logo
NC's big incentive deals are failing at a staggering rate. We're getting played.

NC's big incentive deals are failing at a staggering rate. We're getting played.

Yahoo23-02-2025

Economic development grants are always a political favorite in North Carolina. Governors absolutely love to hand them out.
Of course, it's easy to celebrate when a company promises a flood of new jobs. But once the cameras are packed away, more often than not, those jobs never actually materialize.
We've known about this problem for years. The bad news? It's getting worse.
So far in 2025, six state incentives deals have already collapsed — putting North Carolina on pace to blow past last year's total of 20 failed projects, according to my analysis of Department of Commerce records. That was already an increase from 19 failed deals in 2023 and 15 the year before.
At this rate, our state's deals are falling apart almost as fast as we're making them. Over the last five years, North Carolina has averaged 28 new Job Development Investment Grant deals per year, and 15 terminations. That means for every two new deals we make, one fails. The number of successful completions is just seven per year.
Almost every time there's a job announcement like Novo Nordisk expanding in Johnston County, there's a similar deal that's canceled — like Microsoft bailing on a deal to grow in Charlotte and Morrisville.
Even more troubling: This year's failures aren't because of 'economic headwinds' or unforeseen struggles. Two of the six companies are walking away without even filing the required paperwork. They're not even pretending to take these deals seriously.
So why should we?
The idea behind economic incentives is simple: Offer companies millions in grants or tax breaks in exchange for jobs and investment. The state puts money on the table, and in theory, that money fuels growth that wouldn't have happened otherwise.
At least that's the pitch. Economic development officials insist these deals are necessary to stay competitive.
And the numbers are staggering. Over the last five years, North Carolina has promised companies $2.7 billion in incentives and actually paid out $233 million.
What have we gotten in return? Since the state's major incentives programs began, companies have committed to creating 211,881 jobs — but so far, fewer than half (99,935) have materialized, my analysis found.
While some projects are ongoing, at the current pace of cancellations, it's hard to be optimistic.
Of the 426 JDIG grants awarded since 2003, only 50 have been successfully completed. Meanwhile, 203 have been terminated or withdrawn.
In Charlotte, Electrolux, Centene, and Allstate promised hundreds of jobs. In Wake County, Microsoft, Xerox and Citrix did the same. In each of these cases, the companies cancelled the incentives deal before hitting a single target.
That doesn't even take into account the fact that many of these deals aren't even about creating new jobs at all. A large chunk of incentives go toward 'retaining' jobs for companies that were already here.
And even when new jobs are created, they often come from companies relocating employees from other states, not hiring North Carolinians who actually need work.
The money itself isn't always the issue — companies don't get paid unless they meet some requirements. The grant amounts are tied to a percentage of payroll taxes generated by the new jobs.
But even if companies don't get the full payout, they still get something valuable: goodwill. They enjoy headlines, political support, and public credibility—only to bail when the numbers don't work out. There are no real consequences.
The incentives system isn't failing. On the contrary, it's working exactly as designed. The problem is that we don't ask enough of companies in exchange for these deals.
If North Carolina is willing to make long-term commitments to them, they should be required to make long-term commitments to us.
Fail to deliver? Pay the money back. All of it. No exceptions.
We know this approach can work. Look at what happened when Pactiv Evergreen abruptly shut down its Canton paper mill last year — despite taking a $12 million incentives deal.
The state sued. Pactiv was forced to repay $6.25 million to North Carolina, Haywood County, and the town of Canton. It wasn't a full refund, but it was meaningful.
Yes, this case was unique. Unlike other companies that quietly exit deals, Pactiv's abrupt shutdown left the state little choice but to act. What's more, the incentives program Pactiv used differs from most business grants. But it proves a point: North Carolina can fight back.
But what if we treated all broken deals this way?
Imagine if every company that bailed on its commitments faced the same consequences. Would businesses be so quick to break their promises if they knew the state would actually hold them accountable?
Right now, companies know they can cash in on goodwill and walk away unscathed.
That has to change. If North Carolina is going to keep making these deals, companies should know: This time, we're keeping score.
Andrew Dunn is a contributing columnist to The Charlotte Observer and The News & Observer. of Raleigh. He is a conservative political analyst and the publisher of Longleaf Politics , a newsletter dedicated to weighing in on the big issues in North Carolina government and politics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How a 'brag doc' can help you ace interviews and land a job, says recruiter: ‘No one's reading cover letters'
How a 'brag doc' can help you ace interviews and land a job, says recruiter: ‘No one's reading cover letters'

