Muir hits out at pollution plan 'misinformation'

Stormont's agriculture minister has hit out at what he has called "misinformation" over his department's plans to reduce water pollution which have faced criticism from some in the agri-food sector.
Northern Ireland's long-overdue Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) for 2026-29 was published for consultation last month.
Many of the proposals are linked to the Lough Neagh Action Plan. Some political parties and farming unions have argued the plans are out of touch with the reality of agriculture.
But on Tuesday, Andrew Muir said they were draft proposals with final decisions yet to be taken.
Speaking in the Assembly the minister also criticised as "disgraceful" recent commentary on social media about the issue.
"I have seen misogynistic comments against officials in my department, there have been racist comments in relation to people that we are very, very fortunate to have working in our agri-food sector.
"Not for a very long time have I seen such vile homophobic comments about myself. I am a gay man and I am proud to be a gay man and it has no relevance whatsoever to the Nutrients Action Programme nor my ability to do this job."
The minister went on to say: "Some of the comments made towards me - I'm thick enough to be able to take that, it was shocking and I have not seen something like that since the 1990s, but some of the comments for example in terms of foreign nationals working in agri-food, I just thought that was beneath contempt and I think it's important we call this out here.
"We can have a rational discussion around these things but we should not descend into that, and some of the comments against officials are wrong."
The leader of the Opposition, SDLP assembly member Matthew O'Toole said it was "utterly disgusting" and the minister had the opposition's support in calling it out, while the DUP's Gary Middleton said the social media comments against the minister and his officials were unacceptable.
Farmers say NI pollution proposals 'out of touch'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

2 days ago

• New York Post

Politicians who endorse NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani should earn your complete contempt

Please take note of all the politicians jumping aboard the Zohran Mamdani train — because they're telling you that they're just hunky-dory with an anti-Israel zealot who routinely flirts (at least) with blatant antisemitism. This holds particularly for Brad Lander and Michael Blake, the mayoral rivals cross-endorsing him: They've thereby disqualified themselves from even a No. 5 ranking by any decent New Yorker. And of course it applies to Sen. Bernie Sanders, whose Mamdani endorsement dropped Tuesday, as well and Bernie's protégé, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. So much for AOC's efforts to distance herself from Squad-mates like venomous Jew-hating Reps. Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib — or ex-Squad-boy Jamaal Bowman, for that matter. (Jamaal's endorsed Zohran, too, natch.) As well as to the various local pols who've listed Zohran as any one of their top choices among the nine or so who qualified for at least one debate: Remember to vote against Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, Rep. Nydia Velásquez, state Sen. John Liu and state Attorney General Tish James if you ever get another chance. Look: On top of having basically never achieved anything in life, Mamdani's been an anti-Israel activist since college; he not only refuses to support Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, he's declined to sign on to Assembly resolutions condemning the Holocaust. He's done a friendly interview with sick online influencer Hasan Piker and pretends 'globalize the Intifada' and 'from the river to the sea' merely express a desire for Palestinian rights, when the slogans are all about 1) violence against Jews anywhere and everywhere and 2) the destruction of Israel. He's a cop-defunder, too. All he's got going for him is charm and a raging socialist platform that would destroy the city if he got the chance to implement it. Sadly, that's enough to have him polling No. 2 (albeit in the weakest Democratic field ever) — and that momentum, plainly, is enough for hacks like Lander and Blake to cut cross-endorsement deals with the devil. Shame on them all.

