2 Ways That ‘Childhood Trauma' Rewires The Brain — By A Psychologist
Research reveals how childhood trauma restructures the brain and immune system in ways that can last ... More well into adulthood.
Most well-informed people are aware of how often traumatic childhood experiences are associated with serious mental health conditions later in life. What few people know, however, is how exactly trauma gives rise to these disorders.
Some attribute it to emotional scarring, or psychological wounds that live only in the mind. But according to 2022 research from Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health, these wounds are in no way metaphorical. To the brain, trauma can be as real and physical as a cut, a burn or a broken bone.
Here are two major ways that childhood trauma physically reshapes the brain, essentially rewiring individuals biologically.
1. Trauma Trains The Body And Brain To Stay On High Alert
When a child is exposed to repeated threats, their body and brain have no choice but to adapt. And one of the first systems to respond, in such cases, is the immune system.
As you may already know, the immune system's primary purpose is to protect us in situations it perceives to be risky. In most cases, this pertains to illness, injury, infections, viruses, bacteria and so on — but also to stressful situations. Should it sense a threat of any of these kinds, it readies itself to respond.
But when abuse, neglect or instability are the norm in a child's life, their immune system remains ready and activated. The body cannot afford to respond to these environmental stressors in the way it would to a specific, localized or short-lived threat; constant threats necessitate constant vigilance.
As such, since the immune system believes it's permanently at risk, it operates accordingly at all times. It produces chemical messengers — specifically, inflammatory molecules — to protect the body from infection or injury, but in extreme excess.
However, without any physical wounds to tend to, this overproduction gives rise to chronic inflammation. Astoundingly, the 2022 study discovered elevated levels of these inflammatory markers years, even decades, after the participants' trauma.
Typically, these inflammatory molecules are transmitted via the bloodstream to whichever site they're needed; in healthy individuals, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) usually prevents them from entering the brain. But, with enough exposure to trauma, this barrier can become much easier to bypass.
As a result, these molecules begin crossing into the brain, where they're not usually meant to go. Once they cross the barrier, they begin to interfere with key neurological functions. This, in turn, can significantly impact a child's mood, memory or attention.
Notably, if the body never gets the message that it's safe — that is, if a child is constantly exposed to trauma without any breaks — this state of hypervigilance can eventually give rise to serious mental health challenges. And, in severe cases, the brain's physical architecture begins to shift in response to the ongoing sense of danger.
2. Trauma Can Cause White Matter To Fray
To understand what this chronic inflammation can do, it helps to think of the brain in the same way you would a town, rather than just an arbitrary collection of parts or lobes. This town is built with two primary materials: white and gray matter.
In the simplest of terms, white matter is what keeps your brain running smoothly. It comprises billions of long, fibrous threads that allow your most important brain regions (your gray matter) to communicate with one another.
In this case, gray matter would be the neighborhoods of the town, where your thoughts and feelings 'live.' White matter, on the other hand, is the highway system they use to travel.
According to the 2022 study, individuals with bipolar disorder who had experienced adverse childhood experiences showed clear signs of white matter disruption. Specifically, their brain scans revealed lower levels of fractional anisotropy, which is a measure used to assess how coherent and structured these white matter tracts are.
In essence, the aforementioned inflammation can result in lasting damage to an individual's white matter. In most cases, this means the brain's internal communication system will function less efficiently than that of a person without trauma.
When white matter is intact and well-organized, it acts much like well-planned and well-looked after roads: information moves quickly and efficiently across the brain. But once white matter connections are lost, tangled or damaged, those signals slow down or get misrouted — much like cars do on a road with potholes, cracks or fading paint.
This is exactly what the brain looks like when it's frequently exposed to trauma in early life: a collection of unkempt, interconnected roads, on which cars struggle significantly to travel. And this kind of 'unkemptness' in the brain's highway system has very real, functional consequences.
The study notes that damage to the white matter's structural integrity can lead to miscommunication between some of the brain's most essential regions. In turn, it's considerably more challenging for the emotional centers of the brain to communicate with the areas responsible for logic and regulation. This can lead to dysfunction in:
As a result, an individual might feel perpetually on edge without ever really knowing why. Even in situations where they have every logical reason to feel safe, they might struggle to calm themselves down. And despite immense exhaustion or tiredness, they might find themselves lying wide awake at night.
