Feeling drained? These ‘battery drainers' are zapping all your energy: study
If you're tired reading this, you're not alone. One in three Americans are drained before the day even starts.
And what precious energy they do have is quickly zapped away, according to a survey of 2,000 people which pinpointed what drains Americans' energy the most.
Results showed that the pain of being interrupted, being forced to engage in awkward small talk and being on the receiving end of unsolicited advice are some of the biggest 'battery drainers,' according to new research.
The survey conducted by Talker Research on behalf of Zipfizz examined the energy levels of 2,000 Americans and asked them to name the things that zap their energy day to day and their social stamina.
Dull interactions, even duller weather and worries over finances were among the most common drains.
Additional social energy suckers were dealing with office gossip (6%), being subjected to overly personal conversations with coworkers (4%) and colleagues showing you something on their phone (3%).
No wonder then a further one in three blamed their jobs for leaving them drained.
And it's not just our jobs leaving us drained. The survey also found the biggest hits to our physical energy were lack of quality sleep (42%) and the never-ending cycle of housework (28%).
While 56% of participants said they believe staying hydrated plays a key role in their energy levels, the average reported water intake was just 5.3 cups per day, well below the recommended 15.5.
And that lack of hydration, sleep and social drainage all take their toll with many Americans reporting crashes during the day.The average American starts to fade by 11:54 a.m. — right before lunch.
So how do people power through the dreaded mid-day slump? A quick caffeine fix (25%), turning up the music (15%) or sneaking in a nap (14%) are the go-to energy boosts for getting through the day.
Thirteen percent reported exercising or mindful movement, while 8% said they take a break to enjoy the outdoors if they feel their energy crash during the day.
'This survey really shows how quickly our energy can take a hit — even before lunchtime,' said Marcela Kanalos, spokesperson for Zipfizz. 'From housework to weather, it's the small, constant drains that add up. Knowing how to recover from that dip can make all the difference.'
And when the weekend finally hits? For 48%, it doesn't bring the relief they hoped for — they're still feeling wiped out.
More than a quarter (28%) believe that making small habit changes, like drinking more water, can have a significant impact on how energized they feel.
When asked what they'd do if they could reclaim just one hour of daily energy, their answers revealed what many are missing most: time to unwind.
The top choice was simply relaxing (15%), followed by being physically active or exercising (14%) —and ironically — getting more sleep (13%).
Others said they would spend more quality time with friends or family (10%) and catch up on chores (9%).
'When people are running on empty before noon and the weekend doesn't offer the recovery they hoped for, it's a sign that quick fixes aren't enough,' added Kanalos. 'Real energy comes from small, consistent choices — like better sleep, hydration and meaningful downtime — that add up over time. We don't just need to push through the day; we need to learn how to recharge in ways that actually last.'
TOP 10 BIGGEST SOCIAL BATTERY ZAPPERS
Being interrupted or talked over (15%)
Awkward small talk (11%)
Customer service interactions (9%)
Talking to strangers (9%)
Unsolicited advice (8%)
Office gossip (6%)
Group video calls (4%)
Overly personal conversations with coworkers (4%)
Coworkers showing you something on their phone (3%)
Networking events (3%)
BIGGEST ENERGY SUCKERS
Lack of quality sleep (42%)
Housework/chores (28%)
Finance worries (26%)
Bad weather (20%)
Dull social interactions (19%)Talker Research surveyed 2,000 Americans; the survey was commissioned by Zipfizz and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 1 – May 5, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
ChatGPT use linked to cognitive decline, research reveals
Relying on the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT to help you write an essay could be linked to cognitive decline, a new study reveals. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab studied the impact of ChatGPT on the brain by asking three groups of people to write an essay. One group relied on ChatGPT, one group relied on search engines, and one group had no outside resources at all. The researchers then monitored their brains using electroencephalography, a method which measures electrical activity. The team discovered that those who relied on ChatGPT — also known as a large language model — had the 'weakest' brain connectivity and remembered the least about their essays, highlighting potential concerns about cognitive decline in frequent users. 'Over four months, [large language model] users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels,' the study reads. 'These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of [large language model] reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning.' The study also found that those who didn't use outside resources to write the essays had the 'strongest, most distributed networks.' While ChatGPT is 'efficient and convenient,' those who use it to write essays aren't 'integrat[ing] any of it' into their memory networks, lead author Nataliya Kosmyna told Time Magazine. Kosmyna said she's especially concerned about the impacts of ChatGPT on children whose brains are still developing. 'What really motivated me to put it out now before waiting for a full peer review is that I am afraid in 6-8 months, there will be some policymaker who decides, 'let's do GPT kindergarten,'' Kosmyna said. 'I think that would be absolutely bad and detrimental. Developing brains are at the highest risk.' But others, including President Donald Trump and members of his administration, aren't so worried about the impacts of ChatGPT on developing brains. Trump signed an executive order in April promoting the integration of AI into American schools. 'To ensure the United States remains a global leader in this technological revolution, we must provide our Nation's youth with opportunities to cultivate the skills and understanding necessary to use and create the next generation of AI technology,' the order reads. 'By fostering AI competency, we will equip our students with the foundational knowledge and skills necessary to adapt to and thrive in an increasingly digital society.' Kosmyna said her team is now working on another study comparing the brain activity of software engineers and programmers who use AI with those who don't. 'The results are even worse,' she told Time Magazine. The Independent has contacted OpenAI, which runs ChatGPT, for comment.
