logo
Wayne Gretzky's Rare 2006 Ford GT Heritage Edition Hits the Ice on Bring a Trailer

Wayne Gretzky's Rare 2006 Ford GT Heritage Edition Hits the Ice on Bring a Trailer

Yahoo03-06-2025

Read the full story on Modern Car Collector
A supercharged slice of American performance history with celebrity provenance has hit the auction block as Wayne Gretzky's 2006 Ford GT Heritage Edition is now live on Bring a Trailer, ending June 6.
Already a sought-after modern classic, the first-generation Ford GT stands out for its old-school supercar feel—manual transmission, rear-wheel drive, and raw V8 power. This example adds a layer of exclusivity, having once been owned by the NHL's all-time leading scorer, the 'Great One' himself.
Finished in the iconic Gulf livery—pale blue and orange—this Heritage Edition echoes the 1960s GT40s that triumphed at Le Mans. Number '99' decals on the doors serve as a nod to Gretzky's legendary jersey number, further enhancing its appeal to both car collectors and hockey fans alike.
Under the rear clamshell sits a 5.4-liter supercharged V8, producing 550 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque. Paired to a six-speed manual transmission and a limited-slip differential, the GT delivers a driving experience that's both visceral and nostalgic. Car and Driver clocked this model at 0–60 mph in 3.3 seconds when new, making it quicker than several European exotics of its day.
Despite its performance pedigree, this car has barely been exercised, showing just 1,200 miles on the odometer. Inside, it offers modest creature comforts like air conditioning and a CD player—rare luxuries in such a focused machine.
While celebrity ownership can add inconsistent value, the combination of ultra-low mileage, a desirable Heritage Edition, and connection to a sports icon makes this Ford GT a compelling bidder's target.
Bidding is open now through June 6, and given rising market interest in early Ford GTs, this one is expected to draw serious attention—and potentially, a price worthy of its legendary lineage.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blue Jackets Sunday Gathering: 6 potential trade chips, targets and free-agent signings
Blue Jackets Sunday Gathering: 6 potential trade chips, targets and free-agent signings

New York Times

time44 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Blue Jackets Sunday Gathering: 6 potential trade chips, targets and free-agent signings

