New York bill proposes aid in dying for terminally ill patients

ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) — A controversial proposed change to New York State law could allow folks who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness to expedite the process of their death.
NYS Senate Bill S138 proposes the amendment of existing public health law to include the Medical Aid in Dying Act. Similar amendments have been made to health laws in ten other states and Washington, D.C.
Senior New York Campaign Director for Compassion and Choices Corinne Carey explained why she believes passing this bill is a necessity.
'It affirms that New York is committed to bodily autonomy, not just for reproductive health issues, but in all stages of life,' Carey said.
If passed, those who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness could be given the option of being prescribed medicine, which when self-administered, would hasten their death.
In order to receive this option, the patient would be required to have a doctor attest to their mental state, have two separate non-interested witnesses agree the decision is that solely of the patient, and the patient would need to be able to self-administer the drug.
Carey emphasized the big reason Compassion and Choices advocates for this policy nationwide, which is to provide the choice.
'We know that more than a third of people who get the prescription actually never take it, but derive an incredible peace of mind, knowing that should their suffering become unbearable, there is an option for them to die on their own terms,' Carey said.
Those opposed to the bill argue that it devalues human life, citing concerns regarding the criteria for determining the mental state of a patient. Lawmakers supporting the bill, including Assemblywoman Jen Lunsford, say it provides terminally ill folks the dignity they deserve nearing the end of their lives.
'I think people want certainty that if they find themselves in a situation where they are in pain, where their quality of life has diminished to the point where the justification for remaining alive is less than the justification of dying with dignity, peace and on their own terms, they want to know that they have that option,' Lunsford said.
The bill is currently in Senate committee review and can be found on the State Senate website.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

37 minutes ago

• Fox News

'Baby steps': Leader Thune details his work to corral Republicans behind Trump's legislative vision

Print Close By Alex Miller Published June 22, 2025 FIRST ON FOX: Senate Majority Leader John Thune is weathering headwinds in his own conference over outstanding concerns in President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" that threaten to derail the legislation, but he's taking it in stride and standing firm that the megabill will make it to the president's desk by July 4. "We have to hit it, and you know whether that means it's the end of next week, or whether we roll into that Fourth of July week," the South Dakota Republican told Fox News Digital during an interview from his leadership suite. "But if we have to go into that week, we will," he continued. "I think it's that important. And you know what I've seen around here, at least in the past, my experience, if there's no deadline, things tend to drag on endlessly." TOP TRUMP ALLY PREDICTS SENATE WILL BLOW PAST 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' DEADLINE Senate Republicans have been working on their version of Trump's mammoth bill, which includes priorities to make his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent, sweeping changes to healthcare, Biden-era energy credits and deep spending cuts, among others, since the beginning of June. Now that each portion of the bill has been released, Thune is eyeing having the bill on the floor by the middle of next week. But, he still has to wrangle disparate factions within the Senate GOP to get on board with the bill. "It is a work in progress," Thune said. "It's, you know, sometimes it's kind of incremental baby steps." A cohort of fiscal hawks, led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., are unhappy with the level of spending cuts in the bill. Some Senate Republicans want to achieve at least $2 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, but Johnson has remained firm in his belief that the bill should go deeper and return to pre-COVID-19 pandemic spending levels. Others, including Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, are upset with tweaks to Medicaid, and the impact those changes could have on rural hospitals and working people on the healthcare program's benefit rolls. 'IT JUST BAFFLES ME': SENATE REPUBLICANS SOUND ALARM OVER MEDICAID CHANGES, SPENDING IN TRUMP MEGABILL Thune has to strike a precarious balancing act to sate the concerns of his conference, given that he can only afford to lose three votes. It's a reality he acknowledged and described as trying to find "the sweet spot" where he can advance the bill back to the House. He's been meeting with the factions individually, communicating with the White House and working to "make sure everybody's rolling in the same direction." "Everybody has different views about how to do that, but in the end, it's cobbling together the necessary 51 votes, so we're working with anybody who is offering feedback," he said. Collins and others are working on the side to create a provider relief fund that could offer a salve to the lingering issues about the crackdown on the Medicaid provider rate tax in the bill. The Senate Finance Committee went further than the House's freeze of the provider tax rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to healthcare providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, for non-Affordable Care Act expansion states, and included a provision that lowers the rate in expansion states annually until it hits 3.5%. "We're going to do everything we can to make sure that, for example, rural hospitals have some additional assistance to sort of smooth that transition," Thune said. BLUE STATE REPUBLICANS THREATEN REVOLT AGAINST TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' IF SENATE CHANGES KEY TAX RULE Thune, who is a member of the Finance panel, noted that "we all agree that the provider tax has been gamed" and "abused" by blue states like New York and California, and argued that the changes were done to help "right the ship" in the program. "I think that's why the sort of off-ramp, soft-landing approach [from] the Finance committee makes sense, but these are substantial changes," he said. "But on the other hand, if we don't start doing some things to reform and strengthen these programs, these programs aren't going to be around forever, because we're not going to be able to afford them." The Senate's product won't be the end of the reconciliation process, however. The changes in the bill will have to be green-lit by the House, and one change in particular to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap already has a cohort of blue state House Republicans furious and threatening to kill the bill. The Senate's bill, for now, left the cap unchanged at $10,000 from the policy ushered in by Trump's first-term tax cuts, a figure that Senate Republicans view as a placeholder while negotiations continue. Indeed, Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., is working with members of the SALT caucus in the House to find a compromise on the cap. But the appetite to keep the House-passed $40,000 cap isn't strong in the Senate. "The passion in the Senate is as strong as it is in the House against changing the current policy and law in a way that… favors high-tax states to the detriment and disadvantage of low tax states," he said. "And so it's the emotion that you see in the House side on that particular issue is matched in the Senate in a different direction." Meanwhile, as negotiations continue behind the scenes on ways to address issues among Senate Republicans, the Senate Parliamentarian is currently chunking through each section of the greater "big, beautiful bill." The parliamentarian's role is to determine whether policies within each section of the bill comport with the Byrd Rule, which is the arcane set of parameters that govern the budget reconciliation process. Thune has made clear that he would not overrule that parliamentarian on Trump's megabill, and re-upped that position once more. The reconciliation process gives either party in power the opportunity to pass legislation on party lines and skirt the Senate filibuster, but it has to adhere to the Byrd Rule's requirements that policy deals with spending and revenue. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP However, he countered that Senate Republicans planned to take a page from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., when Democrats rammed former President Joe Biden's agenda through Congress. "The Democrats with the [Inflation Reduction Act] and [American Rescue Plan Act], for that matter, they dramatically expanded the scope of reconciliation and what's eligible for consideration," he said. "So, we've used that template, and we're pushing as hard as we can to make sure that it allows us to accomplish our agenda, or at least as much of our agenda as possible, and fit within the parameters of what's allowed," he continued. Print Close URL

