Got an Intel-based Mac? Here's why you'll want to replace it over the next couple of years
One of the things that Apple didn't say during its developer conference keynote talk emerged soon after. During another session at WWDC25 (that Apple calls 'Platforms State of the Union') it was announced that this year's macOS 26 Tahoe will be the last to support Intel-based Mac laptops and desktops. And that's why you'll probably want to upgrade over the next couple of years.
That means 2019 and early-to-mid 2020 Macs will lose support earlier than they otherwise would. But by late 2026 when macOS 27 comes out, it will be six years since the last Intel Macs were released and nearly the same amount of time since the first Apple Silicon Macs.
Apple will continue to release security updates for three years (presumably from now). So you'll definitely want to have moved on by mid-2028 in my opinion as Apple won't update your Mac against security threats and other things that early computer magazines called 'net nasties'.
For macOS Tahoe, Intel-based Macs that meet the system requirements will get access to the new Liquid Glass design, Spotlight and Continuity updates. You'll also get the new Phone app for macOS.
As you may know, Intel Macs don't support features like Apple Intelligence. Supported Intel-based Macs include MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2019), MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2020, four Thunderbolt 3 ports), iMac (27-inch, 2020) and Mac Pro (2019). It is a little weird for me looking at that list knowing that some of these machines were some of the most powerful PCs on the market at the time.
It's also hard not to feel sorry for those people who bought the 2019 Mac Pro (at great cost, starting at $5,999) when Apple Silicon was only just around the corner (though we were still four years off an Apple Silicon Mac Pro).
During its talk, Apple suggested that app developers should complete any outstanding work needed to migrate fully to Apple Silicon saying that it will support the Rosetta emulation technology for macOS 26 and 27 – meaning apps and technologies designed for Intel Macs only can still run.
During his address, Apple's senior director of developer relations said: 'Apple Silicon enables us to achieve things that were previously unimaginable and it's time to put all of our focus and innovation there.
'If you've not done so already, now is a great time to help your users migrate to the Apple silicon version of your apps.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Stuff.tv
2 days ago
- Stuff.tv
How the fast bits from the F1 movie were shot on a custom built iPhone camera
Unless you've been living under a rock, you've no doubt heard about F1: The Movie. It's one of the most anticipated movies of 2025. But what you might not know, is that Apple is behind the film. It's an Apple TV movie which is heading to cinemas first. But Apple didn't just fund the movie and offer a platform for you to stream it – it actually helped to film it. Apple actually built a customer camera for Formula 1 cars to use during filming. This wasn't Tim Cook rocking up to set with an iPhone taped to a steering wheel. The tech giant built a bespoke bit of kit from the inside out using iPhone parts. Read more: Apple Maps free update brings Monaco to life for F1 fans How Apple built a custom F1 car camera with iPhone parts The upcoming F1 film from Apple, starring Brad Pitt and directed by Joseph Kosinski (behind Top Gun: Maverick), wanted to put the viewer right in the cockpit. Problem is, F1 cars are aerodynamic nightmares for anything bulkier than a bolt. You can't slap a Hollywood-grade cinema camera on one and expect it not to fly off. Or melt. While the standard broadcast cameras F1 already uses are great for telly, it turns out that they're absolutely dire for cinema. So Apple's solution was to tear an iPhone apart and build a camera that fits in the same spot as existing F1 broadcast units. Wired got the behind-the-scenes look at this camera tech, which is some seriously impressive gear. The firm took the 48MP sensor from the iPhone 15 Pro Max and put it inside a module (most likely) powered an A17 Pro chip. Let's be clear, this wasn't smartphone shoot. An iPhone didn't film this footage. It's a purpose-built device encased in a shell that looks just like the original F1 camera. It complies with weight and design rules so could be used on the cars on track. But the fact that it's the same camera sensor as an iPhone that slips into your pocket is seriously impressive. Shock-proof, heat-proof, and strong enough to survive the kind of g-forces that would make the average DSLR weep, the module was tested beyond even what Formula 1 requires. The footage, captured in ProRes Log, is fully gradeable for editors. That Log format, and support for the professional ACES colour pipeline, both showed up later as an iPhone feature. Coincidence? I think not. Turns out this secret little movie project has been influencing the iPhone's feature set from behind the curtain. As for controls, F1 cars aren't allowed to have onboard wireless systems, because the FIA apparently doesn't fancy seeing a camera take off mid-race. So the whole setup had to be wired. To work with this, Apple designed an iPad control panel that let the filmmakers tweak ISO, shutter angle, frame rate, and more via USB-C. Very un-Hollywood, but very Apple. The high-speed shots it enabled are scattered throughout the movie. Apparently there's no 'shot on iPhone' tag in sight, so you'll just have to keep your eyes peeled for the magic. F1: The Movie hits international cinemas and IMAX theatres on 25 June, with a US release two days later on 27 June. Prepare for noise, speed, and the most expensive use of an iPhone camera sensor to date.
