Expert reveals the 'desperate' text you shouldn't send if you want a second date
Dating in 2025 can be a hugely stressful and complicated affair as most singletons know all too well.
Many people go on enjoyable dates, and then are surprised when the person they shared a pleasant evening with just disappear.
This can be especially galling when everything seemed to go well, and a second date seemed to be in the bag.
Not knowing what went wrong can mean daters are left questioning their behaviour, ruminating on what happened - and why.
According to sex and relationship expert Anita Fletcher, many daters are likely jeopardising their chances of securing a second date by sending 'desperate' text messages that can put off a prospective partner.
She said: 'We've all been there, but some texts scream desperation louder than others.'
Anita has identified six texting mistakes people make that can make them appear desperate and needy, and come across as red flags to potential partners.
1. 'Hey, you there?' (The desperation check-in)
This seemingly innocent message is a major red flag, according to Anita.
She explained that sending it multiple times throughout the day shows you're constantly checking if they're available – and that you have nothing better to do.
'This text reveals anxiety about being ignored,' she said.
'It puts pressure on the other person to respond immediately, which feels suffocating in early dating.'
Better alternative: Wait until you have something specific to say. Try: 'Just saw that new coffee place you mentioned! Have you tried their cold brew?'
2. The triple text trap
Message 1: 'Hey! How's your day?' Message 2: 'Hello???' Message 3: 'Guess you're busy…'
Nothing says needy like bombarding someone with multiple messages when they don't respond fast enough. This behaviour shows you can't handle even brief periods without validation.
'Triple texting demonstrates poor emotional regulation,' said Anita 'It suggests you'll be high-maintenance in a relationship.'
Better alternative: Send one thoughtful message and give them time to respond. If they don't reply within 24 hours, move on gracefully.
3. 'Why aren't you responding?'
Asking people why they aren't instantly replying to messages 'reveals deep insecurity and an inability to respect boundaries', according to Anita
This confrontational text is relationship kryptonite. Demanding explanations for response times shows controlling behaviour before you've even met in person.
Fletcher notes: 'This message reveals deep insecurity and an inability to respect boundaries. It's manipulative and will make anyone run for the hills.'
Better alternative: Simply don't send it. People have lives outside their phones.
If someone consistently ignores you, take the hint.
4. The Overshare Avalanche
'I had such a terrible day at work and my boss yelled at me and then I got a parking ticket and my mum called about Thanksgiving drama and I'm so stressed I can barely function…'
Dumping your emotional baggage via text before establishing a real connection is overwhelming and inappropriate.
'Early dating should be fun and light,' Fletcher advises. 'Save the heavy stuff for when you've built trust and rapport.'
Better alternative: Keep early texts upbeat. Try: 'Work was intense today! Looking forward to unwinding. How was your day?'
5. 'I Miss You' (After one date)
Texting someone to say 'I miss you' after just one date comes across as needy and suggests unhealthy attachment patterns
Declaring intense feelings too soon is a classic needy move. Telling someone you miss them after minimal interaction suggests unhealthy attachment patterns.
'This text implies you're already emotionally dependent on someone you barely know,' Fletcher warns. 'It's too much, too fast.'
Better alternative: Express enjoyment without intensity: 'Had a great time last night! Would love to do it again soon.'
6. The Validation Seeker
Fishing for compliments or reassurance through text screams insecurity. These messages put the other person in an awkward position of having to boost your ego. Fletcher explains: 'Confidence is attractive. Constantly seeking validation suggests you don't believe in your own worth.'
Better alternative: Build confidence through actions, not texts. Focus on sharing interesting thoughts or planning fun activities instead.
Discussing why people send needy texts after just meeting someone, sex and relationship expert Anita Fletcher said: 'Most people send needy texts because they're operating from a place of fear – fear of abandonment, fear of rejection, or fear of not being good enough.
'When someone doesn't respond immediately, anxious attachers spiral into worst-case scenarios. They think silence means disinterest, when really the other person might just be in a meeting.'
According to Anita, the irony is that in being needy, the texter 'creates exactly what we're trying to avoid – rejection'. She continued: 'When we bombard someone with desperate messages, we're essentially saying "I don't trust you to like me unless I constantly remind you I exist". That's exhausting for the recipient.