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A collection of notes, insights, ruminations and did-you-knows gathered throughout the week that was for the Columbus Blue Jackets: Since the end of the Stanley Cup Final early last week, business across the NHL has picked up, with a flurry of signings and trades as clubs get ready for next weekend's draft and the start of free agency. Advertisement Blue Jackets GM Don Waddell has yet to join the party, but it's not for lack of trying. Waddell, who spent part of last week in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., attending a showcase for young Russian players, has been quietly working behind the scenes on moves both big and small. As colleague Pierre LeBrun reported, the Blue Jackets had talked with the Dallas Stars about Mason Marchment before Marchment was traded to the Seattle Kraken last week. The Blue Jackets want a top-six forward and a right-shot center, but they also want to reconstruct their blue line with a right-shot (right side) defenseman who can play in the top four. They'd also like to overhaul their goaltending, which has been among the worst in the NHL over the past four seasons. Yeah, that's all. Of course, Waddell may not get it all done — that's literally every position on the ice, right? — by the time the league settles into its offseason hibernation around mid-July. As the silly season kicks into overdrive beginning this week, here are six players (or commodities) the Blue Jackets might trade, six players they could trade for and six players they could be expected to pursue via free agency. 1. No. 14 pick: OK, not a player (technically), but this pick will have a name by Friday evening. Waddell has made it clear he's willing to part with one or both of his first-round picks — he also has No. 20 — but the guess here is he'll need to add a sweetener (perhaps No. 2 on this list) to land an impact player. 2. Yegor Chinakhov, LW: Chinakhov has plenty of talent; the shot, the speed. But he has had trouble staying on the ice, and if there's one thing veteran GMs loathe, it's a player who is frequently injured or is perceived to be unwilling to push through pain. 3. Elvis Merzlikins, G: If we assume there is a market — a team that thinks it can pull Merzlikins' considerable talent back to the surface — the Blue Jackets would have to consider it. Any deal would likely require the Blue Jackets to pay a portion of his remaining salary (two years, $5.4 million salary cap hit). Failing a trade, a buyout is possible. Advertisement 4. No. 20 pick: It's unclear whether this draft is deep enough for anybody to be truly excited about the No. 20 pick, but, hey, you have to listen. Waddell is willing to move one of his first-round picks. He's not against moving both of his first-round picks, either. Friday could be fun. 5. Ivan Provorov, D: If it becomes clear that Provorov is hitting free agency, there will be several teams lined up to sign him, just as teams were lining up to trade for him at the deadline in March. If a club wants dibs, it might trade for Provorov's rights so it can negotiate a deal without interference from another club. We see you, Rangers. 6. Cole Sillinger, C: This one would sting. Sillinger is an important part of the Blue Jackets at a very young age, and there's certainly no desire to trade him. But if the Blue Jackets are in the market for big moves involving significant pieces, they'd have to include impact players, too. Sillinger, who plays behind Adam Fantilli and Sean Monahan, would move the needle for a lot of clubs. 1. JJ Peterka, LW, Buffalo: It seems unconscionable that the Sabres, waiting desperately for their rebuild to gain traction, would move a 23-year-old player who has scored 55 goals the past two seasons. But it doesn't sound like Peterka is longing for upstate New York. Few would be more familiar with the Blue Jackets' roster than former GM Jarmo Kekäläinen, who joined Buffalo's hockey operations department earlier this month. 2. Rasmus Andersson, D, Calgary: The Blue Jackets need a top-four defenseman who can play on the right side. They (desperately) need some grit and nastiness in their top four. Andersson checks both of those boxes. If Dante Fabbro doesn't re-sign with Columbus, Andersson could potentially get a look on the top pair with Zach Werenski. Andersson has one year remaining at $4.55 million and has a six-team no-trade list, according to PuckPedia. Advertisement 3. John Gibson, G, Anaheim: The Ducks and Gibson have been rumored to be parting ways for, what, three seasons now? It's never seemed more likely than now, with youngster Lukas Dostal playing his way into the No. 1 job. The market for free-agent goaltenders is thin. A trade might be the safest bet. Gibson has two years remaining at $6.4 million and a 10-team no-trade list. 4. Noah Dobson, D, NY Islanders: Is this guy seriously available? His name has been kicked about more than you'd expect for a 25-year-old, top-four defenseman who has averaged 11.5 goals and 52.25 points over the last four seasons. The return would have to be substantial, and there would be many bidders. 5. Jason Robertson, LW, Dallas: It's hard to believe the Stars would even take calls on a two-time 40-goal scorer, one-time 100-point producer who turns 26 next month, but they are reportedly listening. One should assume Waddell has Dallas GM Jim Nill on speed dial — wait, is that still a thing? — but the asking price would be monumental. 6. Martin Necas, RW, Colorado: The salary cap has gone up, but it won't provide enough relief for the Avalanche, who have been in cap and injury hell for a while now. Necas has a history with Waddell, of course. They were in Carolina together when Necas emerged as a legit NHL top-six forward. 1. Mitch Marner, RW, Toronto: It's also hard to believe the Maple Leafs will let a 100-point scorer walk, but it will likely come to that. If Marner is receptive to the idea of joining the Blue Jackets — and they're a much more inviting situation now than they were a short while ago — expect Waddell to throw massive term and money at Marner. His addition would make the Jackets one of the NHL's most dynamic offensive clubs. They might even discover a power play! 2. Nikolaj Ehlers, LW, Winnipeg: The bigger role he's long wanted with the Jets would be his in Columbus, including a possible run with Monahan and Kirill Marchenko on the top line. He's a 25-goal, 60-point player despite modest minutes. He played 15:47 per game last season, which would have ranked eighth among forwards in Columbus. 