How Israelis view the conflict with Iran – DW – 06/20/2025
As people in Israel wait out repeated missile attacks, some wonder how the conflict with Iran will impact the war in Gaza and the fate of hostages still held there.
In one of Tel Aviv's underground bomb shelters — little more than a narrow corridor with thick walls — time seemed to stand still.
There was no internet connection to get any information about the explosions heard outside, as exchanges of fire between Israel and Iran continue.
"We can make the distinction by now what is an interception or a hit, but obviously you worry about how close it is or if someone you know might be in danger," said Lior, a young Israeli man who declined to give his surname, who was trying in vain to find reception on his phone.
Since Israel attacked Iran a week ago, life in Tel Aviv has been dictated by the rhythm of phone alerts issued by Israel's Home Front Command and air raid sirens warning of incoming ballistic missiles from Iran.
On Thursday morning, Iran launched another missile barrage at Israel. While most were intercepted by Israel's defense systems, some hit buildings in the city of Holon and the Tel Aviv suburb of Ramat Gan, as well as the Soroka Hospital in Beer Sheba in southern Israel, leaving a trail of destruction in the surgical ward. Israeli media reported that the complex had been evacuated the previous day.
Israel: Hospital in the south hit after Iran missile attack
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
'A very strange and unsettling time'
Alerts come at any time, and it can take some time for the all-clear.
"Life must go on, and we've been through many other crises, but this is certainly a very strange and unsettling time," Lior told DW.
When another alert was recently triggered in the early morning hours, one of the missiles evaded the defense systems and hit a building just a kilometer (0.6 miles) away.
The shelter shook from the impact, leaving people gasping.
"It's scary. We understand that the missiles are deadlier and that the situation feels different from previous conflicts. I wonder how long this can go on for. People are already on edge from not sleeping most nights," said Shira, who also declined to give her last name.
Many in Israel are scared by the attacks from Iran, but they also said 'life must go on' Image: Tania Krämer/DW
Netanyahu eyes his legacy after October 7 attacks
For Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran is the greatest threat to Israel's security. Iran insists that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, but Netanyahu believes it serves military purposes. Iran's leadership has vowed to annihilate Israel and its people, and Iran y also poses a threat through its ballistic missiles and its many proxies in the region.
Netanyahu had threatened for years to attack Iran and reportedly came close it several times, but in the end, a larger conflict was always avoided. Instead, Israel fought a so-called "shadow war" against Iran through cyberattacks, rhetorical threats and against the many pro-Iranian proxies in the region, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza and the Houthis in Yemen.
But all this had changed last Friday June 13.
"For many years [Netanyahu] chickened out. He was not really ready to take up steps that may end up with fatalities and destruction. So what happened now?" Akiva Eldar, a veteran Israeli journalist and commentator, told DW.
Like other analysts, Eldar believes Netanyahu has to recover from "his "legacy" of the 7 October massacres.
Some analysts believe Israeli Prime Minister Benjami Netanyahu wants to reestablish himself as a guarantor of Israeli security Image: Marc Israel Sellem/POOL/IMAGO
Until 7 October, 2023, Netanyahu had presented himself as the ultimate safeguard of Israel's security. But this image was shattered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking another 251 hostage in what has been described by many as the country's worst security failure.
This also triggered the war in Gaza, where some 55,000 Palestinians have been killed since Israeli's war on Hamas began, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.
Widespread Israeli support for attacks on Iran
Netanyahu's domestic critics accuse him of not wanting to end the war in Gaza and of failing to agree to a new deal with the Hamas militant group that would secure the release of the remaining hostages in exchange for a ceasefire.
But his far-right coalition partners threatened to leave the coalition and trigger early elections if he ended the war without toppling Hamas. In light of his corruption trial, critics also accuse Netanyahu of using the war as a means of maintaining his hold on power.
Following last week's attacks on Iran, which were widely praised on Israeli television broadcasts, Netanyahu appears to have corrected some of his failures.
There is broad support among Jewish Israelis for the strikes in Iran. Some 83% back Israel's military operations and express their confidence in Israel's security institutions and preparedness for a prolonged conflict. That's according to an opinion poll conducted this week by Tel Aviv University and the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
A recent study shows broad support among Israelis for the attacks on Iran Image: Matan Golan/ZUMA Press Wire/IMAGO
In contrast, the majority of Palestinian Israeli citizens said they opposed the strikes and favored diplomacy over military action.
In Ramat Gan, a suburb of Tel Aviv, Ronny Arnon looked at the widespread damage in his neighborhood in disbelief. A missile breached the defense system and hit a building, killing one person.
"I am in the minority here, so many people are supportive," Arnon told DW on Saturday at the start of the Israel-Iran conflict.
