The time of the hawks

We have entered 'the time of the hawks'an era where the traditional calculus of conflict has been rewritten by silicon and steel.
The first casualty of the next war may not be truth, it may be the soldier himself. In command centers from Tampa to Tel Aviv, military operators sit before banks of glowing screens, their fingers moving across keyboards as they pilot death machines prowling the skies thousands of miles away.
This is the revolution that arrived not with fanfare but with the quiet hum of rotors.
Warfare has gone airborne, algorithmic, and increasingly autonomous. The psychology of warfare itself is being rewritten when combatants never see their enemies, never hear the screams, never smell the smoke.
The transformation began quietly enough. When the first primitive drones took flight over Afghanistan two decades ago, they were little more than remote-controlled toys with cameras.
Today, the American MQ-9 Reaper can loiter over a target for 27 hours straight. Its Hellfire missiles and laser-guided bombs awaiting orders from operators who might be sipping coffee in Nevada while surveying a battlefield in Somalia. The Turkish Bayraktar TB2 has become the AK-47 of drone warfare, cheap, effective, and proliferating rapidly across global conflict zones.
From the deserts of Libya to the trenches of Ukraine, this $5 million unmanned predator has proven that air superiority no longer requires billion-dollar fighter jets or decades of pilot training.
But hardware is only part of the story. The real revolution lies in the algorithms that increasingly guide these birds. Artificial intelligence now processes targeting data, identifies threats, and even suggests engagement protocols faster than any human commander could comprehend.
The Pentagon's Project Maven uses machine learning to analyse drone footage, automatically flagging potential targets from hours of surveillance video. Chinese military researchers speak of 'intelligent swarms'coordinated fleets of drones that operate with minimal human oversight, sharing data instantaneously and adapting their tactics in real-time.
This isn't science fiction, it is the current state of military technology, advancing at a pace that makes traditional defence planning obsolete within months rather than years.
The implications stretch far beyond the battlefield. The RQ-4 Global Hawk, soaring at 60,000 feet for over 30 hours, can photograph an area the size of South Korea in a single flight, its sensors capable of reading license plates from the edge of space. This is surveillance capitalism weaponised, the same technologies that track your online shopping habits now determine the fate of nations.
This technological arms race has created a new form of global stratification. Nations fall into distinct categories: the hawks, who dominate the skies with advanced drone fleets and AI-powered command systems; the hunters, who invest heavily in electronic warfare capabilities to jam, hijack, or destroy unmanned systems; and the hunted, who find themselves outmatched by adversaries they cannot see, let alone fight effectively.
China's investment in military AI research now rivals America's, while smaller nations like Turkey and Israel have become drone-warfare exporters, selling their battlefield-tested technologies to the highest bidders.
The economic dimensions are staggering. A single F-35 fighter jet costs over $100 million and requires a pilot trained over many years at enormous expense.
That same budget could purchase twenty Bayraktar TB2 drones, each capable of operating continuously with minimal human oversight. For cash-strapped militaries, the mathematics is compelling, why maintain expensive human pilots when algorithms can fly faster, longer, and without the complications of food, sleep, or post-traumatic stress?
Yet this technological revolution carries profound risks that policymakers are only beginning to understand. When warfare becomes increasingly automated, the threshold for conflict inevitably lowers. It's easier to launch a drone strike than to deploy troops, easier to escalate when your own forces face no immediate physical risk.
The Cuban Missile Crisis lasted thirteen days partly because both Kennedy and Khrushchev understood that any miscalculation could result in nuclear annihilation. But what happens when an AI system misidentifies a school bus as a military transport, triggering an international incident before any human realizes what occurred?
The emerging doctrine of 'algorithmic warfare' also raises uncomfortable questions about accountability and the laws of armed conflict. When an autonomous weapon system kills civilians, who bears responsibility, the programmer who wrote the code, the commander who deployed the system, or the politician who authorised its use? International humanitarian law struggles to address scenarios where machines make life-and-death decisions faster than humans can comprehend, let alone control.
Perhaps most unsettling is how this transformation mirrors broader technological trends. The same artificial intelligence that powers military drones also drives autonomous vehicles, medical diagnostics, and financial trading systems.
The line between civilian and military technology continues to blur as dual-use innovations migrate seamlessly between Silicon Valley startups and Pentagon research labs. Today's video game engine becomes tomorrow's military simulation, today's delivery drone becomes tomorrow's weapons platform.
The time of the hawks represents more than a military revolution, it is a fundamental shift in how power is projected, conflicts are waged, and societies prepare for an uncertain future.
Nations that fail to adapt find themselves not merely outgunned but operating in an entirely different paradigm of warfare. The choice facing governments worldwide is stark, invest in the technologies and training necessary to compete in this new arena, or accept a subordinate role in a world where digital hawks rule the skies.
As military commanders, technology executives, and political leaders grapple with these changes, one thing remains clear, the age of drone warfare is not approaching, it has arrived. The question is no longer whether artificial intelligence will reshape conflict, but how quickly nations can adapt to a reality where wars are won and lost by those who best harness the marriage of silicon and steel.
In this new era, power belongs not to those with the largest armies, but to those who command the most sophisticated swarms of digital predators circling overhead, waiting for orders that may never require human approval.
The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Recorder

