What's going wrong inside the SNP? Activists share all
This activist works for the party and regularly attends national events. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, they said they can't help but worry that the SNP is 'heading back into the same old internal splits' seen at the height of Nicola Sturgeon's leadership.
'Which is exactly what the Unionists want,' they added.
Leader John Swinney is currently facing a wave of discontent from members following the party's underwhelming performance in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.
READ MORE: 'Foolish': Former SNP MP hits out at John Swinney's by-election campaign
When this paper spoke to activists following the result on Friday, it became clear that deeper fissures of frustration and worry had come to the surface. Members said concerns about party strategy had been dismissed by leadership, which echoes frustrations felt under Sturgeon.
For others, it's a repeat of other past elections the SNP would rather forget.
'It's starting to feel like a repeat of [Swinney's] first time in charge,' the Aberdeen activist remarked.
"We are the establishment and Swinney's been part of that shift, giving he's been at the front line for about two decades.
"If John's serious about independence, then it has to be front and centre in everything we do. Right now, it's not.'
One 2026 candidate summarised the thoughts of the majority: a quiet worry whether confidence in leadership will return in time for the elections. 'John has done a really good job of stabilising the party but it's clear that people have lost trust in all politicians," they said.
'We need to do more so that people know we are on their side, we're working hard to come up with ways to improve their day-to-day lives and that the SNP will fight for them. That message isn't getting through at the moment and we need to reflect on why that is.'
Swinney previously led the party, with a sore end. In 2000, Alex Salmond stepped down as leader of the SNP, triggering a new leadership contest.
Swinney, who launched his bid to become the leader of the SNP, advocated for a gradualist approach to independence and won, becoming leader of the opposition in Holyrood.
After disappointing elections in 2001, 2003, and 2004, which saw the party's vote share and number of seats drop, Swinney resigned as SNP leader. This was despite other pro-independence parties like the Scottish Greens and Scottish Socialist Party making gains in Holyrood.
His strategy then is similar to what is fuelling frustration within and outwith the party today. But it's nothing new and he has stood by his tactics when questioned, most thoroughly by Lesley Riddoch last year.
'I get that Swinney's steadied things after a rough patch, but it feels like we've gone quiet on the one thing that actually defines us,' the activist said. 'And in this by-election, we made the mistake of giving Reform a platform by turning them into a talking point.'
Dr Michael Higgins, a political communications expert at the University of Strathclyde, said the SNP had 'demeaned themselves' by focusing on Reform UK in the by-election campaign.
But Swinney doubled down on Sunday, saying he was 'standing up to Farage'. 'I'm going to make no apology for it,' he added.
READ MORE: Has Swinney 'healed' the SNP or will they end up back on life support?
And when asked if he was still the man to lead the party, Swinney said "Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me.
'I was not seeking high office, I'd held high office for a long time in my life, and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.'
Last week, activists told The National they had voiced concerns over Swinney's strategy and had been 'shut down' for questioning the party's tactics.
An affiliate convenor reflected that they felt the on-the-ground campaign "was good" but they had found more Labour support on the doors than expected, adding: "It didn't feel like it was taken seriously."
Looking towards the SNP's record in government, activists are also angry.
Pledge after pledge has been dropped in the last few years. Its flagship target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 75% by 2030 was scaled back, a conversion therapy ban was delayed, the human rights bill was kicked into the long grass, the national care service plan was dropped, and most recently, a new national park in Galloway was scrapped.
One activist, who has been integral in building campaign networks and previously served as an SNP councillor, told The National: 'Personally, I believe there is an issue where the SNP is run from an inner circle that is guided by their own deluded thoughts rather than reality.
'The party I ran for election with was informed by effective engagement with its supporters and membership – not so called 'political insight' from 20-30 somethings who have been at the helm of a party that has not had to work that hard for a monopoly we've been able to sustain against very little organised opposition.
'We now have effective opposition through two forces: a Scottish Labour Party renewed with an impressive manifesto and insight to the issues facing Scotland – and Reform UK who are riding a global populist wave of support from disgruntled people of this nation. Of which I am very much one too.'
