Sir Stephen Fry turns on JK Rowling and claims she's been ‘radicalised'
Sir Stephen Fry has spoken out against Harry Potter author JK Rowling for being radicalised by TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists).
The comedian and actor, 67, famously narrated the Harry Potter book series and in 2022 stood by Rowling despite her 'upsetting' views.
Now, years on from this comment, Fry has seemingly had a change of heart as he criticised the author publicly in a live recording of the podcast The Show People in Clapham.
'She has been radicalised, I fear, and it may be she has been radicalised by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her,' he told host Andrew Keates at the live event attended by the MailOnline.
'It is unhelpful and only hardens her and will only continue to harden her, I am afraid.'
He added that she is a 'lost cause'.
'I am not saying that she should not be called out when she says things that are really cruel, wrong and mocking. She seems to be a lost cause for us.'
The Harry Potter author upset and angered many people as she celebrated the Supreme Court ruling on sex earlier this year in May.
The writer posed with a cigarillo in her mouth and a drink in her hand on her yacht in the Caribbean Sea as she toasted the ruling: 'I love it when a plan comes together.'
The ruling saw Lord Hodge say the term 'woman' in the Equality Act 2010 should be defined according to biological sex assigned at birth.
That definition means trans people can now be blocked from accessing designated single-sex spaces.
Fry suggested that her recent comments changed his previous stance: 'She started to make these peculiar statements and had very strong, difficult views. She seemed to wake up or kick a hornet's nest of transphobia, which has been entirely destructive.
'I disagree profoundly with her on this subject. I am angry she does not disavow some of the more revolting and truly horrible, destructive violently destructive things that people say. She does not attack those at all.
'She says things that are inflammatory and contemptuous, mocking and add to a terribly distressing time for trans people.'
He emphatically stated that he was 'happy to go on the record' and say he was 'really angry' about her comments.
He added that he was 'sorry because I always liked her company' and that he found her 'charming, funny, and interesting'.
In 2022, Fry said on the Beeb Watch podcast: 'She is a friend of mine and I have trans friends and intersex friends who are deeply upset by her.
'That is a circle I have to square personally.'
'I know that JK Rowling doesn't want to see trans people bullied, alienated, shut out of society, made to feel ashamed, guilty, laughed at, all those things.
He added that he wanted to stay firmly on the fence when it came to this debate.
'It is not an argument I want to get involved in because it is upsetting to both sides and I would wish them both to retreat and to consider that is possible for trans people to live full, accepted lives according to their terms in society, and for women to have all the rights and dignities they demand.'
His recent comments show he is no longer comfortable sitting on the fence, and Fry isn't the only celebrity who has worked with Rowling and spoken out against her TERF views.
In response to Rowling's initial comments about gender in 2020, Emma Watson shared her support for the transgender community.
The actress who played Hermione in the Harry Potter series said on social media: 'Trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned or told they aren't who they say they are.
'I want my trans followers to know that I and so many other people around the world see you, respect you and love you for who you are.'
In 2020, Daniel Radcliffe, who played Harry Potter in the film series, commented: ' 'As someone who has been honoured to work with and continues to contribute to The Trevor Project for the last decade, and just as a human being, I feel compelled to say something at this moment.
'Transgender women are women. Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo or I,' he said in the lengthy post.
Tom Felton, who played Draco Malfoy in the film series, was criticised recently when he refused to take a stance on Rowling as he signed on to reprise his character in the Potter stage play The Cursed Child. More Trending
When asked directly whether the controversy around JK Rowling's divisive position on the trans community had impacted his work with the franchise, Felton responded, 'I can't say it does, I'm not really that attuned to it.'
He added: 'I have not seen anything bring the world together more than Potter. She's responsible for that, so I'm incredibly grateful.'
Metro reached out to JK Rowling's representatives, who declined to comment.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: Stephen Fry reveals why he put himself through 'agony' of Celebrity Traitors
MORE: Harry Potter star's new TV show with trans icon is coming out imminently
MORE: Harry Potter fans spot major casting problem – but there's a simple answer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Steps' Ian H Watkins hits out at JK Rowling as he claims the LGBTQI+ community is 'under attack': 'How dare you challenge my existence?'