'My advice? Put down the phone and work on yourself. The best relationships happen when two complete people choose to share their lives, not when one person desperately clings to another for validation. Remember, the right person won't need constant texts to remember you exist – and you won't need constant reassurance that they care.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
I talked dozens out of boarding doomed Titan sub over catastrophic safety risks – Brit victims were deceived, says diver
A LEADING deep sea diver who warned Stockton Rush over Titan sub's catastrophic safety risks says victims were "deceived". Titanic expedition leader Rob McCallum talked almost 40 people out of going on the doomed sub - which claimed five lives when it imploded two years ago. 9 9 9 9 McCallum, who has led seven dives to the Titanic, implored OceanGate boss Rush to let an independent agency test his vessel. But his warnings over the sub's critical safety failings fell on deaf ears and "intolerant" Rush simply brushed aside cautions from experts. The world was put in a chokehold when the unclassed sub vanished from radar during a 12,500ft dive down to the Titanic wreckage. Five days after it disappeared on June 18, 2023, a piece of debris was found on the ocean floor - confirming fears it had imploded. All five on board - Rush, British billionaire Hamish Harding, 58, French Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet, 77, British-Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, 48, and son Suleman, 19 - were killed. Harrowing emails show McCallum tried to warn Rush over Titan's danger - but the OceanGate CEO replied he was "tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation". Rush wrote: "We have heard the baseless cries of 'you are going to kill someone' way too often. I take this as a serious personal insult." McCallum said their tense email exchange ended after OceanGate's lawyers threatened legal action, and so he focussed on limiting the number of people who boarded Titan. He told The Sun: "I'd written to him three or four times, and he wasn't going to change. "I'd run out of options. I thought the sub would not survive sea trials and so I just focused on trying to limit the number of people that got into that thing. 'What's that bang?' Chilling moment sound of doomed Titan sub imploding heard from support ship "I probably talked three dozen people out of going on Titan, and I wouldn't get melodramatic about it, because I didn't want to over dramatise it. "Both because I wanted them to keep listening to what I was saying, but also I didn't want to become a drama queen and sort of written off as hysterical. "And so my simple answer was always, I would never get in an unclassed vehicle and nor should you." McCallum said he spoke to both Harding and Nargeolet, who both decided to take the risk. But he said Dawood and his son Suleman would have had "no idea" about the danger they were putting themselves in on the £195,000 dive as OceanGate downplayed the risk. McCallum said: "Hamish and Paul-Henri knew it was risky, but not the level of risk that they were taking. "The other two had no idea at all. And the reason that there's that uncertainty is because I think there was a concerted effort of deception. 9 9 9 "If you look at the culture of OceanGate, they weren't willing to take outside commentary, and anyone inside the camp that spoke out got fired or worse. "And so you've got this diminishing group of people that are only listening to themselves and they just tuned out the talk of the risk. "The risk was still there. But they just weren't talking about it anymore." McCallum, who founded expedition company EYOS, said all of those who he successfully advised not to board Titan realise they had a "close call". He added: "Within 48 hours of the implosion one rang up in tears and said, 'I owe you my life. I was going to get into that sub, and I couldn't get your voice out of my head, and so I turned around and came home'. "He lost his deposit but he said 'I just couldn't get your voice out of my head', and he was in tears. "People are very conscious that they had a close call." McCallum said on the fateful day of the sub's disappearance from radar he "just felt sick". After the sub lost contact with its support ship Polar Prince rescue crews worked around the clock in what was thought to be a race against time to save the crew. But McCallum said it was clear the sub had imploded. 9 "I knew immediately what had happened," he said. "There were two or three days when everyone was going through the search and rescue. "I didn't understand that because we knew it had imploded. "I was sad to lose some friends and shipmates. But I was grateful for small mercies that it would have been instantaneous." Engineer Rush, who co-founded OceanGate in 2009, created Titan with an experimental design made up of a carbon-fiber pod with titanium rings bolted on. McCallum said carbon fiber material is not fit for submerging so deep underwater. But McCallum's warning that carbon fiber would not withstand such pressure, Rush informed him he was "going to carry on regardless". In 2018, OceanGate's then chief pilot David Lochridge was fired after his inspection report laid bare a series of safety risks. A report from the Marine Board of Investigation is expected to be released in the coming weeks. McCallum said: "The report will be comprehensive and should cover all of the attributing elements that led to the disaster. "It will also indicate who is responsible and who might be subject to prosecution." 9 How the Titan tragedy unfolded By Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) FIVE men plunged beneath the surface of the North Atlantic in a homemade sub in a bid to explore the Titanic wreckage. Four passengers paid £195,000 each to go on the sub, with the fifth member of the trip being a crew member. But what was supposed to be a short trip spiralled into days of agony as the doomed Titan vanished without a trace on June 18, 2023. The daring mission had been months in the making - and almost didn't happen at the hands of harsh weather conditions in Newfoundland, Canada. In a now chilling Facebook post, passenger Hamish Harding wrote: "Due to the worst winter in Newfoundland in 40 years, this mission is likely to be the first and only manned mission to the Titanic in 2023. "A weather window has just opened up and we are going to attempt a dive tomorrow." It would be his final Facebook post. The following morning, he and four others - led by Stockton Rush - began the 12,5000ft descent towards the bottom of the Atlantic. But as it made its way down into the depths, the vessel lost all contact with its mother ship on the surface, the Polar Prince. It sparked a frantic four-day search for signs of life, with the hunt gripping the entire world. There was hope that by some miracle, the crew was alive and desperately waiting to be saved. But that sparked fears rescue teams faced a race against time as the passengers only had a 96-hour oxygen supply when they set out, which would be quickly dwindling. Then, when audio of banging sounds was detected under the water, it inspired hope that the victims were trapped and signalling to be rescued. It heartbreakingly turned out that the banging noises were likely either ocean noises or from other search ships, the US Navy determined. Countries around the world deployed their resources to aid the search, and within days the Odysseus remote-operated vehicle (ROV) was sent down to where the ghostly wreck of the Titanic sits. The plan was for the ROV to hook onto the sub and bring it up 10,000ft, where it would meet another ROV before heading to the surface. But any hopes of a phenomenal rescue were dashed when Odysseus came across a piece of debris from the sub around 1,600ft from the Titanic. The rescue mission tragically turned into a salvage task, and the heartbroken families of those on board were told the devastating news. It was confirmed by the US Coast Guard that the sub had suffered a "catastrophic implosion".