They added: 'What is our vision? What is our plan? What are we delivering on right now that is actually aspirational given? Where is the proof that the SNP is working hard for our nation? Because I can't see it.'
But where can the party go from here?
ONCE again, the party is left asking the same question it has asked itself since Sturgeon quit: "What do we do now?"
The former councillor suggests a 'dose of reality', adding: 'No matter how much we repeat that statement on the doorsteps, that 'we don't take any votes for granted,' we are very much taking the entire nation for granted for the very little effort we put in to being strategic on how we are leading this nation."
READ MORE: How did Labour win the Hamilton by-election with an 'invisible man' candidate?
Others have called for the party to simply be 'more inspirational,' with one staffer adding: 'The churn at the top over last few years has meant promises have often been dropped just as quickly as they've been made.'
Another member said they had been 'stunned' by the result on Friday morning, sharing: 'We obviously lost votes to Reform. The Greens and our vote don't seem to be turning out.
'I think John Swinney is a good man but probably not the best person the get the voters excited enough to vote SNP. It scares me for 2026. Stephen Flynn may be better. There doesn't seem to be a direction for independence.'
However, not everyone agrees that Swinney or the party is in trouble, including Swinney himself.
Coming second in the vote, the First Minister said on Monday, is an 'indication that we are still able to perform strongly electorally'.
The First Minister added that his party lost the overlapping seat at Westminster – Hamilton and Clyde Valley – by 9000 votes last year and by just 600 on Thursday.
'So, we are quite clearly in a position where we can achieve electoral success, but we have got to build on that and make sure we're stronger for 2026,' he added.
'Any suggestions the party isn't fully behind John is being peddled by those outwith the party or by a miniscule minority,' activist Logan Urwin said.
Another activist, who campaigned heavily in the by-election alongside Swinney and candidate Katy Loudon, said: "I feel somewhat confident as feel that we are at a better position than last year.
"I do think that what happened in the by-election was strategic errors and hopefully [will be] fixed next year, but do fear that similar seats to Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse might be at real risk and needs work to make sure they stay SNP".
Glasgow activist Doug Daniel agreed, adding: 'The party seems to be in a much better place than it was when John took over, and although it's a shame we didn't quite get over the line in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse, it's not quite the catastrophe some commentators are making it out to be.
'I think people forget we've only won one of the five previous Holyrood by-elections that have taken place since 2007, and this one was far closer than any of those. I think it'll be a different story in 2026 when people are asking themselves who they trust to stand up for Scotland against a failing Labour UK Government.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Ewing's solo bid threatens to turn SNP stronghold into political battleground
Fergus Ewing's decision to stand as an independent in the Holyrood election next year doesn't come as a huge surprise. He has been hinting at this ever since he announced he wouldn't be standing for the SNP. Ewing has frequently been described as a thorn in the party's side in recent years. In fact, he has been a full bed of roses given the number of issues he has disagreed with them on – the deposit return scheme, gender reform, marine protected areas, the dualling of the A9 and A96. The Ewing name is of course steeped in SNP history. Fergus Ewing has been an MSP since 1999. He served as a government minister for 14 years. But now he is no longer a member of the party – he will sit as an independent backbencher at Holyrood for the rest of this parliamentary term. Then next year he will be taking on the SNP party machine in the election. That runs the risk for the SNP of splitting their vote, and allowing a challenger to squeeze through the middle and take what has been a safe seat. So the Fergus Ewing headache looks set to continue for some time yet for the SNP. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Scottish council to write to PM in call to end arm sales to Israel
SNP councillor Naz Anis-Miah's pro-Palestinian motion was passed by Fife Council despite opposition from the ruling minority Labour administration. Labour councillors dropped their amendment to the motion halfway through the debate, which Anis-Miah described as 'unheard of'. The full motion called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, an end to UK arms sales to Israel, a commitment to upholding international law, and support for increased humanitarian aid to the region. READ MORE: Scottish Labour drop below Alba and Greens in Highlands by-election It also committed the leader of Fife Council, Labour councillor David Ross, to write to Keir Starmer, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds over ending arms exports and instead increasing humanitarian aid. 'Obviously [Benjamin] Netanyahu and Israel are not going to listen to what Fife Council are going to say, but what Fife Council can do is apply pressure to the British government,' Anis-Miah told The National. The debate on the motion was held on Thursday, with councillors going back and forth over Labour's amendment which Anis-Miah said would have 'watered down' the SNP's motion. Speaking in the chamber, Anis-Miah (below) told fellow councillors: 'We can't claim to champion human rights abroad while fueling destruction with our exports. 'We can't preach peace while we enable war. We cannot turn a blind eye to the death of innocent children while our industries build machines that kill them. If we can't stop the bombs let's stop building them. If we can't end the war let's refuse to fuel it. (Image: SNP) 'If we can't undo the suffering, let us not be the ones who prolong it. I urge every member of this chamber to support the motion. "Let's send a clear message to the Prime Minister and Westminster that the people of Fife and Scotland will not be complicit in supplying arms that cause genocide.' Ross told councillors that members of the Labour group were still 'uncomfortable' with some parts of the motion. 'I think undoubtedly we are all horrified and really totally concerned about what is going on and we recognise the need to make a statement,' he added. 'In the interests of speaking with one voice from the council we're prepared to withdraw our amendment with a slight concession on the wording from the SNP motion.' The SNP group agreed to remove a call for the motion to be shared with Cosla and other councils across Scotland. READ MORE: UK scrambles to charter flights out of Israel for British citizens 'We're comfortable that we can share it with our Cosla delegates at the SNP Council group nationwide, and we've also obviously got a network of Councilors across the country, so we're comfortable that we'll share the motion ourselves,' Anis-Miah explained. We previously told how in the last quarter of 2024, the Labour Government licensed exports of more military equipment to Israel than the Tories did for all of 2020-2023 combined. This led to Lammy claiming that The National's article was 'clickbait' as he dismissed the report, which was based on UK Government figures. Several high profile celebrities, including Paolo Nutini and Ncuti Gatwa, have joined calls urging Starmer to suspend arm sales to Israel.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
SNP loses its shine with Fergus Ewing exit
The Ewings, all three of them – Winnie, her daughter Annabelle and, last but not least, her son Fergus – have always added lustre to the SNP and the cause of independence. The late Winnie, Madam Ecosse, all but invented it, at least in the modern era, by winning the Hamilton by-election in 1967 and then becoming the first presiding officer of the reformed Scottish Parliament in 1999. Her daughter has been a minister in several departments, and became a deputy presiding officer of the Holyrood Parliament, and Fergus became – well, just Fergus. He was always his own man, the epitome of the bloke who goes his own way, no matter what. He has now announced that he's had it with the nit-picking, daft policy-loving comrades who even tried to have him chucked out of the party he's spent all of his adult life supporting. And he's going his own way. I'll admit I've never agreed with his continued support for independence, a policy that would have beggared his country. But he was a man of principle who accepted that politicians of different stripes had principles, too. And while they could be challenged, they should not be insulted. Above all, he saw his first duty was to his Highland constituents. He put their need for decent, safe roads at the top of his agenda – especially the dualling of the A9, widely known as Britain's 'killer road' because of crashes. And he didn't want to see fishing communities devastated by supposed green policies aimed at protecting the environment, no matter the human cost. If there was one issue that alienated Fergus Ewing more than most from the SNP, it was Nicola Sturgeon's ill-fated coalition with the ultra-left Scottish Greens. He fought their policies tooth and nail, and rightly declared that most of them were opposed by a majority of the electorate. Nowhere was this more evident than in the Sturgeon/Scottish Greens plan to rewrite society's views on gender. It was a battle in which Ewing was ultimately on the winning side. I'm certain that he has not taken this decision to stand as an independent in next May's Scottish Parliament election lightly. After all, he will almost certainly be standing against an SNP candidate and even at this distance, the arithmetic looks like being very tight. His long-time party will throw everything at him to keep 'his' Inverness and Nairn seat, which they've always held. I'll probably be wrong – I usually am with predictions – but my tenner is on Fergus Ewing holding on against the odds.