a day ago

• Business Recorder

Trump extends deadline for TikTok sale by 90 days

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump announced Thursday he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. 'I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025),' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. President Donald Trump announced on Thursday he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration. The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," said a statement issued by the platform. Digital cold war? Trump said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump has repeatedly downplayed the risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business. The White House announced Monday that Trump would throw the wildly popular video-sharing app, which has almost two billion global users, another lifeline. During this new grace period, the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," the administration said in a statement. The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape." Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. Motivated by national security fears and a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having not attempted to find a suitor. TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain. The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19. Now the deadline is September 17. Tariff turmoil Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing. ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law." Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company. Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on board to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok. Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally. Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm. "TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Forrester Principal Analyst Kelsey Chickering. Despite the turmoil, TikTok has continued with business as usual. The platform on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform.

Express Tribune

4 days ago

• Express Tribune

OpenAI wins $200M US Defence Pentagon deal for AI tools

ChatGPT maker OpenAI has been awarded a $200 million contract to provide the US Defense Department with artificial intelligence tools, the Pentagon said in a statement on Monday. "Under this award, the performer will develop prototype frontier AI capabilities to address critical national security challenges in both warfighting and enterprise domains," the Pentagon said. OpenAI said last week that its annualised revenue run rate surged to $10 billion as of June, positioning the company to hit its full-year target amid booming AI adoption. OpenAI said in March it would raise up to $40 billion in a new funding round led by SoftBank Group at a $300 billion valuation. OpenAI had 500 million weekly active users as of the end of March. The White House's Office of Management and Budget released new guidance in April, directing federal agencies to ensure that the government and "the public benefit from a competitive American AI marketplace." According to a blog post published by Open AI, this marks the first agreement under the new program, designed to provide federal agencies with access to tailored AI tools and ongoing support for national security and administrative applications, according to CNBC news. The Defense Department confirmed most of the work is expected to take place in the National Capital Region, which includes Washington, DC, and parts of Maryland and Virginia. As reported by CNBC News, OpenAI stated the collaboration will explore how advanced AI systems can streamline Defense Department operations. Next on stage: Clemens Kerschbaum and Raphael Dachs will discuss 'Perspectives On AI Security In Defence-Critical Contexts' They will help us understand how 'With the release of Open #AI's @ChatGPT, AI has made its way into #mainstream #technology. However, the technology shows… — The Defence Horizon Journal (@HorizonDefence) May 7, 2025 Potential applications range from enhancing health care access for service members and their families, to analyzing acquisition data, and bolstering cyber defense efforts. The company emphasized that all implementations must align with its established use policies and ethical guidelines. Earlier this year, CEO Sam Altman joined President Donald Trump at the White House to unveil the Stargate project—a $500 billion initiative aimed at dramatically increasing AI computing capacity across the country.