Ian H Watkins hit back at JK Rowling as he spoke out on the minority choosing to attack the LBGTQI community. In his latest career venture the Steps star has released a children's book teaching younger generations that being different is your superpower and Pride is a safe space for people to be open and not be judged by others. Reflecting on his own experience growing up in the Rhondda Valley in Wales in the 80s and 90s, the singer admitted that while things are now more progressive the LGBTQI+ community are still 'under attack'. Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, Ian explained: 'There are a few, they are the minority, a few very powerful people making decisions that the majority do not agree with.... So this book is also a big middle finger up to the b***ts.' Most notably JK Rowling has been very vocal on the subject of trans people for several years and following the Supreme Court 's judgment on April 17, the author has consistently referred to transgender women as being 'men'. Meanwhile Stephen Fry also criticised LGBT charity Stonewall as 'nonsensical' and 'stuck in a terrible, terrible, quagmire' on trans issues as he admitted 'I am not sure I support them' in December. Asked what his response would be to those who use their platform to go against more liberal and progressive views, he began: 'I would say "how dare you?" How dare you challenge my existence. 'Queer people have always been here, we are here and we always will be here. So how dare you make me feel like a second-rate citizen? 'I don't want acceptance, I demand respect and every other LGBTQI+ person would say the same.' Encouraging people to be kind he continued: 'There's actual human beings involved. I think they are playing a political game. But at the end of the day, the bottom line is just be kind. 'We're all facing struggles on a daily basis, you never know what somebody is going through, so just be kind, life is hard enough, let it go.' The star added: 'Who I choose to love, why does that form your opinion? Why should that make you lose sleep at night? No. Worry about yourself.' Ian's new book titled Pride and the Rainbow Warriors follows the Rainbow Warriors on a journey as they teach readers of all ages the definition, history and importance of Pride and what it means to be included in the LGBTQ+ community. Talking about the book, the star explained: 'It's a little love letter to my younger self. 'It's a book that I wish I had had when I was growing up. I was bullied. I was made to feel very different. 'I spent lots of time out of school because I was I called names. I felt like I was secluded and I wanted my children and their friends to grow up in a very different world so that's where the idea for this book came from.' Ian shares twin sons Macsen and Cybi with his former partner Craig Ryder. The couple welcomed the boys via surrogate in 2016 before splitting a year later. Explaining how accepting his children are of sexuality, he joked: 'One of the things Cybi said to me, we're talking maybe five years ago when they were four or five. 'He went, so Daddy, 'boys can marry boys" and I sad "yes," and "girls can marry girls" and I said "yes," and he said "But can a T-rex marry a pterodactyl? And that was the conversation. 'They didn't care about what humans could marry what humans. It was more that the T-rex would eat the pterodactyl. That was the conversation.' After coming out publicly in 2007 in an interview with The Sun, Ian revealed he now feels he is 'making up for all of the years I spent in the closet while in Steps. 'It was a very dark time for LGBTQ people in the 90s. You were demonised. You were painted as the devil. It was sensationalised when somebody was in the closet. 'There was always a gay in the band and the papers knew about it, the press knew about it, and we were scared but I feel like now I'm making up for it.' He added: 'I have a lot of peace to make with my silence and I'm very proactive. I use my voice in a political way and a supportive way for all of my peers. 'So it's a passion project for me this book and I'm really, really proud of it.' As well as the release of the new book, Ian also devotes his time to talking about diversity in schools and encouraging children to embrace their uniqueness. He added: 'There's also a massive lack of education in schools and libraries. The resources are very, very, very sparse. There's not much of it at all so that was another kind of fire in my belly to get this out there.'
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump toy tariffs: Supreme Court won't speed decision on challenge
More: Hasbro layoffs: Toymaker restructures due to tariff struggles and weak demand The company, which makes educational toys, won a court ruling on May 29 that Trump cannot unilaterally impose tariffs using the emergency legal authority he had cited for them. That ruling is currently on hold, leaving the tariffs in place for now. Learning Resources asked the Supreme Court to take the rare step of immediately hearing the case to decide the legality of the tariffs, effectively leapfrogging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Washington, where the case is pending. More: 'Two dolls instead of 30': Trump acknowledges prices will force consumers to cut back More: Second federal court blocks Trump tariffs, this time for Illinois toy importers Two district courts have ruled that Trump's tariffs are not justified under the law he cited for them, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Both of those cases are on appeal. No court has yet backed the sweeping emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Justice Jackson questions if `monied interests' are favored by court
Jackson's dissent came two weeks after she wrote that the court is sending a "troubling message" that it's departing from basic legal standards for the Trump administration. The court's six conservatives include three appointed by President Donald Trump in his first term. In a case involving the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on June 6 said Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency could have complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be "irreparably harmed" by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court's two other liberals - Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan - also disagreed with the majority's opinion in the Trump case. But Kagan joined the conservatives June 20 in siding with the fuel producers. Jackson, however, said there were multiple reasons the court shouldn't have heard the case from among the thousands of appeals it receives. Those reasons include the fact that the change in administrations was likely to make the dispute go away. But by ruling in the fuel industry's favor, Jackson wrote, the court made it easier for others to challenge anti-pollution laws. "And I worry that the fuel industry's gain comes at a reputational cost for this Court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests," she said in her dissent. A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story Jackson said the court's "remarkably lenient approach" to the fuel producers' challenge stands in contrast to the "stern stance" it's taken in cases involving fair housing, desegrated schools or privacy concerns. In response, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the 7-2 opinion, pointed to other cases he said show the court is even handed. Those include its decision last year that anti-abortion doctors couldn't challenge the Food and Drug Administration's handling of a widely used abortion drug. More: Supreme Court revives suit against cop who fatally shot driver stopped for unpaid tolls "In this case, as we have explained, this Court's recent standing precedents support the conclusion that the fuel producers have standing," Kavanaugh wrote about the industry's ability to sue. "The government generally may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders," he wrote.
