Mother Gets Dying Wish After Son Gets Married at Her Hospital Bedside: 'A Moment Full of Love'

A mother in Georgia was able to see her son get married just before she died
The hospital set up a chapel in her room so that she could witness the ceremony
Samuel B. Wilson and Nakiuma Wade, who is an ICU nurse at the hospital, then had their official ceremony two weeks after his mom's funeralA mother in Georgia got her dying wish after seeing her son and daughter-in-law get married by her hospital bed.
In a Facebook update, South Georgia Medical Center (SGMC) Health confirmed Samuel B. Wilson and Nakiuma Wade were able to tie the knot after they managed to turn his mother's room in the Valdosta facility into a space fit for a ceremony.
"In less than 12 hours, a hospital room became a chapel," SGMC Health wrote alongside multiple photos from the special occasion. "SGMC Health was honored to help create an experience that will be remembered forever."
SGMC Health added, "At the bedside of his mother, Samuel B. Wilson married Nakiuma Wade, RN, so that his mother could witness her son's wedding before saying goodbye."
"It was a moment full of love that we will always cherish. Thank you to the Wilson and Wade families for letting us be a part of something so meaningful," the medical center concluded.
While speaking to NBC and ABC-affiliated local station WALB about saying their "I dos" with his late mother in attendance, Wilson said, 'Well, it meant a lot to me because my Momma always gets what she wants, and this was no exception."
Wade, who is an ICU nurse at SGMC Health, told the outlet, 'She would always tell me, 'I want to dance with my baby.' She wouldn't go to any other wedding. She wouldn't go. She would say, 'I got one wedding to go to,' and that's the one she made it to.'
The couple then held an official wedding ceremony on Saturday, May 3, two weeks after the funeral of Wilson's mom, Martha Jenkins Wilson, the outlet stated.
The station noted that Martha had been diagnosed with cancer before her son's ICU wedding, which took place on April 11. She died a day later.
Wilson told WALB, 'I think the saddest part about it is Saturday. Momma wasn't there, but I could feel her presence.'
'All of us at the bedside when she went was everything because it's a lot of times people lose family members, and nobody is at the bedside. But we were able to be there with her, so I knew Saturday she would be so proud that she could dance with her baby,' Wade shared, per the station.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
She added of her late mother-in-law, 'She told every listening ear, and they were able to tell everybody. And that's what she would have wanted."
SGMC Health didn't immediately respond when contacted by PEOPLE for comment.
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

