logo
Mali's junta tightens grip after five years of military rule – DW – 06/17/2025

Mali's junta tightens grip after five years of military rule – DW – 06/17/2025

DW2 days ago

When General Assimi Goita seized power in 2020, many hoped it would bring positive change to Mali, a country grappling with jihadist attacks and an economic crisis. What has actually happened in the past five years?
In 2020 and 2021, General Assimi Goita siezed power of Mali, bringing the country under military rule. Elections scheduled for February 2024 were postponed due to "technical reasons," including issues related to the adoption of a new constitution and a review of electoral lists. A new date has not been announced.
In June 2025, the National Transitional Council approved a bill granting Goita an additional five-year term, extending his presidency until at least 2030.
Stalled fight against Islamist rebels
One of the main justifications for the coup was to improve the nation's security amid a growing number of jihadist attacks. However, this plan has not worked, said Ahmed Ould Abdallah, president of the Sahel Sahara Center for Security Strategies.
"Not only has terrorism not disappeared, it is actually increasing and becoming more intense. It no longer affects only the north and center of the country, but also the south toward Sikasso, and the Kayes region in the west," he told DW.
In early June 2025, several Malian army positions were attacked by the al-Qaeda-affiliated Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims, known as JNIM. At least 30 people were killed in the attack on a camp. In September 2024, JNIM succeeded in attacking Bamako and occupied the airport for several hours. In July 2024, heavy fighting took place in the town of Tinzaouatene near the Algerian border. Tuareg separatists inflicted heavy losses on the Malian army and the Russian-backed Wagner Group.
What's driving Russia's ambitious push into Africa?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Fousseyni Ouattara, vice president of the Defense and Security Commission of Mali's transitional parliament, the National Transitional Council, told DW he blames "invisible hands" for the recent attacks, without offering a specific explanation.
He claims that Mali is in control of its territory.
"There is no doubt that the situation has improved compared to four years ago," he said. "Today, we are acting with full sovereignty. The capture of Kidal shows that there has been a major change."
In November 2023, the Malian Armed Forces, with the help of Wagner Group mercenaries, recaptured the northern city of Kidal from the CSP rebel alliance.
The Ministry of Defense's 2025 budget is 485 billion CFA francs (about $858 million), accounting for nearly 20% of the national budget. Some voices feel it's disproportionate.
"At some point, you have to negotiate," Yoyana Baniara, a former judge and politician in Chad, told DW. "If you put a larger portion of resources into war, you put the country in a difficult economic situation."
Dissolution of political parties, suppression of free speech in Mali
In May 2025, the Malian authorities decided to dissolve all political parties. Many, including Sidylamine Bagayoko, professor of anthropology at the University of Bamako, feel it was the wrong move. "It is political debate that enriches the diversity of discussions and opinions so that the country can move forward," says Bagayoko. Since Mali had close to 300 political parties, many agreed that the system was in need of reform. But such an extreme decision, according to Ulf Laessing, director of the Sahel regional office for the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Bamako, amounts to an "abolition of the opposition."
May 3, 2025: Pro-junta demonstrators in Bamako chant slogans as opposing political parties protest against their dissolution Image: AFP
Indeed, opposition voices seem to come increasingly under threat. The opportunities to freely express one's opinion in Mali have deteriorated over the past five years, said Claus-Dieter König, head of the West Africa office of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (RLS) in Dakar.
"Goita is becoming a dictatorial ruler. Opposition members live in fear of being arrested. Radio stations have been banned and it is more difficult to obtain licenses," König says.
Journalists in the country feel pressure not to write about army losses in the fight against jihadists or about Russian mercenaries, say experts,
Oppression in every corner
Several pro-democracy activists have recently been detained in Mali. According to Human Rights Watch, two opposition leaders who took part in protests in early May have disappeared. Research by the journalist consortium Forbidden Stories found that Malian civilians have been arbitrarily arrested, kidnapped, and tortured in secret prisons. They say Mali's army and the Wagner Group are behind this. Government member Fousseyni Ouattara rejects such accusations: "In Mali, our prisons are open to everyone. Anyone can visit them. No one is arbitrarily arrested," he told DW.
Mali's academic sector is also under threat, says professor Sidylamine Bagayoko: "From 2020 to the present, we have seen several academics imprisoned. As a result, other intellectuals who want to write about restrictions on freedoms, or express their opinions about it. remain cautious."
Assimi Goita took control of Mali through two coups Image: AP Photo/picture alliance
However, despite concerns related to freedom of expression, the current regime still has many supporters, said Laessing. 'I do believe that the predominantly young population still supports the government because they did not want a return to the old elites, who, although elected, were considered corrupt and very close to France.'
Fighting corruption while Mali's economy struggles
When it comes to corruption, some observers are cautiously optimistic.
"In the population survey we conduct annually, respondents say they see an improvement," says Svenja Bode, resident representative of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's Mali office in Bamako.
In 2021, about 90% of respondents said they believed corruption in Mali was very high. This figure has fallen to 58% according to this year's survey which was released in May. Yet regardless of whether or not such perceptions are accurate, it is clear that the government has taken some steps towards reducing corruption — and made sure they were covered by the media, said Bode.
Yet fighting corruption is one thing; improving everyday life is another. 'I don't yet see the major economic progress that will ultimately translate into better living conditions,' said Claus‑Dieter König of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
Mali recently introduced an unpopular new tax on mobile communications and mobile‑money transfers.
Explainer: What the German troop withdrawal from Mali means
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Education initiatives suffer
Meanwhile, power shortages remain a serious problem, and the cost of living has risen sharply due to inflation linked in part to Russia's war in Ukraine, which has driven up the cost of materials worldwide.
"Mali imports everything from gasoline to grain, is heavily dependent on the world market and has no access to the coast,' said Ulf Laessing of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
At the same time, experts such as Laessing say Western countries, including France, are suspending their work in Mali as Russia becomes more involved. The shift is negatively affecting education initiatives.
Laessing said he spoke with Malian participants at an education conference in Tunisia who told him that although there are many initiatives and plans, few are implemented.
Reliou Koubakin and Etienne Gatanazi contributed to this article. It was edited by Sarah Hucal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Israelis view the conflict with Iran – DW – 06/20/2025
How Israelis view the conflict with Iran – DW – 06/20/2025