3. Jake Allen, G, New Jersey: In a thin market, he's at the top of most lists. If the Jackets part ways with Merzlikins, they'd almost certainly want a veteran player to pair with young Jet Greaves as a new-look tandem. Allen, who turns 35 later this summer, will seek a team that can promise him a shot at being the starter. It might take a three-year deal to land him, though. Advertisement 4. Aaron Ekblad, D, Florida: The Panthers will try to keep the band together after winning a second straight Stanley Cup title. For a time, it seemed Seth Jones' arrival would make Ekblad expendable, but he had a tremendous postseason and has made it clear he wants to stay. That's the only reason he's No. 4, not No. 1, on this list. 5. Brock Nelson, C, Colorado: He's not the right-shot center Columbus is looking for, and his career faceoff win percentage (48.0) is nothing to get excited about. But he's the type of player — big, immovable, sturdy — who can fit anywhere on the top two or three lines and have a presence about him. 6. Cody Ceci, D, Dallas: This wouldn't set off fireworks in the Arena District, but Ceci can carry big minutes and play a solid role next to an offensive defenseman. If Fabbro doesn't re-sign with the Blue Jackets, this might be more likely. It was a momentous week for the Ohio AAA Blue Jackets, whose efforts to build a new facility and add multiple sheets of ice to the growing central Ohio hockey scene took a big step forward. Delaware City Council approved plans to build a 125,000 square-foot complex — the Performance Impact Arena and Pavilion — that will include three ice rinks and a 6,000-seat amphitheater, which would host concerts in the summer and be transformed into an outdoor rink for use in the winter. The facility, with a price tag north of $50 million, will be built on approximately 14 acres at the southwest corner of the Sawmill Parkway/Ohio Route 42 intersection, about three miles south of Delaware. Ohio AAA Blue Jackets president Ed Gingher said the amphitheater, which hopes to host 30 concerts per summer, should be completed by May of 2027. For perspective, the downtown Columbus amphitheater, KEMBA Live!, can hold 5,200 for outdoor concerts. Advertisement The hockey rinks will likely be ready for use in the fall or winter of 2027. Gingher said the rinks will be available for use by all levels of hockey, including high school teams and tournaments and local adult leagues. The Ohio AAA Blue Jackets count current NHL players Sean Kuraly, Connor Murphy, Keifer Sherwood and Jack Roslovic among their alums, along with several other pro players and hundreds of players who have earned college scholarships. Sascha Boumedienne would be the program's third first-round NHL draft pick, joining Murphy and Roslovic. When the Blue Jackets arrived as an expansion team in 2000, there were four ice rinks in Columbus. When this project is completed, the area will have 14 rinks, not including the main ice at Nationwide Arena. • Every NHL GM needs to know how to juggle. Waddell, for one, has a lot of balls in the air right now, which might explain why talks with Provorov have been so slow. The Jackets are looking for a right-side defenseman who can balance their pairs, and the more likely path is via trade. That's been Waddell's focus for the last few weeks, and if he lands a top-four defenseman, Provorov is likely expendable. If he figures out he can't, you can expect the Provorov talks to get serious quickly. (By now, both sides know where they stand, right?) • Werenski finished second in Norris Trophy voting, the highest a Blue Jackets defenseman has ever landed. When we spoke with him earlier this week, he acknowledged having mixed feelings. 'If you would have told me before the season that I'd finish second in the Norris, I would have been ecstatic,' he said. 'But when it comes out and you're second, you want to win it. I thought maybe the voting would be a little closer, but there's no denying (Cale Makar's) 30 goals and 90-something points. I totally get why he wins it, right?' Makar earned 176 first-point votes and 1,861 points overall. Werenski earned 13 first-place votes and finished with 1,266 points. • Werenski said he knew he hadn't won the award before it was announced, however. It seems the NHL's new wrinkle this year — they surprised the award winners and captured it on video — was a big hit among fans, and made for a much more enjoyable awards show. But it did reveal to the other finalists whether or not they'd won. 'We were in Europe and all of these surprise videos are coming out,' said Werenski, who took a pre-wedding honeymoon with his fiancée. 'Nobody surprised me in Europe, right? (laughing) So, I knew two weeks before that I didn't win.' • Random item I stumbled upon this week: Mike Sillinger had a heck of an NHL career, totaling 240-308-548 in 1,049 games. But his claim to fame is playing for 12 different franchises (an NHL record) and being traded nine times (tied for an NHL mark). Now get this: His son, Cole Sillinger, who recently turned 22 years old, has already played more games for the Blue Jackets — 286 — than his father did for any of his 12 clubs. Advertisement • It sounds like the Blue Jackets and FanDuel Sports Network are nearing a deal to have the regional sports network continue to air games. There are still some details being worked out, but the framework of a deal is in place. FDSN has already announced it will continue to air Cleveland Cavaliers games next season. One issue regarding the Blue Jackets is finding a studio for use when the club is on the road. In recent seasons, host Brian Giesenschlag and analyst Jean-Luc Grand-Pierre have emanated from a Cincinnati studio during Blue Jackets road games, but that studio is no longer available for use. (Top photo of Ivan Provorov: Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)

