Stroud mum finds safe space in group helping others with postnatal health
A CHARITY'S support group in Stroud has been praised for helping parents with their mental health.
The Gloucestershire Breastfeeding Supporters' Network (GBSN) runs seven free weekly groups across the county to support parents who are breastfeeding.
They offer free one-to-one support through trained peer supporters and breastfeeding counsellors.
One of these groups takes place in Stroud, which mother Danni Smith began attending after she had her second daughter.
Danni wanted help with breastfeeding and in the group found a 'safe space' where she could talk about her postnatal mental health struggles.
She said: "When I first got to the group, my baby was just a few days old and I just felt immediately safe.
"There was no judgement.
"This was a space for my whole family, my husband and toddler could come along too and feel supported."
Danni has since been inspired to become a breastfeeding counsellor and a trustee for GBSN.
She said: "Being able to now be a breastfeeding counsellor who can walk that journey with somebody else and support them through it is a huge privilege."
Now, the support offered by the network is being recognised nationally.
The charity has been shortlisted for a national mental health award by BBC Radio 4 as part of their All in the Mind awards.
This recognition underscores its contribution to providing not just breastfeeding support but also mental health support to parents.
GBSN chair Kirstie Clarke said: "We are so proud to be shortlisted for this award which recognises the dedication of a wonderful team of peer supporters, breastfeeding counsellors and volunteers who make our groups the nurturing and welcoming space that they are.
"Breastfeeding support at GBSN is not only about helping a mother with feeding her baby – our ethos is about providing a holistic approach to caring and empowering parents at all stages of their breastfeeding journeys.
"Even if it's just about giving mums a cup of tea, a slice of cake and a chance to chat with other mums."
The All in the Mind final will be held on June 18 at a ceremony in London.
For more information, visit the Gloucestershire Breastfeeding Supporters' Network website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Deadly weekend heat in England ‘100 times more likely' due to climate crisis
The dangerous 32C heat that will be endured by people in the south-east of England on Saturday will have been made 100 times more likely by the climate crisis, scientists have calculated. Global heating, caused by the burning of fossil fuels, is making every heatwave more likely and more intense. The 32C (89.6F) day forecast on Saturday would have been expected only once every 2,500 years without the climate crisis, the researchers said, and June heatwaves are now about 2-4C (3.6-7.2F) hotter than in the past. Related: Amber heat alert issued across England with warning of 'rise in deaths' The heat is expected to cause premature deaths, particularly among older and vulnerable people. More than 10,000 people died before their time in summer heatwaves between 2020 and 2024, according to the UK Health Security Agency, and the UK government has been heavily criticised for failing to properly prepare people for extreme weather. Prolonged heat is especially dangerous as it gives no time for people's bodies to cool off. Maximum temperatures in the south-east are expected to be above 28C for three consecutive days. The scientists said this heatwave was made 10 times more likely by the climate crisis. Dr Ben Clarke at Imperial College London, who was part of the research team, said the culprit for the extreme heat was clear. 'This weather just wouldn't have been a heatwave without human-induced warming,' he said. Climate breakdown drove the annual global temperature in 2024 to a new record and carbon dioxide emissions from coal, oil and gas are still rising. If that continues for just two more years, passing the internationally agreed limit of 1.5C above preindustrial levels will be inevitable, intensifying the extreme weather already taking lives in the UK and across the globe. Clarke said: 'With every fraction of a degree of warming, the UK will experience hotter, more dangerous heatwaves. That means more heat deaths, more pressure on the NHS, more transport disruptions, and tougher work conditions. The best way to avoid a future of relentless heat is by shifting to renewable energy.' Dr Friederike Otto, also at Imperial College London, said: 'It is really important to highlight this early summer heatwave because the impacts of heat are still severely underestimated, and the UK is not prepared for this type of weather.' The Climate Change Committee, the government's official advisers, said in April that the UK's preparations for adapting to a changing climate were 'inadequate, piecemeal and disjointed'. Otto said: 'Heatwaves are called the silent killer, because we don't see people dropping dead on the street, but killers they are. In Europe in 2022, more than 60,000 people died in the summer from extreme heat.' Maja Vahlberg at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre said: 'Sadly most people die from heat indoors and alone, especially older people and those with underlying health conditions, such as lung or heart disease.' Prof Mike Tipton, a physiologist at Portsmouth University, said: 'The human body is not designed to tolerate prolonged exposure to this sort of extreme heat. It is undeniable that climate change is now costing British lives. Those politicians and commentators who pour scorn on climate action should reflect on this fact because, until we stop emitting greenhouse gases, these episodes are only likely to become more extreme.' The extremely dry spring, combined with soaring temperatures, means the UK is also facing a high risk of wildfires, said Theodore Keeping, also at Imperial College London: 'We've already seen the highest burnt area on record in the UK this year.' People should take extreme care with fires, barbecues and cigarettes, he said. Related: How do we know that the climate crisis is to blame for extreme weather? The rapid study of the role of global heating in the predicted weekend heatwave compared the likelihood of the high temperatures in today's hotter climate with that in the cooler preindustrial period. The team, part of the