Who Will Be the Next Pope? This Is What the Smart Money Says
The centuries-old tradition of wagering on papal elections was in full swing on Day 1 of the conclave Wednesday.
As black smoke emerged from the Sistine Chapel in Rome's early evening, indicating the first round of voting had failed to settle on a new pope, any of the 133 cardinals who convened at the Vatican may soon emerge as the next pontiff.
However, betting markets around the world have narrowed the field down to two favorites.
Pietro Parolin, a 70-year-old Italian who has been the Vatican's Secretary of State since 2013, is the favorite at Polymarket, Kalshi, and at foreign bookies.
Coming in a close second is Luis Antonio Gokim Tagle, a 67-year-old Filipino known as the 'Asian Francis' because of his similar commitments to social justice.
Kalshi, a prediction market based in New York, gave Parolin a 26 percent chance of winning as of Monday afternoon, followed by Tagle at 22 percent. Next is the Italian Matteo Zuppi, at 10 percent; the Italian Pierbattista Pizzaballa, at nine percent; and the Hungarian Péter Erdő, at eight percent. American cardinal Raymond Leo Burke was given a one percent chance of emerging as pope by Kalshi.
Polymarket, which exploded in popularity during the 2024 presidential election for projecting a comfortable Donald Trump victory while polls placed the race as neck-and-neck, had the same top four. However, it gave the fifth-highest chance to the Ghanaian Peter Turkson.
Kalshi and Polymarket have accepted approximately $30 million in wagers on who will be the next pontiff.
Polymarket launched its 'Next Pope' market in February, more than two months before Pope Francis died at 85 on April 21. The market has primarily held steady with Parolin as the favorite, but has had Tagle and Pizzaballa leading for brief periods.
Parolin was described as a 'deputy pope' in his role under Francis and is considered to be a moderate choice. Tagle is regarded as a liberal, like Francis, and would be the first modern-era Asian pope should he emerge as the next pontiff. Zuppi, 69, is viewed as a liberal, while Pizzaballa, 60, is considered a conservative who holds some progressive views.
Wagering on papal elections goes as far back as 1503, during the early Renaissance period. While the methods for placing bets have evolved, it remains among the most difficult elections to forecast thanks to its secretive nature and the number of potential winners (Polymarket has accepted wagers on 20 different cardinals).
Harry Crane, a Rutgers University statistics professor who studies election outcomes and betting markets, told USA Today that papal prediction markets are largely being avoided by professional gamblers because of how tight-lipped the cardinals are in the wake of a pontiff's death.
Still, Crane reminded that prediction markets can make significant moves based on limited information. He recalled how prediction markets moved drastically last summer regarding whether Biden would withdraw from the presidential race.
'We saw those odds change pretty drastically based on very little information about what Nancy Pelosi may or may not have said,' Crane said, recalling big market swings during the 2024 presidential election. 'In a way, they're very similar because that was done behind closed doors, and the (conclave) is done behind closed doors.'
Vatican-watchers are quick to remind those experiencing their first papal election that they are often defined by their unpredictability. As the old saying goes, whoever enters the conclave as pope exits a cardinal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. has "no interest" in putting troops on the ground in Iran, Vance says
Vice President Vance said Sunday that the United States doesn't plan to send ground troops into Iran and there is "no interest" in engaging in a "protracted conflict" with the nation. The big picture: Vance and other Trump administration officials appeared on Sunday shows to praise President Trump 's decision to carry out a series of airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites, while reassuring Americans that the mission — dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer — isn't the launching point for a wider conflict. Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press," Vance called the mission a "precise, a very surgical strike tailored to an American national interest" — preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon — and that he had "no fear" of a drawn-out conflict. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed the sentiment on CBS' "Face the Nation," saying that there are no plans from the U.S. to engage in further attacks on Iran unless they "mess around" and attack Americans or U.S. military sites. What they're saying: Rubio said Sunday that the U.S. carried out the attack after efforts to negotiate with Iran stalled, but that Trump administration officials are "prepared to talk to them tomorrow." Both men also dismissed the notion that the U.S. is at war with Iran, with Vance stating that the war is with Iran's nuclear program. "We destroyed the Iranian nuclear program. I think we set that program back substantially," Vance told NBC News' Kristen Welker. Zoom out: Vance and Rubio were unable to confirm the extent of the damage done to the nuclear sites, but Iran Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told CNN that the strike was a "betrayal of diplomacy." "No one knows what will happen next, but what is sure is that the responsibility of the consequences of this war must be borne by the United States and Israel," he said. Bagahei refused to say how Iran might respond to the U.S. strike, but said the nation is entitled to "exercise its right of self-defense."
New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Homeland Security warns of possible terrorist attacks in US following strike on Iran
The Department of Homeland Security issued a terrorism alert on Sunday — warning of possible Iranian attacks against the US following the American airstrikes against Tehran's nuclear program. DHS warned officials to be on the lookout for Iranian-led attacks over the next three months by terror cells inspired to retaliate following Saturday night's strike. 'The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland,' DHS said in a statement. Advertisement Iranians at a rally in Tehran after the US airstrikes on three of the countries nuclear facilities on June 22, 2025. via REUTERS Along with the possibility of extremist attacks on US soil, officials warned that the chances of both cyberattacks and antisemitic acts are likely to increase. The advisory comes after the NYPD put out its own alert last night, with Gov. Hochul upping security at the MTA and Port Authority.
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Iran government moves to block major oil, gas route
Iran's parliament approved a measure June 22 endorsing the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil transportation route, following U.S. airstrikes in Iran. Around 20% of the world's oil and gas flow through the narrow channel connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman. Its closure would likely mean rising fuel costs for global consumers, including Americans. While Iranian state media reported that the parliament had agreed to endorse blocking the strait, the decision ultimately belongs to Iran's Supreme National Security Council. Live updates: US on 'high alert' for Iran retaliation, says nuke program 'obliterated' Iranian officials have said the country would defend itself should the U.S. effectively join Israel's war with Iran. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said in a press conference the U.S. is on "high alert" for retaliation from Tehran, after American bombers targeted three Iranian nuclear sites. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned against closing the strait, calling such a decision an escalation of conflict. 'That would be a suicidal move on their part, because I think the whole world would come against them if they did that,' Rubio said in an interview with CBS's Margaret Brennan.