an hour ago

• New York Post

‘There's a baby in there. But it's dead:' mom shares horrific story

'Oh my god, you're pregnant.' The nurse had whispered it like a revelation. As if she had been delivering good news. But all Ash could do was blink at her. She had to once again recount her nightmare: 'That's literally the whole reason I'm here… There's a baby in there. But it's dead.' 3 'There's a baby in there. But it's dead,' a woman named Ash shared about her health issues. kidspot 'It could have been life-threatening' Ash had just completed a routine urine test ahead of surgery, which had flagged high hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) levels. Weeks beforehand, The Gold Coast mom terminated her pregnancy after the embryo implanted in her C-section scar, left behind from her previous pregnancy. 'It would have been like life-threatening had I continued that pregnancy ' Ash revealed to Kidspot. 3 Weeks before, Ash terminated her pregnancy after the embryo implanted in her C-section scar, left behind from a previous pregnancy. Seika – The frightening list of risks she was faced with included permanent bladder damage, severe haemorrhaging and the potential need for a hysterectomy. Scar tissue doesn't stretch like the uterus does. Had the baby been left to grow with the placenta attached to her scar, the outcome could have been devastating. It is one of the rarest forms of pregnancy, so rare that many doctors hadn't had much experience with a case like hers. It meant different specialists, numerous appointments and trying to find whatever information she could online. She turned to Google, Facebook groups and TikTok to find others who had experienced the same thing. 'I tried every possible like hashtag like 'cesarean scar', 'c-section defect.' I tried all of them,' she revealed. 'It's crazy that as women, we don't even know our own bodies and how things can work. It's just… it's crazy.' Originally, after terminating her pregnancy, doctors were keen to wait for her body to absorb and pass the pregnancy. The doctors treated her with methotrexate. Only they didn't foresee the complications. Ash was in and out of emergency rooms, consistently begging doctors to do something to help. 'That led to like a cascade of months of like emergency trips to the hospital where I was having haemorrhaging bleeds and intense pain,' she said. 'I'd get to the emergency and then they would say there's nothing that we can do. You've just got to wait for this to be absorbed by your body.' The mental toll of waiting became too much. 'I snapped one day' she admitted. 'How many more emergency trips to the hospital am I going to have to go through?' 'My bladder was fully adhered to my caesarean scar defect' Throughout this process, Ash repeatedly asked for other options. She'd asked doctors to perform a D&C (dilatation and curettage). 'They're like no you can't have a D&C due to the location of the pregnancy,' she recounted. Doctors were concerned it could lead to a rupture of her uterus. After months of complications, pain, and being medically gaslit, a private surgeon in Brisbane performed a robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of her uterus. 'They cut open the uterus. He took out the old pregnancy,' she explained. 3 'It's crazy that as women, we don't even know our own bodies and how things can work. It's just… it's crazy,' Ash said. kidspot But he found something else. 'My bladder was like fully adhered to my caesarean scar defect on the outside of my uterus,' Ash revealed. 'He said it was like folded like a concertina three times and attached.' It explained so much. 'I just thought, no wonder I could never fully empty my bladder after giving birth,' she said. For Ash, it explained symptoms she had ignored for years. 'So I remember asking him 'So is this the reason why that like I could never fully empty my bladder?'' she said. 'Since the surgery my bladder has been performing like normal. Like pre-children.' 'No one's talking about this' More and more mothers are experiencing chapters of her story, and in some cases some mothers replicate her experience. 'That's what made me want to share on TikTok. The amount of women that have come into my inbox and say 'I had this, I never even knew',' Ash revealed. 'We don't even know our own bodies, because no one's talking about this.' And through all of it, one thing kept her going. Her son. 'I kept thinking, 'I have to be okay. I have to be here for him,'' she said. ' As much as I wanted this baby, I already had a little boy who needed his mum.' The door isn't closed to more children, but the risks are now clear. 'I am allowed to try again after the three month mark,' Ash said. 'But there's a chance it could be an ectopic again.' Any new pregnancy would be high-risk and require close monitoring and early delivery by repeat caesarean. 'I don't know if I'm brave enough to risk it,' she admitted. 'I want another baby… but I also want to stay alive for the one I already have.'

Miami Herald

11 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Econometer: Should the US ban drug advertising to consumers?

