Mercury poisoning in Peru's Amazon found in nearly 80 per cent of villagers in recent study
Indigenous and riverine communities in the Loreto region of the Peruvian Amazon have "chronic exposure" to mercury, according to a new study — and experts say the biggest culprit is gold mining in the region.
The test results released this month by the Center for Amazonian Scientific Innovation at Wake Forest University (CINCIA) in the United States show nearly 80 per cent of the people tested late last year had levels of mercury far above the safe limits in six communities on the banks of the Nanay and Pintuyacu rivers.
"The majority of the population is contaminated," said Jairo Reategui Davila, the Apu, or leader, of San Antonio de Nanay, one of the tested communities.
"We call on the authorities to take action on the matter because we are very concerned," he said.
The results showed 37 per cent of the 273 men, women and children tested had levels of mercury at more than 10 ppm (parts per million) in their hair, compared to just three per cent under the 2.2 ppm limit established by the World Health Organization (WHO).
How did so much mercury get in the environment? The central factor is a lust for gold, according to scientists and officials.
Gold prices have soared by nearly 50 per cent in the last year, beating successive record highs, and encouraging a flourishing illegal gold mining trade in the Amazon, where illegal miners use mercury to extract gold particles from the river silt.
After the gold is extracted, these mining operations burn off the mercury, turning the toxic metal to vapour that is absorbed by surrounding plants, soil and rivers, said Claudia Vega, head of the mercury program at CINCIA, damaging local nature and biodiversity and raising significant health concerns.
Mercury poisoning is associated with several health issues, including cognitive impairment in adults and irreversible developmental delays and learning difficulties for children and babies in the womb.
Gabriel Barría, regional coordinator for heavy metals for the local health authority, said it was "very regrettable that villagers were highly contaminated" and blamed the spread of illegal gold mining for the mercury levels in Amazon rivers.
He said the health authority did not have the budget to carry out tests for mercury and had only tested 12 villagers on a recent health visit relying on blood and urine samples.
Exceeding the limit
CINCIA said tests revealed an average level was 8.41 ppm, exceeding the WHO limit by nearly four times.
Given that illegal mining in Loreto is fairly recent, there are no comprehensive studies on its health impact on the local population yet.
But the levels in these initial tests are already higher than those in the Peruvian Amazon region most impacted by illegal gold mining, Madre de Dios, where 2012 tests showed the majority of adults had average mercury levels of 2.7 ppm.
Communities along the Amazon have had to deal with illegal gold mining operations for decades, but it's become a mounting problem in South America in recent years despite governments attempting to crack down on them.
In 2023, Colombia, Brazil and the U.S. teamed up to destroy 19 illegal gold mining dredges in the Amazon rainforest. Around 114,000 grams of mercury was being dumped into the river every month at these sites, which authorities said were run by a transnational criminal group.
Luis Fernandez, executive director of CINCIA and research professor at Wake Forest University, said if illegal mining continued to spread in Loreto, then villagers with already high mercury levels might begin to approach those close to the worst-recorded cases of mercury contamination.
This includes Minamata Bay, the renowned case in Japan in the 1950s, where children were born with congenital deformities and neurological disabilities caused by a chemical factory dumping mercury into the water supply for decades.
Vega from CINCIA, who led the study, said the results showed worrying "background" levels of mercury in the Loreto riparian communities.
The villagers' fish-based diet was the biggest vector for the mercury entering their systems, Vega said. While this particular study couldn't fully determine if the mercury came from naturally occurring sources or human-caused activities like illegal gold mining, she noted that "several studies agree that the entry of mining into a territory tends to significantly increase mercury levels in the environment."
The villagers tested for this newly released study were mainly exposed to methylmercury, researchers found, a highly toxic form that accumulates in the body.
