In the $250B influencer industry, being a hater can be the only way to rein in bad behavior
Since 2020, content creator Remi Bader had accumulated millions of TikTok followers by offering her opinions on the fits of popular clothing brands as a plus-size woman.
In 2023, however, Bader appeared noticeably thinner. When some fans asked her whether she'd undergone a procedure, she blocked them. Later that year, she announced that she would no longer be posting about her body.
Enter snark subreddits. On Reddit, these forums exist for the sole purpose of calling out internet celebrities, whether they're devoted to dinging the late-night antics of self-described 'hot mess' Alix Earle or venting over Savannah and Cole LaBrant, a family vlogging couple who misleadingly implied that their daughter had cancer.
While the internet is synonymous with fan culture, snark subreddits aren't for enthusiasts. Instead, snarkers are anti-fans who hone the art of hating.
After Bader's refusal to talk about her weight loss, the Remi Bader snark subreddit blew up. Posters weren't upset that Bader had lost weight or had stopped posting about her body size. Instead, they believed Bader the influencer, who'd built her brand on plus-size inclusion in fashion, wasn't being straight with her fans and needed to be taken to account.
It worked. During a March 2025 appearance on Khloe Kardashian's podcast, Bader finally revealed that she had, in fact, had weight-loss surgery.
Some critics see snarkers as a big problem and understandably denounce their tendency to harass, body shame and try to cancel influencers.
But completely dismissing snark glosses over the fact that it can serve a purpose. In our work as social media researchers, we've written about how snark can actually be thought of as a way to call out bad actors in the largely unregulated world of influencing and content creation.
Before there were influencers, there were bloggers. While bloggers covered topics that ranged from entertainment to politics to travel, parenting and fashion bloggers probably have the closest connection to today's influencers.
After Google introduced AdSense in 2003, bloggers were easily able to run advertising on their websites. Then brands saw an opportunity. Parenting and fashion bloggers had large, loyal followings. Many readers felt an intimate connection to their favorite bloggers, who seemed more like friends than out-of-touch celebrity spokespersons.
Brands realized they could send bloggers their products in exchange for a write-up or a feature. Furthermore, advertisers understood that parenting and fashion bloggers didn't have to adhere to the same industry regulations or code of ethics as most news media outlets, such as disclosing payments or conflicts of interest.
This changed the dynamic between bloggers and their fans, who wondered whether bloggers could be trusted if they were sometimes being paid to promote certain products.
In response, websites emerged in 2009 to critique bloggers. 'Get Off My Internets,' for example, fashioned itself as a 'quality control watchdog' to provide constructive criticism and call out deceptive practices. As Instagram and YouTube became more popular, the subreddit 'r/Blogsnark' launched in 2015 to critique early influencers, in addition to bloggers.
Today the influencer industry has a valuation of over US$250 billion in the U.S. alone, and it's on track to be worth over $500 billion by 2027.
Yet there are few regulations in place for influencers. A few laws have emerged to protect child influencers, and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has established legal guidelines for sponsored content.
That said, the influencing industry remains rife with exploitation.
It goes both ways: Corporations can exploit influencers. For example, a 2021 study found that Black influencers receive below-market offers compared with white influencers.
Likewise, influencers can deceive or exploit their followers. They might use unrealistic body filters to appear thinner than they are. They could hide who's paying them. They may promote health misinformation such as the controversial ParaGuard cleanse, a fake treatment pushed by wellness influencers that claimed to rid its users of parasites.
Or, in the case of Remi Bader, they might gain a huge following by promoting body positivity, only to conceal a weight-loss procedure from their fans.
For disappointed fans or followers who feel burned, snark can seem like the only regulatory guardrail in an industry that has gone largely unchecked. Think of snark as a Better Business Bureau for the untamable world of influencing – a form of accountability that brings attention to the scammers and hustlers.
Todays's snark exists at the intersection of gossip and cancel culture.
Though cancel culture certainly has its faults, we approach cancel culture in our writing as a worthy tool that allows audiences to hold the powerful accountable. For example, communities of color have joined forces to call out racists, as they did in 2024 when they exposed lifestyle influencer Brooke Schofield's anti-Black tweets.
Influencers build trust with their audiences based on being 'real' and relatable. But there's nothing preventing them from breaking that trust, and snarkers can swoop in to point out bad behavior or hypocrisy.
