Medicare go-broke date pushed up three years in latest trustees report
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter.
A key trust fund underpinning Medicare's hospital benefit will go broke three years earlier than previously expected absent congressional action, threatening benefits for seniors, according to the Medicare trustees' annual report released Wednesday.
The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund will be depleted in 2033, instead of 2036, as Medicare spending continues to outpace the program's income, the trustees — a group comprised of the HHS, Treasury and Labor secretaries, along with the Social Security commissioner — warned.
The bleaker outlook is due to higher-than-expected spending for hospital care, hospice services and physician-administered drugs. The trustees called on Congress to act quickly to stabilize Medicare, though near-term action is unlikely as the Republican majority focuses on advancing their reconciliation megabill.
Medicare has been teetering on the edge of insolvency for a while. But the latest report from Medicare's trustees is more dire than last year's, which projected Medicare would become insolvent in more than a decade.
Now, Medicare's hospital trust fund will start running out of money in eight years — when today's 57-year-olds first become eligible for the program.
The looming go-broke date is a result of the fund's substantial shortfall as Medicare costs continue to grow rapidly, trustees said in the report. Medicare costs are expected to increase from 3.8% of the gross domestic product in 2024 to 6.2% in 2050 before reaching 6.7% in 2099, the report projects.
Costs to another fund that pays Parts B and D, called the Supplemental Medical Insurance trust fund, are also climbing, increasing pressure on beneficiary budgets and the federal budget. (Though, the Supplemental Medical Insurance trust fund is largely funded by premiums and general revenue that resets each year and doesn't face the same solvency concerns.)
This year's estimates, which are based on current payment rates, could be conservative, trustees said. Under an alternate scenario, in which provider payments grow at a rate more consistent with underlying medical costs — a change aggressively lobbied for by physician associations — Medicare spending will rise to 8.8% of the GDP in 2099 rather than 6.7%, according to the report.
The precarious footing of the federal insurance program, which covers almost 69 million people in the U.S., is due to the country's underlying demographic shifts, according to experts.
More and more Americans are aging into Medicare, while at the same time the number of workers paying into its trust fund is dropping. More seniors are also selecting privatized Medicare Advantage plans, which are more expensive than traditional Medicare coverage.
If and when the U.S. hits Medicare's go-broke date, the hospital trust fund, which pays hospitals and providers of post-acute services and also covers some of the cost of private Medicare Advantage plans, will have inadequate income to fund those benefits. Medicare payments would immediately be cut by 11%, according to the report. Those cuts would grow over time, likely disrupting services for seniors and reimbursement for providers.
It's worth nothing that there's a significant degree of uncertainty in trustees' projections, which vary based on macroeconomic forces in a given year.
For example, in 2020, in the early throes of COVID-19, the board predicted the hospital trust fund would run out by 2026. That deadline was pushed back to 2028 and then 2031 in subsequent years' reports, amid a broader economic rebound and more care shifting to cheaper outpatient settings.
Still, the fund hasn't met the trustees' test for short-range financial adequacy since 2003, and has triggered funding warnings since 2018.
To date, Congress has not allowed Medicare to go under. But legislators' lack of action despite years of warnings is a source of heartburn for budget hawks, Medicare advocates and physician lobbies.
Experts say lawmakers need to act soon given many reforms to stabilize Medicare could take a few years to go into effect.
'The projections in this report show that change is needed to address Medicare's financial challenges,' the Medicare trustees wrote in their report. 'The sooner solutions are enacted, the more flexible and gradual they can be.'
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, restoring Medicare solvency would require Congress to boost the payroll tax rate by 14% or reduce Medicare spending by 9% — both politically unappetizing proposals.
Other reforms that could curb Medicare spending, like implementing site-neutral payments or reducing overpayments in MA, have more bipartisan support but aren't a policy priority on the Hill. Republicans are currently focused on hammering out legislation to extend tax cuts from President Donald Trump's first term, cut green energy programs, fund border control and curb Medicaid spending.
'We are running out of time to phase in changes gradually and avoid harsh cuts, sharp tax increases, or unacceptable borrowing. Demagoguing this issue may be politically expedient, but it will ultimately prove ruinous for the tens of millions of Americans that rely on the programs,' Maya MacGuineas, the president of the CRFB, said in a statement Wednesday.