Politico

an hour ago

• Politico

Senate parliamentarian greenlights state AI law freeze in GOP megabill

The Senate's rules referee late Saturday allowed Republicans to include in their megabill a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state and local artificial intelligence laws — a surprising result for the provision that's split the GOP. Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) rewrote a House-passed AI moratorium to try to comply with the chamber's budgetary rules. His version made upholding the moratorium a condition for receiving billions in federal broadband expansion funds. Both parties made their arguments before the parliamentarian Thursday. 'It's good policy,' Cruz said of the moratorium in a recent interview. Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) has also defended the provision, saying it's necessary to avoid a 'labyrinth of regulation' with '50 different states going 50 different directions on the topic of AI regulation.' Though the parliamentarian delivered a victory for Republicans, a number of conservative senators including Sens. Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), have vocally opposed the provision. Hawley has vowed to work with Democrats on an amendment to remove the language once the megabill hits the floor. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and the House Freedom Caucus have also opposed the AI moratorium, with Greene threatening to oppose the megabill H.R. 1 (119) if the legal freeze remains.

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Opinion: Big Beautiful Bill to take from poor and give to rich.' That's not Christian.

Recently President Trump signed Executive Order 14202, establishing the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias. (Those who want to eradicate other kinds of bias are on their own, apparently.) The stated purpose was to identify any unlawful anti-Christian policies, practices or conduct. Although I am not a federal employee, I am willing to do my civic duty and expose such conduct when I see it. We need look no further than the omnibus budget bill that has passed the House and is currently before the Senate (often referred to as The Big Beautiful Bill.) This bill is a massive transfer of wealth from poor to rich. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Americans in the highest 10% of income would gain the equivalent of $12,000 a year, while the lowest 10% would lose nearly $1,600 a year. This despite some 'populist features' such as the elimination of taxes on tips and a $4,000 tax credit for low income folks on Social Security. These 'features' expire at the end of Trump's term, when, apparently, poor people won't need them anymore. The tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy are permanent. The Wharton Budget Model predicts that those in the top 10% of income will receive 65% of the bill's benefits, while increasing the deficit by $3.2 trillion over 10 years. The Yale Budget lab estimates that, under the provisions of the bill, only the richest 20% would be better off. Working people who are sick had better pray for good health, because this bill is going to leave them high and dry. Between the expiration of subsidies for those enrolled under the Affordable Care Act, and cuts in Medicaid, the CBO estimates that 3% of Americans, or 16 million people, will lose their health coverage. This includes 520,000 people in North Carolina. The bill also cuts food assistance programs like SNAP. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would cut as much as $300 billion from SNAP, the largest cut in the program's history. An estimated one in four aid recipients may be affected, many of them children. Some states that cannot afford to make up for federal cuts may eliminate the program entirely. In other words, this bill takes from the poor to give to the rich. Takes from our children and gives to the rich. Takes from the sick and hungry and gives to the rich. That seems anti-Christian to me. I am no Biblical scholar, but I majored in philosophy and comparative religions as an undergraduate. I even read the book(s.) Jesus, especially, was a champion of the poor. 1 John 3:17. But whoever has the world's goods, and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? Prov. 19:17. He who is gracious to a poor man lends to the LORD, and He will repay him for his good deed. Besides the rich, who are the winners in this budget? The legislation provides $46.5 billion to build Trump's wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, $4 billion to hire an additional 3,000 new Border Patrol agents, 5,000 new customs officers, and funds for 10,000 more Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and investigators. We need more people to round up folks at Home Depot, hunt them down in farmer's fields, and stow undocumented people in torture prisons overseas with no due process. Doesn't the Bible tell us to welcome immigrants? Leviticus 19:33– a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. You don't have to take my word for this. The Catholic Church, the Episcopal Church and the Lutheran Church are among those urging senators not to accept the budget as adopted by the House. America Magazine, a Jesuit publication, says 'the legislation is anything but beautiful, at least from the perspective of Catholic teaching.' The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has sent a letter to Congress 'strongly encouraging them to reconsider provisions that harm the poor and disadvantaged, our immigrant brothers and sisters, and the environment.' I am proud to highlight this issue for those in the Trump administration concerned about anti-Christian policies. Thank you for your attention to this matter. More: Opinion: Republicans' new 'budget framework' will still add trillions to national debt More: Opinion: Fallout from Big Beautiful Bill voted for by Chuck Edwards would be far-reaching C.S. Chima is a writer and retired health care administrator in Asheville. This article originally appeared on Asheville Citizen Times: Opinion: Big Beautiful Bill tax cuts for wealthy to hurt poor