CNBC

time31 minutes ago

  • CNBC

How a 'brag doc' can help you ace interviews and land a job, says recruiter: ‘No one's reading cover letters'

One of the best pieces of advice Maddie Machado received from a former boss at Microsoft was to keep track of all her career wins. Machado would log "anytime I did a good job, anytime I made someone's life easier, anytime I got kudos" first in a Microsoft document, then a running email draft and now in a slide presentation. She calls it a "brag doc" and says she's used it in every interview for the last 10 years. Machado, 35, is a reverse recruiter and founder of SkillScript, a resume platform, in Tampa, Fla. The concept of documenting your career wins isn't new, but her method categorizes four specific aspects of your professional success: Machado says having a brag doc on hand can help you network and could make a bigger impact than a traditional resume or cover letter. "No one's reading cover letters," Machado says. "Even when I was a recruiter for so many years, I can count on maybe one hand how many times I actually read a cover letter." A brag doc, meanwhile, is "a time for you to toot your own horn," Machado says. "It's hard to see on your resume the amount of impact and the things that you actually owned and are actually proud of." It also shows off the most important aspects of a candidate a hiring manager wants to know, Machado says, based on her time working with hiring managers at companies like Meta and LinkedIn. Hiring managers will generally already know what you do day-to-day in your role, Machado says, but are looking for what you'll bring to a new company and things that will make them think, "Wow, look at what she did there. Imagine what she could do here," she says. "And that's what your brag doc is doing." A brag doc is a useful resource to attach to your application, to follow up with a hiring manager on LinkedIn after you've applied for a role, or even to cold-message someone to network, Machado says. It won't necessarily get you the job right away, but it could get you in the hiring pipeline that much faster. Then, use it to prepare for interviews and negotiate a strong offer, Machado says. "It's nice to be able to remind yourself what you've accomplished so far, whether it's big or small, and also be able to share with other people," she says.

If I Could Buy Only 1 "Magnificent 7" Stock Over the Next Year, Alphabet Would Be It, but Here's the Key Reason
If I Could Buy Only 1 "Magnificent 7" Stock Over the Next Year, Alphabet Would Be It, but Here's the Key Reason

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

If I Could Buy Only 1 "Magnificent 7" Stock Over the Next Year, Alphabet Would Be It, but Here's the Key Reason

Alphabet shares have dipped 2% over the past year, while most "Magnificent Seven" stocks posted double-digit percentage gains. Market leaders like Nvidia and Microsoft may look flashier, but Alphabet could offer better value. A tasty combination of affordable shares and artificial intelligence (AI) expertise sets this stock apart from the rest. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › The "Magnificent Seven" moniker was originally intended as a warning to long-term investors. Remember, the movie by the same name doesn't have the happiest of endings, and the tragedy made sense as a metaphor for potential market bubbles. Still, the Magnificent Seven group keeps setting the tone for the overall stock market, and most of these stocks are market darlings in 2025, with double-digit price gains over the last 52 weeks. But Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) is lagging behind with a 2% price dip over the last year, and the stock looks downright undervalued in many ways. It's the only Magnificent Seven stock I have bought this year, for one simple reason: It's the best combination of affordable shares and unbeatable artificial intelligence (AI) expertise in this elite group. The other Magnificent Seven companies may have a leg up on Alphabet in the AI market so far. Nvidia's (NASDAQ: NVDA) profitable sales growth is unbeatable. Revenue-based market shares suggest that the cloud computing solutions from Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are running circles around Google Cloud. But those proven and promised results are firmly baked into the stock prices. Nvidia stock trades at 47 times earnings and 49 times free cash flows today. Microsoft and Amazon have P/E ratios in the mid-30s and cash flow multiples well above Nvidia's. At the same time, Alphabet stock looks affordable at 19 times earnings and 28 times free cash flows. The numbers never tell the whole story, and there's more to say about Alphabet's long-term growth opportunities. From AI services to quantum computing systems, the company was built to thrive amid ever-changing markets and unexpected economy jolts. But the modest stock valuation is a great starting point for further research. Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If I Could Buy Only 1 "Magnificent 7" Stock Over the Next Year, Alphabet Would Be It, but Here's the Key Reason was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Pre-IPO Anduril Now Worth $30 Billion
Pre-IPO Anduril Now Worth $30 Billion

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pre-IPO Anduril Now Worth $30 Billion