Even the smallest, most inconsequential decisions can feel overwhelming, since the mental routes that once effortlessly facilitated those processes can feel as though they're punctuated with delays and detours.
Unfortunately, these responses can persist well into adulthood, and well past their years of trauma.
That said, this doesn't mean that the brain is 'broken,' nor that it has 'failed.' It just means that the brain has adapted to danger and inflammation in the only way it was designed to: by reinforcing defensive pathways to protect itself.
When faced with trauma, the brain makes an executive decision to prioritize survival over flexibility — even if that means day-to-day functioning might be a bit more difficult later on in life.
This is a sign of resilience, not failure.
The effects of trauma can linger, but so can resilience. Take this science-backed test to find out how you respond to life's challenges: Brief Resilience Scale
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
A potent heat dome is sending temperatures into the triple digits
The hottest temperatures of the year so far will soon reach the eastern half of the United States as a brutal heat dome starts to build over the weekend. Dangerous, record-breaking heat will impact millions next week. Much of the East is getting a brief respite from the July-like heat that baked the region earlier this week, but thermometers will soar to even more extreme levels starting Sunday. Tens of millions of people from the Midwest to the East Coast will face a level 4-of-4 extreme heat risk Sunday through at least Thursday, according to the National Weather Service. Such long-lasting heat is rare, will likely offer little to no overnight relief and will affect anyone without effective cooling and/or adequate hydration,' the agency warns. High temperatures across the Plains, Midwest, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast are expected to hit at least 15 degrees above normal next week and will mark the hottest temperatures of the year to date, rising well into the 90s. With humidity, it could feel as hot as 110 degrees — especially in the Mid-Atlantic. The heat will peak in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic early next week. Forecast highs are around 97 degrees in New York City Sunday through Tuesday and could break daily records. In Washington, DC, the temperature could reach 100 — matching or breaking records on both days. Boston is expected to be around 90 degrees on Monday and 94 on Tuesday, just shy of daily records set in the mid-90s. Over 250 daily temperature records could be broken on Monday and Tuesday, including both record highs and record warm lows — many at sites with data going back to the early 1900s. Heat remains the deadliest form of extreme weather in the US, contributing to more than 800 deaths annually on average since 1999, a 2023 study found. Days of intense heat disproportionately drive more severe public health impacts, even in places accustomed to summer heat. Emergency room visits for heat-related illness surge on 'major' and 'extreme' risk days, particularly when high humidity and warm nights prevent the body from cooling, according to the National Weather Service. Nighttime temperatures are also warming faster than daytime highs due to climate change. This makes it harder for the body to cool and recover and increases the risk of heat-related illness and death. This stretch of heat is building just as the seasons officially change. The summer solstice was on Friday at 10:42 p.m. ET, the moment the Northern Hemisphere is tilted closest to the sun. The solstice brings the highest sun angles and longest days of the year, meaning more solar energy is available to fuel extreme heat. The solstice is the start of astronomical summer, but meteorologists mark the beginning of summer on June 1, using calendar months to better match seasonal weather patterns. The hottest weeks of the year still lie ahead. For nearly all of the country — outside of parts of the Desert Southwest in Arizona, New Mexico and West Texas — the warmest days typically occur in July or August. This early-season event is likely just a preview of what's to come, though this stretch of heat is expected to ease by the end of next week. CNN Meteorologist Mary Gilbert contributed to this report.
CNET
27 minutes ago
- CNET
Heatstroke Can Happen Fast. Here's How to Spot It Before It's Too Late.
