Superman can do almost anything. And that's one reason his movies have struggled
Superman returns to the big screen this summer, as DC Studios tries to reinvigorate the film fortunes of its iconic do-gooder.
But that's not an easy task, despite studio investment of at least $225 million US in Superman, which hits theatres on July 11 starring David Corenswet.
Because, for all his powers, Superman has struggled as a film franchise. Movie-goers have many superheroes to choose from, and those commercial pressures are separate from the perpetual issue of coming up with compelling stories for a morally rigid hero with few vulnerabilities.
Aficionados say Superman's long history in pop culture provides a big potential audience, but his fans have expectations that can be hard to meet.
"Superman can be a tough nut to crack," said artist Jason Fabok, co-founder of media company Ghost Machine, who previously worked for DC Comics — drawing the Man of Steel for the Justice League and Superman/Batman titles. He also helped shape Superman's look on a collectible coin.
"He's got all these fans… They want a good Superman movie. They want something that's going to really evoke those feelings that they had of the character for all these years."
To succeed, this Superman will have to prove the old-fashioned hero remains compelling for today's audiences — a challenge where prior movies have struggled.
"Can this new iteration be the one that is the spark to say: Superman's still cool?" asked Todd McFarlane, the Calgary-born comics pro who created the Spawn character and co-founded Image Comics. He also founded McFarlane Toys, a company that's making tie-in action figures for the film.
If not, McFarlane says Superman could go the way of Mickey Mouse — a former pop-culture juggernaut who has fallen by the wayside.
McFarlane says it can be difficult to find problems for Superman to face, given his super-powers.
"He's almost god-like, right? So... what's the jeopardy of our hero?" he asked.
"Superman seems to be able to spin moons on his finger like a basketball. So, what's his Achilles heel?" McFarlane notes this is why early writers came up with kryptonite.
That's the challenge facing this movie's writer-director James Gunn, who's undoubtedly under pressure to deliver a winner, despite also being the studio's co-CEO. DC Studios did not respond to inquiries from CBC News about the new Superman.
"I wouldn't want to be in his shoes," said McFarlane, despite Gunn's success bringing Marvel's once-obscure Guardians of the Galaxy to the screen.
McFarlane says, after writing and illustrating comics for 40 years, there's a core principle he keeps in mind.
"Being a hero should be hard," he said. "There should be cause and effect of everything you do."
That can lead to scenarios where Superman must make difficult choices, or cope with competing crises. Like in 1978's Superman, in which Lois Lane died when he was preoccupied with other matters. (Fortunately, he turned back time to save her life.)
A lot of lore
Superman made his Action Comics debut in 1938, co-created by Canadian-born artist Joe Shuster and writer Jerry Siegel.
The cape-draped hero eventually made his way to radio, cartoons, television and the movies — and a lot has happened along the way. (A small sample: Superman proposed marriage to a mermaid; his secret identity was repeatedly revealed; and he died at one point.)
With so much history, there're a lot of potential story nuggets to be mined — and it appears Superman's makers know this, given the many characters seen in the movie's trailers, including the hero's dog, Krypto.
And even if some — Lois Lane, Lex Luthor, Jimmy Olsen — are already highly familiar to audiences, Fabok says they can be compelling if given the right tweaks.
He recalls when, in the comics, Luthor became the president of the United States, prompting the question: "What happens if Superman has to face Lex Luthor now, but he's running the country?"
A reliable hero
Superman is an unapologetic good guy. Fans and comics creators say that's core to his character and his enduring appeal.
"You know that Superman is good," said Fabok, recalling a moment in one movie when it's stated the hero is "what humanity should strive for."
Steve Younis, the editor-in-chief of the long-running Superman Homepage, says Superman "does the right thing simply because it's the right thing to do," and as such inspires the audience.
Gunn has argued the same, telling Rolling Stone that the "very good nature of him, this really strong belief in what's right, sometimes perhaps to a fault, is what makes Superman who he is."