Recommended Reading
Medicare go-broke date extended to 2036, but warning bells continue ringing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Is ‘Scrotox,' The Procedure Zack Wickham Got On ‘The Valley'
Zack Wickham (L), seen here with Melissa Marie Carelli and Benji Quach, got injections of "Scrotox" ... More on a recent episode of "The Valley" on Bravo. (Photo by: Griffin Nagel/Bravo via Getty Images) You could say it takes balls to do this on television. The June 10 episode of the Bravo reality TV series The Valley featured one of its regulars, Zack Wickham, going to a clinic to get a "Scrotox" injection. Now, 'Scrotox' is not short for a scrotum saying something toxic like 'Sorry if you were offended.' Instead, it's a portmanteau of the words 'scrotum' and 'Botox' that's being used to describe a procedure where you get botulinum toxin injections into your scrotum. Why Men May Get Scrotox Your first question may be why as in why would you do that? After all, getting a needle inserted into your scrotum probably isn't the first thing that you would do for fun. Well, Scrotox began as a way to treat chronic scrotal pain, otherwise known as chronic orchialgia. Botulinum toxin injections can block the release of neuropeptides that lead to neurogenic inflammation and pain. But chronic scrotal pain doesn't appear to be the reason why Wickham needed such a needle into his scrotum. Rather, here's the rationale provided by Wickham: 'Apparently, it feels really good during sex and just looks aesthetically better. You know how balls go up and down? I just was like, 'You know what? Let's see what happens when they stay down.' In addition to the down with the balls thing, there are claims that such injections can make your scrotum look smoother, bigger and more filled out as well as hang more loosely and lower. And for those with particularly sweaty balls, Scrotox supposedly can reduce the sweat produced by your scrotal sac. This certainly isn't the only genitalia enhancement procedure that has become more popular among men in recent years. In February for example, I wrote in Forbes about the penis and scrotal filler trend. This is where men with moolah like finance bros have been getting substances injected into their penises, scrotums or both to enhance their sizes and appearances. What's Involved With Getting Scrotox Getting Scrotox entails first getting your scrotum numbed by anesthetic ointment or cream. Because that's what generally needed before a needle goes into your scrotum. The doctor—and it should be an appropriately licensed and certified doctor like a dermatologist, plastic surgeon or urologist and not some random person with a needle—then will insert a needle attached to a syringe into your scrotum and slowly inject Botox through the needle. The doctor may deliver repeated injections to cover more of your scrotum. Naturally, the health professional should check for bleeding or any complications before the procedure is finished. The whole thing, which can be performed on an outpatient basis, typically takes two to four minutes. Following the procedure, you can probably safely return to work, unless your work involves jackhammering, repeated blows to the balls or anything that will cause any stress to your scrotum. Note, if your work regularly involves repeated blows to the balls, you may want to look for another job. It's also a good idea to refrain from lifting heavy objects and having sex for at least several hours after the procedure. Don't be disappointed if you don't have super smooth balls or if your balls haven't settled down just yet. It can take a few days to a week to see the changes in your scrotum. How Effective Is Scrotox The belief is that all of this may help make sex more possible and pleasurable. After all, who hasn't been in a situation where a potential partner has said, 'Although you've got a great personality, great character and great everything, your scrotum is just way too wrinkly for us to date?' And who doesn't follow the bouncing balls during sex? Regardless, it's not clear what role scrotal appearance and the scrotum in general play in the pleasure during sex. Entering terms like 'scrotum' and 'fun' and 'pleasure' into PubMed reveals a lack of peer-reviewed studies evaluating such questions. There's also a dearth of peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating the aesthetic effectiveness of Scrotox and the duration of effects. In other words, it's not clear how smooth a given scrotum will get or how low balls will go for a given person. Anecdotal reports suggest that the aesthetic effects tend to last around three to four months. So if you want to maintain some type of appearance change down there, you may have to stay on the ball, so to speak, with repeat injections periodically over time. What Are The Potential Side Effects Of Scrotox Most of the potential side effects of this procedure are related to the fact that you are getting a needle stuck into your scrotum. You could suffer some pain, numbness swelling, tightness or bruising around the area. A study published in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology did find that find that injections of botulinum toxin into the nether regions of male rats led to changes in testicular physiology and lower sperm counts. But you presumably are not a rat, physically at least, and what happens in rats doesn't