"[The] greatest risk is for pregnant women and children: methylmercury can cross the placenta and affect the development of the developing baby's brain," Vega said. "This type of exposure is a serious public health concern, even if affected individuals do not show immediate symptoms."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
Mercury poisoning in Peru's Amazon found in nearly 80 per cent of villagers in recent study
Indigenous and riverine communities in the Loreto region of the Peruvian Amazon have "chronic exposure" to mercury, according to a new study — and experts say the biggest culprit is gold mining in the region. The test results released this month by the Center for Amazonian Scientific Innovation at Wake Forest University (CINCIA) in the United States show nearly 80 per cent of the people tested late last year had levels of mercury far above the safe limits in six communities on the banks of the Nanay and Pintuyacu rivers. "The majority of the population is contaminated," said Jairo Reategui Davila, the Apu, or leader, of San Antonio de Nanay, one of the tested communities. "We call on the authorities to take action on the matter because we are very concerned," he said. The results showed 37 per cent of the 273 men, women and children tested had levels of mercury at more than 10 ppm (parts per million) in their hair, compared to just three per cent under the 2.2 ppm limit established by the World Health Organization (WHO). How did so much mercury get in the environment? The central factor is a lust for gold, according to scientists and officials. Gold prices have soared by nearly 50 per cent in the last year, beating successive record highs, and encouraging a flourishing illegal gold mining trade in the Amazon, where illegal miners use mercury to extract gold particles from the river silt. After the gold is extracted, these mining operations burn off the mercury, turning the toxic metal to vapour that is absorbed by surrounding plants, soil and rivers, said Claudia Vega, head of the mercury program at CINCIA, damaging local nature and biodiversity and raising significant health concerns. Mercury poisoning is associated with several health issues, including cognitive impairment in adults and irreversible developmental delays and learning difficulties for children and babies in the womb. Gabriel Barría, regional coordinator for heavy metals for the local health authority, said it was "very regrettable that villagers were highly contaminated" and blamed the spread of illegal gold mining for the mercury levels in Amazon rivers. He said the health authority did not have the budget to carry out tests for mercury and had only tested 12 villagers on a recent health visit relying on blood and urine samples. Exceeding the limit CINCIA said tests revealed an average level was 8.41 ppm, exceeding the WHO limit by nearly four times. Given that illegal mining in Loreto is fairly recent, there are no comprehensive studies on its health impact on the local population yet. But the levels in these initial tests are already higher than those in the Peruvian Amazon region most impacted by illegal gold mining, Madre de Dios, where 2012 tests showed the majority of adults had average mercury levels of 2.7 ppm. Communities along the Amazon have had to deal with illegal gold mining operations for decades, but it's become a mounting problem in South America in recent years despite governments attempting to crack down on them. In 2023, Colombia, Brazil and the U.S. teamed up to destroy 19 illegal gold mining dredges in the Amazon rainforest. Around 114,000 grams of mercury was being dumped into the river every month at these sites, which authorities said were run by a transnational criminal group. Luis Fernandez, executive director of CINCIA and research professor at Wake Forest University, said if illegal mining continued to spread in Loreto, then villagers with already high mercury levels might begin to approach those close to the worst-recorded cases of mercury contamination. This includes Minamata Bay, the renowned case in Japan in the 1950s, where children were born with congenital deformities and neurological disabilities caused by a chemical factory dumping mercury into the water supply for decades. Vega from CINCIA, who led the study, said the results showed worrying "background" levels of mercury in the Loreto riparian communities. The villagers' fish-based diet was the biggest vector for the mercury entering their systems, Vega said. While this particular study couldn't fully determine if the mercury came from naturally occurring sources or human-caused activities like illegal gold mining, she noted that "several studies agree that the entry of mining into a territory tends to significantly increase mercury levels in the environment." The villagers tested for this newly released study were mainly exposed to methylmercury, researchers found, a highly toxic form that accumulates in the body. "[The] greatest risk is for pregnant women and children: methylmercury can cross the placenta and affect the development of the developing baby's brain," Vega said. "This type of exposure is a serious public health concern, even if affected individuals do not show immediate symptoms."
