Harvard professor who studied love for 25 years reveals the one sign that your relationship will last a lifetime - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion

A Harvard professor who studied love for more than two decades has revealed the secret behind a long-lasting relationship - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion.
Arthur Brooks, a social science expert, appeared on The Drive podcast with Peter Attia MD and the pair shared the signs that a relationship will last a lifetime.
During their chat, the pro explained that the key is finding a partner who is also your best friend - as the bond will remain even as the initial chemistry sizzles.
'One of the most important things for a happy life is a partnership with somebody who will be the last person who you set eyes on as you take your last dying breath, that is really, really important,' he explained.
'The goal of your marriage is not passion, it's friendship. This is the goal, you must be close friends, ideally best friends, with your spouse.
'I'm going to be with my wife Ester until death do us part, that has to be the juice of the relationship where the love actually makes happiness and love is truly the great secret to happiness.'
He said that there are also a couple of indicators that a marriage may end in divorce - including people who feel lonely in their relationship.
Arthur used the example of 'empty nest syndrome' which refers to parents experiencing sadness or distress when their children have grown into adults and moved out of the family home.
He said: 'The people who suffer the most from empty nest syndrome is not the empty nest it's the fact that they are with one other bird and they don't really like that bird.'
Arthur said that when two people have been together for a long time it can be normal - and even 'advisable' - that their passion levels are not as high as when they were fresh into their relationship.
He described lacking intimacy levels as 'healthy, normal and actually advisable because it's more sustainable in the long run'.
'But some people are very happy and don't have that. What do they have in common? Very, very close personal lifelong friends,' the professor continued.
'Here is the key, if you don't have a spouse you need real friends. These are people who know your secrets, take your 2am phone call and that you talk to a lot.'
However, Arthur also said that it is still very important to ensure that you upkeep friendships with others even if you are in a marriage; adding that men are usually worse at keeping in touch with their pals.
'You've got to work on these things for sure for a lot of reasons besides the fact that it's just healthy and good. You might, at some point, be left alone if you're widowed. You don't want to be alone under those circumstances.
'That is one of the reasons why men do so poorly when they lose their wives because a lot of them don't have real friendships.'
The expert added that one of the red flags a marriage will end in separation is when a couple only have their children in common and nothing else.
'A companion in love that is your wife that turns out to be much more indicative of your happiness than actually having a relationship with your kids because your kids are turning into different people every year - that's super fun and interesting but that is not the key,' Arthur said.
'One of the greatest predictors of divorce is partners who are lonely while living together and this [means] that the only thing you have in common is your kids.
'[When] that one point of commonality disappears and you're sitting across the table blinking at each other during dinner and not talking because you literally have nothing to talk about.'
To prevent this from happening, Arthur said that it is important for married couples to partake in activities together, whether that is reading the same book, playing the same sports or even practicing the same religion to keep their bond strong and allow them to have things in common.
He remarked: 'They should develop philosophical interests in common, they're talking about deep things.
'There's got to be something bigger than "Did you change his diaper?" because that's not going to be in common forever and you're going to be lonely in your relationship.'
This comes as dating coach Paige Moyce, from the south east of England, also revealed the five signs that your relationship is doomed.
She said the first sign that things are coming to an end is that you are staying together for a whole list of reasons - but your happiness is not one of them.
'Maybe you're staying for the kids, maybe you're staying because you fear being alone or you don't want them with anyone else,' she said.
'Maybe you're staying because you are scared of what it would look like to leave, or you don't want to hurt that person.'
Whatever the reason, your own happiness does not come anywhere near the top of the list, or even on it at all.
The second sign is when communication turns into a conflict. Even when you watch your tone or pick the 'right time' to talk it seems to end up in an argument.
She said: 'All this does is drive a bigger and larger wedge between you and this person. If our needs are not being met, then how long is this relationship going to last for?'
Paige added that loneliness is another indicator that the relationship is doomed, saying that people can actually feel more lonely in a relationship than out of one.
She added: 'Just because we are physically with someone, doesn't mean we are emotionally with someone. If you're honest, when was the last time you felt special in this relationship? When was the last time you felt valued?'
The fourth sign that your relationship is over is that you have lost your sense of individuality because you have put your partner first.
'You have put this person before you so many times that it is now normal to do so, but now you don't know what you want,' she said.
'Because you have prioritised the other person, you are now left wondering what it is that you want, which can leave you feeling overwhelmed.
Lastly, Paige said that if you were given a magic wand with the option to leave, you would take the opportunity.
She said: 'If someone could guarantee that you could get through it, that it wouldn't be hell, that you would be happy again, that you would meet someone else and that would be confident again, you would take it.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

37 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Grade-school math sum leaves people scratching their heads... can you solve the simple problem in 30 seconds?