Women are getting wealthier — and they don't invest the same way as men
Women are getting wealthier — and they don't invest the same way as men

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Women are getting wealthier — and they don't invest the same way as men

Women are becoming richer, and they're changing the face of wealth. According to a report by McKinsey published last month, women control about a third of all retail financial assets in the US and the European Union. By 2030, that proportion is expected to rise to between 40% to 45%, wrote Cristina Catania, global co-convener and European lead for the risk and resilience practice, and Jill Zucker, senior partner and co-leader of McKinsey's global growth transformation service line. The report is based on a survey of about 13,000 American and European investors, nearly half of whom were female financial decision makers. It found that between 2018 and 2023, global wealth rose by 43%, but jumped by 51% for women. Women's expanding control of assets is being driven by a combination of factors, including a continuing decline in marriage rates, the ongoing boost in women's average earnings, demographic trends like longer life expectancies, and a broad shift in attitudes about women managing their own finances. Risk doesn't equal reward As women become wealthier through investing, it's becoming clearer that they don't approach it the same way as men. "Women are much more risk-aware," Anna-Sophie Hartvigsen, cofounder of financial education and investment platform Female Invest, told Business Insider. "I would like to call it much more realistic in their own ability to invest." She said women are less likely than men to invest emotionally. "On average, men trade a lot more often than women because they believe they can beat the market or they read something in the news, and they get pumped up or afraid, and then they invest based on that," Hartvigsen said. Female investors, in her view, tend to be more calm, more realistic, and better at assessing risk. However, Katie Geery, an advisor at Rise Private Wealth Management, says being more cautious can also hold women back by leading them to miss out on opportunities to build wealth. "It is important to work with a trusted financial advisor who understands your risk tolerance and can walk you through making well-educated investment decisions based on your long-term goals," she told BI. Returns aren't everything The aims of investing also sometimes differ between men and women. "Women prefer to invest toward achieving specific goals rather than chasing the highest returns," said Avanti Shetye, financial planner at Wealthwyzr. Geery said female investors tend to be more focused on philanthropy and gifting. They often consider their values when buying stock and want their purchases to help make a better impact on the world. "Women often seek financial advisors who are empathetic and take the time to get to know them on a more personal level to gain a deeper understanding of their goals and values," she said. On Female Invest, Hartvigsen said the principles its members care about the most include climate, especially a firm's carbon footprint, and diversity in leadership, in terms of a board having a good gender balance. Start investing early For Shetye, it's important to start investing early. "Women tend to be primary caregivers for children or aging parents and often take unpaid time off," she said. "Not only that, women statistically live longer than men, which implies that women would need to invest as much as they can as early as possible so that their portfolios last them through retirement." Hartvigsen said long-term financial planning is vital: "When you do that, it doesn't matter what happens today." Both agree that this plan should be grounded in expert advice. "Working with a financial planner whose planning process is rooted in financial education can help provide comfort and security to stay consistent even in the roughest of markets," Shetye said. But she also believes that practice is more important than perfection. "You are never going to know everything there is to know about investing," Shetye said. "The key is consistency, and time will do the heavy lifting." Hartvigsen advises her clients to invest monthly on the same day and to diversify their investments. "If you do that, historically, it has been near impossible not to make money in the long run."

