HHS probing hospital over firing of nurse who blew whistle on minors getting gender treatments
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is probing "a major pediatric teaching hospital" over the alleged firing of a nurse who sought a religious exemption to avoid administering puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children.
"The Department will robustly enforce federal laws protecting these courageous whistleblowers, including laws that protect healthcare professionals from being forced to violate their religious beliefs or moral convictions," Acting HHS OCR Director Anthony Archeval said in a statement.
While HHS has not confirmed the hospital's identity, it is believed to be Texas Children's Hospital (TCH) — the largest children's hospital in the U.S. — as the investigation follows whistleblower nurse Vanessa Sivadge's testimony on Capitol Hill. Sivadge first came forward publicly in June 2024 and was later fired in August 2024.
Dems Spar With Whistleblower Who Exposed Children's Hospital For Performing Trans Surgeries On Minors
Sivadge told lawmakers that she had witnessed "disturbing trends and concerning practices" relating to the treatment of children diagnosed with gender dysphoria. She also said that she "observed the powerful and irreversible effects" of treatments that patients were told were "lifesaving."
"I witnessed firsthand how doctors emotionally blackmailed parents by telling them that if they did not affirm their child's false identity, their child would harm themselves. In particular, I was saddened to see young girls suffering from profound mental health struggles like depression and anxiety, many of whom had also suffered sexual abuse or trauma, persuaded by doctors at Texas Children's that a hormone would resolve their gender confusion," Sivadge told lawmakers.
Read On The Fox News App
Hospitals Warned They Must Protect Children From Chemical And Surgical Mutilation: Hhs Agency Memo
Dr. Eithan Haim, who was accused of violating HIPAA while in surgical training at Baylor College of Medicine, which is affiliated with TCH, also blew the whistle on the hospital for "lying about the existence of its transgender program." The Biden DOJ brought charges against Haim for the alleged HIPAA violations, but the case was ultimately dropped under the Trump administration.
Haim claimed the hospital was engaging in fraudulent billing practices to hide the fact that it was carrying out transgender procedures on minors even though it was against Texas law. This included recording mastectomies as "breast reduction" surgeries and billing testosterone prescribed to a teen girl under a male diagnosis.
In her testimony, Sivadge said that federal agents came to her home when investigating the whistleblower, now known to be Haim, because of her objections to transgender medicine. She described the interaction as intimidating and said that one of the special agents "effectively asked me to compromise my Christian beliefs and made veiled threats regarding my career and safety if I didn't comply with their demands."
Sivadge's attorney filed a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on April 11, alleging that she "observed TCH doctors, after very little deliberation or critical analysis, embarking children on dangerous and often irreversible courses of 'gender-affirming' treatment."
According to the complaint, TCH "temporarily" paused "gender-affirming services" for minors after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in February 2022 that such treatments could constitute child abuse. The treatments were banned in the state following the passage of a bill in May 2023, which went into effect in September 2023. According to Sivadge's attorney, she asked to be transferred back to cardiology in May 2024, citing her religious beliefs.
Sivadge publicly blew the whistle on TCH on June 18, 2024, and was asked not to report to work the next day, according to the complaint. Just days later, on June 21, she was placed on administrative leave and was officially terminated in August 2024. TCH alleged that the termination of her employment was due to improper access to medical records.
On Jan. 28, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the "Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation" order, which prevents minors from undergoing transgender treatments. In accordance with this order, HHS has issued guidelines for prospective whistleblowers.