The Hill

3 days ago

• The Hill

NYC mayoral race tightens: Polling

The Democratic primary for the New York City mayor's race has tightened further in the latest Marist Poll, with former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo ahead but with a narrower lead. The poll released Wednesday showed Cuomo winning in the city's ranked-choice voting system in the seventh round, 55 percent to 45 percent, over state Assembly member Zohran Mamdani in second. That's still a somewhat comfortable margin for Cuomo but closer than the 60 percent to 40 percent margin in the last round that Marist's poll from last month showed. Ranked choice allows voters to select up to five candidates in order of the preference of support. The candidate with the fewest top preference votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed according to their supporters' next preference. The process continues until a candidate receives a majority. In the first round, Cuomo is ahead with 43 percent, followed by Mamdani with 31 percent. City Comptroller Brad Lander, who made headlines Tuesday after his arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, came in third with 8 percent, while New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams received 7 percent and former Comptroller Scott Stringer received 4 percent. The other candidates received 2 percent or less. The poll was conducted before Lander was detained as he was trying to guide an immigrant through court and released shortly after. While Cuomo has the lead, an overview of the poll from Marist notes some voters' support remains up for grabs for the top contenders, with 11 percent undecided in the first round and 11 percent not choosing Cuomo or Mamdani at any point on their ballot. The results support other polls that show Mamdani closing the gap behind Cuomo, who has been the front-runner in the race for months. The margin of Cuomo's lead has depended on the poll, but he's kept the lead by at least several points in public, independent polling of the race. The Marist poll showed Cuomo is strongest in the Bronx, with 49 percent support, and Queens and Staten Island, where he receives 44 percent. He rose in Manhattan from 32 percent last month to 41 percent now, while Mamdani is strongest in Brooklyn, where he receives 36 percent, up 11 points. Mamdani has also made gains among Latinos, doubling his support from last month from 20 percent to 41 percent. He leads Cuomo among that group. While Mamdani has made gains and notched key endorsements, including from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a win over Cuomo would be considered a significant upset. Mamdani is formally receiving an endorsement from 2021 mayoral candidate Maya Wiley, who came in third and ran as a progressive, on Wednesday. Pollsters also found an increasing number of voters are following the race closely ahead of the primary next week. Three quarters of respondents said they're following it closely or very closely, an increase from two thirds last month. The poll was conducted among 1,350 likely Democratic primary voters from June 9 to 12. The margin of error is 4.3 percentage points.

Yahoo

3 days ago

• Yahoo

Windsor Framework structures ineffective and overly bureaucratic

The structures of the Windsor Framework are 'ineffective, opaque and overly bureaucratic', DUP leader Gavin Robinson has told peers. Mr Robinson said that the post-Brexit trading deal could never be effective until fundamental issues around lack of consent from unionists are addressed. The House of Lords Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee has been holding evidence sessions examining the operation of the framework. The Windsor Framework was agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amending the Northern Ireland Protocol. It governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region. The DUP later reached the Safeguarding the Union deal with the previous UK government to further reduce some checks and paperwork on goods moving from the rest of the UK into Northern Ireland, leading to the restoration of the powersharing Executive at Stormont last year. However, many unionists remain opposed to the framework, stating it creates a new regulatory border within the United Kingdom and because Northern Ireland continues to follow some EU laws relating to goods. During his appearance before the committee, Mr Robinson was asked to assess the extent to which voices in Northern Ireland could be heard through the structures of the framework. He said: 'I don't have a lot of faith in the current structures. 'When you consider the ability for politicians, parliamentarians, stakeholders, businesses, to engage with them. 'The structures around the Windsor Framework, though they may have evolved, are ineffective, opaque and overly bureaucratic. 'They frustrate the ability for ordinary, routine and at times complex and serious engagement to either satisfy, resolve or ameliorate some of the harmful impositions that Northern Ireland finds itself in under these arrangements.' The DUP leader added: 'I believe it cannot ever be effective until the fundamentals are resolved around the imposition that Northern Ireland was placed in without the consent of any elected unionist in Northern Ireland, without the consent of party colleagues in Westminster.' In December, MLAs at Stormont voted to continue with the current arrangements for at least another four years in a democratic consent motion, which was part of the arrangements agreed between the UK and the EU. However, unlike other votes at Stormont, there was no requirement for cross-community support for the motion. Mr Robinson told peers: 'Though we have gone through a cycle of a parliamentary vote in Assembly terms in December of 2024, an inversion of cross-community protections. 'A false choice, do you wish this imposition to continue for a period of eight years or four years with a potential review. 'I don't believe they have been effective at all and if the Government were serious about increasing the opportunity to have voices heard and engage fundamentally in the propositions that are causing material impact, both constitutionally and practically in Northern Ireland, then they wouldn't only find an effective mechanism for that engagement but they would look at the fundamentals.' He added: 'We have at the heart of this an agreement between the UK and the EU where they decide what is going to happen to Northern Ireland without any recourse to the citizenry of Northern Ireland or the elected representatives. 'Then you have the attempt or the added aspects of inclusion and participation but without any substantial or meaningful outworkings of that participation or inclusion.'