The U.S. is rare among Western nations because it allows pharmaceutical advertising. But a new effort aims to stop it. A bill was introduced in Congress recently that would ban pharmaceutical manufacturers from using direct-to-consumer advertising, from TV to social media, to promote their products. Prescription drug advertising employs a lot of people, directly and indirectly. Billions are spent on advertising each year, employing advertising workers, and 24.4% of ad minutes were for prescription drugs across evening news programs on ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and NBC this year through May, according to data from iSpot analyzed by The Wall Street Journal. Proponents of the bill say advertising drives up the cost of prescription goods. Pharmaceutical trade groups have said advertisements serve public health by increasing disease awareness and educating consumers about treatment options. Question:Should the U.S. ban drug advertising to consumers? Economists Alan Gin, University of San Diego YES: Advertising is supposed to give consumers more information about products, but are consumers really in a position to make an informed decision about pharmaceuticals? Those decisions are best left to physicians, who probably have more knowledge about the effectiveness of medications. Consumers can be swayed by slick and repetitive ads into wanting products that might not be the best for them. The money spent on the ads will add to the already high price of the drugs. James Hamilton, UC San Diego NO: Proponents of a ban argue that ads cause people to request unnecessary drugs. But advertisements helped several of my friends learn about options that they didn't know were available. I'm also concerned any time the government dictates what companies are allowed to talk about. It's appropriate to ensure ads do not make inaccurate claims. And doctors should always say no if patients request a prescription that the doctor does not believe is going to help them. Caroline Freund, UC San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy YES: Advertising specific drugs leads to overprescribing, higher drug and insurance prices, and creates bad incentives, like promoting the most profitable drugs. Because insurance limits consumer costs, more prescription drugs are purchased than needed or used. If the goal is to share important information, industry groups can promote a range of treatments for a condition, leaving discussions of individual products to medical professionals. Drugs also carry risks that are not easily captured in 30 seconds. Kelly Cunningham, San Diego Institute for Economic Research NO: Firms do not advertise to raise costs but engage in marketing to inform the public (especially doctors writing prescriptions) of the drug's usefulness. Without marketing, firms would be unable to get information out necessary to make a drug salable in the first place. The drug's value is decided by the marketplace with consumers driving the entire process. Value of advertising is derived from the value consumers place on the drug, not the other way around. Norm Miller, University of San Diego NO: While most physicians try to keep up on the latest drug research, some do not, thus the need for public information about new drugs. What should be mandatory in ads are their efficacy, side effects and potential for addiction, using FDA verified stats. Lies and exaggerations should be illegal. It should also be illegal for drug manufacturers to incentivize or pay doctors for prescribing any drug, and physicians that take such gifts should lose their license. Ray Major, economist YES: Every ad starts with or ends with "ask your doctor if this drug is right for you." Prescription drug advertisement targets consumers hoping they ask their doctor for a specific brand of drug. Consumers are not qualified to self diagnose symptoms and prescribe drugs to themselves based on information from a commercial. Doctors should be prescribing drugs based on a patients' needs and not influenced by patients who have seen an ad for a prescription drug. David Ely, San Diego State University NO: Commercial speech by pharmaceutical companies that is truthful and informative should be protected. A ban on drug advertising goes too far. A better option is enhanced regulation by the FDA and FTC to ensure that the risks and effectiveness of prescription drugs are accurately communicated in advertising to the public. Under a ban, resources would be shifted to increased promotional efforts targeting health care providers so the cost of prescription goods may not decline. Executives Gary London, London Moeder Advisors NO: I am not a big fan of drug advertisements, but unlike cigarette ads, which clearly promoted sickness for generations, at least drugs are lifesaving. The government should not get involved. However, I have never fully understood why pharmaceutical companies promote directly to patients rather than physicians. They complicate medical care. Be that as it may, these advertisements certainly prop up the cable channels, who need the revenue. Bob Rauch, R.A. Rauch & Associates YES: The U.S. and New Zealand are the only countries that allow pharmaceutical companies to advertise directly to consumers. Drug ads often downplay the risks, leading to uninformed decisions. Ads can push consumers toward brand-name drugs, even when cheaper alternatives exist. Also, patients may request unnecessary medications, pressuring doctors to prescribe them. Sure, ads can educate, lead to earlier diagnosis, and boost the economy! But let's limit ads during the first few years of release. Phil Blair, Manpower NO: They are a product like any other. With artificial intelligence, clients and patients can educate themselves on various options just like they do with other products. Of course, they should heed their doctors' advice. Austin Neudecker, Weave Growth YES: Drugmakers spent $10 billion on direct-to-consumer ads last year. These costs are ultimately reflected in the world's highest per-capita health care bill, with relatively poor health outcomes. Slick spots encourage viewers to "ask your doctor" for brands even when cheaper generics accomplish the same goal. Treatment decisions should be based on clinical evidence, not marketing budgets. Pharma could shift a fraction of this outreach to physician education so that patients will still learn about therapies from an informed source. Chris Van Gorder, Scripps Health YES: Absolutely. The cost of pharmaceuticals has become prohibitive to patients and providers like hospitals, and the huge cost of advertising is wrapped into those costs. While we want informed patients, pharmaceutical education should be handled by patients' physicians, not a jingle on TV. Advertising also can be misleading and increase the cost of drugs to taxpayers - which is why many countries prohibit advertising. Jamie Moraga, Franklin Revere NO: While I don't enjoy watching the litany of drug advertisements consistently shown on family programming, I don't support a blanket ban. Instead, drug advertising should follow the model currently allowed to cigarette advertising: prohibit ads on TV and radio but allow other forms of advertising with appropriate limitations and regulations. While raising awareness of available treatments can be beneficial, the current barrage of drug advertising is excessive and likely leads to over prescription and increased health care costs. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Time Business News

18 hours ago

• Time Business News

Have You Seriously Considered The Option Of Orale Steroïden?

