Why Harvard is now willing to negotiate with Trump after months of legal and financial warfare
Why Harvard is negotiating with Trump after months of US legal and funding clashes
After months of fierce legal battles and deep financial strain, Harvard University has reopened negotiations with the Trump administration, signaling a potential turning point in one of the most high-profile confrontations between a US president and an academic institution.
The renewed talks mark a sharp departure from Harvard's earlier posture, when it publicly resisted what it described as overreach and political interference by the federal government.
The discussions resumed during a recent meeting at the White House, where Harvard representatives presented a PowerPoint outlining steps the university has taken to address concerns around antisemitism, viewpoint diversity, and admissions practices.
In return, the White House issued a letter proposing specific actions Harvard must undertake for a resolution, as reported by the New York Times. Though the university has yet to respond formally, sources cited by the New York Times described the White House's tone as serious and the talks as active.
A shift driven by mounting financial and legal pressure
Harvard's decision to return to the negotiating table appears to be motivated by the growing toll of its standoff with the administration.
The Trump government has already stripped billions in federal research funding from the university and launched a series of legal actions, including efforts to bar international students, who make up about a quarter of Harvard's student body. It also initiated an investigation under the False Claims Act and threatened the school's tax-exempt status, as detailed by the New York Times.
Harvard officials, while publicly defiant, have been privately reassessing the university's future under continued federal pressure.
According to the New York Times, university leaders now believe that prolonged conflict could make Harvard "far smaller and less ambitious." Despite having a $53 billion endowment, much of that capital is restricted, making the institution more financially vulnerable than it appears.
Talks follow broader discontent and political signaling
The university reportedly sought to reengage after Secretary of Education Linda McMahon raised the prospect of negotiations and after other university leaders encouraged Harvard to represent academia in dialogue with Washington.
The Trump administration, according to the New York Times, hopes that a deal with Harvard could become a model for similar arrangements with other elite institutions.
While the White House has targeted other universities, the fight with Harvard has been the most contentious. At one point, the administration demanded sweeping changes, including merit-based hiring and admissions, curbs on faculty influence, external reviews of diversity-related departments, and reporting obligations through 2028.
Trump signals optimism while scrutiny looms
President Trump hinted at an impending breakthrough on Truth Social, calling the prospective deal "mindbogglingly historic," and adding it would be "very good for our Country," as quoted by the New York Times. However, sources cautioned that a deal remains unlikely within the next week.
As talks progress, both sides face scrutiny. Students, faculty, and alumni are expected to examine any agreement closely. "It would be a tragedy if Harvard resolved this in a way that gave support and encouragement to the idea of extralegal extortion," said former Harvard president Lawrence H. Summers, as quoted by the
New York Times
.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump Got Iran's "Sleeper Cell" Threat At G7, Then Ordered Strikes: Report
In the days leading up to the US' surprise military strike on Tehran's three nuclear sites, Iran warned it would activate sleeper cell attacks on American soil if the operation went ahead, according to a report by NBC News. The threat was reportedly delivered directly to President Donald Trump through an intermediary during the G7 summit in Canada last week. Trump, who left the summit early on June 16 citing "operational security," said at the time that he preferred to be "on the scene" in Washington as tensions between Iran and Israel escalated, as per CNN. Two US officials and a source familiar with the situation told NBC that Iran's private message warned of possible terror attacks inside the US, executed by dormant sleeper cells if the US proceeded with the strike. On Saturday night, Trump gave the green light for strikes on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, later describing the mission as "a spectacular military success." Sleeper cells are understood to be covert operatives who remain inactive until they receive orders to carry out terror attacks or sabotage. US officials have not confirmed whether any specific threats have materialised following the operation. Trump earlier vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to American officials. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that Israel was now "close" to eliminating Iran's nuclear capabilities. As tensions remain high, a new bulletin from the National Terrorism Advisory System warns of a "heightened threat environment in the United States." The bulletin cites the increased risk of low-level cyberattacks by pro-Iranian hacktivists and potential cyber operations by Iranian state actors. The ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, the bulletin warns, could spur violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators. "The ongoing Israel-Iran conflict brings the possibility of increased threat to the homeland," said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, citing cyberattacks, acts of violence, and antisemitic hate crimes.
NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
Iran Launches Missiles Towards US Air Base In Qatar
Iran on Monday fired missiles aimed at an American base in Qatar, the largest strategic asset of the US army in the West Asia region, in retaliation to the attack ordered on its nuclear sites by US President Donald Trump over the weekend. Trump is currently in the Situation Room monitoring the Iranian retaliation. Iran had issued threats to retaliate against the United States after Washington dropped 30,000-pound bunker-busters on the country's underground nuclear installations over the weekend, while President Donald Trump openly raised the possibility of the Iranian government being toppled. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow as Tehran sought backing from one of its last major power friends for its next steps. Earlier on Monday, Israel struck a jail for political prisoners in Tehran in a potent demonstration that it was expanding its targets beyond military and nuclear sites to aim squarely at the pillars of Iran's ruling system. A few hours ago, the US embassy in Qatar told US citizens they should shelter in place "until further notice". The short statement did not go into any specific detail, but said the alert had been issued "out of an abundance of caution". Qatar has temporarily closed its airspace, forcing planes to divert away from Doha - one of the world's busiest airports. In a post on social media, Qatar said this is part of a set of precautionary measures being taken based on developments in the region. The Indian Embassy in Doha has issued an advisory for its citizens in Qatar and said, "In view of the ongoing situation, Indian community in Qatar is urged to be cautious and remains indoors. Please remain calm and follow local news, instructions and guidance provides by Qatari authorities. The Embassy will also keep updating through our social media channels."
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Will deal and diplomacy save India's oil interests? Experts weigh in
As the conflict between Iran and Israel escalates after Trump's entry, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has emphasised that there's no cause for alarm and reaffirmed India's preparedness and diplomatic outreach to prevent further will deal and diplomacy save India's oil interest? What are India's options? Watch as experts explore India's energy and security interests, its potential role as mediator, and relations with Western nations amid sanctions on Iran. The show also covers Congress MP Shashi Tharoor's recent praise for Prime Minister Modi's diplomacy, calling him a 'prime asset for India on the global stage', which has caused controversy within the Congress party.