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump administration makes sweeping changes to ObamaCare, ends ‘Dreamer' coverage
The Trump administration is shortening ObamaCare's annual open enrollment period and ending the law's coverage of immigrants that entered the U.S. illegally as children, according to a final rule announced Friday. The Biden administration made it easier and more affordable to sign up for Affordable Care Act plans, causing enrollment to swell to an all-time high. The Trump administration claims those moves opened a wave of fraudulent enrollment that's costing taxpayers billions of dollars. According to the rule, the federal open enrollment period will run from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31. Currently, federal open enrollment ends Jan. 15. States operating their own health insurance exchanges will have the flexibility to set their own open enrollments, so long as they run no longer than nine weeks between the November and December dates. In addition to the shortened enrollment period, the administration said it is ending ObamaCare coverage for immigrants that came into the U.S. illegally as children, also known as 'Dreamers.' The provision will undo a Biden-era rule that was estimated to allow 147,000 immigrants to enroll in coverage. A federal judge blocked the rule from being enforced in 19 states, and it is still being litigated. The administration also banned plans from covering 'sex-trait modification' as an essential health benefit beginning in plan year 2026. The policy will apply to the five states that currently include coverage for gender-affirming care, as well as in states that do not have such coverage expressly mentioned. But many of the other changes announced Friday will only last a year, like requiring more income verifications for people to enroll in coverage on federal exchange plans. The one-year sunset is a change from when the rule was proposed in March. It's designed to give Republicans on Capitol Hill an opportunity to codify the provisions into law for the long-term and use the savings to fund their massive party-line tax and spending bill. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the rule is projected to save up to $12 billion in 2026 by 'reining in wasteful federal spending, and refocusing on making health insurance markets more affordable and sustainable for hardworking American families.' For instance, the rule requires federal exchange plans to check consumers' eligibility for special enrollment periods and raise the burden of verification for people who are automatically re-enrolled in subsidized plans. The rule also requires plans to charge those people a $5 monthly premium until they confirm or update their eligibility information. The rule also ends a monthly special enrollment period for people with income below 150 percent of the federal poverty line, which CMS said 'has been exploited to enroll consumers or change their plans without their knowledge.'
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Supreme Court finds retired firefighter cannot sue for disability discrimination
Advertisement In a dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined, in part, by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, argued that the justices had abandoned protections for vulnerable retirees. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Disabled Americans who have retired from the work force simply want to enjoy the fruits of their labor free from discrimination,' Jackson wrote, adding that Congress had 'plainly protected their right to do so' when it drafted the federal disability rights law. Sotomayor, in a separate writing, argued that a majority of the justices appeared in agreement that retirees may be able to bring disability discrimination claims for actions that occurred while they were still employed. Stanley might have been able to argue that this would apply in her case, too, Sotomayor wrote, but the court had not been asked to weigh in on that question. Advertisement Stanley worked as a firefighter in Sanford, Florida, a city of about 65,000 people northeast of Orlando. When she started her job in 1999, the city offered health insurance until age 65 for two categories of retirees -- those with 25 years of service and those who retired early because of disability. In 2003, the city changed its policy, limiting health insurance to those who retired because of disability to just 24 months of coverage. After nearly two decades, Stanley retired in 2018 at age 47 after she was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. She expected that the city would continue to pay for most of her health insurance until she turned 65, but it refused, citing its changed policy. Stanley sued, claiming that the city had violated the ADA by providing different benefits to 25-year employees versus those who retired because of a disability. She argued that the city's policy amounted to impermissible discrimination based on disability. A federal trial judge dismissed her claim under the ADA, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit agreed. In asking the justices to hear the case, lawyers for Stanley said it could affect millions of disabled Americans who rely on retirement benefits that they earned while employed. One section of the ADA specifies that it is illegal to discriminate in compensation because of a disability. The justices wrestled with whether the section included retirees. Deepak Gupta, a lawyer for Stanley, said in an emailed statement that the decision had created 'a troubling loophole that allows employers to discriminate against retirees simply because they can no longer work due to their disabilities.' Advertisement In her dissent, Jackson wrote that she hoped Congress might step in and provide a 'legislative intervention' to shield other disabled retirees. This article originally appeared in