Within the competitive world of family vlogging, snarkers see themselves as doing more than stirring the pot. They're truth-tellers who bring injustices to light, such as abuse and child labor exploitation. Some of this exposure is paying off, with more and more states introducing and passing family vlogger laws that require children to one day receive a portion of their parents' earnings or restrict how often children can appear in their parents' videos.
Yes, snark can veer into cyberbullying. But that shouldn't discount its value as a tool for transparency. Influencers are ultimately brands. They sell audiences ideas, lifestyles and products.
When people feel as if they've been misled, we think they have every right to call it out.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jessica Maddox, University of Alabama and Jess Rauchberg, Seton Hall University
Read more:
Gossip is a social skill – not a character flaw
US states are finally starting to put in place protections for the kids of family vloggers
With the end of the Hollywood writers and actors strikes, the creator economy is the next frontier for organized labor
Jess Rauchberg receives funding from Microsoft Research.
Jessica Maddox does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
This Viral Air Fryer S'Mores Dip Is Still the Perfect Comfort Snack
After a TikTok of air fryer s'mores dip popped up on my For You page, I had to try it. Now, a year later, this snack is just as tasty as ever. TikTok users were shocked that they hadn't thought of making this snack before, and so was I. However, I was happily surprised by how easy it looked to whip up. TikTok user Cecilie Bak Klemens shared the video of her making the mouthwatering dip in her air fryer, and that post has since garnered more than 75 million views and a host of hilariously relatable comments, including some from well-known brands. "All of a sudden we know what we're making for breakfast, lunch, and dinner tomorrow," Pinterest commented on the now-viral video. I knew I had to try this snack, and I'm happy to report that it was as simple as the 12-second TikTok made it seem. Here's how you can make this s'mores dip whenever you're craving it -- no fire pit needed. Read more: Best Air Fryers of 2025 How to make air fryer s'mores dip Step 1: Line your airfryer with parchment paper that's trimmed to the size of your basket, or use a removable air fryer basket that can be cleaned separately. (This step is optional but will cut down on cleaning time.) Step 2: Place marshmallows inside the air fryer, along with chunks of the chocolate of your choice. (We used classic Hershey's chocolate.) You can use as many, or as few, marshmallows as you like, then add an equal amount of chocolate pieces. Corin Cesaric/CNET Step 3: Cook at 375 degrees for 10 minutes or until the marshmallows are golden brown. Step 4: Let the dip cool slightly, then enjoy it with graham crackers. The outside of your s'mores dip will be slightly crunchy and golden brown, and the inside will be perfectly gooey. Corin Cesaric/CNET If the dip hardens while you're eating it, you can pop it back in the air fryer for a few minutes until you get the desired consistency again. Read more: Everything You've Always Wanted to Know About Air Fryers (but Were Afraid to Ask) How to clean your air fryer Although this recipe seems like it would create quite the mess, using a separate removable baking pan or parchment paper makes the clean up is a breeze. However, if you have some overflow or your air fryer is simply due for its cleaning, follow these three simple steps. Air fryer s'mores dip FAQ Can you make traditional s'mores using an air fryer? Yes! If you want to skip the dip and make your s'mores whole, you can place the bottom graham cracker, chocolate and marshmallow in the air fryer (don't forget the parchment paper!) and toast it for a few minutes. When it's done, use another graham cracker to squish your creation together. Is there anything you can't cook in the air fryer? While the air fryer perfectly cooks a lot of things, some are just better when made with different appliances, such as leafy greens and large cuts of meat. Here are six more foods that shouldn't be cooked in your air fryer. More air fryer recipes to try
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mom-to-Be Refuses to Agree to Husband's 'Unique' Baby Names from Favorite Fantasy Novel
A pregnant woman says she and her husband are at odds over what to name their baby In a post shared to Reddit, the woman writes that the couple has been "discussing (arguing about) a name for the last 8 months" The problem? She wants something classic, while her husband wants something "unique" from one of his favorite works of fictionA soon-to-be mom says she isn't interested in compromising on a baby name with her husband, who wants something "unique." In a post shared to Reddit, the anonymous 31-year-old writes that she and her husband still don't know the sex of their baby, but have been "discussing (arguing about) a name for the last 8 months." "Now I'm afraid there is going to be a tug of war at the hospital over the birth certificate," she writes. "Stylistically, we want very different things." "I like 'classic' names," she explains. "To give a few examples for a boy's name: Martin, Silas, Calvin. My husband prefers more unique names — he suggested both Artemis and Entrari from his favorite work of fiction." The woman writes that she is not interested in naming the child "after a fictional