Summer 2025 is already breaking heat records across the US, with temperatures climbing higher earlier than expected. If you're spending time outdoors, whether for work or recreation, it's critical to know the risks of heat-related illness. Heatstroke, the most dangerous of them, can set in quickly and become life-threatening without warning. It doesn't just happen to athletes or people doing intense physical activity. Classic heatstroke can occur simply by being in a hot environment for too long. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, people who work outside are especially vulnerable in the first few days of exposure, because the body needs time to adapt to rising temperatures. As the heat intensifies this summer, understanding how to spot and respond to heatstroke could be the most important safety step you take. In addition to workers, heatstroke is especially common among the elderly, very young children, including babies, and in times "when we see these heat waves that go on for several days," Dr. Korin Hudson, an emergency room physician with MedStar Health, told CNET last year. People with certain medical conditions and those taking certain medications or drugs, including alcohol, may also have a higher risk of heatstroke. Here's what to know if you or someone near you starts experiencing symptoms of heatstroke. Heatstroke symptoms Sometimes, heatstroke can start with symptoms of heat exhaustion, which isn't quite as serious as heatstroke but still requires someone to cool down as quickly as possible. If left untreated, heat exhaustion can progress to heatstroke, which is a medical emergency. If your symptoms worsen, last more than one hour or you start vomiting, call 911. Symptoms of heatstroke, according to the Mayo Clinic and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, include: Altered mental state, including confusion, agitation and slurred speech (this may also result in "odd" behavior) Headache Hot, flushed, usually dry skin (or, alternatively, heavy sweating -- if brought on by exercise, heatstroke may include moist skin) Loss of consciousness Racing heartbeat Rapid breathing Seizures Very high body temperature Vomiting Keeping hydrated by drinking enough water, both before you head outdoors and while you're out in the heat, is an important step to warding off heat illness.1. Call 911 Having heatstroke is a medical emergency that requires professional care. If there's more than one person around to aid the person suffering heatstroke, Hudson advised that one person call 911 while the other helps the person through the steps below. 2. Get to a cooler area immediately If you're around someone who has heatstroke, move them to a cooler area, such as a nearby air-conditioned room or into the shade. Either way, "try to move them out of the heat as quickly as possible," Hudson said. The goal is to cool down the body's core temperature. 3. Take off excess clothing Removing long-sleeve shirts, pants or other clothing will help a person cool down faster. Hudson said the goal is to reach "evaporative cooling," and clothing can prevent evaporation. (For people who choose to run in layers to "sweat off weight," Hudson said, you probably shouldn't. It's dangerous and can lead to heatstroke. You may consider cooling clothes that work with your body to keep you cooler and more comfortable.) 4. Hold ice, cold towels or cool water to the skin If you have something like a cold towel or a water bottle, put it on your or the other person's neck, armpits or groin. While you wait for help to arrive, you can even spray them down with cold water or put them in a cold shower -- anything to cool them off. Cold water immersion or an ice bath is one treatment for heatstroke that doctors may use at the hospital. Don't force a drink on someone experiencing heatstroke, the CDC says. This is different advice than for someone who's experiencing heat exhaustion, which typically comes before heatstroke. While someone with heat exhaustion may be given sips of water or sports drink, a person experiencing heatstroke may be confused, lose consciousness or have an altered state of consciousness. "Because they have a depressed or altered level of consciousness, it may affect their ability to swallow safely so it's probably better not to give them anything to eat or drink," Hudson said. Before and after heatstroke: Check on your neighbors Some people are more susceptible to heat illness and heatstroke, such as older adults, younger children, people with mobility issues, certain health conditions and those taking certain medications, including common drugs like blood pressure or antidepressant medications. In case of a heat wave, be especially mindful to check in with your elderly neighbor down the hall or a friend who has trouble getting around, according to Hudson. "This is the time that we really suggest people check on their neighbors," she said. "Especially in places where people don't have access to air conditioning or don't have a way to get someplace cool." "They may be feeling poorly but can't do anything about it," Hudson added.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why is AI halllucinating more frequently, and how can we stop it?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The more advanced artificial intelligence (AI) gets, the more it "hallucinates" and provides incorrect and inaccurate information. Research conducted by OpenAI found that its latest and most powerful reasoning models, o3 and o4-mini, hallucinated 33% and 48% of the time, respectively, when tested by OpenAI's PersonQA benchmark. That's more than double the rate of the older o1 model. While o3 delivers more accurate information than its predecessor, it appears to come at the cost of more inaccurate hallucinations. This raises a concern over the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) such as AI chatbots, said Eleanor Watson, an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) member and AI ethics engineer at Singularity University. "When a system outputs fabricated information — such as invented facts, citations or events — with the same fluency and coherence it uses for accurate content, it risks misleading users in subtle and consequential