Business Recorder

4 days ago

• Business Recorder

The time of the hawks

We have entered 'the time of the hawks'an era where the traditional calculus of conflict has been rewritten by silicon and steel. The first casualty of the next war may not be truth, it may be the soldier himself. In command centers from Tampa to Tel Aviv, military operators sit before banks of glowing screens, their fingers moving across keyboards as they pilot death machines prowling the skies thousands of miles away. This is the revolution that arrived not with fanfare but with the quiet hum of rotors. Warfare has gone airborne, algorithmic, and increasingly autonomous. The psychology of warfare itself is being rewritten when combatants never see their enemies, never hear the screams, never smell the smoke. The transformation began quietly enough. When the first primitive drones took flight over Afghanistan two decades ago, they were little more than remote-controlled toys with cameras. Today, the American MQ-9 Reaper can loiter over a target for 27 hours straight. Its Hellfire missiles and laser-guided bombs awaiting orders from operators who might be sipping coffee in Nevada while surveying a battlefield in Somalia. The Turkish Bayraktar TB2 has become the AK-47 of drone warfare, cheap, effective, and proliferating rapidly across global conflict zones. From the deserts of Libya to the trenches of Ukraine, this $5 million unmanned predator has proven that air superiority no longer requires billion-dollar fighter jets or decades of pilot training. But hardware is only part of the story. The real revolution lies in the algorithms that increasingly guide these birds. Artificial intelligence now processes targeting data, identifies threats, and even suggests engagement protocols faster than any human commander could comprehend. The Pentagon's Project Maven uses machine learning to analyse drone footage, automatically flagging potential targets from hours of surveillance video. Chinese military researchers speak of 'intelligent swarms'coordinated fleets of drones that operate with minimal human oversight, sharing data instantaneously and adapting their tactics in real-time. This isn't science fiction, it is the current state of military technology, advancing at a pace that makes traditional defence planning obsolete within months rather than years. The implications stretch far beyond the battlefield. The RQ-4 Global Hawk, soaring at 60,000 feet for over 30 hours, can photograph an area the size of South Korea in a single flight, its sensors capable of reading license plates from the edge of space. This is surveillance capitalism weaponised, the same technologies that track your online shopping habits now determine the fate of nations. This technological arms race has created a new form of global stratification. Nations fall into distinct categories: the hawks, who dominate the skies with advanced drone fleets and AI-powered command systems; the hunters, who invest heavily in electronic warfare capabilities to jam, hijack, or destroy unmanned systems; and the hunted, who find themselves outmatched by adversaries they cannot see, let alone fight effectively. China's investment in military AI research now rivals America's, while smaller nations like Turkey and Israel have become drone-warfare exporters, selling their battlefield-tested technologies to the highest bidders. The economic dimensions are staggering. A single F-35 fighter jet costs over $100 million and requires a pilot trained over many years at enormous expense. That same budget could purchase twenty Bayraktar TB2 drones, each capable of operating continuously with minimal human oversight. For cash-strapped militaries, the mathematics is compelling, why maintain expensive human pilots when algorithms can fly faster, longer, and without the complications of food, sleep, or post-traumatic stress? Yet this technological revolution carries profound risks that policymakers are only beginning to understand. When warfare becomes increasingly automated, the threshold for conflict inevitably lowers. It's easier to launch a drone strike than to deploy troops, easier to escalate when your own forces face no immediate physical risk. The Cuban Missile Crisis lasted thirteen days partly because both Kennedy and Khrushchev understood that any miscalculation could result in nuclear annihilation. But what happens when an AI system misidentifies a school bus as a military transport, triggering an international incident before any human realizes what occurred? The emerging doctrine of 'algorithmic warfare' also raises uncomfortable questions about accountability and the laws of armed conflict. When an autonomous weapon system kills civilians, who bears responsibility, the programmer who wrote the code, the commander who deployed the system, or the politician who authorised its use? International humanitarian law struggles to address scenarios where machines make life-and-death decisions faster than humans can comprehend, let alone control. Perhaps most unsettling is how this transformation mirrors broader technological trends. The same artificial intelligence that powers military drones also drives autonomous vehicles, medical diagnostics, and financial trading systems. The line between civilian and military technology continues to blur as dual-use innovations migrate seamlessly between Silicon Valley startups and Pentagon research labs. Today's video game engine becomes tomorrow's military simulation, today's delivery drone becomes tomorrow's weapons platform. The time of the hawks represents more than a military revolution, it is a fundamental shift in how power is projected, conflicts are waged, and societies prepare for an uncertain future. Nations that fail to adapt find themselves not merely outgunned but operating in an entirely different paradigm of warfare. The choice facing governments worldwide is stark, invest in the technologies and training necessary to compete in this new arena, or accept a subordinate role in a world where digital hawks rule the skies. As military commanders, technology executives, and political leaders grapple with these changes, one thing remains clear, the age of drone warfare is not approaching, it has arrived. The question is no longer whether artificial intelligence will reshape conflict, but how quickly nations can adapt to a reality where wars are won and lost by those who best harness the marriage of silicon and steel. In this new era, power belongs not to those with the largest armies, but to those who command the most sophisticated swarms of digital predators circling overhead, waiting for orders that may never require human approval. The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners