Aggie MacKenzie on 'awful' backstage scuffle with Kim Woodburn that started feud
The late Kim Woodburn's How Clean Is Your House? co-star Aggie MacKenzie has spoken about the reason behind the feud between the pair.
Woodburn died earlier this week aged 83, following a short illness, and MacKenzie, 69, subsequently paid tribute to her former co-star.
'Kim was a tormented soul, but now she's finally at peace. We clashed often,' the statement provided to Metro read.
'Behind the fierce persona was deep pain and incredible strength. She survived because she had to. I hope she's resting now. She was an unforgettable woman.'
The co-stars garnered national fame for their innovative Channel 4 cleaning show, How Clean Is Your House? which ran from 2003 to 2009 – but were beset by long-standing feud rumours since professionally parting ways over 16 years ago.
After the grime-fighting reality show came to end, both hinted in various interviews that all was not well behind the scenes.
MacKenzie has now spoken about the reason behind their feud, saying it dates back to an angry altercation with Woodburn that drove a professional wedge between the pair.
The now-yoga teacher told The Mirror about a fallout behind the scenes of a Cinderella pantomime in Brighton back in January 2008 – in which the dirt-busting duo played the Ugly Stepsisters – that effectively ended their professional relationship.
MacKenzie recalled Woodburn missing her cue in the theatre, so she tapped her on the shoulder to remind her and then they went on for their scene – yet when they came off stage MacKenzie said Woodburn was 'furious'.
She told the publication: 'She pushed me. She actually pushed me so hard that I fell over. I lost it then. I really really lost it with her.
'The whole thing kind of blew up then. She went off to her dressing room and she was crying her eyes out. She was really upset and I was really upset – I was so furious.'
The interval was extended until Woodburn finally agreed to go back on stage, MacKenzie said.
'It was awful,' she continued. 'After all of that I was just done. It felt like she had kind of crushed me. The disrespect was so much and I knew that I couldn't actually continue being civil anymore without an apology.' More Trending
MacKenzie went on to say she had never received an apology from Woodburn, adding: 'I don't think that Kim knew how to apologise to anyone.
'She was a very complex person. Essentially, she probably had no confidence, she probably deep down hated herself, and so in order to survive she had to put on a big front to keep herself protected and to keep people away.
'If she apologised to me, that would be showing weakness in her eyes. So no, I never got an apology from her.'
Metro has contacted Kim Woodburn's estate for comment.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
View More »
MORE: Lou Christie, chart-topping singer and 1960s idol, dies aged 82
MORE: Wincey Willis, ITV's first female weather presenter, dies aged 76
MORE: The moment Kim Woodburn savagely branded Phillip Schofield 'phoney' on This Morning
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Strictly star slams 'double standards' at BBC after Naga Munchetty 'sex jibe'
A Strictly Come Dancing star has slammed the BBC over its 'double standards' following presenter Naga Munchetty's alleged 'sex jibe'. Welsh opera singer, Wynne Evans, 53, was sensationally dumped from the Strictly Come Dancing Live Tour earlier this year over inappropriate comments he made. The 'unacceptable' joke – which was first believed to be towards host Janette Manrara but Wynne has since insisted it was a jibe at Jamie Borthwick – apparently referenced having a threesome. Soon after, he apologised, saying he was 'deeply sorry for the pain my inappropriate action caused' and would take a break from the public eye for 'self-reflection' and to 'prioritise my well-being'. Now, however, following the news that BBC Breakfast star Naga is facing bullying allegations and inappropriate 'sex jibe' claims, Wynne has called out the director general, Tim Davie. Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Posting the front page of The Sun in a now-deleted post, Wynne said: 'I really wish Naga well and I hope she doesn't get hounded. 'But come on @bbc @bbccymruwales what double standards. 'Tim Davie [Director-general of the BBC] promised to protect people on Strictly from being hounded by the press, but he won't even meet with me.' Presenter Naga, 50, hosts the BBC flagship morning programme alongside Charlie Stayt. It was reported earlier this year that an internal investigation was being carried out into allegations of bullying at the program. Since, it has emerged that the editor of BBC Breakfast, Richard Frediani, is taking an extended period of leave after allegations of bullying behaviour, including a claim he shook a female colleague. Deadline reported that Naga had raised concerns with senior BBC figures regarding his conduct, amid other misconduct complaints colleagues made against him. The Sun then reported claims that Naga faced her own bullying allegations. No formal action has been taken, but she is said to have been spoken to about an incident. Wynne previously spoke to The Sun about the fallout, saying he is 'not a bad guy'. He also stated that he is 'not a misogynist', explaining that 'spit-roast boy' was a nickname given to EastEnders actor Jamie, insisting that the quip was a prank that 'backfired'. 'It's been heartbreaking,' he said of the aftermath. ''Spit-roast boy' was a nickname we all gave Jamie Borthwick because he could contort his legs over his head like a spit-roast chicken. 'I would be the first to apologise if I had used it in the double meaning of that word. 'But it absolutely wasn't meant sexually – and the fact I used 'boy,' alright, it's nuanced, but it shows I was talking to Jamie, NOT Janette.' Earlier this month, Wynne shared a full apology video from Strictly Come Dancing, which he claims the BBC ordered him to cut short. The singer and his professional dance partner sparked controversy when she appeared to move his hand from her waist, which he said was 'just a body language experiment that was picked up on'. The pair shared a brief apology video at the time, but he has now shared a different version, which is 50 seconds long instead of the 10-second clip that got published. His video begins with Katya saying: 'Hello everyone. We felt the need to clarify something. We find it quite fascinating how people take time to look into in such detail every gesture, every look.' Wynne added: 'So we thought we'll mess around. And we said, 'Oh I'll put my hand on your waist, you pretend to move it away, and let's see who notices it.' 'And now everybody thinks I'm a weirdo. But really, I promise you I'm not. And we're doing this high ten thing as well, where she blanks me from a high ten.' The pair insisted it was 'all sort of planned just to see if anybody notices', while Katya said they wanted to 'clarify that it's all just messing around'. More Trending 'He's not a creep,' she added. 'But he's a brilliant dancer.' When he was removed from the bill, having already done several performances, a spokesperson from the BBC said: 'We have made it very clear to Wynne that we do not tolerate such behaviour on the tour. 'We were not previously aware of the remark and did not receive any complaints.' View More » Metro has contacted the BBC for comment. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Legendary BBC series hailed as 'guilty pleasure' streaming on completely free UK service MORE: 'I beat the system and proved I didn't need a TV licence' MORE: More schedule changes confirmed as EastEnders is pulled from BBC One
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Gail Porter wows with wig transformation 20 years after alopecia diagnosis
Gail Porter has been showered with compliments from fans after stepping out wearing a wig. The Scottish TV personality began losing her hair to alopecia – a condition that causes hair loss or baldness in some or all areas of the body – in 2005. Several years later, her lashes and brows began growing back, and she sported a short, cropped look. However, in 2010, the former model revealed that she had started losing her hair once more, and the following year, she unveiled a shaved head again. Gail, 54, has always refused to wear a wig or hairpieces to conceal her baldness, having been keen on raising awareness of alopecia. However, in recent years, she's started to experiment more, and last year, she unveiled a mid-length blonde wig to her followers. Then, last night, she rocked a dramatic new look, heading to the British LGBT Awards with long locks. The ceremony has been held annually since 2014 and is a huge moment in the LGBTQ+ community's calendar, with the likes of Jade, Billy Porter, and Ian 'H' Watkins receiving trophies this time. Ahead of walking the red carpet, Gail took to Instagram to debut her blonde tresses, which she wore in waves as they cascaded down past her waist. She tagged Amber Jean Rowan in the caption, thanking the wig maker – who has also made wigs for Strictly's Amy Dowden after her cancer treatment. Taking to the comments, her 81,000 followers were keen to heap praise on her, with some having to do a double-take to make sure it was really her. 'Stunning 😍😍 Gawjeeeeus 😍😍', commented @mcchalkiewhite. 'Wow Gail. Beautiful with it and Beautiful without it', wrote @christine_anne_garstin. 'Gail you look amazing 😍😍😍', complimented @tinabear1969. 'Wow had to look twice 👏 looks really good 👍', wrote @neilcornish13. Gail removed her wig for the event itself, posing proudly on the carpet alongside some of the UK's biggest LGBTQ+ talent and allies. The former children's television presenter got her first wig in 20 years in January 2024, which she debuted on social media. She wrote at the time: 'First wig ever!! Well, one that's coming home with me and the cat! Made with so much love and care ❤️Thank you so so much to everyone at @amberjeanshop Adore my new hair! X' Speaking previously about losing her hair, the ex-Celebrity Big Brother housemate explained to Metro that she was forced to sleep on benches when work dried up as a result of her refusing to wear a wig. Gail found that TV shows were only interested in booking her if she would talk about 'being bald', which also came while going through her divorce with her former husband and Toploader guitarist Dan Hipgrave. As her situation worsened in the mid-00s, Gail was unable to make ends meet as she became 'more and more depressed'. When appearing on the BBC Access All Podcast in August 2023, Gail also explained that work dried up very rapidly. 'It was so quick,' she said. 'I had long blonde hair, and then four weeks later I was completely bald. 'People didn't want to go near me for television or anything because I looked different.' More Trending Last year, she was also praised for taking on her first photoshoot in a wig, with Sue Schilling, the chief executive of Alopecia UK, saying it is key to give people options as there is neither a 'right' nor a 'wrong' way to have alopecia. Gail added to The Sun at the time: 'I don't think I'm a role model, but if me being bald or me wearing a wig gives someone the confidence to go and try it for themselves, I'm glad. 'I like the fact that women and men talk to me about hair loss.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
I watched 28 Years Later despite hating horror films - scaredy-cats should too
I distinctly remember the moment I started hating scary films. My friend's mum had snuck me and her daughter – two only-just-13-year-olds – into a screening of 15-rated Hot Fuzz. I know now that this Simon Pegg cult classic is considered a comedy but for teenage me, it was the most terrifying thing I'd ever seen. Beheadings, impalings, and charred bodies – it was far too much. So when 28 Weeks Later came out that same year, and friends suggested watching the original in preparation, I squirmed. I actually believe I sat on my pal's sofa with eyes closed, periodically walking in and out the room (which has resulted in a very patchy recollection of the plot). Anyway, all that's to say that I haven't strayed far from the rom-com/action/comedy genre since. Until this week – when I scored an invite to the premiere of 28 Years Later. Not one to turn down a freebie, and with my 31-year-old big girl pants firmly on, I decided to give it a watch. Warning: This article contains spoilers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video And I have to say, even as someone who despises jumpscares, it's definitely worth seeing. I do have a slight disclaimer in that I did demand Metro's senior film reporter Tori Brazier – who had seen the film the day before – warn me about the scariest moments. I was met with instructions like 'when you see the deer skull, close your eyes', and 'turn away when they enter the train carriage'. For those who have spent a life trying to stay blissfully unaware of the plot of the zombie trilogy, it's this: 28 years before the most recent installment, animal rights activists release chimpanzee lab subjects who essentially spread a rage-inducing virus across the UK creating 'the infected' (aka zombies). These running, blood-vomiting, shrieking monsters (who are largely naked by 28 Years Later) terrorise the UK to the point that the nation is placed in global quarantine, with human survivors left to defend themselves while life goes on in the rest of the world. In a little community, on a small island off the mainland, separated by one road through the water, 12-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams), his mum Isla (Jodie Comer) and his dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), have found safety. The film sees Spike and both of his parents make trips to the mainland; in his dad's case, it's so Spike can make his first kill; in his mum's, Spike's looking to find the mysterious Dr Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) who lives on the mainland and who Spike believes can cure Isla of her unknown illness. And of course, there's the infected to navigate around – especially the new alphas (aka super zombies) providing ample opportunity for blood, gore and scares. There's the opening five minutes, where we wait with bated breath to see if a roomful of terrified children survive the infected descending. Well, you can guess how that goes. And there's the scene where we see an alpha rip a man's head from his neck, withdrawing his spine like a bone from a tender beef rib, and using it to batter another man. But you know what, despite Tori's warnings, I only closed my eyes once (I did, however, jump out of my skin twice). Because, in that moment, I really felt like I would be missing out if I decided to watch the insides of my eyelids instead. The acting in this film is phenomenal. Right before it screened, Danny Boyle talked about the 'Harry Potter effect' and how there are an incredible amount of talented young wannabe-actors out there. We saw it with Owen Cooper in Adolescence, and we see it again with Alfie Williams who does a stand-out job, considering it is his character that leads the entire plot of the film. We feel his terror, fear for his safety from the offset, feel the immense pressure that's on him, see his youthful innocence when he notices his dad is exaggerating their successes, and treasure the moments he has with his mum, pulling silly faces in a crumbling cathedral. The main cast may be small but they are mighty. Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jodie Comer and Ralph Fiennes don't have a huge amount of screen time each but when they do appear, they draw you in with their quirks, flaws and humanness (which is kind of the whole point of the film, I know). Yes, I might have found the straddling of the slapstick comedy vs the heart-wrenching vs the horror jarring at times, but I'm well-assured that that is the beauty of Danny Boyle, and in honesty the film would be a lot weaker if even one of these aspects were missing. As part of her warning, Tori mentioned that there was one scary scene I must keep my eyes open for, and I'm glad I listened. Thinking they've escaped an alpha after a night of near-death experiences, Jamie and Spike walk back across the causeway, the stress falling away as they joke around. The peace doesn't last and we see an immense chase scene, with the camera panning in and out to show the splash of the father and son's strides being closely followed by that of their pursuer, all under an inky blue sky peppered with stars and northern lights. More Trending It's utterly gorgeous while also bringing you out in a cold sweat. I'd have been a fool to look away. And so I'm glad I faced my fears and gave into the horror genre. I would hardly say I'm a convert (I'll still be comfort-watching Miss Congeniality for the rest of my days), but maybe I'll go back and give 28 Days and 28 Weeks later a go. Maybe I'll even like them. Maybe I'll finally be able to face Hot Fuzz. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I went to Glastonbury and discovered it's just really overrated MORE: 'One of the best horror films' is finally coming to Amazon Prime next week MORE: 'I'm the 6ft 8in Alpha in 28 Years Later that's haunting your dreams'