World Weather Attribution group, was also able to reuse detailed climate modelling undertaken for a similar heatwave in 2022, speeding up their conclusions. They said older people were at greatest risk from the high temperatures, but that others with existing vulnerabilities could also be affected, with the effectiveness of some medications being changed by the heat or affecting people's ability to cool down. Sweating is how the body cools so it is vital to drink plenty of water, the researchers said. Closing windows and curtains during the day and opening them in the cool of the night can help keep temperatures in homes down, they said. A recent study estimated that 80% of UK homes overheat in the summer. Temperatures in the UK rose above 40C for the first time in 2022. The Met Office said on Wednesday that the UK had a 50/50 chance of temperatures soaring to 40C again in the next 12 years as the climate crisis worsens and that 45C could not be ruled out. Extreme heat is more deadly than floods, earthquakes and hurricanes combined, according to a report by the insurance giant Swiss Re published on 12 June. 'Up to half a million people globally succumb to the effects of extreme heat each year,' it said. 'Extreme heat used to be considered the 'invisible peril' because the impacts are not as obvious as of other natural perils,' said Jérôme Haegeli, chief economist at Swiss Re. 'With a clear trend to longer, hotter heatwaves, it is important we shine a light on the true cost to human life, our economy, infrastructure, agriculture and healthcare.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Assisted dying – medical anthropolgist on the complex practical and ethical road ahead
The House of Commons narrowly passed the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill on June 20, a significant step toward legalising assisted dying in England and Wales. The bill must still pass through the House of Lords before it can become law. So far, the debate has centred on a key question: should people already facing a terminal prognosis have the legal right to choose when to end their lives? The discussions, both in Parliament and among the wider public, have often focused on personal stories of dying – some shared as examples of a 'good' death, others as cautionary tales of suffering. When speaking to the BBC after the bill passed, MP Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the legislation, described the current situation as a 'failing status quo.' She argued that the law must change to offer more control and compassion at the end of life. More than 530,000 people die in England each year, and it's estimated that around 90% of them could benefit from palliative care. Yet many are still dying in pain, with thousands experiencing unmet needs in their final months. Some supporters of the bill argue that access to assisted dying could offer an escape from anticipated suffering and loss of dignity, especially when palliative care falls short. The concept of a 'good' death already shapes the country's end-of-life care policy. Current practice encourages patient choice, comfort and dignity usually guided by the question: what matters most to you? Through advance care planning, patients can express preferences for their care, such as refusing resuscitation or declining further treatment. But these choices are usually framed in terms of what not to do. Assisted dying, by contrast, introduces a new ethical dimension: it's not about withholding treatment, but about actively intervening to end life. Over the past 15 years of conducting ethnographic research on end-of-life care in England, I've seen just how deeply people are affected when asked to contemplate their future – or the future of someone they love. Read more: Some patients are decisive: they know what they don't want, and they say so clearly. Others apologise for being a burden. Some find it too difficult to plan at all. In fact, fewer than 3% of UK adults have documented advance care plans. Clinicians, too, face challenges. I've seen doctors wish patients would recognise when treatment has become futile – and patients, in turn, hope doctors will take the decision to 'just stop'. There can be deep mistrust, with some fearing they'll be 'given up on'. These tensions are unlikely to disappear if assisted dying is legalised; in fact, they may become more pronounced. In England, the legal definition of 'terminal illness' is a life expectancy of six months or less, and that's the threshold used in this bill. It excludes people with incurable but long-term conditions who may be suffering, but aren't likely to die within half a year. This six-month cut-off also assumes that doctors can accurately predict how long someone has left. But Marie Curie, the end of life charity, called that definition 'outdated' and 'arbitrary,' highlighting how it fails to reflect clinical reality. Read more: More recently, research examining nearly 100,000 patient records from London found that prognosis is least reliable when predicting survival over the 'weeks to months' time-frame – exactly the bracket covered by the bill. Doctors are more confident estimating if someone has less than two weeks or more than a year. Anything in between is often described, quite literally, as 'the length of a piece of string'. The bill's passage in the Commons reflects a growing desire to give people more choice, control and clarity at the end of life. For many, it marks a long-overdue recognition of both suffering and the right to self-determination. Yet while the vote signals strong support for greater autonomy in dying, the everyday realities of predicting prognosis and navigating complex end-of-life decisions remain uncertain. The practical and ethical challenges are far from resolved. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Erica Borgstrom receives/has received funding for her research from the National Institute of Health Research, the UKRI Economic and Social Research Council, Marie Curie, the Foundation for the Sociology of Health and Illness, NHS England & NHS Innovation, and End of Life Doula UK.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
2 Ways That ‘Childhood Trauma' Rewires The Brain — By A Psychologist