Some fans hope the new Superman will steer toward a brighter on-screen experience. Some recent Superman adventures that went to darker, moodier places, simply "never worked," for Fabok.
He and McFarlane both say Superman is a character who belongs in the light — both visually and conceptually.
"Superman is a character of the day, the sun," said Fabok.
"He's bright, he's a beacon of hope."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
I'm choosing to leave for the U.S. for a unicorn job. Does that make me a traitor to Canada?
Social Sharing This First Person column is the experience of Alice Nelson, who is a dual citizen of Canada and the U.S. For more information about CBC's First Person stories, please see the FAQ. In January 2025, I got a call to go for a job interview at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA). They were looking for a professor to lead a new theatre arts degree program. My friend Claire said, "That's a unicorn job!" "What's a unicorn job?" I asked. "It's a job where they're looking for someone very specific and you are that unicorn." A typical tenure-track job will get 100 applicants. I was feeling like one very, very lucky unicorn. I had to make a difficult choice: stay in my tenured job teaching theatre in Windsor, Ont., where my career was at a standstill or move to the U.S. to start over. It was a choice further complicated by the trade war initiated by Donald Trump and his claims that Canada should become the 51st state of the U.S. A big move Seven years earlier, I was living in Calgary and had been working contract jobs as a theatre artist and educator. On my 40th birthday, I landed a tenure-track position as an assistant professor in the school of dramatic art at the University of Windsor. My partner, Oly, and I had community and family in Calgary. I wasn't sure if he would want to go with me. But when I told him I got the job, he smiled and said, "I guess we're moving to Windsor." We packed up and drove across the country with our two dogs to start our new life in Ontario. Fast-forward to July 2024, I achieved tenure and became an associate professor. That same month, University Players, our students' mainstage, which gives them the opportunity to apply their training, was shut down. The six staff members who taught students the production side of theatre lost their jobs in the department. The school also decided to halt new enrollment in the acting program. In September, a guest speaker at UWindsor's Senate repeated over and over: "Nobody is coming to save us" — referring to Canadian universities. And it's true — every day there's an article about programs being cut at another Canadian university or college due to underfunding from provincial governments, the impact of tuition freeze and a recent federal cap on international student permits (which has hit Ontario hard). Yup, nobody is coming to save us. I felt like one of the violinists on the Titanic. "Gentlemen, it has been a privilege playing with you tonight." Concerned for my future, I started job hunting. I'm a dual citizen of the U.S. and Canada, so I was looking in both countries, hoping to find something in my field. Theatre faces deep cuts Over the next year, I made it a goal to foster opportunities for students who had lost a ton of performance opportunities. I directed a radio play version of A Christmas Carol, organized a Thrille r flash mob, ran an improv club and directed Kristen Thomson's comedy, The Wedding Party, in our smaller studio theatre. During the hiring process with UTA, I was asked why I wanted to leave a job that I loved, where I had tenure and was thriving. To which I answered honestly: Our mainstage was cut, the acting program was not accepting any students next fall and our university had (at the time) a projected $30-million deficit. A couple of weeks later, I was offered the job. Then, things started to change politically between the U.S. and Canada. Trump started making tariff threats to Canada and goading that it should be the 51st state. I found the rhetoric ridiculous, and like others, felt an upswell in Canadian patriotism. The response through protests and social media was also "Elbows up," encouraging Canadians to get ready to fight. Given the context, my parents were worried about me moving to the U.S., and friends expressed their concerns. On top of that, my partner is not a dual citizen, and we aren't married. That meant he couldn't move with me easily. While my contract was being drawn up, I had a month to agonize over the decision, visit an immigration lawyer and convince my parents that I was a unicorn. On my overanalyzed pro and con list, some pros were: I could work in my field, direct plays and there would be no shovelling. Some cons were: Living apart from my partner until we get married and get him citizenship, leaving my students before they graduate, the lack of universal health care, targeting of the 2SLGBTQ+ community in the U.S., restrictions on women's bodily autonomy, racism and deportation, etc. This list could go on and on. Also, no Tim Hortons. The idea of being a Canadian in the U.S. in 2025 is complicated, and I feel guilty leaving at a time when I want to back my country. I've had some people give me a hard time about moving to the U.S. One person called me a traitor. Am I? I want to stay in Canada, but I also want to support my family financially. I have to remind myself and friends who don't want me to move that not all Americans are bad. A lot of them didn't vote for Trump, and my mom's side of the family in the U.S. are Democrats. I joke about the lack of Tim Hortons because I fear telling the truth in public will get me flagged at the border, and I won't be able to cross. Yet, I'm American, and as a citizen, I can't be denied entry. After a lot of thought, I took the job. The Canadian part of me doesn't want to leave, but the American part of me is relieved I can work in my field in the U.S., as there are no opportunities in my field in Canada right now — they are disappearing. Well, I better get packing. This unicorn, Canadian at heart, is riding off into the sunset with her saddlebag of theatre books, two dogs, a wedding date set and hope for the future.