How Iran could retaliate after the U.S. strikes on its nuclear program
How Iran could retaliate after the U.S. strikes on its nuclear program

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

How Iran could retaliate after the U.S. strikes on its nuclear program

DUBAI — Iran has spent decades building multi-tiered military capabilities at home and across the region that were at least partly aimed at deterring the United States from attacking it. By entering Israel's war, the U.S. may have removed the last rationale for holding them in reserve. That could mean a wave of attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East, an attempt to close a key bottleneck for global oil supplies, or a dash to develop a nuclear weapon with what remains of Iran's disputed program after American strikes on three key sites. A decision to retaliate against the U.S. and its regional allies would give Iran a far larger target bank and one that is much closer than Israel, allowing it to potentially use its missiles and drones to greater effect. The U.S. and Israel have far superior capabilities, but those haven't always proved decisive in America's recent history of military interventions in the region. Ever since Israel started the war with a surprise bombardment of Iran's military and nuclear sites June 13, Iranian officials from the supreme leader on down have warned the U.S. to stay out, saying that direct American involvement would have dire consequences for the entire region. It should soon be clear whether those were merely threats or a grim forecast. Here's a look at what Iran's next move might be. The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf, through which some 20% of all oil traded globally passes, and at its narrowest point it is just 21 miles wide. Any disruption there could send oil prices soaring worldwide and hit American pocketbooks. Iran boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines that could potentially make the strait impassable, at least for a time. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea. The U.S., with its 5th Fleet stationed in nearby Bahrain, has long pledged to uphold freedom of navigation in the strait and would respond with far superior forces. But even a relatively brief battle could paralyze shipping traffic and spook investors, causing oil prices to spike and generating international pressure for a ceasefire. The U.S. has tens of thousands of troops stationed in the region, including at permanent bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates — Arab Gulf countries just across the Persian Gulf from Iran — and much closer than Israel. Those bases have the same kinds of sophisticated air defenses as Israel's, but would have much less warning time before waves of missiles or swarms of armed drones. And even Israel, which is several hundred miles farther away, has been unable to stop all of the incoming fire. Iran could also choose to attack key oil and gas facilities in those countries with the goal of exacting a higher price for U.S. involvement in the war. A drone attack on two major oil sites in Saudi Arabia in 2019 — claimed by the Houthis but widely blamed on Iran — briefly cut the kingdom's oil production in half. Iran's so-called 'Axis of Resistance' — a network of militant groups across the Middle East — is a shadow of what it was before the war ignited by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel out of the Gaza Strip, but it still has some formidable capabilities. Israel's 20-month war in Gaza has severely diminished the Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups, and Israel decimated Lebanon's Hezbollah last fall, killing most of its top leadership and devastating much of southern Lebanon, making its involvement unlikely. But Iran could still call on the Houthis, who had threatened to resume their attacks in the Red Sea if the U.S. entered the war, and allied militias in Iraq. Both have drone and missile capabilities that would allow them to target the United States and its allies. Iran could also seek to respond through militant attacks farther afield, as it is widely accused of doing in the 1990s with an attack on a Jewish community center in Argentina that was blamed on Tehran and Hezbollah. It could be days or weeks before the full impact of the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites is known. But experts have long warned that even joint U.S. and Israeli strikes would only delay Iran's ability to develop a weapon, not eliminate it. That's because Iran has dispersed its program across the country to several sites, including hardened, underground facilities. Iran would probably struggle to repair or reconstitute its nuclear program while Israeli and U.S. warplanes are circling overhead. But it could still decide to fully end its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. North Korea announced its withdrawal from the treaty in 2003 and tested a nuclear weapon three years later, but it had the freedom to develop its program without punishing airstrikes. Iran contends that its program is peaceful, though it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA assess Iran hasn't had an organized military nuclear program since 2003. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but does not acknowledge having such weapons. Krauss and Gambrell write for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store