Fox News has reached out to TCH and HHS for comment.Original article source: HHS probing hospital over firing of nurse who blew whistle on minors getting gender treatments
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
a day ago
- Washington Post
Administration to phase out NIH support of HIV clinical guidelines
The National Institutes of Health's support for federal guidelines that steer the treatment of more than a million HIV patients in the United States will be phased out by next June, according to the agency's Office of AIDS Research, a move that troubled some doctors and raised questions about whether the guidelines themselves will change. It is unclear whether Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. plans to bring the guidance in line with his own controversial views about an infectious disease that 30 years ago was the leading cause of death for people 25 to 44 years old. The Office of AIDS Research, which is part of the National Institutes of Health, informed members of the panels responsible for the guidelines in a letter that, 'in the climate of budget decreases and revised priorities, OAR is beginning to explore options to transfer management of the guidelines to another agency within' HHS. The guidelines, detailed recommendations on how to diagnose and treat medical conditions, can affect what tests, treatments and medications are covered by insurance companies and Medicare, said Aniruddha Hazra, associate professor of medicine at University of Chicago Medicine. The lack of clarity in the letter caused some in the medical community to worry that switching oversight of the guidelines to another branch of HHS could be a first step by the Trump administration toward more drastic changes in the government's treatment recommendations. 'From a practical standpoint, it's monumental,' Hazra said of the news about the guidelines, which he called the basis for much of the knowledge about HIV. 'The loss of this kind of federal guidance throws everything into the dark,' he said. Hazra described the guidelines as a dynamic document that changes at least once or twice a year as new studies and scientific evidence come to light. Guidelines for HIV are divided into a half-dozen categories, including sets for adults/adolescents, pediatric patients, pregnant women and HIV patients who are displaced by natural disasters. The webpage listing the guidelines now says they are 'being updated to comply with Executive Orders,' raising the question of whether sections dealing with care for transgender people with HIV may be changed or eliminated. The letter sent to panel members did not say specifically if or how the clinical practice guidelines might change, only that 'Together, we now have an opportunity to develop a proactive, careful transition plan for each Panel.' The letter noted that 'a special session on guidelines sustainability planning' has been scheduled for Thursday with panel leadership and the Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council. Officials at NIH referred questions to the Department of Health and Human Services, which did not respond to emails requesting clarification of the letter. Kennedy has long espoused controversial views about HIV, suggesting that contrary to widely held medical belief, the virus was not the cause of AIDS. In a video posted on Twitter in 2023, Kennedy tells an audience, 'A hundred percent of the people who died at first, the first thousand who had AIDS, were people who were addicted to [a class of drugs called] poppers. … They were people who were part of a gay lifestyle. They were burning the candle at both ends, and they were taking a lot of injectable drugs.' Under Kennedy, HHS has terminated hundreds of millions of dollars in HIV-related research grants. The department closed its Office of Infectious Diseases & HIV Policy that coordinated the federal response to the virus. At the same time, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lost staff in its HIV prevention division who conducted studies and surveillance, ran health campaigns and supported local prevention programs. 'These guidelines serve as a reference for the world in addition to caring for people in the U.S.,' said Theodore Ruel, chief of the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, and co-chair of one of the panels responsible for the guidelines. 'It is disappointing that such a key guideline about HIV for children in the USA will no longer be supported by the NIH,' said Ruel — whose panel examines antiretroviral therapy for the medical management of children living with HIV — stressing that he was not speaking for the other panelists. 'I am concerned that we are unlikely to find a new home that can maintain the same depth, quality, access and capacity for real-time updating.' He expressed faith that the panelists would push to find a home for the guidelines where they can continue to offer 'science-driven support' for doctors and patients. James M. Sosman, medical director for UW Health's HIV Care and Prevention Program, who has been caring for people with the disease for decades, said that having the guidelines under the auspices of the Office of AIDS Research made sense. 'Would I look to move that? I'm reluctant because it's like, 'Hey, if you've got a guy that's hitting home runs at third base, don't move them to first base,'' Sosman said. 'I mean if it's working out, why are you disrupting this for costs that don't seem that great.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Medicare go-broke date pushed up three years in latest trustees report
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. A key trust fund underpinning Medicare's hospital benefit will go broke three years earlier than previously expected absent congressional action, threatening benefits for seniors, according to the Medicare trustees' annual report released Wednesday. The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund will be depleted in 2033, instead of 2036, as Medicare spending continues to outpace the program's income, the trustees — a group comprised of the HHS, Treasury and Labor secretaries, along with the Social Security commissioner — warned. The bleaker outlook is due to higher-than-expected spending for hospital care, hospice services and physician-administered drugs. The trustees called on Congress to act quickly to stabilize Medicare, though near-term action is unlikely as the Republican majority focuses on advancing their reconciliation megabill. Medicare has been teetering on the edge of insolvency for a while. But the latest report from Medicare's trustees is more dire than last year's, which projected Medicare would become insolvent in more than a decade. Now, Medicare's hospital trust fund will start running out of money in eight years — when today's 57-year-olds first become eligible for the program. The looming go-broke date is a result of the fund's substantial shortfall as Medicare costs continue to grow rapidly, trustees said in the