assassin and he doesn't want to name his child after 'an old man.'" "Combining one 'old man' name with one 'unique name/fictional reference' seems to create a really weird-sounding combination and we are both arguing over the first name anyway," she continues. While she would love for them to both be "happy with the child's name," her husband "hates every single name I suggest," and vice versa. "I do feel as though I should have a little more influence over the name, if only because he automatically gets the child's last name, no questions asked," she continues. After months of arguing, she presented her husband with a compromise, telling him "that the child could have whatever name he picked out, on the condition that they get my maiden last name." However, he "refused," which she knew would happen. "I don't actually expect them to have my last name. I was just trying to express that I understand how important the last name is and I would accept his first name suggestion if I had the privilege of automatically assuming the last name," she explains. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Now, the mom-to-be says she is "getting less and less excited about the arrival of the child, because it is surrounded by disagreement after disagreement." "I feel like I'm not getting to name the child something that means a lot to me, names that I have had in my notes app since I was in high school," she writes. "He said that he doesn't want to sigh (out of distaste) every time he has to call out this child's name." Fellow Reddit users weighed in on the baby-naming debacle, with many siding with the poster, emphasizing that they are "naming a person, not forcing the world to play 'guess the reference' with his favorite literary properties." One person suggested the couple each "create a list of baby names you think the other person would like." "Emphasize that you get he likes unique names, but he needs to consider your tastes as well," the person explains. "See if you can come up with a list of 'cool names' that you think he would like that aren't distasteful to you, and ask that he do the same." "Are there characters from books, comics, movies he likes that have more traditional names? Are there 'vintage' or 'classic' names that are more unique and don't sound so old-fashioned?" the commenter continued. "There is definitely room for compromise here if both of you agree that the other's opinions are important as well." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man Says His Girlfriend Is ‘Hurt' He's Going to His Son's Birthday Party Because His Ex-Wife Will Be There
A man's girlfriend doesn't want him to attend his son's birthday party because his ex-wife will be there He and his ex-wife divorced two years ago, but co-parent their two kids without any "big conflict" Reddit users were bewildered that the man felt he had to think about attending his son's partyA man has turned to the internet because his girlfriend is upset that he wants to attend his son's birthday party, all because his ex-wife will be there. In a post on Reddit's 'Am I the A------' forum, the father, 36, explained that he shares two children, age 8 and 5, with his ex-wife, whom he divorced two years ago. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! 'There is no big conflict between me and my ex-wife and there has never been one apart of the occasional disagreements about the shared bank account of the kids,' he wrote. 'No big of a deal, just small issues. The only contact I have with my ex is whenever something has to be arranged for the kids." The man said that his son wants to have a party with six of his friends for his upcoming birthday. His ex-wife made the arrangements as he will be at her home on the day of the celebration. 'He wants to go to a big playground,' the man said of his son, adding that it was about 12.5 miles away. 'My son came up to me and asked if I would attend his party and drive half of his friends to the playground and be there when he celebrates his birthday with his friends,' he continued. 'I said yes because I feel like I can't say no to this request.' However, his girlfriend is upset that he wants to attend the party because his ex-wife will be there. 'She doesn't understand why I have to be there. My son will be playing with his friends leaving me with his mother to sit and wait,' he wrote. 'According to her, we will be giving off 'happy family vibes' which hurt her feelings. She says I'm loyal to my ex and I should have my priorities with her. ' The man said he told his girlfriend that he wanted to be there for his son and himself. 'I want to be the kind of father who is part of my kids' memories. I don't want to be the father who was never there because I let my dislike for my kids' mother prevail,' he wrote. He asked the forum if he was wrong to attend the party, and the consensus was bewilderment that the question had to be asked. 'She asked why are you going to your son's birthday.... read that you wanna be with that????' a commentator wrote. Others noted that the girlfriend was exhibiting 'red flags galore.' 'This whole situation screams jealousy and insecurity. Prioritizing your kids' happiness over her feelings is the right move. A healthy partner would support your role as a father, not undermine it,' a poster wrote. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Others were more blunt in their assessment of him. 'He's an a—--- just for asking reddit,' the commentator wrote. Read the original article on People