DW

time4 hours ago

  • DW

How Israelis view the conflict with Iran – DW – 06/20/2025

As people in Israel wait out repeated missile attacks, some wonder how the conflict with Iran will impact the war in Gaza and the fate of hostages still held there. In one of Tel Aviv's underground bomb shelters — little more than a narrow corridor with thick walls — time seemed to stand still. There was no internet connection to get any information about the explosions heard outside, as exchanges of fire between Israel and Iran continue. "We can make the distinction by now what is an interception or a hit, but obviously you worry about how close it is or if someone you know might be in danger," said Lior, a young Israeli man who declined to give his surname, who was trying in vain to find reception on his phone. Since Israel attacked Iran a week ago, life in Tel Aviv has been dictated by the rhythm of phone alerts issued by Israel's Home Front Command and air raid sirens warning of incoming ballistic missiles from Iran. On Thursday morning, Iran launched another missile barrage at Israel. While most were intercepted by Israel's defense systems, some hit buildings in the city of Holon and the Tel Aviv suburb of Ramat Gan, as well as the Soroka Hospital in Beer Sheba in southern Israel, leaving a trail of destruction in the surgical ward. Israeli media reported that the complex had been evacuated the previous day. Israel: Hospital in the south hit after Iran missile attack To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'A very strange and unsettling time' Alerts come at any time, and it can take some time for the all-clear. "Life must go on, and we've been through many other crises, but this is certainly a very strange and unsettling time," Lior told DW. When another alert was recently triggered in the early morning hours, one of the missiles evaded the defense systems and hit a building just a kilometer (0.6 miles) away. The shelter shook from the impact, leaving people gasping. "It's scary. We understand that the missiles are deadlier and that the situation feels different from previous conflicts. I wonder how long this can go on for. People are already on edge from not sleeping most nights," said Shira, who also declined to give her last name. Many in Israel are scared by the attacks from Iran, but they also said 'life must go on' Image: Tania Krämer/DW Netanyahu eyes his legacy after October 7 attacks For Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran is the greatest threat to Israel's security. Iran insists that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, but Netanyahu believes it serves military purposes. Iran's leadership has vowed to annihilate Israel and its people, and Iran y also poses a threat through its ballistic missiles and its many proxies in the region. Netanyahu had threatened for years to attack Iran and reportedly came close it several times, but in the end, a larger conflict was always avoided. Instead, Israel fought a so-called "shadow war" against Iran through cyberattacks, rhetorical threats and against the many pro-Iranian proxies in the region, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza and the Houthis in Yemen. But all this had changed last Friday June 13. "For many years [Netanyahu] chickened out. He was not really ready to take up steps that may end up with fatalities and destruction. So what happened now?" Akiva Eldar, a veteran Israeli journalist and commentator, told DW. Like other analysts, Eldar believes Netanyahu has to recover from "his "legacy" of the 7 October massacres. Some analysts believe Israeli Prime Minister Benjami Netanyahu wants to reestablish himself as a guarantor of Israeli security Image: Marc Israel Sellem/POOL/IMAGO Until 7 October, 2023, Netanyahu had presented himself as the ultimate safeguard of Israel's security. But this image was shattered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking another 251 hostage in what has been described by many as the country's worst security failure. This also triggered the war in Gaza, where some 55,000 Palestinians have been killed since Israeli's war on Hamas began, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Widespread Israeli support for attacks on Iran Netanyahu's domestic critics accuse him of not wanting to end the war in Gaza and of failing to agree to a new deal with the Hamas militant group that would secure the release of the remaining hostages in exchange for a ceasefire. But his