"Our prime minister is called the magician, because he knows how to make a show, how we are winning and beat all our enemies. We started a fire we don't know how to end."
A window of opportunity
One of the factors that paved the way for the attack was Israel's systematic weakening of Iran's regional proxies over the past months, analysts say.
During the last direct exchange of fire between Iran and Israel in October 2024, Israel claimed to have struck vital air defense systems, reducing Iran's defense capabilities and creating an opportunity to attack.
In December, the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, another Iranian ally, was overthrown.
Israeli military officials told DW this provided Israel the aerial freedom of movement it needed and paved the way for its air force to strike Iran.
All eyes are now on US President Donald Trump, who is said to be considering whether the United States will engage alongside Israel in military action in Iran.
Israel's attack on Iran: Dragging Trump into the conflict?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Although Trump had advised Netanyahu against resorting to military action, he has since changed his tune. This is despite the fact that his administration had pursued negotiations with Iran, mediated by Oman, regarding Irannuclear program.
On Tuesday, Trump said that the US would not kill Ayatollah Khamenei "for now," but demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender."
"[Netanyahu] feels comfortable that he can also drag Trump into this war," Eldar said. "And what will be remembered? Netanyahu will be the Israeli leader who saved us from another Holocaust," referring to the stated goals of Iran's leadership that Israel should be destroyed.
Hostages and the war in Gaza
But Israel also fighting on another front: The war in Gaza.
In Tel Aviv's central Dizengoff Square on Wednesday, a small group of protesters held up large photos of the remaining Israeli hostages held in Gaza.
Among them was the mother of Matan Angrest, a soldier who was taken hostage on October 7.
"When the war in Iran began, we were really afraid our precious one, my son, will be forgotten there in Gaza, his situation is bad, his life is in danger," Anat Angrest told DW.
"But a few hours later, I got a lot of messages from many Israelis that they felt that with the success in Iran, this will help to bring [the hostages] back."
Protesters in Tev Aviv call for the release of Israelis held kidnapped by Hamas in Gaza Image: Tania Krämer/DW
Angrest is critical of Netanyahu's government for not doing enough to bring her son and the other hostages home sooner.
But she believes that a weakened Iran will lead to less support for Hamas and to the end of the war in Gaza.
"We hope that the decision to act now is connected to Gaza; that it is part of a strategic plan and that the Israeli government will finally be able to end the war in Gaza," Angrest told DW.
"Because when we take out the leaders of the terrorists, Iran, we can finish what we started in Gaza, and we won't be in danger anymore."
Edited by: Sean Sinico
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Iran-Israel war: Will India need to pick a side? – DW – 06/20/2025
The escalating conflict in the Middle East presents India with tough choices — balancing energy security, economic stability and its delicate diplomacy between Israel and Iran. India maintains amicable relations with both Israel and Iran, which is the result of a delicate balancing act stretching back many years. Now, New Delhi finds itself in a precarious position as the Israel-Iran conflict seems to be escalating into a broader confrontation with mounting death tolls and rising uncertainty. India's diplomatic tightrope Over the last decade, India has strengthened ties with Israel, particularly in defense and technology. India has acquired advanced weaponry, including Barak 8 defense missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), loitering munitions and sophisticated radar systems. In last month's short-lived conflict between India and Pakistan, New Delhi reportedly utilized various Israeli-origin weapons, underscoring the importance of the strategic defense partnership. At the same time, India values its historical and cultural connections with Iran, as well as its strategic role in regional connectivity, energy security, and geopolitical balance. Tehran is also New Delhi's second-largest supplier of crude oil. Israeli civilian sites hit by barrage of Iranian missiles To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Importantly, Iran acts as India's gateway to Afghanistan and Central Asia. The Chabahar Port project on the Gulf of Oman, developed jointly by India and Iran, is central to this strategy, providing India with direct access to this region while bypassing Pakistan. Shanthie Mariet D'Souza, a regional expert monitoring current events, said that "India needs to maintain its balancing act to protect its security ties with Israel and protect its strategic interests and economic commitment to the Chabahar Port." "With such contrasting objectives, strategic ambiguity serves the purpose of India being dragged into the conflict, which is bound to widen if the war drags on," D'Souza, founder of the Mantraya Institute for Strategic Studies, told DW. Safeguarding New Delhi's interests Last week, India's Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement expressing deep concern at the recent developments between Iran and Israel. "India urges both sides to avoid any escalatory steps. Existing channels of dialogue and diplomacy should be utilised to work towards a de-escalation of the situation and resolving underlying issues," said the statement. "India enjoys close and friendly relations with both countries and stands ready to extend all possible support," it added. Sticking to its policy of strategic ambiguity and nonalignment, India distanced itself from a recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) statement denouncing Israel's attacks on Iran. The SCO is a 