Two Congress MLAs jailed for blocking Jaipur road in 2014
A magistrate's court here sentenced two sitting Congress MLAs and seven others to one-year imprisonment on Wednesday (June 18, 2025) in an 11-year-old case of unlawful assembly and blocking of a public road outside the University of Rajasthan during a protest. The convicts also included an unsuccessful Congress candidate in the 2023 Rajasthan Assembly election.
Congress MLAs Mukesh Bhakar, elected from Ladnun, and Manish Yadav, representing Shahpura, were among the student leaders who staged a protest and blocked Jawaharlal Nehru Marg outside the university's gate for about 20 minutes on August 13, 2014. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Parikshita Detha found them guilty after a protracted trial lasting 11 years.
The two MLAs, who were then National Students' Union of India (NSUI) leaders, had gathered along with about 200 students at the university's gate to protest against the process followed for the Common Entrance Test (CET) for admission to postgraduate courses. The State was ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party at the time.
The nine were convicted under Sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 283 (danger or obstruction in public way or line of navigation), and 341 (wrongful restraint) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year's imprisonment each, along with a fine of ₹3,200 each.
Bail granted
The court granted bail to all the convicts and gave them one month's time to file an appeal in a higher court. Among the convicts, Abhishek Chaudhary contested the 2023 Assembly election as a Congress candidate from Jaipur's Jhotwara constituency and lost.
The other convicts in the case are Rajesh Meena, Ravi Kirad, Wasim Khan, Dron Yadav, Bhanu Pratap Singh, and Vidyadhar Meel. The court observed that their protest had led to a complete blockade of Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, which is an important arterial road in Jaipur, and caused a significant traffic disruption.
The Assembly membership of both Mr. Bhakar and Mr. Yadav will remain unaffected, as a legislator can be disqualified only on being convicted of an offence with a two-year sentence or more, as per Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
The Assembly membership of Bharatiya Janata Party MLA Kanwar Lal Meena was terminated last month after he was sentenced to three years in jail in a 20-year-old case for brandishing a revolver at a Sub-Divisional Magistrate. Baran district's Anta Assembly seat has fallen vacant after Meena's disqualification.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Assam court frames charges against IPS officer in 2019 sexual harassment case
A Special Court in Assam's Karbi Anglong recently framed charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and for sexual harassment against IPS officer Gaurav Upadhyay in a six-year-old case from the time when he was the Superintendent of Police (SP) of the district. In an order issued on June 18, R. Lal., the Special Judge, POCSO of Karbi Anglong framed charges under section 354 and 354A of the Indian Penal Code – provisions that pertain to criminal force to a woman 'with intent to outrage her modesty' and sexual harassment – and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act against Upadhyay and set July 21 as the next date of hearing. On that day, the court is scheduled to inquire whether he pleads guilty or intends to face trial. The incident, involving a minor girl, allegedly took place in 2019 and a police case was registered in January 2020. The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) had probed the case and subsequently submitted its chargesheet against the IPS officer in 2021. The court has recorded that there are two alleged incidents from 2019. In its order, the court noted that the case has been in the pre-trial for several years. On the June 18 hearing as well, the counsel for the accused had sought directions of the court to call for the investigating officer to produce statements of 13 witnesses not relied upon at the time of submitting the chargesheet. 'The chargesheet is for an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The legislature has mandated a time-bound completion of trial in such cases. Judicial precedents also direct the trial courts to expedite such cases, placing them on the fastest track possible. It is noted that this case has remained at the pre-trial stage for several years and further adjournment runs the risk of infringing Article 21 of the Constitution, a right available to the victim with equal vigour,' states the order. Upadhyay, is an IPS officer of the 2012 batch. He is currently the additional secretary of the state transport department, the state project director of the Assam Inland Water Transport Development Society, and the project officer of Assam Integrated River Basin Management. Bringing on record the statement of the victim, the court stated, 'The court has perused all relevant materials furnished by the prosecution side, including the statement of the victim. This court has also heard both sides. Based on the materials, there is ground for presuming, under section 288 CRPC, that the accused has committed an offence under Section 10 of the POCSO Act. IT is pertinent to mention here that there were two incidents of sexual assault on the victim. The first assault occurred in SP Bungalow in Diphu. The second assault took place in the hotel room where the victim was staying with her mother and brother'.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran Hacks Into Israeli CCTVs, Refines Strikes With Surveillance Footage: Officials
Indus Water War Heats Up: Now Omar Abdullah Refuses To Divert Water To Punjab, Congress Hits Back A fresh water dispute has erupted between Jammu & Kashmir and Punjab, just weeks after Punjab's clash with Haryana. This time, it's over the proposed 113 km canal to divert surplus Indus water from J&K to Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan to prevent it from flowing to Pakistan. J&K CM Omar Abdullah has rejected the idea, saying Jammu itself faces water scarcity. 'Why should I send water to Punjab?' he asked, reminding that Punjab already has three rivers under the Indus Waters Treaty. He also invoked the decades-old Shahpur Kandi barrage dispute, insisting J&K won't give up more water. Reacting sharply, Congress MP Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa accused Abdullah of undermining Punjab's sacrifice and patriotism, pointing to Punjab's suffering during Operation Sindoor, saying 'Pakistan attacked Punjab more than Jammu & Kashmir.' The conflict exposes deeper fault lines in India's federal water-sharing model, raising questions of equity, national interest, and regional politics — especially with Pakistan watching closely as India attempts to control its Indus water allocations.#waterdispute #punjabvsjk #induswaters #shahpurkandi #operationsindoor #omarabdullah #sukhjinderrandhawa #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews 6.0K views | 6 hours ago
India.com
39 minutes ago
- India.com
Congress slams Goa government, alleges Rs 72000000000 annual loss from..., blames BJP of...
This is India's richest liquor company, produces cheapest alcohol like…, company name is… New Delhi: Goa Pradesh Congress Committee has launched a scathing attack against the state government for permitting open smuggling of liquor. The party has alleged that the smuggling is causing an estimated loss of Rs 7,200 crore per annum. State Congress president Amit Patkar alleged that at least ten trucks carrying liquor worth Rs 2 crore each cross the Patradevi border every day to reach states such as Gujarat, where alcohol is banned. Patkar highlighted a recent incident where a truck transporting liquor caught fire in Dhargalim and questioned the inaction of the authorities. 'The truck is registered with the transport department, but the police and excise people say they can't identify its owner. How is this possible?' he asked. Patkar also condemned the excise department for not having mechanisms to trace or intercept illegally made and packaged liquor exiting Goa. Blaming the Pramod Sawant government's inaction, Patkar said 36 hours after the Dhargalim incident, both the excise department and the police had done nothing, and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) was quiet. 'We demand that the CM clarify the state to tell us where this liquor came from and where it went. This is a big national threat. By tomorrow, they have to come out with this, and if they don't, then we will gherao the commissioner of excise.' Congress criticised local authorities for turning a blind eye to liquor being smuggled out of Goa.
