Elon Musk posts clean drug tests, but lab claims he flushed it out of his system — netizens call it fake
On June 17, 2025,
Elon Musk
posted a screenshot of his
clean drug test results
on X. He captioned it just 'lol,' clearly mocking the drug use accusations. The test showed negative results for ketamine, cocaine, ecstasy, amphetamines, and more.
The test was done by Fastest Labs of South Austin. The sample was collected on June 11, which is 12 days after the New York Times published a big report accusing him of using drugs, as compiled by People and New York Times.
As per the New York Times report, Musk was a near-daily ketamine user during Trump's 2024 campaign. They also claimed he used ecstasy and hallucinogenic mushrooms. Musk allegedly carried a pillbox with Adderall but also a stimulant. The report also said his ketamine use hurt his bladder, citing a 2022 study from NIH. During that time, Musk had donated nearly $275 million to Trump's campaign.
What's wrong with the test?
The lab itself says urine tests only detect drugs taken in the past 2–10 days. Musk took the test 12 days after the report, so he had time to flush drugs from his system if he used them earlier, according to the Fastest Labs website and People's report.
A lab employee told People that urine tests are not reliable for older drug use, except cannabis. Hair follicle tests can detect drug use from the past 90 days, but Musk didn't take that kind.
Live Events
Grok defends Musk
X's AI bot Grok responded to a user saying Musk's report shows he's 'clean as a whistle.' Grok said the post might be a joke, a way to shut down rumors, or a dig at critics. It mentioned the timing with SpaceX news and said Musk might just be laughing off the drama.
Trump & Musk
Musk was working as a 'special government employee' in Trump's White House. His contract ended on May 30, the same day NYT's report about his drug use came out.
Between May 30 and June 11, Musk went on a wild social media rant against Trump. He called Trump's policy bill a 'disgusting abomination,' and accused Trump of hiding Epstein files, as per the report by People.
On June 11, Musk tweeted he regrets some posts about Trump. He admitted some comments 'went too far.' But insiders say Musk and Trump's relationship is now totally broken. 'It sort of evolved from love to transactional to now pure avoidance', he added, 'Trump doesn't forget', according to the Political Source via People.
FAQs
Q1. Did Elon Musk really use drugs like ketamine and ecstasy?
The New York Times said he did, but Musk denied it by sharing a clean drug test taken 12 days later.
Q2. Why do people think Elon Musk's drug test might be fake or useless?
Because urine tests only detect drugs taken in the past 2–10 days, and Musk's test was done 12 days after the report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
36 minutes ago
- India Today
How Trump targeted Harvard's foreign students and what court says now
Harvard University, known globally for its academic excellence and diverse student body, has found itself at the center of a political storm. Former U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration have repeatedly tried to restrict the university's ability to host international students — a move that directly challenges Harvard's global identity. Now, recent court rulings have provided temporary relief, but the situation remains SECURITY 'S ATTEMPT TO CUT HARVARD INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PROGRAMMEOne of the major actions came from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which tried to revoke Harvard's certification to host international students under the Student Exchange and Visitor Program. This program allows institutions to issue key visa documents (like the F-1 student visa), and without it, Harvard wouldn't be able to enroll students from responded by suing the government, claiming that DHS didn't follow proper procedures. In May, a federal judge temporarily blocked DHS's action. Then, in a more recent ruling, the judge issued a preliminary injunction, halting the move until the legal case is fully resolved — which could take months or longer. While the ruling is a win for Harvard, the judge noted that DHS still has the right to evaluate Harvard's status through regular procedures. For now, the university remains certified, but the review ENTRY BAN FOR INCOMING HARVARD STUDENTSadvertisementIn a separate action, Trump issued a presidential proclamation to stop new international students from entering the U.S. if they planned to attend Harvard. The administration argued that allowing these students in was not in the country's quickly challenged this in court, arguing that targeting students bound for one specific school didn't meet the legal standard of banning a "class of aliens." The same judge stepped in again to pause this entry ban — with no end date set yet. Harvard is now waiting for the judge to make a longer-term decision on this linked his efforts to concerns about antisemitism on Harvard's campus, especially during pro-Palestinian protests. But Harvard's leadership has insisted they're already working to address these issues and won't bow to political VISA SCRUTINY AND DISCRIMINATION CONCERNSIn another move, the Trump administration ordered US embassies and consulates to inspect the social media accounts of anyone applying for a visa to study or work at Harvard. The idea was to screen for content that could be seen as anti-American or after, the State Department expanded this to include all student visa applicants across the country, not just those going to Harvard. Visa applicants were told to make their social media accounts public, raising concerns about privacy and were also told to give priority to schools where international students make up less than 15% of the student body. Since Harvard and other Ivy League schools have higher percentages of foreign students, this effectively places them at a IT MATTERS?International students are a major part of Harvard's community — making up about 26% of the total student population. In certain programs, like public policy, business, and law, that number is even say the Trump administration's actions are part of a broader effort to pressure elite universities into changing campus policies related to protests, admissions, and academic hiring. Supporters argue that the government is simply holding institutions accountable. Either way, Harvard believes it's being unfairly targeted, and the courts are now playing a key role in deciding what comes next.(With AP inputs)Tune InMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Spy chief flip-flop? After Trump's 2nd rebuke over Iran intel, Tulsi Gabbard shifts tone