ways," Watson told Live Science. Related: Cutting-edge AI models from OpenAI and DeepSeek undergo 'complete collapse' when problems get too difficult, study reveals The issue of hallucination highlights the need to carefully assess and supervise the information AI systems produce when using LLMs and reasoning models, experts say. The crux of a reasoning model is that it can handle complex tasks by essentially breaking them down into individual components and coming up with solutions to tackle them. Rather than seeking to kick out answers based on statistical probability, reasoning models come up with strategies to solve a problem, much like how humans think. In order to develop creative, and potentially novel, solutions to problems, AI needs to hallucinate —otherwise it's limited by rigid data its LLM ingests. "It's important to note that hallucination is a feature, not a bug, of AI," Sohrob Kazerounian, an AI researcher at Vectra AI, told Live Science. "To paraphrase a colleague of mine, 'Everything an LLM outputs is a hallucination. It's just that some of those hallucinations are true.' If an AI only generated verbatim outputs that it had seen during training, all of AI would reduce to a massive search problem." "You would only be able to generate computer code that had been written before, find proteins and molecules whose properties had already been studied and described, and answer homework questions that had already previously been asked before. You would not, however, be able to ask the LLM to write the lyrics for a concept album focused on the AI singularity, blending the lyrical stylings of Snoop Dogg and Bob Dylan." In effect, LLMs and the AI systems they power need to hallucinate in order to create, rather than simply serve up existing information. It is similar, conceptually, to the way that humans dream or imagine scenarios when conjuring new ideas. However, AI hallucinations present a problem when it comes to delivering accurate and correct information, especially if users take the information at face value without any checks or oversight. "This is especially problematic in domains where decisions depend on factual precision, like medicine, law or finance," Watson said. "While more advanced models may reduce the frequency of obvious factual mistakes, the issue persists in more subtle forms. Over time, confabulation erodes the perception of AI systems as trustworthy instruments and can produce material harms when unverified content is acted upon." And this problem looks to be exacerbated as AI advances. "As model capabilities improve, errors often become less overt but more difficult to detect," Watson noted. "Fabricated content is increasingly embedded within plausible narratives and coherent reasoning chains. This introduces a particular risk: users may be unaware that errors are present and may treat outputs as definitive when they are not. The problem shifts from filtering out crude errors to identifying subtle distortions that may only reveal themselves under close scrutiny." Kazerounian backed this viewpoint up. "Despite the general belief that the problem of AI hallucination can and will get better over time, it appears that the most recent generation of advanced reasoning models may have actually begun to hallucinate more than their simpler counterparts — and there are no agreed-upon explanations for why this is," he said. The situation is further complicated because it can be very difficult to ascertain how LLMs come up with their answers; a parallel could be drawn here with how we still don't really know, comprehensively, how a human brain works. In a recent essay, Dario Amodei, the CEO of AI company Anthropic, highlighted a lack of understanding in how AIs come up with answers and information. "When a generative AI system does something, like summarize a financial document, we have no idea, at a specific or precise level, why it makes the choices it does — why it chooses certain words over others, or why it occasionally makes a mistake despite usually being accurate," he wrote. The problems caused by AI hallucinating inaccurate information are already very real, Kazerounian noted. "There is no universal, verifiable, way to get an LLM to correctly answer questions being asked about some corpus of data it has access to," he said. "The examples of non-existent hallucinated references, customer-facing chatbots making up company policy, and so on, are now all too common." Both Kazerounian and Watson told Live Science that, ultimately, AI hallucinations may be difficult to eliminate. But there could be ways to mitigate the issue. Watson suggested that "retrieval-augmented generation," which grounds a model's outputs in curated external knowledge sources, could help ensure that AI-produced information is anchored by verifiable data. "Another approach involves introducing structure into the model's reasoning. By prompting it to check its own outputs, compare different perspectives, or follow logical steps, scaffolded reasoning frameworks reduce the risk of unconstrained speculation and improve consistency," Watson, noting this could be aided by training to shape a model to prioritize accuracy, and reinforcement training from human or AI evaluators to encourage an LLM to deliver more disciplined, grounded responses. RELATED STORIES —AI benchmarking platform is helping top companies rig their model performances, study claims —AI can handle tasks twice as complex every few months. What does this exponential growth mean for how we use it? —What is the Turing test? How the rise of generative AI may have broken the famous imitation game "Finally, systems can be designed to recognise their own uncertainty. Rather than defaulting to confident answers, models can be taught to flag when they're unsure or to defer to human judgement when appropriate," Watson added. "While these strategies don't eliminate the risk of confabulation entirely, they offer a practical path forward to make AI outputs more reliable." Given that AI hallucination may be nearly impossible to eliminate, especially in advanced models, Kazerounian concluded that ultimately the information that LLMs produce will need to be treated with the "same skepticism we reserve for human counterparts."
