds the Labour majority, meaning those MPs could see a crucial drop in support. The government is gearing up for a fight, indicating it will make no further concessions. On Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner failed to rule out stripping the whip from Labour rebels, while government enforcers are warning MPs that their political career prospects will be ruined if they oppose the bill. Whips and wannabe rebels alike expect the potential revolt to be whittled down as July 1 approaches. Some opponents are weighing whether to abstain at the second reading and wait until the third reading to take a more decisive vote, as whips are encouraging them to do. 'I'd be amazed if he were defeated here,' Anand Menon, director of the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, said. 'If the whips got a whiff they were going to get defeated, they'd give some concessions. The worst of all outcomes is to lose this.' Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inside Kate Middleton and Prince William's Most Relatable Chapter Yet
Originally appeared on E! Online Kate Middleton deciding to skip the 2025 Royal Ascot was a reminder that not everything is back to normal for the royal family. The Princess of Wales has been out and about exponentially more than she was in 2024, of course, the 43-year-old having shared in January that the unspecified type of cancer she was treated for last year was in remission. But Kate is still in the midst of balancing what's best for her health with all the public-facing duties that would be expected of her in an average year. Which is how most of her and Prince William's 14 years of marriage could be described, work-wise, up until 2024's unprecedented pile-up of crises. Which, ironically, meant that Kate and William's life took on an mistakable whiff of relatability for a change while they simply tried to keep it all together for , 11, , 10, and , 7, and come out the other side as whole as from E! Online Tom Sandoval's America's Got Talent Audition Leaves Judges in Shock Matthew McConaughey's 3 Kids Are His Spitting Images in Rare Family Photo What Happened to Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Chandi Dayle? Americas Sweethearts Bahamas Scandal Explained And while normal isn't generally a descriptor that applies unironically to Kate and William, who's celebrating his 43rd birthday June 21, there was nothing normal about the thick layer of scrutiny they had to operate under once Kensington Palace said early last year that Kate would be taking a few months off from official duties. But when Kate informed the world in a March 22, 2024, video message that she was undergoing preventative chemotherapy, it was a humbling moment for those banking on a more salacious explanation for her absence. Not to mention, it was a reminder that, when an extremely public person whose main job is to be seen asks for health-related privacy, she has her reasons. For the most part, in keeping with how the couple have handled most of the outside hysteria—while addressing it at all is unusual, they've still been relatively unreactive compared to how some celebrities deal with vicious rumors—they stayed the course. William, meanwhile, had already pressed pause on his own schedule after Kate's surgery and his father's treatment for an enlarged prostate. But after Charles shared that he'd been diagnosed with cancer, the heir to the throne knew he had to get back to work as soon as possible as the youngest and most popular senior royal still in commission. "They are very good at keeping calm and carrying on, no matter what's going on behind closed doors," royals correspondent told E! News after Charles' February 2024 announcement. "We continually see this commitment to duty no matter what." At the same time, she added, "We look at them oftentimes as made of steel and just nothing affects them, they aren't led by their emotions and they never seem to be ill, they're not real people. Knowing they're just like us is a really good way to encourage others to be on top of their own health." Kate noted in her video, filmed in the garden at Windsor Castle, that it had taken time both for her to recover from "major surgery" and for her and William to best explain her situation to George, Charlotte and Louis "in a way that is appropriate for them, and to reassure them that I am going to be OK." She added, "Having William by my side is a great source of comfort and reassurance. I am well and getting stronger every day by focusing on the things that will help me heal." Composed and sanguine as she may have been, and though she did not share any other particulars about her condition, by historic royal standards that was practically the Rolling Stone interview."I would hope that many of the people that've peddled these conspiracy theories, which have ranged from her being in a coma to having botched cosmetic surgery, might just take a break from the keyboard," NBC News royals contributor Katie Nicholl told anchor Lester Holt afterward. "As a family, they've obviously been going through a huge amount." Noting the implied plea for privacy in the princess' message, Nicholl said that Kate shares information "in her time, on her terms, and what comes first for her isn't the public trying to find out what's happened here. It's about protecting her family." William returned to work weeks later, accepting cards on his father and Kate's behalf during his visit to Surplus to Supper in Surrey, which combats food waste and the the scourge of hunger due to poverty. When a volunteer entreated him to look after his wife, William assured her, "I will, thank you very much." Kate, who still was attending to some duties from home, said in her video that her work had always brought her "a deep sense of joy" and she was looking forward to getting back out there as soon as she was able. When she and the kids emerged at the 2024 Trooping the Colour (the monarch's official birthday celebration) last June, Nicholl called it a "wonderful surprise," explaining, "We know that as the King and the Princess of Wales have gone through this cancer journey together, they've very much been supporting each other behind the scenes. Well this is the ultimate show of support."It was behind closed doors, however, where William stepped up without fanfare, taking periodic breaks from official duties to be home with his family. "Trying to get through everything else and keep everything on track has been really difficult,' William told reporters during his visit to Cape Town, South Africa, to award the fourth annual Earthshot Prize in November. "I'm so proud of my wife, I'm proud of my father, for handling the things that they have done. But from a personal family point of been brutal." Ahead of the couple's 13th anniversary in 2024, royal biographer Robert Jobson told HELLO! that the date was "a testament to not only their love, but also their unity." As "their strength lies in being together," Jobson said, "the ups and downs they have weathered together have cemented their bond, which is now unshakeable." He continued, "Catherine has done her best to stick to a routine for the sake of the children. She and William know the importance of taking each day as it comes. It was a huge blow when they first learned of the diagnosis, but they are both mentally