Steroid tablets may cause side-effects if taken for an extended period, such as osteoporosis and weight gain. You can minimize these side effects by taking calcium and vitamin D supplements, exercising regularly and refraining from smoking. Always carry with you a red or blue steroid emergency card provided by the person prescribing or dispensing your medicine, which outlines your dosage and medical condition to healthcare providers. Trustworthiness Online purchasing of steroids offers convenience, yet also poses certain risks to buyers' health and legal repercussions. Furthermore, counterfeit or unregulated products could be purchased. Therefore, buyers should ensure their vendors are legitimate by doing a detailed investigation and reviewing customer feedback as well as looking for professional website designs, secure payment options and transparent shipping policies from them. Steroids are powerful substances that can dramatically change how the body functions if taken under medical guidance and with other substances. If taken alone or taken by people not familiar with them, however, steroids can be potentially lethal. Google-owned YouTube and Facebook make it easy for potential steroid users to obtain appearance and performance-enhancing drugs (APEDs) without prescriptions, with searches for specific names of APEDs leading to videos providing contact details and instructions on purchasing them; other searches pointed towards bodybuilding or fitness model websites hosting content about steroids containing relevant terms relating to them. In addition, most websites did not present accurate information about use or risks and declined legal responsibility when selling illegal substances – all making life easy for steroid buyers. Customer service Purchase of steroids online requires taking into consideration several aspects to ensure its legality and safety, such as regional regulations, product authenticity and effectiveness, payment security measures and shipping policies. Users also often evaluate customer service by testing responsiveness and helpfulness of support teams. Steroids may be illegally used to enhance athletic performance, such as marathon running or swimming. Unfortunately, long-term or high dose use of these substances can have adverse side effects; to ensure safety it's important to consult a doctor first when considering taking steroids. As mentioned previously, steroids may interact with certain medicines, increasing your risk of side-effects. This is particularly relevant if taken in combination with NSAIDs that cause stomach ulcers; additionally, steroids can make you less sensitive to pain – this could pose problems if recovering from surgery or experiencing injury and this could result in serious health complications if left unchecked. Payment options Steroids may help treat flare-ups of rheumatoid arthritis, lupus or gout. Steroids can be taken in various forms; from tablets to liquids or creams or injections. Some individuals experience side effects from taking steroids; usually mild and they subside once treatment stops; this is more likely to happen when dosage levels are increased or taken for extended periods. Your treating provider will monitor your symptoms closely and may adjust dosage if symptoms worsen over time. Steroid tablets often cause more side effects than creams or injections because they enter the bloodstream, where they can have widespread impact. Steroid tablets may lead to weight gain and increased appetite; increase infection risks; raise pre-diabetes risks and bolster diabetes or pre-diabetes risks; slow growth rates among children or teenagers and require periodic height checks for those taking them; these adverse reactions must all be carefully considered before choosing which form of treatment would work best. Some individuals combine multiple anabolic steroids together, or 'stack', in order to enhance their effects. Others may 'pyramid' their use by gradually increasing doses over a period of time before stopping for a time so their bodies can recover. Product availability Steroids are powerful tools that can help increase muscle mass, boost strength, and enhance performance. But to avoid unwanted side effects and legal complications, orale steroïden must only be purchased from reliable licensed providers like myroidshop1 net/nl/. Steroids carry potential side effects and may even be illegal in certain countries, making it essential to understand the various legal implications when purchasing online. Doing your research thoroughly on this subject will enable you to make wiser purchase decisions while avoiding potential legal ramifications. Dianabol, Clenbuterol and Trenbolone are among the most widely available anabolic steroids on the market. All three compounds are known to accelerate muscle growth and fat loss and can be found in high doses on the market. Be wary of untrustworthy suppliers who sell counterfeit or substandard steroids that could pose health risks to users. TIME BUSINESS NEWS