Unicorn defense and AI stock Anduril hit its first $1 billion valuation six years ago. Today, Anduril is making $1 billion a year in revenue, its privately-owned stock has gone up 30-fold, and it wants to IPO. Anduril's a popular defense stock, but it costs far too much to justify buying. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Once upon a time, unicorn companies -- privately owned, but valued in excess of $1 billion -- were a rare breed. Lately, there seem to be whole herds of them. Take Anduril for example. The privately held artificial intelligence and defense company founded by Oculus VR inventor Palmer Luckey first hit the magic $1 billion private market value back in 2019. But Anduril didn't stop there. Growing steadily over the past half-decade, the privately traded defense stock last week raised $2.5 billion in new cash, and the company as a whole is now valued at $30.5 billion, according to a report from Bloomberg. That's a growth rate any investor would love to get a piece of. And while you cannot invest in Anduril stock yet, you might soon be able to. Because Anduril says it's going to IPO. Anduril Chairman Trae Stephens told Bloomberg his company aims to "scale into the largest problems for the national security community." Of particular note, Anduril recently took over a gigantic $22 billion Pentagon augmented reality contract from Microsoft. But Anduril needs cash to reach the scale it wants "to shore up the balance sheet and make sure we have the ability to deploy capital into these manufacturing and production problem sets that we're working on." Pre-IPO companies like Anduril have three ways they can do that. They can take out loans (at currently high interest rates). Or they can hold an IPO and sell their shares to public investors for cash. Or they can sell shares discretely, in a private stock offering. This last route is the one Anduril took, but in his interview with Bloomberg, Stephens made it clear he's not ruling out an IPO -- at all. "Long term we continue to believe that Anduril is the shape of a publicly traded company," said Stephens. "We're not in any rapid path to doing that [but] we're certainly going through the processes required to prepare for doing something like that in the medium term." Stephens and Luckey might want to shift that focus into the short term, however, because circumstances may never be better to make Anduril a popular IPO stock. It's been only a couple of weeks now since Ukraine launched Operation Spiderweb, deploying more than 100 artificial intelligence (AI)-guided drones from trucks to attack airfields across Russia, causing billions of dollars' worth of damage to military assets -- apparently with no casualties -- for an investment measured in thousands of dollars. The memory of that mission hadn't even faded before Israel launched its own surprise attack on Iran, Operation Rising Lion, last week. While most headlines focus on the exploits of Israel's hundreds of fighter aircraft bombing military and nuclear targets in Iran, Israel's Mossad spy agency apparently also used drones and remotely operated weapons systems to great effect. These attacks weren't just reminiscent of Operation Spiderweb. They were reminiscent of Anduril's own artificial intelligence drone technology. With both successes fresh in investors' minds right now, there may be no better time to launch an IPO to capitalize on this free publicity. But let's not get irrationally exuberant here. What's good for Anduril isn't necessarily good for investors. As popular a stock as Anduril might be if it IPOs, that doesn't necessarily mean you should buy it. Consider what a $30.5 billion valuation means for a future publicly traded Anduril stock. According to Luckey, Anduril roughly doubled its 2023 revenue in 2024, making "about a billion" dollars in 2024 sales. The company isn't believed to be profitable yet, so that doesn't mean much in terms of P/E ratios. But it does mean that Anduril sells for a price-to-sales ratio of about 30.5. Compare that to alternatives in the "new defense tech" space. AeroVironment (NASDAQ: AVAV), which up until about the time of Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine was the biggest name in U.S. drone stocks, costs 7.4 times trailing sales -- one quarter of Anduril's valuation. And AeroVironment is a profitable defense stock, earning about $33 million last year. Karman Holdings (NYSE: KRMN), itself a recent defense stock IPO (that I've argued is also overpriced) is closer to Anduril's valuation at 17.3 times sales, but still only about half as expensive. And again, Karman is already earning profits. Don't even ask about more traditional defense contractors like General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, or Northrop Grumman. Combined, those three giants earned more than $13 billion last year, but their P/S ratios range from only 1.6 (GD and Lockheed) to 1.9 times sales. That's way cheaper than any of the new defense tech stocks, Anduril included, and with far longer track records of success. I'm not here to knock Anduril. As a company, I think it's pretty great, and a superb success story in American business. I have high (if cautious) hopes that Anduril might shake up an entrenched and overly concentrated defense industry that's basically made up of companies like General D, LockMart, and Northrop, and help the Pentagon to spend taxpayer defense dollars more wisely. I just don't think you should invest in Anduril stock. Not at today's valuation, at least. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $377,293!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,319!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $659,171!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AeroVironment and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends Lockheed Martin and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Pre-IPO Anduril Now Worth $30 Billion was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store