How to protect yourself from the bad air caused by Canada's wildfires

Plumes of smoke are blanketing large swaths of the U.S. and parts of Europe, which presents risks for those breathing it.
The Midwest, Northeast and Great Lakes regions of the U.S. have 'very unhealthy' air quality, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, and experts say people should take precautions.
What counts as bad air?
The EPA's Air Quality Index converts all pollutant levels into a single number. The lower the number, the better.
Anything below 50 is classified as 'healthy.' Fifty to 100 is 'moderate" while 100-150 is unhealthy for 'sensitive groups,' and anything above 150 is bad for everyone. The Air Quality Index was around 160 in many parts of the Upper Midwest on Wednesday.
Sensitive groups include people with asthma, lung disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, said Dr. Sanjay Sethi, chief of the division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at the University of Buffalo's medical school.
'If you have heart or lung problems, then you've got to be definitely more careful," Sethi said. "I would either avoid going outside or wear an N95 (mask) or at least a dust mask.'
Is my air unhealthy?
Sometimes the air is bad enough to see or smell the smoke. Even if you don't see the pollution, it can be unhealthy to breathe.
The EPA maintains a website with up-to-date, regional air quality information. PurpleAir, a company that sells air quality sensors and publishes real-time air quality data, has a citizen scientist, air quality monitoring network with a more granular map of street-by-street air quality readings.
The best way to get indoor air quality readings is to buy a monitor, said Joseph Allen, director of Harvard University's Healthy Buildings Program.
'You can find these low-cost, indoor air quality monitors just about everywhere online now. They don't cost all that much anymore,' he said.
What if I have to go outside?
For most people, going outside for just a short time won't have a negative long-term impact, said Sethi.
Wearing an N95 mask, which became common during the coronavirus pandemic, will help filter out the pollution.
'N95 is going to get rid of 90-95% of the particles,' said Jennifer Stowell, a research scientist at Boston University's Center for Climate and Health. 'If you have access to a mask that has a respirator-type attachment to it, then that's the very best.'
If you must be outside and you experience symptoms, experts say you should head indoors or somewhere else with better air quality. Even if you are healthy, it's good to take precautions.
"If you start wheezing, which is like this whistling sound of the chest, or if you're feeling short of breath, that's definitely more concerning,' Sethi said.
How do I make my air cleaner?
Close the windows and turn on the air conditioner, if you have one, setting it to circulate the indoor air. Use blankets to cover cracks that allow outside air into your home, such as under doors.
Finally, swapping the air conditioner's filter for a MERV 13 filter can help, though you should make sure it's installed correctly.
'If you happen to have access to an air purifier, even if it's just a room air purifier, try to keep it running and in the room that you're doing most of your activities in,' said Stowell.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

E&E News

3 hours ago

• E&E News

Power plant rollback could compel clampdown on other polluters

EPA's newly proposed rollback of stricter power industry air toxics regulations could carry a ricochet effect: states having to toughen controls on other pollution sources to meet required air quality goals, according to an in-house analysis released this week. Under the draft rule published Tuesday, the agency would scrap regulations updated last year primarily to tighten emission limits on mercury, arsenic and other hazardous metals from coal-fired power plants. But as a side benefit, those regulations were also expected to cut concentrations of smog and soot in parts of the United States, possibly including some that were flunking ambient air quality standards for one or both of those pollutants, the regulatory impact analysis says. Advertisement 'As these emissions reductions will not occur under this proposed repeal action, states may need to pursue emissions reductions from other sources to reach the standards, incurring costs for those sources,' the analysis says.

Miami Herald

14 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Tens of Thousands In California Told To Stay Indoors

Tens of thousands of people in southern California have been advised to remain indoors as "emergency" air quality conditions impact parts of the Coachella Valley on Friday. The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) AirNow map, which provides a real-time snapshot of air quality, shows that air pollution levels around Cathedral City and Thousands Palms are "very unhealthy" to "hazardous" on Friday morning. The warnings mean that the risk of negative health effects from air pollution is increased for everyone, not just vulnerable populations. Air pollution and extreme heat pose significant health risks to the general public, in particular for the young, seniors and vulnerable populations such as those with underlying respiratory or cardiovascular conditions. The EPA warns that the current air pollution levels can lead to serious health issues, including reduced lung function, severe respiratory symptoms including chest pain and aggravated coughs, and increased hospital admissions. The AirNow Map shows that a maroon warning - the highest category - is in force for Cathedral city, which has a population of more than 50,000 people. A "hazardous" maroon warning means that pollution levels are of "emergency conditions," and that "everyone is more likely to be affected," the AirNow website says. A "very unhealthy" purple warning - the second highest category - covers Desert Edge, Sky Valley, Thousand Palms and Sunair. AirNow says that the risk of health effects are "increased for everyone" in these areas. Meanwhile, red warnings are also in force in the Coachella Valley in Rancho Mirage and parts of Palm Desert, along with a large area along the California-Arizona border including Yuma. Red warnings mean that "some members of the general public may experience health effects; members of sensitive groups may experience more serious health effects." The EPA said that residents should stay inside wherever possible while the air quality is so poor. "Everyone: Avoid all physical activity outdoors. Sensitive groups: remain indoors and keep activity levels low. Follow tips for keep particle levels low indoors." It added: "The biggest health threat from smoke is from fine particles... [which] aggravate chronic heart and lung diseases - and even are linked to premature deaths in people with these conditions." Jonathan Grigg, professor of pediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University of London, told Newsweek previously: "There are very clear links between inhaling particles and earlier death from both respiratory and cardiovascular diseases." Air quality warnings are updated regularly by the EPA and National Weather Service. Residents in affected areas can access daily forecasts and health guidance via and local agencies, with officials providing current information as environmental conditions develop. Related Articles What Is A Heat Dome? Millions To Face Scorching Temperatures This WeekendRare Summer 'Winter' Storm To Strike With Two Feet of SnowUS Heat Wave Warnings: Live Tracker Maps 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Newsweek

