Jamie Foxx roasts Sean ‘Diddy' Combs over vulgar testimonies in sex-trafficking trial: ‘He's a nasty motherf—ker'
Jamie Foxx roasted 'nasty' Sean 'Diddy' Combs over the vulgar testimonies that have been given in the disgraced rapper's sex-trafficking trial.
'That Diddy s–t crazy, huh?' he said while performing on stage at The Comedy Store in West Hollywood, Calif., last Thursday, per a video obtained by Urban Hollywood.
'I don't know if he's going to jail but he's a nasty motherf–ker! Am I right? Especially for our community — white people, it's cool, but Black people, like, that was our hero. All that goddman baby oil, boy.'
Foxx, 57, then brought up Combs' ex-girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura's testimony about how the disgraced rapper allegedly made a male escort urinate in her mouth.
'And then the urine,' he added, before his 31-year-old daughter, Corinne Foxx — who was moderating the Netflix event — interrupted him.
'Oh, that's right. Just let it be. My bad, I'm sorry,' the comedian said.
However, Jamie didn't let it go and continued questioning the alleged sexual acts Combs, 55, was involved in.
'Why you so nasty, Diddy? Old nasty motherf–ker,' he continued.
''Take that, Take that.' That makes you listen to that differently now. What are we taking? 'Cause I don't want any of that,' the Grammy winner continued on, referring to the phrase the Bad Boy Records founder famously uttered.
'For the Black people in here, you know how that hurts us. 'Cause Diddy was, 'It's all about the Benjamins.' That was our whole culture. Now, 'It's all about the baby oil.''
Page Six has reached out to Combs' rep for comment but did not immediately hear back.
The dad of seven is currently on trial facing three charges: racketeering conspiracy; sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; and transportation to engage in prostitution.
Combs has pleaded not guilty and denied all culpability.
Last month, Jamie finally set the record straight about rumors that the 'I'll Be Missing You' emcee tried to kill him when the singer had his medical emergency in 2023.
'… I snuck in my phone because I didn't know what the outside world was saying and I couldn't get my mind around the fact that I had a stroke. I'm in f–kng perfect shape,' the 'Ray' actor recalled during a Hollywood Reporter roundtable of his time being hospitalized.
'[I see things like,] 'Puffy tried to kill me.' No, Puffy didn't try to kill me,' he stated.
Jamie revealed in December 2024 that his medical emergency was due to a brain bleed that led to a stroke.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
30 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Is ‘FUBAR' returning for season 3? Everything we know so far
By Aman Shukla Published on June 23, 2025, 19:30 IST Last updated June 23, 2025, 14:00 IST Alright, FUBAR fans, time to talk about that Netflix show with Arnold Schwarzenegger kicking butt and bickering with his spy daughter. Season 2 hit in 2025, and now everybody's buzzing: is Season 3 a go or a no? Here's the lowdown on what's up with FUBAR, scraped from the latest chatter. What's FUBAR All About? If you haven't binged it yet, FUBAR is this wild ride where Arnie plays Luke, a CIA dude ready to kick back and retire, only to find out his daughter Emma (Monica Barbaro) is also a secret agent. Season 1, dropped in 2023, was pure gold with explosions and dad jokes. Season 2? Kinda divisive. Some loved it, others called it a snooze. Still, fans want more. Is FUBAR Season 3 Happening? Right now, Netflix hasn't given the green light for FUBAR Season 3. There's no official word, and that's got fans on edge. A post floating around on X claimed Season 2's viewership tanked by 80% compared to Season 1, hinting the show might be on the chopping block. But hold up—there's no hard proof from Netflix or the showrunners to back that up. X posts can be shaky, so don't take them as gospel. For now, it's a waiting game. Why Could Season 3 Still Happen? Even without confirmation, there's hope for more FUBAR . Here's why: Arnold's a Big Deal : Schwarzenegger's name alone pulls in viewers. His TV comeback is a huge win for Netflix, and they might not want to let that go. Loyal Fans : People are rooting for the show. On X, one fan begged for Season 3, shouting out the cast—like Fortune Feimster—and Arnie's epic action-hero energy. Loose Ends : Season 2 left some big questions unanswered. I won't spoil it, but the finale screams for a follow-up. Netflix's Playbook: Sometimes Netflix keeps shows alive if they have a solid fanbase, even if numbers dip. FUBAR could still have enough juice for another round. What's Next? Until Netflix spills the beans, FUBAR Season 3 is up in the air. Fans can help by streaming the heck out of Seasons 1 and 2 and hyping it online. Keep an eye out for news, and fingers crossed we'll see Luke back in action. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at
Business Upturn
30 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
The Gilded Age season 3 premiere recap: Everything we know so far
HBO's The Gilded Age is back, and Season 3 is already stirring up drama in 1880s New York. Julian Fellowes's show about wealth, power, and scandal has fans buzzing with its mix of fancy costumes and messy family fights. The new season started airing on June 22, 2025, and here's everything you need to know about what's going down with the Russells, van Rhijns, and more. When and Where to Watch The Gilded Age Season 3 The third season hit HBO and Max on June 22, 2025, at 9 p.m. ET/PT. You'll get eight episodes total, dropping every Sunday, with the big finale set for August 10, 2025. If you're itching to see it early, the first episode screened at the Tribeca Film Festival on June 12, 2025, with the cast and Fellowes spilling some tea afterward. Want to catch up? Seasons 1 and 2 are streaming on Max, and Season 3 episodes are there too, ready for your weekend binge. What's the Story This Time? Season 3 picks up right after Bertha Russell (Carrie Coon) won the Opera War in Season 2, snagging the Duke of Buckingham for her Metropolitan Opera