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Want to plant trees to offset fossil fuels? You'd need all of North and Central America, study finds
Planting trees has plenty of benefits, but this popular carbon-removal method alone can't possibly counteract the planet-warming emissions caused by the world's largest fossil-fuel companies. To do that, trees would have to cover the entire land mass of North and Central America, according to a study out Thursday. Many respected climate scientists and institutions say removing carbon emissions — not just reducing them — is essential to tackling climate change. And trees remove carbon simply by 'breathing.' But crunching the numbers, researchers found that the trees' collective ability to remove carbon through photosynthesis can't stand up to the potential emissions from the fossil fuel reserves of the 200 largest oil, gas and coal fuel companies — there's not enough available land on Earth to feasibly accomplish that. And even if there were, if those 200 companies had to pay for planting all those trees, it would cost $10.8 trillion, more than their entire combined market valuation of $7.01 trillion. The researchers also determined that the companies would be in the red if they were responsible for the social costs of the carbon in their reserves, which scientists compute around $185 per metric ton of carbon dioxide. 'The general public maybe understand offsetting to be a sort of magic eraser, and that's just not where we're at,' said Nina Friggens, a research fellow at the University of Exeter who co-authored the paper published in Communications Earth & Environment, a Nature Portfolio journal. Carbon offsetting essentially means investing in tree planting or other environmental projects to attempt to compensate for carbon emissions. Trees are one of the cheapest ways to do this because they naturally suck up planet-warming carbon. Fossil fuel corporations, along with other companies and institutions, have promoted tree-planting as key part of carbon offset programs in recent years. For example, TotalEnergies, a global energy company, said in a statement that it is 'investing heavily in carbon capture and storage (CCS) and nature-based solutions (NBS) projects.' To do their calculations, the researchers looked at the 200 largest holders of fossil fuel reserves — the fuel that companies promise shareholders they can extract in the future — and calculated how much carbon dioxide would be released if this fuel is burned. The researchers also focused solely on tree planting because the expense and technological development needed for other forms of carbon capture are still mostly cost-prohibitive. Forestry expert Éliane Ubalijoro, who was not involved with the research, called the study 'elegant.' It 'gives people a sense of proportion around carbon,' said Ubalijoro, CEO of CIFOR-ICRAF, an international forestry research center. But she cautioned against oversimplifying the equation by looking only at carbon capture, noting that tree planting done right can foster food security and biodiversity and protect communities from natural disasters. The paper effectively makes the point that it's financially impossible to offset enough carbon to compensate for future fossil fuel burning, said Daphne Yin, director of land policy at Carbon180, where her team advocates for U.S. policy support for land-based carbon removal. And the idea that companies would ever be required to account for the downstream emissions from the fossil fuel they extract is a 'fantasy,' she said. The idea of planting trees is appealing to the public and to politicians because it's tangible — people can literally see the carbon being incorporated into branches and leaves as a tree grows, Friggens said. But she says other methods shouldn't be overlooked — microbes underground store carbon too, but they can't be seen. And it's a physically and mathematically inescapable fact, illustrated in part by this study, that there's no getting around it — we have to stop emitting carbon, said Jonathan Foley, the executive director of Project Drawdown, who also was not part of the study. Carbon emissions are like an overflowing bathtub, he says: Before you start cleaning up, you have to turn off the water. 'Trees are the sponges and the mops we use to clean up the mess,' he said. 'But if the taps are still running and the water's pouring out over the edges of your bathtub, destroying your bathroom and your home, maybe you've got to learn to turn off the taps too.' ___ Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling and Bluesky @ ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Nova Scotia prepares for blue-green algae as the summer season begins
Blue algae blooms are making their presence known in the Maritimes as summer approaches. It may not have been beach weather in the Halifax area Wednesday, but as the summer approaches it won't be long until beaches are full. 'Around this time of year, we're working with our colleagues in recreation, making sure all of our protocols are up to date, and that any changes that need to be made have been approved,' said Halifax Regional Municipality Environment Manager Emma Wattie. Supervised beaches in Halifax officially open for the season July 1, which is when water quality testing begins. 'Bacteria likes it warm. They like it sunny, much like us, but they want more shallow water typically,' said Wattie. Both the Nova Scotia and New Brunswick governments are warning about the risk of blue-green algae as temperatures rise. It can look like fine grass clippings in the water, spilled paint, pea soup or sometimes like a thick scum on the surface. Consuming or swimming in water with blue-green algae can cause skin, eye and throat irritation in humans but it can be much worse for dogs. 'These toxins are extremely potent, so even a small volume can be lethal,' said Dr. Dan Maguire, a veterinarian at PetFocus Veterinary Hospital Bedford South. Maguire said if you think your pet may have consumed contaminated water, you should get them treatment right away. 'This can be harmful to both the liver and the nervous system,' he said. 'Symptoms can appear from minutes to hours, and we're looking for things like vomiting, diarrhea, weakness.' Wattie said blue-green algae is happening more frequently and in larger blooms but there wasn't any more in the Halifax area last year than in year's past. 'When a beach or a lake has a blue-green algae bloom, it's more likely for that bloom to come back year to year, so we are seeing it in areas like Cunard Pond, and Birch Cove, and Lake Banook,' she said. There are other water issues to be on the lookout for this summer. 'We test for enterococci in the saltwater and E. coli in freshwater,' said Nova Scotia Lifeguard Service Director Paul D'Eon. The service monitors provincial beaches. 'If we get poor results, we implement a closure and do re-testing,' D'Eon said. If someone does come across blue-green algae in Halifax Regional Municipality, they should contact 311. Sightings at Nova Scotia beaches can be reported by calling 1-877-936-8576. For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page