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harvard professor who studied love for 25 years reveals the one sign that your relationship will last a lifetime - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion
A Harvard professor who studied love for more than two decades has revealed the secret behind a long-lasting relationship - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion. Arthur Brooks, a social science expert, appeared on The Drive podcast with Peter Attia MD and the pair shared the signs that a relationship will last a lifetime. During their chat, the pro explained that the key is finding a partner who is also your best friend - as the bond will remain even as the initial chemistry sizzles. 'One of the most important things for a happy life is a partnership with somebody who will be the last person who you set eyes on as you take your last dying breath, that is really, really important,' he explained. 'The goal of your marriage is not passion, it's friendship. This is the goal, you must be close friends, ideally best friends, with your spouse. 'I'm going to be with my wife Ester until death do us part, that has to be the juice of the relationship where the love actually makes happiness and love is truly the great secret to happiness.' He said that there are also a couple of indicators that a marriage may end in divorce - including people who feel lonely in their relationship. Arthur used the example of 'empty nest syndrome' which refers to parents experiencing sadness or distress when their children have grown into adults and moved out of the family home. He said: 'The people who suffer the most from empty nest syndrome is not the empty nest it's the fact that they are with one other bird and they don't really like that bird.' Arthur said that when two people have been together for a long time it can be normal - and even 'advisable' - that their passion levels are not as high as when they were fresh into their relationship. He described lacking intimacy levels as 'healthy, normal and actually advisable because it's more sustainable in the long run'. 'But some people are very happy and don't have that. What do they have in common? Very, very close personal lifelong friends,' the professor continued. 'Here is the key, if you don't have a spouse you need real friends. These are people who know your secrets, take your 2am phone call and that you talk to a lot.' However, Arthur also said that it is still very important to ensure that you upkeep friendships with others even if you are in a marriage; adding that men are usually worse at keeping in touch with their pals. 'You've got to work on these things for sure for a lot of reasons besides the fact that it's just healthy and good. You might, at some point, be left alone if you're widowed. You don't want to be alone under those circumstances. 'That is one of the reasons why men do so poorly when they lose their wives because a lot of them don't have real friendships.' The expert added that one of the red flags a marriage will end in separation is when a couple only have their children in common and nothing else. 'A companion in love that is your wife that turns out to be much more indicative of your happiness than actually having a relationship with your kids because your kids are turning into different people every year - that's super fun and interesting but that is not the key,' Arthur said. 'One of the greatest predictors of divorce is partners who are lonely while living together and this [means] that the only thing you have in common is your kids. '[When] that one point of commonality disappears and you're sitting across the table blinking at each other during dinner and not talking because you literally have nothing to talk about.' To prevent this from happening, Arthur said that it is important for married couples to partake in activities together, whether that is reading the same book, playing the same sports or even practicing the same religion to keep their bond strong and allow them to have things in common. He remarked: 'They should develop philosophical interests in common, they're talking about deep things. 'There's got to be something bigger than "Did you change his diaper?" because that's not going to be in common forever and you're going to be lonely in your relationship.' This comes as dating coach Paige Moyce, from the south east of England, also revealed the five signs that your relationship is doomed. She said the first sign that things are coming to an end is that you are staying together for a whole list of reasons - but your happiness is not one of them. 'Maybe you're staying for the kids, maybe you're staying because you fear being alone or you don't want them with anyone else,' she said. 'Maybe you're staying because you are scared of what it would look like to leave, or you don't want to hurt that person.' Whatever the reason, your own happiness does not come anywhere near the top of the list, or even on it at all. The second sign is when communication turns into a conflict. Even when you watch your tone or pick the 'right time' to talk it seems to end up in an argument. She said: 'All this does is drive a bigger and larger wedge between you and this person. If our needs are not being met, then how long is this relationship going to last for?' Paige added that loneliness is another indicator that the relationship is doomed, saying that people can actually feel more lonely in a relationship than out of one. She added: 'Just because we are physically with someone, doesn't mean we are emotionally with someone. If you're honest, when was the last time you felt special in this relationship? When was the last time you felt valued?' The fourth sign that your relationship is over is that you have lost your sense of individuality because you have put your partner first. 'You have put this person before you so many times that it is now normal to do so, but now you don't know what you want,' she said. 'Because you have prioritised the other person, you are now left wondering what it is that you want, which can leave you feeling overwhelmed. Lastly, Paige said that if you were given a magic wand with the option to leave, you would take the opportunity. She said: 'If someone could guarantee that you could get through it, that it wouldn't be hell, that you would be happy again, that you would meet someone else and that would be confident again, you would take it.'