What seemed like a regular grade school math problem had people totally stumped on social media. The equation 9 x 3 - 9 shared by @BholanathDutta on X left social media users completely mystified. So, are you smarter than a fourth grader? Or better yet, the average adult on X? See if you can solve this equation in 30 seconds or less. But first, here's a hint: Ever heard of PEMDAS? The age-old acronym guides you through the proper order for solving a complicated calculation like this one. It stands for Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and then Subtraction. Using that method, the solution is easy. There are no parentheses or exponents, so multiplication is first. 9 x 3 = 27 Then, the equation reads: 27 - 9 ÷ 3 But before doing any subtraction, PEMDAS implies that division is next. 9 ÷ 3 = 3 Now, it's painless. 27 - 3 = 24 Did you get it right? Commenters under the original X post made the common error of solving the math sum left to right, instead of utilizing the elementary principle. First they multiplied. 9 x 3 = 27 Then, subtracted. 27 - 9 = 18 And then divided. 18 ÷ 3 = 6 A few people even, inexplicably, got 9 as their answer. It had to take some mental gymnastics to find that solution. Sure, a calculator could be an easy shortcut. But, nothing beats the satisfaction of solving a problem yourself.

The Guardian

an hour ago

• The Guardian

Readers reply: Are school and college reunions good for us?