10-member bloc created by China and Russia to counter the Western-led global is also a SCO member, despite its regional rivalry with China. Responding to the escalation between Israel and Iran, the SCO expressed "serious concern" and strongly condemned the Israeli military strikes. Indians seek jobs in Israel amid high unemployment To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video P R Kumaraswamy, a professor of Middle Eastern studies specializing in Israeli politics at Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, told DW that India's strategic silence on the Israel-Iran conflict, mirrored by its decisive refusal to endorse the SCO, reflects a "calculated, nuanced and matured approach" rooted in its national interests and geopolitical balancing. "This approach, akin to its neutrality during the Ukraine-Russia war, also recognizes the sentiments in several Arab capitals as they are caught between Israeli actions and a nuclear Iran as their neighbor," said Kumaraswamy. "Strategic autonomy can also be pursued through calculated and minimalist responses without any rhetorical declarations." D'Souza, however, said such a policy will be useful as long as the conflict between Israel and Iran is short. "If it drags on, every move of India will be analyzed and assessed, and its impartiality will be tested, which will be a test case for India's diplomacy," she said. "It will come under pressure if the conflict prolongs. However, being a votary of diplomacy and dialogue is a prudent policy that will maintain India's principle of non-alignment," she added. Will India's hand be forced? Earlier this week, India launched "Operation Sindhu" to evacuate Indian nationals, starting with 110 Indian students from northern Iran. These students were assisted in crossing into Armenia by road under the supervision of Indian diplomats. Iranians protest Israeli strikes To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Following the successful evacuation from Iran, India extended the operation to include its nationals in Israel. Indian citizens who wish to leave Israel are being evacuated through land borders and then brought to India by air, according to India's Foreign Ministry. Former diplomat Anil Wadhwa said India would resist the pressure to take a clear side in the conflict unless New Delhi's vital interests like energy, connectivity, or security, are directly threatened. "Strategic autonomy has been prioritized by India. In the Middle East itself, opinions are divided over Iranian nuclear activities. India, therefore, works on a bilateral basis with its Middle East partners to develop trust and enhance its interests," Wadhwa told DW. "India will not want to be drawn into bloc-based confrontations. It is building trust through tailored partnerships," he added. Edited by: Keith Walker
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Iran-Israel conflict: Will India need to pick a side? – DW – 06/20/2025
The escalating conflict in the Middle East presents India with tough choices — balancing energy security, economic stability and its delicate diplomacy between Israel and Iran. India maintains amicable relations with both Israel and Iran, which is the result of a delicate balancing act stretching back many years. Now, New Delhi finds itself in a precarious position as the Israel-Iran conflictseems to be escalating into a broader confrontation with mounting death tolls and rising uncertainty. India's diplomatic tightrope Over the last decade, India has strengthened ties with Israel, particularly in defense and technology. India has acquired advanced weaponry, including Barak 8 defense missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), loitering munitions and sophisticated radar systems. In last month's short-lived conflict between India and Pakistan, New Delhi reportedly utilized various Israeli-origin weapons, underscoring the importance of the strategic defense partnership. At the same time, India values its historical and cultural connections with Iran, as well as its strategic role in regional connectivity, energy security, and geopolitical balance. Tehran is also New Delhi's second-largest supplier of crude oil. Israeli civilian sites hit by barrage of Iranian missiles To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Importantly, Iran acts as India's gateway to Afghanistan and Central Asia. The Chabahar Port project on the Gulf of Oman, developed jointly by India and Iran, is central to this strategy, providing India with direct access to this region while bypassing Pakistan. Shanthie Mariet D'Souza, a regional expert monitoring current events, said that "India needs to maintain its balancing act to protect its security ties with Israel and protect its strategic interests and economic commitment to the Chabahar Port." "With such contrasting objectives, strategic ambiguity serves the purpose of India being dragged into the conflict, which is bound to widen if the war drags on," D'Souza, founder of the Mantraya Institute for Strategic Studies, told DW. Safeguarding New Delhi's interests Last week, India's Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement expressing deep concern at the recent developments between Iran and Israel. "India urges both sides to avoid any escalatory steps. Existing channels of dialogue and diplomacy should be utilised to work towards a de-escalation of the situation and resolving underlying issues," said the statement. "India enjoys close and friendly relations with both countries and stands ready to extend all possible support," it added. Sticking to its policy of strategic ambiguity and nonalignment, India distanced itself from a recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) statement denouncing Israel's attacks on Iran. The SCO is a 10-member bloc created by China and Russia to counter the Western-led global is also a SCO member, despite its regional rivalry with China. Responding to escalation between Israel and Iran, the SCO expressed "serious concern" and strongly condemned the Israeli military