Stuff.tv
2 days ago
- Stuff.tv
Satechi FindAll Glasses Case makes your specs almost impossible to lose
Apple's Find My network can be a godsend if your iPhone or AirPods go walkabout – and now the Satechi FindAll Glasses Case has come along to make your specs harder to lose too. Made from vegan leather (AKA not leather at all), the Satechi FindAll Glasses Case has Bluetooth 5.4 LE onboard, so once you've added it to your Find My app you'll be able to use your phone to track the case down when you can't remember where you put it. There's no ultra-wideband onboard, so it won't be as accurate as Apple's AirTags, but it should still help you narrow down the search to the point that you can trigger the 80dB SOS chime and use your ears to locate it. That'll also go off as a 'don't forget me!' alarm if you leave it behind anywhere. The 150mAh battery inside should last up to eight months and it supports wireless charging (both Qi and Qi2). If you have a MagSafe charger you can also stick it to that. Shaped like a Toblerone to ensure it's compatible with as many pairs of glasses as possible, including Ray-Ban Meta's AI pairs and those slightly odd 'extended reality' ones, you can choose from three colours: black, sand and desert rose. When your glasses aren't inside, it also folds down flat to make it easier to carry around. The case will set you back £40/$50 and Satechi's FindAll range also includes a luggage tag, a keychain, and a Tile-style card for slipping into your wallet.
Stuff.tv
7 days ago
- Stuff.tv
I got hands on with the next-gen iPad software: has Apple finally fixed iPad multitasking?
You can't do proper work on an iPad! That's the refrain we've all heard from day one, cheerfully obliterated when people started running businesses, writing books and recording entire albums on an Apple tablet. But even as a long-time iPad fan, I'll admit there's been a kernel of truth in the naysaying. Because although there are many amazing iPad apps, the broader interface has long felt like My First PC. That goes back to the iPad's origin story – a huge iPhone without the phone part. Such simplicity was great for focus and immersion within a single app. The wheels came off when you were smashing out spreadsheets or making movies and quickly discovered your fancy new tablet couldn't juggle windows in a manner that even rivalled a 1990s PC. In fact, to start with, the iPad didn't have windows at all. Windows of opportunity The iPad launched as a resolutely full-screen device. Five years later, Split View and Slide Over debuted, Apple presumably recognising that the 'iPad Pro' moniker would be absurd for a device that cost as much as a laptop yet didn't let you use two apps side by side. But after that point, Apple dragged its feet for years regarding external displays. The subtext: if you wanted real multitasking, you should buy a Mac. Eventually, the company relented on that too, foisting Stage Manager on everyone. Given its simultaneous appearance on Mac and iPad, it may well have been a ploy to rethink iPad and Mac windows alike. The tiny snag: it was terrible. Fortunately, with iPadOS 26, we now have take three for iPad windows. And, indeed, three windowing modes, which you can switch between in Settings > 'Multitasking & Gestures' or in Control Centre. Here's how they shake out. Left: retro. Middle: goodness. Right: badness. Mode 1: Full-Screen Apps (aka 'retro' iPad) This mode lets your iPad party like it's 2010. One app at a time. Switch between apps with a four-finger swipe (or use the App Switcher, accessed by dragging up from the bottom of the screen). It's the mode your kids or elderly parents will use. Shortly before the more tech-savvy among them asks where Split View went. And Slide Over. Tsk, Apple. They were the good ones! Mode 2: Windowed Apps (aka you couldn't Mac it up) It's macOS – on an iPad! Ish. Apps launch in full screen, but can be resized (grab the drag-handle, bottom right), moved and overlapped (drag the top edge). Traffic-light buttons – close, minimise, maximise – are present and correct. Hold them and you get window tiling options. There's even a menu bar (drag down from the top edge). Blimey. The iPad also has tricks of its own. Double-tap a window's top edge to switch between full-screen and its custom position. Or flick it up or down, accordingly. You can also drag-flick a top edge left or right to have the window fill half of the screen, in the closest equivalent to Split View on an iPad you're going to see unless Apple brings back the original. Mode 3: Stage Manager (aka why is this still here?) Stage Manager lives. Like a whiffy zombie. It remains so you can arrange windows across multiple groups in what Apple calls a 'focused multitasking experience', but that I'd describe as a 'horrible mess that needs to be hurled into a ravine and covered with a billion tonnes of rock so that it can never emerge again'. A minor difference of opinion, then. However, you'll need it for external display support. Bah. Still, it helpfully turns on automatically when you connect a display, so that's something. Back to the Mac A bit of macOS I'm happy hasn't yet made it to iPadOS. Windowing isn't the only bit of macOS welded to iPadOS 26. You can now put folders in the Dock. The Files app is improved, if still lacking. Although in not being renamed Finder, it at least avoids that app's diabolical icon redesign. Preview has made a comically late appearance. And background process support now means your spendy M4-powered tablet will no longer kill a video render when you have the audacity to check an urgent email. You might look at this convergence of apps and design across iPad and Mac and reason this means they're becoming one. Surely, now, we'll see iPads running Mac apps or Macs with touchscreens? I'm unconvinced a full merger is on the cards. What Apple has instead done, in one big update I never thought we'd see, is please both camps. Minimalists and beginners still get their clean, streamlined, single-app experience. And power users who've been screaming into the void for iPad windows with proper multitasking get that too. Progress.