15 hours ago

• Newsweek

Trump Considering Asbestos Ban Reversal Sparks Warning: 'Lives at Risk'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration will "reconsider" a ban on the use of asbestos in the U.S. that took a decades-long battle to be finalized, sparking concern among health advocates. "This is another attempt by industry, going back to when they blocked the first EPA asbestos ban in 1989, to allow for continued use of a deadly material responsible for some 40,000 U.S. deaths and some 250,000 worldwide deaths each year," Dr. Arthur L. Frank, a professor of public health and medicine at Drexel University, told Newsweek. "We know in some settings as little as one day of exposure can give some individuals cancer," he added. Newsweek has contacted the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) via email for comment. File photo: Workers begin the abatement and demolition of a property contaminated with asbestos in Michigan. File photo: Workers begin the abatement and demolition of a property contaminated with asbestos in Michigan. Conor Ralph/The Flint Journal- via AP Why It Matters Asbestos was used by building and construction industries for strengthening cement and plastics as well as for insulation, roofing, fireproofing and sound absorption. Since 2000, more research uncovered the health risks associated with the mineral, and it has been classified by various U.S. departments as a known human carcinogen. Exposure to asbestos is linked to more than 40,000 deaths in the U.S. each year, according to the EPA under the Biden administration. Chrysotile asbestos, also known as white asbestos, is banned in 50 countries because of its association with lung cancer, and in 2024, the Biden administration finalized its own ban, meaning the last type of asbestos used in or imported into the country would be prohibited. What To Know According to court documents filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the EPA said that the process of re-evaluating the ban would take about 30 months, delaying the implementation of the ban finalized by the Biden administration. The move was opposed by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, the court filings said. "Reconsidering the EPA's 2024 Chrysotile Asbestos Rule is deeply concerning," Linda Reinstein, president and co-founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told Newsweek. Reinstein lost her husband, Alan, to a type of lung cancer, mesothelioma, caused by asbestos. "While this rule was a landmark step under the Toxic Substances Control Act, it only banned one fiber—chrysotile—in six specific conditions of use," Reinstein added. "Now, due to litigation and political pressure, the EPA has signaled it may reverse core parts of the rule, including protections for chlorine and caustic soda manufacturing." The Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, within the EPA, will be investigating whether the Toxic Substances Control Act "went beyond what is necessary to eliminate the unreasonable risk and whether alternative measures—such as requiring permanent workplace protection measures—would eliminate the unreasonable risk." The Toxic Substances Control Act includes the Biden administration's plan to ban asbestos from use in the U.S. When the Biden administration announced its finalization of the ban in the summer of 2024, the EPA administrator at the time, Michael Regan said: "The science is clear—asbestos is a known carcinogen that has severe impacts on public health." However, Trump, in his 1997 book The Art of the Comeback, said that asbestos is "100 percent safe, once applied." "I believe that the movement against asbestos was led by the mob, because it was often mob-related companies that would do the asbestos removal," he added. In 2018, Uralasbest, one of the world's largest producers and sellers of asbestos, put Trump's face, along with the words "Approved by Donald Trump, 45th president of the United States," on some of its products, according to the Guardian. What People Are Saying Dr. Arthur L. Frank, a professor of public health and medicine at Drexel University, told Newsweek: "Although this partial ban went through proper procedures, to now come and claim, as their document states, 'no party would be prejudiced by the requested abeyance,' fails to recognize that putting off this ban will lead to unnecessary disease and death for some Americans going forward. The U.S. has not yet joined some 70 countries in the world, including all developed countries, in banning—and in all other cases totally banning—the use of all forms of asbestos. "While there is currently little import of much raw asbestos fiber, products containing asbestos such as friction products and roofing materials can still be bought and used. The U.S. should have a comprehensive and total ban on import and use and should see that proper disposal takes place for tons still in place. Because of the long latency to develop disease, even with such a ban, new cases of asbestos disease will still be seen 50 years from now." Linda Reinstein, president and co-founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told Newsweek: "This rollback is happening in the context of broader deregulatory actions by the Trump administration. Executive Orders 14303 and 13771, combined with EPA staffing cuts, will severely limit the agency's ability to evaluate and manage chemical risks. These changes threaten to dismantle science-based safeguards and delay action on a known carcinogen that kills 40,000 Americans annually. "There is no safe level of asbestos exposure. Only federal legislation can ensure a comprehensive and lasting ban. That's why the bipartisan 2025 Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now (ARBAN) Act is essential. It would ban all forms of asbestos, close dangerous loopholes and prevent further rollbacks." Senator Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, on Monday: "The Trump Administration's 'Polluters over People' agenda is once again threatening our health, this time undermining the chance for all Americans to have a future free of asbestos exposure. We know that asbestos is a killer, which is why it has been banned in more than 50 countries around the world. "The United States was starting to catch up, but the Trump EPA is delaying and rolling back this vital public health safeguard, undermining this progress. I will continue to explore all options—including legislation—to phase out all dangerous asbestos fibers and provide stronger protections for our health." What Happens Next While the EPA said, according to the court filings, it would need 30 months to review the legislation, it has requested that the court extend the suspension of the law for six months, subject to additional extension requests.