strikes. Indians seek jobs in Israel amid high unemployment To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video P R Kumaraswamy, a professor of Middle Eastern studies specializing in Israeli politics at Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, told DW that India's strategic silence on the Israel-Iran conflict, mirrored by its decisive refusal to endorse the SCO, reflects a "calculated, nuanced and matured approach" rooted in its national interests and geopolitical balancing. "This approach, akin to its neutrality during the Ukraine-Russia war, also recognizes the sentiments in several Arab capitals as they are caught between Israeli actions and a nuclear Iran as their neighbor," said Kumaraswamy. "Strategic autonomy can also be pursued through calculated and minimalist responses without any rhetorical declarations." D'Souza, however, said such a policy will be useful as long as the conflict between Israel and Iran is short. "If it drags on, every move of India will be analyzed and assessed, and its impartiality will be tested which will be a test case for India's diplomacy," she said. "It will come under pressure if the conflict prolongs. However, being a votary of diplomacy and dialogue is a prudent policy that will maintain India's principle of non-alignment," she added. Will India's hand be forced? Earlier this week, India launched "Operation Sindhu" to evacuate Indian nationals, starting with 110 Indian students from northern Iran. These students were assisted in crossing into Armenia by road under the supervision of Indian diplomats. Iranians protest Israeli strikes To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Following the successful evacuation from Iran, India extended the operation to include its nationals in Israel. Indian citizens who wish to leave Israel are being evacuated through land borders and then brought to India by air, according to India's Foreign Ministry. Former diplomat Anil Wadhwa said India would resist the pressure to take a clear side in the conflict unless New Delhi vital interests like energy, connectivity or security are directly threatened. "Strategic autonomy has been prioritized by India. In the Middle East itself, opinions are divided over Iranian nuclear activities. India, therefore, works on a bilateral basis with its Middle East partners to develop trust and enhance its interests," Wadhwa told DW. "India will not want to be drawn into bloc-based confrontations. It is building trust through tailored partnerships," he added. Edited by: Keith Walker
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
DW appoints Barbara Massing as new Director General – DW – 06/20/2025
Germany's international broadcaster will be headed by a woman for the first time, after the DW Broadcasting Council appointed Barbara Massing as new Director General. She will replace Peter Limbourg on October 1, 2025. German international broadcaster Deutsche Welle announced Friday that Barbara Massing will replace Peter Limbourg as the company's director general on October 1, 2025. "I am thrilled to appoint Barbara Massing as the next director general," said Karl Jüsten, chair of the DW Broadcasting Council and its selection committee. "She brings not only top-tier leadership and journalistic expertise but also the strategic foresight needed to position Deutsche Welle for long-term success in a challenging global media environment." As managing director for Business Administration, Massing has been key to expanding DW programming as well as streamlining the organization, said Jüsten, who emphasized that she "is exactly the leader Deutsche Welle needs to strengthen its role as a trusted, independent global voice for democracy and freedom." Achim Dercks, deputy director of DW's Advisory Board, also praised Massing's success in expanding and restructuring DW activities and pledged to work alongside her to insure that DW "remains a relevant voice in the world, providing people with free information" in what he described as "geopolitically challenging times." Massing thanked the council for its trust in her leadership and for the opportunity to help shape DW's future. "Fact-based, reliable journalism is our most valuable asset and it is more important now, in times of AI-manipulated content and disinformation, than it has ever been," said Massing on Friday. Massing's nomination was put forth after a unanimous decision by the Broadcasting Council's seven-member selection committee. Massing will replace outgoing Director General Peter Limbourg, who announced his retirement in September 2024, after holding the position since 2013. Barbara Massing will be first woman to lead DW A fully qualified lawyer, Massing joined DW in 2006 and became part of its Management Team in 2014 after previously working as a producer for German public broadcaster ARD and for the Franco-German broadcaster Arte. Massing, who holds, among others, positions on the advisory boards for the city of Bonn's International Beethovenfest and the University Hospital Bonn, will become the first woman to lead DW since its founding on May 3, 1953. During her career Massing has focused on digital transformation, organizational culture and sustainability. The director general is responsible for steering and coordinating DW's strategic and operational activities in close collaboration with its governing bodies. According to the DW Act, the director general must be elected via secret ballot by the Broadcasting Council for a term of six years. Re-election to the post is permitted, and a two-thirds majority is required for appointment. DW is Germany's independent international broadcaster and provides news and information in 32 languages around the world with TV, online and radio services reaching 320 million users every week and employs around 4,000 people from 140 different countries DW's work focuses on topics such as freedom and human rights, democracy and the rule of law, world trade and social justice, health education and environmental protection, technology and innovation.