opening. The show's all about the 1880s, a time when money and status ruled New York, but nobody got to the top without some serious sacrifices. Bertha's chasing an even bigger win to cement her family's spot in high society, while her husband, George (Morgan Spector), is betting it all on a wild plan to build a railroad from Chicago to Los Angeles. He's out in Arizona trying to buy mines in Morenci, but the local miners aren't making it easy, and it could cost him big. Over at the van Rhijn house, things are tense. Agnes van Rhijn (Christine Baranski) is not thrilled that her sister Ada Forte (Cynthia Nixon) is calling the shots now, thanks to a surprise inheritance. Marian Brook (Louisa Jacobson) and Larry Russell (Harry Richardson) are sneaking around, falling for each other behind everyone's backs. Meanwhile, Peggy Scott (Denée Benton) is catching feelings for Dr. William Kirkland (Jordan Donica), but his snooty family isn't exactly rolling out the welcome mat for a Black journalist. The season's got some heavy stuff too, like divorce—super scandalous back then. Aurora Fane's husband, Charles, wants out of their marriage, and there's talk it might be because he's hiding who he really is. Plus, expect some dark twists, like a freak accident and a violent moment that shakes things up. Who's in the Cast? The main crew is back: Carrie Coon as the fierce Bertha, Morgan Spector as George, Christine Baranski as the sharp-tongued Agnes, and Cynthia Nixon as the newly empowered Ada. Louisa Jacobson keeps Marian's story moving, and Denée Benton's Peggy is getting more to do this season. You'll also see Taissa Farmiga as Gladys Russell, Harry Richardson as Larry, Blake Ritson as Oscar van Rhijn, and Donna Murphy as the queen of society, Mrs. Astor. New faces are shaking things up. Phylicia Rashad plays Elizabeth Kirkland, a tough Newport socialite, with Brian Stokes Mitchell as her preacher husband, Frederick. Their son, Dr. William Kirkland (Jordan Donica), is Peggy's new love interest. Victoria Clark joins as Joan Carlton, an old-money type, and you've got Merritt Wever as Bertha's sister Monica O'Brien, plus Bill Camp as J.P. Morgan himself. Other newcomers like Leslie Uggams, Lisagay Hamilton, and Andrea Martin add more spice to the mix. Episode 1 Recap The season kicks off far from New York's fancy ballrooms, in dusty Morenci, Arizona. George is trying to lock down those mines for his railroad dream, but the miners want a union, and he's not having it. Back home, the van Rhijn house is a mess. Ada's leaning into the temperance movement after losing her husband, Luke, and Agnes is grumpy about playing second fiddle. Peggy gets sick with pneumonia, and a racist doctor refuses to help her, which hits hard and forces her family to step in. At the Russells', Bertha's pushing Gladys to marry the Duke of Buckingham (Ben Lamb), but Gladys is sneaking off with Billy Carlton (Matt Walker) instead. When Bertha finds out, it's fireworks. Marian and Larry are keeping their romance quiet, but it's getting serious. Larry also ditches his business partner Jack on a clock project, which stirs up trouble. The episode sets up a season that's not afraid to get gritty while still delivering the glitz. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court turns away Virginia's appeal in felon voting ban lawsuit
The Supreme Court turned away Virginia's appeal on Monday that sought to quash a challenge to the state's lifetime felon voting ban, allowing the lawsuit to move ahead toward trial. Two disenfranchised voters claim the ban violates the Virginia Readmission Act, a federal law that set conditions for Virginia to regain congressional representation following the Civil War. Lower courts allowed the suit to move forward, saying courts can enforce the Readmission Act and the state doesn't have 11th Amendment immunity. But Virginia's Republican-controlled attorney general's office argued to the justices that would open the 'floodgates' and mark a 'radical change in the law.' 'The Fourth Circuit's ruling that the Readmission Acts are judicially enforceable invites courts to wade into the political decisions that restored the rebel States to federal representation more than 150 years ago, calling into question Congress's continuing determination that the States have republican governments and are entitled to representation,' the state wrote in its petition. In a brief order, the Supreme Court declined to take up the case. A federal district judge is set to hold a bench trial in October in the case. It was filed in 2023 by two convicted felons who are ineligible to vote under the Virginia Constitution's lifetime voting ban for felons. Tati Abu King was originally convicted of robbery in 1988 before the governor restored her voting rights. She later lost them again after being convicted of felony drug possession. Toni Heath Johnson has various felony convictions dating back to the 1980s, including forgery, credit card theft and bigamy. Her voting rights, too, were restored, but she was subsequently convicted of drug possession and child endangerment. Their suit points to the Virginia Readmission Act, which was signed in 1870 following the Civil War and allowed the state to regain congressional representation. But it was conditioned on the state never changing its constitution to disenfranchise voters except for those convicted of 'such crimes as are now felonies at common law.' The two Virginians, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and law firm Wilmer Hale, argue that exception only covers a handful of long-recognized felonies like murder, arson and rape. But they say their convictions weren't recognized at common law in 1870, so they should be able to vote. They urged the Supreme Court to turn away Virginia's appeal so the case can move forward. 'The Act's purpose was to prevent Virginia from manipulating statutory criminal law to disenfranchise Black voters—specifically, from convicting and disenfranchising newly freed Black residents based on statutory crimes that were not felonies at the time Virginia entered the Union,' their attorneys wrote.