File photo of Tulsi Gabbard and US President Donald Trump A rare and public fracture has emerged within the highest levels of the US national security establishment, as director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Saturday revised her stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions, hours after being directly contradicted by President Donald Trump. In a striking turn, Gabbard posted on X that her earlier testimony to Congress, where she said that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, had been taken "out of context." She acknowledged that US intelligence now believes Iran could have a nuclear weapon "within weeks to months" if it decides to finalise assembly. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," Gabbard wrote. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." Her statement came after a sharp rebuke from President Trump, who told reporters Friday, "She is wrong," in response to her previous assertion that Iran is not actively building a nuclear weapon. The president had earlier dismissed her analysis outright, saying, "I don't care what she says," during a press interaction earlier in the week. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The disagreement comes at a particularly sensitive moment, as the White House weighs its strategic posture in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict. Trump's public alignment with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long warned of Iran's nuclear capabilities, further highlights the rift within the administration. Despite the public back-and-forth, officials within the administration have attempted to downplay the tension. They emphasised that uranium enrichment by Iran does bring it closer to a weapons threshold, even if the final steps toward weaponisation have not been confirmed. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the intelligence community's assessment has not undergone a fundamental change. According to the source, spy agencies still believe that Iran would need up to three years to develop a deliverable nuclear warhead capable of striking a target.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why Harvard is now willing to negotiate with Trump after months of legal and financial warfare
Why Harvard is negotiating with Trump after months of US legal and funding clashes After months of fierce legal battles and deep financial strain, Harvard University has reopened negotiations with the Trump administration, signaling a potential turning point in one of the most high-profile confrontations between a US president and an academic institution. The renewed talks mark a sharp departure from Harvard's earlier posture, when it publicly resisted what it described as overreach and political interference by the federal government. The discussions resumed during a recent meeting at the White House, where Harvard representatives presented a PowerPoint outlining steps the university has taken to address concerns around antisemitism, viewpoint diversity, and admissions practices. In return, the White House issued a letter proposing specific actions Harvard must undertake for a resolution, as reported by the New York Times. Though the university has yet to respond formally, sources cited by the New York Times described the White House's tone as serious and the talks as active. A shift driven by mounting financial and legal pressure Harvard's decision to return to the negotiating table appears to be motivated by the growing toll of its standoff with the administration. The Trump government has already stripped billions in federal research funding from the university and launched a series of legal actions, including efforts to bar international students, who make up about a quarter of Harvard's student body. It also initiated an investigation under the False Claims Act and threatened the school's tax-exempt status, as detailed by the New York Times. Harvard officials, while publicly defiant, have been privately reassessing the university's future under continued federal pressure. According to the New York Times, university leaders now believe that prolonged conflict could make Harvard "far smaller and less ambitious." Despite having a $53 billion endowment, much of that capital is restricted, making the institution more financially vulnerable than it appears. Talks follow broader discontent and political signaling The university reportedly sought to reengage after Secretary of Education Linda McMahon raised the prospect of negotiations and after other university leaders encouraged Harvard to represent academia in dialogue with Washington. The Trump administration, according to the New York Times, hopes that a deal with Harvard could become a model for similar arrangements with other elite institutions. While the White House has targeted other universities, the fight with Harvard has been the most contentious. At one point, the administration demanded sweeping changes, including merit-based hiring and admissions, curbs on faculty influence, external reviews of diversity-related departments, and reporting obligations through 2028. Trump signals optimism while scrutiny looms President Trump hinted at an impending breakthrough on Truth Social, calling the prospective deal "mindbogglingly historic," and adding it would be "very good for our Country," as quoted by the New York Times. However, sources cautioned that a deal remains unlikely within the next week. As talks progress, both sides face scrutiny. Students, faculty, and alumni are expected to examine any agreement closely. "It would be a tragedy if Harvard resolved this in a way that gave support and encouragement to the idea of extralegal extortion," said former Harvard president Lawrence H. Summers, as quoted by the New York Times . Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