Research reveals how childhood trauma restructures the brain and immune system in ways that can last ... More well into adulthood. Most well-informed people are aware of how often traumatic childhood experiences are associated with serious mental health conditions later in life. What few people know, however, is how exactly trauma gives rise to these disorders. Some attribute it to emotional scarring, or psychological wounds that live only in the mind. But according to 2022 research from Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health, these wounds are in no way metaphorical. To the brain, trauma can be as real and physical as a cut, a burn or a broken bone. Here are two major ways that childhood trauma physically reshapes the brain, essentially rewiring individuals biologically. 1. Trauma Trains The Body And Brain To Stay On High Alert When a child is exposed to repeated threats, their body and brain have no choice but to adapt. And one of the first systems to respond, in such cases, is the immune system. As you may already know, the immune system's primary purpose is to protect us in situations it perceives to be risky. In most cases, this pertains to illness, injury, infections, viruses, bacteria and so on — but also to stressful situations. Should it sense a threat of any of these kinds, it readies itself to respond. But when abuse, neglect or instability are the norm in a child's life, their immune system remains ready and activated. The body cannot afford to respond to these environmental stressors in the way it would to a specific, localized or short-lived threat; constant threats necessitate constant vigilance. As such, since the immune system believes it's permanently at risk, it operates accordingly at all times. It produces chemical messengers — specifically, inflammatory molecules — to protect the body from infection or injury, but in extreme excess. However, without any physical wounds to tend to, this overproduction gives rise to chronic inflammation. Astoundingly, the 2022 study discovered elevated levels of these inflammatory markers years, even decades, after the participants' trauma. Typically, these inflammatory molecules are transmitted via the bloodstream to whichever site they're needed; in healthy individuals, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) usually prevents them from entering the brain. But, with enough exposure to trauma, this barrier can become much easier to bypass. As a result, these molecules begin crossing into the brain, where they're not usually meant to go. Once they cross the barrier, they begin to interfere with key neurological functions. This, in turn, can significantly impact a child's mood, memory or attention. Notably, if the body never gets the message that it's safe — that is, if a child is constantly exposed to trauma without any breaks — this state of hypervigilance can eventually give rise to serious mental health challenges. And, in severe cases, the brain's physical architecture begins to shift in response to the ongoing sense of danger. 2. Trauma Can Cause White Matter To Fray To understand what this chronic inflammation can do, it helps to think of the brain in the same way you would a town, rather than just an arbitrary collection of parts or lobes. This town is built with two primary materials: white and gray matter. In the simplest of terms, white matter is what keeps your brain running smoothly. It comprises billions of long, fibrous threads that allow your most important brain regions (your gray matter) to communicate with one another. In this case, gray matter would be the neighborhoods of the town, where your thoughts and feelings 'live.' White matter, on the other hand, is the highway system they use to travel. According to the 2022 study, individuals with bipolar disorder who had experienced adverse childhood experiences showed clear signs of white matter disruption. Specifically, their brain scans revealed lower levels of fractional anisotropy, which is a measure used to assess how coherent and structured these white matter tracts are. In essence, the aforementioned inflammation can result in lasting damage to an individual's white matter. In most cases, this means the brain's internal communication system will function less efficiently than that of a person without trauma. When white matter is intact and well-organized, it acts much like well-planned and well-looked after roads: information moves quickly and efficiently across the brain. But once white matter connections are lost, tangled or damaged, those signals slow down or get misrouted — much like cars do on a road with potholes, cracks or fading paint. This is exactly what the brain looks like when it's frequently exposed to trauma in early life: a collection of unkempt, interconnected roads, on which cars struggle significantly to travel. And this kind of 'unkemptness' in the brain's highway system has very real, functional consequences. The study notes that damage to the white matter's structural integrity can lead to miscommunication between some of the brain's most essential regions. In turn, it's considerably more challenging for the emotional centers of the brain to communicate with the areas responsible for logic and regulation. This can lead to dysfunction in: As a result, an individual might feel perpetually on edge without ever really knowing why. Even in situations where they have every logical reason to feel safe, they might struggle to calm themselves down. And despite immense exhaustion or tiredness, they might find themselves lying wide awake at night. Even the smallest, most inconsequential decisions can feel overwhelming, since the mental routes that once effortlessly facilitated those processes can feel as though they're punctuated with delays and detours. Unfortunately, these responses can persist well into adulthood, and well past their years of trauma. That said, this doesn't mean that the brain is 'broken,' nor that it has 'failed.' It just means that the brain has adapted to danger and inflammation in the only way it was designed to: by reinforcing defensive pathways to protect itself. When faced with trauma, the brain makes an executive decision to prioritize survival over flexibility — even if that means day-to-day functioning might be a bit more difficult later on in life. This is a sign of resilience, not failure. The effects of trauma can linger, but so can resilience. Take this science-backed test to find out how you respond to life's challenges: Brief Resilience Scale