necessarily happen in humans. It would be helpful to have more human studies to evaluate the potential effects of Scrotox on human sperm counts. Getting Botox injected in the other important part of your body, namely your face, can have rarer side effects like headaches, fatigue, chills, fever or difficulty seeing, speaking, swallowing or breathing. elsewhere into the body. And you've probably seen how getting repeated injections of Botox into the face over time could alter its appearance. It's not clear which of these potential side effects could apply to Botox injections to the scrotum. That's because once again the dearth of peer-reviewed published scientific studies of the procedure, especially longer term ones. Therefore, consider all of this before you hit the sack, so to speak. And think about how important the appearance of your scrotum may be to you and the people around you. Will getting Scrotox really make a difference in how you are perceived and feel? Is it worth risking the unknowns about Scrotox? Weighing the relative pros and cons can help you decide whether you want to go through with it or if it just seems too nuts for you.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Adobe brings AI-image generation app to phones, adds partners
(Corrects paragraphs 2-4 to reflect that new partner models are not yet available on the Firefly mobile app) By Stephen Nellis SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Adobe Inc. released its first dedicated artificial intelligence smartphone app on Tuesday that includes AI models from the company and partner firms, in a bid to tap into a growing trend of sharing AI images and videos over social media. The new Firefly mobile app packages Adobe's own AI model together with models from OpenAI and Google and is available on iOS and Android phones. In addition, Adobe is integrating models from new partner firms Ideogram, Luma AI, Pika and Runway, which can be accessed in Firefly Boards, a product that is part of the Firefly web app. Generating images that can easily be shared on social media has become a key driver of AI interest, with OpenAI's Ghibli-style AI images driving record traffic to the ChatGPT creator. Adobe's mobile service will offer subscribers unlimited basic image generation from Adobe models, while it will charge extra for access to the company's premium models and those from its partners. The subscription cost will be the same as for the web versions of Firefly, which start at $10 per month. The San Jose, California-based company had earlier released AI tools along with the mobile app version of its popular image-editing program Photoshop. Adobe has not disclosed how much it pays the partner models on the Firefly app. The company had promised users that its AI model is trained only on material that it has a legal right to use, with Adobe offering protection against copyright claims. Ely Greenfield, Adobe's chief technology officer for digital media, said Adobe's approach has also gained some resonance among consumers. "Even for many of our individual customers, that promise of the commercial safety and the story about how Firefly is trained continues to be a really important differentiator," Greenfield said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Boone County homes for sale were listed at higher prices in May. Here's a look
The median home in Boone County listed for $435,000 in May, up 1.2% from the previous month's $430,000, an analysis of data from shows. The statistics in this article only pertain to houses listed for sale in Boone County, not houses that were sold. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Boone County's median home was 2,140 square feet, listed at $203 per square foot. The price per square foot of homes for sale is up 1.4% from May 2024. Listings in Boone County moved briskly, at a median 39 days listed compared to the May national median of 51 days on the market. In the previous month, homes had a median of 43 days on the market. Around 280 homes were newly listed on the market in May, a 21.7% increase from 230 new listings in May 2024. The median home prices issued by may exclude many, or even most, of a market's homes. The price and volume represent only single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes. They include existing homes, but exclude most new construction as well as pending and contingent sales. Across the Columbia metro area, median home prices rose to $419,900, slightly higher than a month earlier. The median home had 2,162 square feet, at a list price of $198 per square foot. In Missouri, median home prices were $309,999, a slight increase from April. The median Missouri home listed for sale had 1,760 square feet, with a price of $173 per square foot. Throughout the United States, the median home price was $440,000, a slight increase from the month prior. The median American home for sale was listed at 1,840 square feet, with a price of $234 per square foot. The median home list price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. Experts say the median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average list price, which would mean taking the sum of all listing prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high price. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Columbia Daily Tribune: Boone County homes for sale were listed at higher prices in May