Are school and college reunions good for us? Or do they just confront us with uncomfortable past versions of ourselves and others, keeping us trapped in old, unhealthy patterns? Donna Cavalli, Michigan Send new questions to nq@ Hmm, well look what happened to Friends Reunited. Wiretrip Can we discuss this question again in 10 years? JonathanBaldwinAgain Maybe. If it reawakens happy memories and lets you reconnect with people you genuinely got on with but had lost track of and a friendship or two is rekindled then yeah, it'll be good for you. If it reawakens memories of a bad time in your life and nobody else you actually ever liked turns up it's going to be a melancholy waste of time. IrishIain Reunions are for catching-up with people you haven't stayed in touch with, which means there are three possible outcomes: disappointment, envy and sex. These are not mutually exclusive. There's also the opportunity to express joy/sadness/indifference (delete as applicable) at learning which students, parents and teachers have passed away and how, which is dangerous ground to be on for all sorts of reasons. Dorkalicious Given that I was at school with Nigel Farage, I shall not be going to any reunion for fear that he might turn up! Teamhead I grew up in New Jersey. My high school class was 500 strong. We've held reunions every 10 years since graduating in 1972. It's unbelievable how close some of us still are – we stay in touch on social media and messenger. I'm living in Europe now and welcome my high school mates to come over and enjoy my current home and surrounds. Nice to keep in touch! Karen Kristian, by email No. If they were such good mates you would've stayed in touch. If there is someone that slipped through the cracks you should be able to find someone who knows them or the actual person by going online. You can reach out from there and see what happens. catchytitled I have gone to my law school reunion every five years for the last 40 and enjoy it more each time. I wasn't the most popular or the smartest person at school but I had a lot of really lovely classmates and so my time at school – perhaps unlike those of many others – was a pleasure. When I go back I find that the people I was close to, I am still close to and I really enjoy seeing them again and catching up. The people whom I never really knew in the hustle and bustle of school are also such a pleasure to get to know now. When we are younger we make so many assumptions about people and that gets in the way of friendship and appreciation. Now, 40 years later, we know that the things that we worried about back then – career success, status, money – don't mean as much as we thought it did and it's a pleasure to see people we knew at one time and enjoy their company. GreenforDanger My classmates are the closest thing that I will ever have to sisters. We grew up together, from the ages of 11 to 18, saw each other through our worst teenager angst, spots, hairstyles, crazes, relationships. When we left our all-girls grammar school in the 1970s we were all desperate to escape and escape we did – yet somehow those amazing connections have bought me back to these now amazing and inspirational women who mean so much to me and complete me. Now that we are that much older those friendships have become even more precious – not just for the girls we were but especially so for the women we are now. Name supplied, by email I haven't been to a reunion but I have run into various people from secondary school when coming back home from abroad and the experience tends to go as follows: What have you been up to, Miffled? Moved around Europe a lot, finally settled in NL 10 years ago. Oh you smoke weed and stuff then over there? Nah, not really. Not my scene. So why did you move? I just like travelling, I guess. Wanted to explore. You still based here? Yeah, never left. Never would. [Mutual awkward staring] See you. See you. Based on that, I would really not bother with a reunion. MiffledKitty Going to one that I partly instigated, a 40th anniversary of graduating from university for our subject. It will be interesting to see where people ended up. So it's a mixture of seeing if you easily reconnect with people and a blind date. I think that university reunions probably work better as you chose where to go and what to do and the people you associated with, unlike school. People I got on with from that period I still do, and it can almost feel like we last spoke yesterday when we meet up. OliversTravels I've attended two of my high school reunions (class of 1959), and though I haven't been to the last one, the earlier ones were very memorable because we discovered that we all look older, which is a very humbling experience that we should all be grateful for. Now in our 80s we can also be grateful that other people knew us when we were shining, fresh and bright, and with whom we now very intimately share the personal history of a whole generation. RPOrlando, by email Yes, but with a few caveats. Don't expect to make new friends. Passing acquaintances will remain so – unless you discover a shared interest in extreme ironing, or similar. Large dinners are a lousy idea. Keep things small and personal and don't work too hard at providing a wonderful venue. It's the opportunity to talk in relaxed surroundings that counts. Eric Boa, by email I hated school and have no friends from my school days. Sounds like hell. Shots1992 I went to a reunion once, where I only met people I wasn't interested in while I was still at school, and I wasn't interested in them after all those years. Naturally I was hoping to see all those wonderful girls I'd been to scared to say something to, but sadly they'd all got married and now had boring lives. Johan van Slooten, the Netherlands, by email I went to a high school reunion in my 30s, and while I appreciate the efforts of the organisers, for me it was a meaningless event. I never enjoyed school, and had left my home town at 19 to study in London. The night felt like an odd dream. I wore a gorgeous tatty 1950s gown that I'd picked up for a tenner at a festival, drank a lot of whisky, and felt vaguely panicky. People I didn't remember kept asking me what I was doing these days, and there was a lot of inevitable talk about jobs and families and kids, which was all quite repetitive and dull. Everyone was nice enough, but the peculiar mix of curiosity and competition was a noticeable undercurrent. All very parochial. I'd never go to another one. liz7evans I've never been to a full-scale school reunion, but even among old classmates who weren't close friends, I've got a good idea of who's got married, divorced, had children, come out, emigrated. Some even let me know where they've been for dinner recently. I guess social media has killed the element of surprise. Friends reunited, indeed … EddieChorepost Our school reunion after 45 years was mostly a success. Old hatreds flared round only one particularly disliked ex-head boy. At least one group reignited their sixth-form camaraderie with a curry afterwards. For most people it was a proper closure of that chapter of their lives. Their original school leaving after final examinations had been overshadowed by a new vista of adult freedom that was hard to conceive. techie272 I don't even really remember being at school – always baffled by conversations about something we did one Tuesday morning 40 years ago … GCday There is no amount of money that I could be offered to go to these events. High school was seven years of poverty and awful, often cruel teachers, and this at an esteemed school which is centuries old. I also refuse to join any alumni societies or to donate even a penny, when they come around with their begging bowls. I will give anything I can to my former primary school which was run by kind and caring nuns. Janubian My dad was a wise old owl. I asked him once when he was still active in the Royal Naval Reserve if he ever went to the British Legion Club. 'Blimey no, they've all still got their tin hats on.' Miserable lot, he reckoned. A 'do' at the 'Battery' as it was called, fine, those reunions, not on your nelly. bricklayersoption My mother, aunts, uncle, brother, sister and some cousins all went to the same school. While I have fond memories growing up in this small town where most of us were related and everyone knew each other, school was different. After my grandparents were gone, the large family reunions faded away. Some of us left for the big city. The town school has an all-class reunion every year which my mother enjoyed going to when she reached her late 80s and 90s. My class this month has a 50th-year reunion which I am not attending. Once I left I never really looked back. The song Smalltown Boy by Bronski Beat comes to mind. dallastxhollywood Going back to secondary school after 30 years was great. It got rid of hang-ups, forgiving those frail old teachers, happy for how life had turned out for classmates. It was very valuable for a couple of lads who had been expelled. I took an assembly at my primary school 50 years after it had opened. I felt I could sit crossed-leg with the children. They looked the same! And as university had been a three-year holiday camp, going back after 40 years was starting the party again. I don't need to return to any of them again. Those chapters are complete. gedparker The trouble is that the only thing you've got in common is being at school, and once you've relived a few memories that's it. I found the same thing with someone I worked with 15 years ago. We met up a couple of times and all we had to talk about was people we used to work with. So dull, and afterwards I had dreams about work. Goldgreen

Times

2 hours ago

• Times

Jarell Quansah to join Bayer Leverkusen in £35m deal from Liverpool

Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.