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Natalie Sue wins Leacock Medal for Humour for novel ‘I Hope This Finds You Well'
Natalie Sue's debut novel 'I Hope This Finds You Well' has won this year's Stephen Leacock Memorial Medal for Humour. The $25,000 award is given to the best Canadian book of literary humour published in the previous year. The novel follows the story of an office worker in her early thirties who one day stumbles upon all of her colleagues' private emails and decides to use their gossip to help save her job. 'I Hope This Finds You Well' was published by HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. Sue is a Calgary-based author of Iranian and British descent who spent her early years living in western Canada. Runners-up, who received $5,000 each, were Greg Kearney for 'An Evening With Birdy O'Day,' about an aging hairstylist who lost connection with his childhood best friend when he left to pursue a pop music career, and Patricia J. Parsons for 'We Came From Away: That Summer on the Rock,' which follows one woman's attempt to reconnect her family with Newfoundland. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 21, 2025.
Globe and Mail
15 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
'Roadblock': Paramount Stock (NASDAQ:PARA) Surges as the Trump Settlement Sputters
As it turns out, entertainment giant Paramount (PARA) was actually fairly close to a deal with President Trump over the 60 Minutes lawsuit. But, when the deal was fairly close, a 'roadblock' emerged and put a halt to the whole matter, at least for now. Investors reacted with surprising strength, and perhaps even more surprising positivity. Paramount shares gained nearly 2.5% in the closing minutes of Friday's trading. Confident Investing Starts Here: The settlement had reached $35 million, reports noted, when Paramount suddenly found itself paralyzed by indecision. That delay caused Trump lawyers to pivot and pull back to their original demand, calling for a $50 million settlement. The biggest problem seems to be that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is also involved in this, and needs to sign off on the merger with Skydance as well. Reports suggested that Paramount brass believes that the FCC's sign-off on the deal needs to be contingent on settling the case, but by like token, the idea that requiring FCC approval as part of the settlement looks a lot like a bribe. Trump's legal team, reports note, has already been clear that the Trump suit and the FCC case are two separate matters. But with outside organizations looking to launch their own lawsuits should the settlement go through, looks may count for more here than anyone expected. South Park Losses Mount Meanwhile, as Paramount faces the prospect of losing South Park exclusivity, it quietly pulled another old episode from the field. The pull this time showed up in the Canadian and Australian markets, reports noted, and this time, featured Butters' Very Own Episode pulled from Paramount+. Why, however, is a bit of a mystery. Several South Park episodes are apparently a bit too spicy for streaming, in retrospect, with around a dozen classic episodes set to be pulled from the catalog and relegated to a 'ban list', reports noted. The reports got stranger as an Australian viewer noted that the Paramount+ listing had been pulled, but the episode could still be watched by watching through Paramount+ on Amazon (AMZN) Prime Video. Is Paramount Stock a Good Buy Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on PARA stock based on two Buys, eight Holds and five Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 18.62% rally in its share price over the past year, the average PARA price target of $12.08 per share implies 2.23% downside risk. See more PARA analyst ratings Disclosure Disclaimer & Disclosure Report an Issue