far-right coalition partners threatened to leave the coalition and trigger early elections if he ended the war without toppling Hamas. In light of his corruption trial, critics also accuse Netanyahu of using the war as a means of maintaining his hold on power. Following last week's attacks on Iran, which were widely praised on Israeli television broadcasts, Netanyahu appears to have corrected some of his failures. There is broad support among Jewish Israelis for the strikes in Iran. Some 83% back Israel's military operations and express their confidence in Israel's security institutions and preparedness for a prolonged conflict. That's according to an opinion poll conducted this week by Tel Aviv University and the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. A recent study shows broad support among Israelis for the attacks on Iran Image: Matan Golan/ZUMA Press Wire/IMAGO In contrast, the majority of Palestinian Israeli citizens said they opposed the strikes and favored diplomacy over military action. In Ramat Gan, a suburb of Tel Aviv, Ronny Arnon looked at the widespread damage in his neighborhood in disbelief. A missile breached the defense system and hit a building, killing one person. "I am in the minority here, so many people are supportive," Arnon told DW on Saturday at the start of the Israel-Iran conflict. "Our prime minister is called the magician, because he knows how to make a show, how we are winning and beat all our enemies. We started a fire we don't know how to end." A window of opportunity One of the factors that paved the way for the attack was Israel's systematic weakening of Iran's regional proxies over the past months, analysts say. During the last direct exchange of fire between Iran and Israel in October 2024, Israel claimed to have struck vital air defense systems, reducing Iran's defense capabilities and creating an opportunity to attack. In December, the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, another Iranian ally, was overthrown. Israeli military officials told DW this provided Israel the aerial freedom of movement it needed and paved the way for its air force to strike Iran. All eyes are now on US President Donald Trump, who is said to be considering whether the United States will engage alongside Israel in military action in Iran. Israel's attack on Iran: Dragging Trump into the conflict? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Although Trump had advised Netanyahu against resorting to military action, he has since changed his tune. This is despite the fact that his administration had pursued negotiations with Iran, mediated by Oman, regarding Irannuclear program. On Tuesday, Trump said that the US would not kill Ayatollah Khamenei "for now," but demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender." "[Netanyahu] feels comfortable that he can also drag Trump into this war," Eldar said. "And what will be remembered? Netanyahu will be the Israeli leader who saved us from another Holocaust," referring to the stated goals of Iran's leadership that Israel should be destroyed. Hostages and the war in Gaza But Israel also fighting on another front: The war in Gaza. In Tel Aviv's central Dizengoff Square on Wednesday, a small group of protesters held up large photos of the remaining Israeli hostages held in Gaza. Among them was the mother of Matan Angrest, a soldier who was taken hostage on October 7. "When the war in Iran began, we were really afraid our precious one, my son, will be forgotten there in Gaza, his situation is bad, his life is in danger," Anat Angrest told DW. "But a few hours later, I got a lot of messages from many Israelis that they felt that with the success in Iran, this will help to bring [the hostages] back." Protesters in Tev Aviv call for the release of Israelis held kidnapped by Hamas in Gaza Image: Tania Krämer/DW Angrest is critical of Netanyahu's government for not doing enough to bring her son and the other hostages home sooner. But she believes that a weakened Iran will lead to less support for Hamas and to the end of the war in Gaza. "We hope that the decision to act now is connected to Gaza; that it is part of a strategic plan and that the Israeli government will finally be able to end the war in Gaza," Angrest told DW. "Because when we take out the leaders of the terrorists, Iran, we can finish what we started in Gaza, and we won't be in danger anymore." Edited by: Sean Sinico

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store