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
This is how we do it: ‘I discovered my bisexuality when my husband and I started swinging'
I thought Simon might leave me if I said no to swinging. I agreed to it for him, for our relationship Simon and I met on a blind date when I was 19. I was immediately attracted to him – he looked like a tall Tom Cruise. In the years that followed, we got married, had kids. I was too busy being a mother to think about my needs, or his, which meant Simon stopped feeling wanted. I felt inadequate, like I couldn't give him what he needed. When I found flirtatious messages on his phone from another woman, it was a wake-up call. I felt hurt and betrayed, and trust was lost. Then one night in bed, Simon gently suggested swinging. I was resistant to it, but I thought Simon might leave me if I said no. I agreed to it for him, for our relationship. I never thought it would end up bringing so much value to my life. Simon signed us up to local swinging group's mailing list, but I thought it looked seedy, so he set up a profile for us on Swinging Heaven, a dating app for people in the lifestyle. A week later, we were in a pub interviewing a couple about everything from safety and consent to swinging resorts. Meeting these nice people helped quell my fears. I've since discovered that I'm bisexual. When I kissed a woman for the first time, I thought: 'Wow, this is why men love kissing women; they're so soft and sensual.' Simon would have sex twice a day if he could, whereas I'd prefer to have it every seven to 10 days. We now have sex four to five times a week, which is more in line with Simon's libido than mine. This level of compromise partly comes from an old insecurity: that if he doesn't feel satisfied, he could cheat again. But swinging has given Simon the freedom he needs, so he's less likely to now. On a personal level, swinging has boosted my confidence – I used to feel insecure about my body, but now I feel empowered and sexy. It's also improved our relationship, forcing us to communicate and be more open with each other. I always say that as long as your relationship is strong, every couple should try swinging at least once. If you're keen to talk to us about your sex lives you can get in touch by filling in the form below. It is very important that both sexual partners are happy to participate. Mostly, it's a turn on to see my wife with other people. Having sex with other people has also transformed our sex life with each other Because I have a higher sex drive than Nicole, when our sex life waned after 29 years of marriage, I found it frustrating. So, 10 years ago, I began an affair with a colleague. Although we didn't have sex, we'd message and meet up in secret. It felt good to be desired. When Nicole found out, I ended it, but I realised I needed sexual freedom. I no longer wanted a monogamous life. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Two years after the affair, I suggested to Nicole that we try swinging. She was initially sceptical, so we were cautious. We went for drinks with a couple experienced in the lifestyle and bombarded them with questions. We wanted to know everything. After an OK first experience with another couple in their hot tub, we had sex with that first couple. With them, we were in safe hands, and we've been friends ever since. The swinging lifestyle is more than just sex, it's friendship. We have 'besties with benefits', who we see every other week and care deeply for. I need to feel something for someone to have sex, but I'd struggle to be in love with someone else. There has been surprisingly little jealousy on both sides, especially when we know the people well. Mostly, it's a turn on to see my wife with other people. Having sex with other people has also transformed our sex life with each other, and made me desire my wife more. People comment on our physical connection, which is still strong after 34 years. But where before we'd go weeks without having sex, we now have it every other day. I feel most attracted to Nicole when she is radiant, happy and confident, surrounded by her friends, and getting attention from men and women who fancy her.