report. Medicare costs are expected to increase from 3.8% of the gross domestic product in 2024 to 6.2% in 2050 before reaching 6.7% in 2099, the report projects. Costs to another fund that pays Parts B and D, called the Supplemental Medical Insurance trust fund, are also climbing, increasing pressure on beneficiary budgets and the federal budget. (Though, the Supplemental Medical Insurance trust fund is largely funded by premiums and general revenue that resets each year and doesn't face the same solvency concerns.) This year's estimates, which are based on current payment rates, could be conservative, trustees said. Under an alternate scenario, in which provider payments grow at a rate more consistent with underlying medical costs — a change aggressively lobbied for by physician associations — Medicare spending will rise to 8.8% of the GDP in 2099 rather than 6.7%, according to the report. The precarious footing of the federal insurance program, which covers almost 69 million people in the U.S., is due to the country's underlying demographic shifts, according to experts. More and more Americans are aging into Medicare, while at the same time the number of workers paying into its trust fund is dropping. More seniors are also selecting privatized Medicare Advantage plans, which are more expensive than traditional Medicare coverage. If and when the U.S. hits Medicare's go-broke date, the hospital trust fund, which pays hospitals and providers of post-acute services and also covers some of the cost of private Medicare Advantage plans, will have inadequate income to fund those benefits. Medicare payments would immediately be cut by 11%, according to the report. Those cuts would grow over time, likely disrupting services for seniors and reimbursement for providers. It's worth nothing that there's a significant degree of uncertainty in trustees' projections, which vary based on macroeconomic forces in a given year. For example, in 2020, in the early throes of COVID-19, the board predicted the hospital trust fund would run out by 2026. That deadline was pushed back to 2028 and then 2031 in subsequent years' reports, amid a broader economic rebound and more care shifting to cheaper outpatient settings. Still, the fund hasn't met the trustees' test for short-range financial adequacy since 2003, and has triggered funding warnings since 2018. To date, Congress has not allowed Medicare to go under. But legislators' lack of action despite years of warnings is a source of heartburn for budget hawks, Medicare advocates and physician lobbies. Experts say lawmakers need to act soon given many reforms to stabilize Medicare could take a few years to go into effect. 'The projections in this report show that change is needed to address Medicare's financial challenges,' the Medicare trustees wrote in their report. 'The sooner solutions are enacted, the more flexible and gradual they can be.' According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, restoring Medicare solvency would require Congress to boost the payroll tax rate by 14% or reduce Medicare spending by 9% — both politically unappetizing proposals. Other reforms that could curb Medicare spending, like implementing site-neutral payments or reducing overpayments in MA, have more bipartisan support but aren't a policy priority on the Hill. Republicans are currently focused on hammering out legislation to extend tax cuts from President Donald Trump's first term, cut green energy programs, fund border control and curb Medicaid spending. 'We are running out of time to phase in changes gradually and avoid harsh cuts, sharp tax increases, or unacceptable borrowing. Demagoguing this issue may be politically expedient, but it will ultimately prove ruinous for the tens of millions of Americans that rely on the programs,' Maya MacGuineas, the president of the CRFB, said in a statement Wednesday. Recommended Reading Medicare go-broke date extended to 2036, but warning bells continue ringing
Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
RFK Jr. goes after immigrants to cut health insurance costs
The Trump administration is tightening eligibility for Obamacare coverage in what it says is a bid to combat a 'surge of improper enrollments' and to lower insurance costs broadly. Critics say the rule changes will cause eligible people to miss out on a chance at subsidized health insurance and increase the uninsured rate. 'With this rule, we're lowering marketplace premiums, expanding coverage for families, and ensuring that illegal aliens do not receive taxpayer-funded health insurance,' HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a press release that projects $12 billion in savings from the rule changes next year. Those changes include reducing the enrollment period for plans by two weeks, adding paperwork requirements for some enrollees, ending the use of federal subsidies to help cover the cost of transgender people's transition-related medical care, and barring Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients from purchasing insurance on the exchanges. Those are immigrants brought to the country without documentation when they were children whom President Barack Obama protected from deportation. The final rule also repeals a special enrollment period for individuals in households earning less than 150 percent of the federal poverty level. CMS estimates about 725,000 to 1.8 million people will lose coverage as a result of the final rule. In January, CMS said about 24 million people had signed up for Obamacare coverage for 2025. Many of those will lose coverage because enrollment will be less consumer-friendly, said Larry Levitt, who advised President Bill Clinton on health policy and is now executive vice president for health policy at KFF, a health care think tank. 'I think the combination of the shorter open enrollment period and the more complex income verification rules will result in more people falling through the cracks,' Levitt said. Levitt noted that many policies in the final rule are effective only for the 2026 plan year, but that could change if Congress codifies them. The House last month included some of the changes in its version of President Donald Trump's megabill. The Senate hasn't yet voted on its version of the bill, which aims to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts but needs budget savings to do it. The final rule shortens the annual open enrollment period from Nov. 1 to Dec. 31. The previous enrollment period ran from Nov. 1 to Jan. 15. The regulation also eliminates a policy under which individuals with low incomes who are eligible for premium-free plans are automatically re-enrolled in them. Under the new rule, they will be re-enrolled with a $5 monthly premium in plan year 2026. If the individual files paperwork showing they are still eligible for a no-premium plan, they'll be re-enrolled in one. Taken together, CMS estimates the changes will cause individual health insurance premiums to drop by an average of 5 percent.