strong. Without doubt, it has brought the couple even closer together." Better yet, Kate slowly returned to the spotlight, her schedule streamlined but her engagements reminiscent of previous years as she took Charlotte to Wimbledon last July, attended the Festival of Remembrance in November and hosted her annual Christmas carol service at Westminster Abbey. As royal biographer and The Crown historian Robert Lacey told People, "The double illness has placed enormous pressure on William, both as a parent and inheritor of the family business. It has brought all kinds of challenges. He [has handled] it with calmness and lack of drama." Lacey added, "From what we know of their personal lives, for William and Kate, spending time with their children is the most precious and enjoyable thing they can do." Ahead of the couple's 13th anniversary in 2024, royal biographer Robert Jobson told HELLO! that the date was "a testament to not only their love, but also their unity." As "their strength lies in being together," Jobson said, "the ups and downs they have weathered together have cemented their bond, which is now unshakeable." He continued, "Catherine has done her best to stick to a routine for the sake of the children. She and William know the importance of taking each day as it comes. It was a huge blow when they first learned of the diagnosis, but they are both mentally strong. Without doubt, it has brought the couple even closer together." Better yet, Kate slowly returned to the spotlight, her schedule streamlined but her engagements reminiscent of previous years as she took Charlotte to Wimbledon last July, attended the Festival of Remembrance in November and hosted her annual Christmas carol service at Westminster Abbey. Though like any couple whose schedules are mapped out months in advance, she and William have had to learn how to adjust on the fly. "Life as you know it can change in an instant and we've had to find a way to navigate the stormy waters and road unknown," Kate, sharing that she'd completed chemotherapy, said in a September video message. "The cancer journey is complex, scary and unpredictable for everyone, especially those closest to you. With humility, it also brings you face to face with your own vulnerabilities in a way you have never considered before, and with that, a new perspective on everything." In honor of their two decades as a couple, keep reading to see Kate and William's sweetest moments: Blush and BashfulThey Still Got GameJingle Bell RoyalsMonarch Approved(Originally published April 28, 2024, at 9 p.m. PT)
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Parents' Social Dilemma—Is It Ever OK To Bring an Uninvited Sibling to a Birthday Party?
As a mom of six, I am constantly juggling schedules: I'll drop this one at dance class on my way to taking my other one to swim practice. And then my husband can take our son to the birthday party—but what to do with our preschooler and the baby? Given my daily balancing act, when I recently received an invitation that said siblings were welcome to join the celebration, I breathed a sigh of relief. For once, I didn't have to worry about what to do with my littles so that an older kiddo could attend a party. It's a delicate scenario for parents to navigate, and one that's getting a lot of attention on the parenting community forum Mumset, based out of the United Kingdom, where one parent asked a key question. "Am I being unreasonable to think it's outrageous to bring a sibling to a party and then put them on the table to eat with all the kids that were actually invited. Then take cake and party bag for them!? I would never do this but I don't know if I'm being mean about it." In a poll on the post, 95% voted that this parent is NOT being unreasonable. Supporters of the original poster commented: "People who do that are very entitled. It's almost like invites need to have a disclaimer on them." "I think even asking if the siblings can come is cheeky." Agree - really bad manners to do this. But other commenters raise a very valid point: child care. It's just not always possible to have someone else look after a sibling while your other child attends the party. That's where our experts come in. Wondering if siblings can tag along to a birthday party is a relatable dilemma for many busy parents. According to experts, the answer depends on many factors, such as how well you know the host, the venue, and the age of the birthday child. Of course, Genevieve Dreizen, a modern-day etiquette and boundaries expert and COO and co-founder of Fresh Starts Registry, says when in doubt, a good rule of thumb is just to bring the child who is invited. But if you find yourself in a bind with child care, clear, honest communication is the best policy—just don't wait until the last minute. You want to allow the host time to plan ahead, according to Olivia Pollock, Evite's Etiquette & Hosting Expert. 'It's totally OK to say something like, 'We'd love to come, but I don't have childcare that day—would it be okay if I brought little Joey?'' she tells Parents. Just be sure to respect the host's wishes. 'While some hosts lean into 'the more the merrier,' others might have specific budgets or be limited due to venue space,' Pollock says. Remember, cautions Dreizen, the host has a lot on their plate with planning and throwing the party, and whether you can find child care shouldn't add to their burden. That said, according to Jo Hayes, etiquette and parenting consultant, speech-language pathologist, and founder of when it's a party for younger children, a host may know to expect that siblings may attend. 'If it's for a 4-year-old, with parents expected or likely to stay, there's a strong likelihood the invitation is somewhat 'open,' with younger siblings potentially welcome,' she says. We all make mistakes! If you show up to a party with a sibling and it feels awkward, again, be honest. 'Apologize to the host, and let them know you miscalculated,' Dreizen counsels. Pollock advises offering to help out with handing out snacks or juice boxes to make up for the imposition. 'Being extra grateful and courteous can make even the most awkward situations not a big deal,' she says. It definitely helps to specify on an invitation whether siblings are included to prevent a faux pas from happening in the first place. 'The best parties are the ones where everyone knows what to expect,' says Pollock. When extra guests aren't included, she suggests adding a short note to the invite, such as, 'Due to space limitations, we can't accommodate siblings—thanks for understanding!' Indeed, as Hayes points out, ''Siblings not welcome' sounds rather impolite!' If another parent shows up with more little ones in tow than you planned for, Pollock's advice is to lead with grace. 'If the sibling's presence won't derail your plans, smile, roll with it, and file it under 'parenting happens,'' she says. If the addition does impact your plans—for instance, you only had enough pottery pieces for the invited kids to paint—experts say it's alright to set boundaries and let the parent know your situation. 'Just try to treat each other with respect and kindness,' says Dreizen. 'There should be an understanding from both the hosts and those invited that we are all trying to do our best.' Read the original article on Parents
