Opinion - Hegseth wants massive Pentagon cuts, but many obstacles stand in his way

The Pentagon is not unaccustomed to what its denizens term 'cut drills.' These are last-minute orders to find funds to cut, numbering in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, in an upcoming or current budget.
Because of the last-minute nature of such requests for budget reductions, the programs most often scuttled are promising new development efforts, whether already in procurement or still in research and development. Legacy programs, on the other hand, which both Pentagon bureaucrats and Hill staffers favor, inevitably avoid the budget guillotine.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's demand for what can only be termed 'the mother of all cut drills' renders it inevitable that few programs, new or long-standing, will survive unscathed. His memo calls for an annual 8 percent reduction in budget authority though fiscal 2030.
The Pentagon has indicated that its fiscal 2026 target is about $50 billion in cuts. But that amounts to less than 6 percent of the 2025 Biden defense budget. An 8 percent reduction in actual new budget authority would come to $72 billion in fiscal 2026 and some $375 billion through fiscal 2030.
Both sets of estimates appear to be based on an annual inflation rate of 2.1 percent through 2030, which the Department of Defense assumed in its fiscal 2025 budget projection. But that rate seems artificially low, given the likelihood that the inflationary impact of tariffs will drive rates above the already higher current inflation rate of 3 percent. Applying a higher inflation rate could increase the Hegseth targets by at least another $10 billion.
Hegseth has indicated that 17 categories of defense spending will be exempted from the proposed cuts. Some of these exemptions are vague programs with potentially major costs. The most egregious example is the plan for an Iron Dome system over America. This effort could cost as much as $100 billion annually through 2030; its total cost has been estimated at $2.5 trillion. Other programs — such as priority critical cybersecurity, 'executable surface ship programs' and what are termed 'Indo-Pacom construction projects' — will be less expensive than Iron Dome, but have yet to have their costs defined.
Still other exempted programs with well-developed estimates will also consume a significant portion of the defense budget over the next several years. These include Virginia-class submarines, with a unit cost in excess of $7 billion; the Air Force Collaborative Combat Aircraft program, ranging from $750 million in FY 2026 to about $3 billion in FY 2030; the strategic nuclear modernization program, amounting to at least $18 billion annually; and Replicator and other dispensable drones, which, depending on the number purchased, could approach $1 billion.
Given the decision to exempt major Navy and Air Force programs, it appears that Army programs, especially Army force levels, will be a major target for significant cuts. While Hegseth is unlikely to reduce military pay and benefits, their costs would drop commensurate with any reductions in military personnel.
Civilian employee levels are certain to be another major target for reductions. The number of Defense Department civilians has risen since 2003 by 137,000, or nearly 20 percent, even though the U.S. is not involved in a major conflict. By far the biggest increase has been in the Defense Agencies, totaling over 80 percent. There appears to be no real justification for these increases.
Finally, base operations, long considered to be a funding 'black hole' within the operations and maintenance accounts, could also face significant reductions. To achieve these cuts, however, requires an ability to identify how exactly funds for base operations are put to use. That has proved to be exceedingly difficult in past budget reduction attempts .
While Army force levels, defense civilians and base operations are likely targets for budget reductions, the Pentagon has but a few days to identify these or other bill-payers for the so-called exempted programs, as well as the sources of the $50 billion or more in budget cuts that Hegseth is seeking.
It is noteworthy that the Department of Defense did not list either aircraft carriers or the F-35 program as targets for reductions or even program termination. Until now, the only clearly identified reductions are in so-called 'woke' programs, and climate-change related efforts. Eliminating them will not bring the Pentagon even remotely close to its budget reduction target. To come anywhere close to Hegseth's target, the Pentagon bureaucracy will engage in yet another cut drill, with many promising programs falling on the cutting room floor while legacy activities survive yet again.
Moreover, many of the administration's proposed reductions will have to face significant congressional opposition, even from otherwise supportive Republicans. There is a lengthy list of legacy programs that have survived well beyond their optimal service lives due to the jobs they created and sustained in members' districts. Bureaucrats working on these programs have a history of providing legislators with ammunition to sink any effort to kill their pet programs. As a result, even dovish members of Congress have consistently and successfully defended programs located in their district, regardless of expense or military suitability.
Hegseth was able to overcome the challenges of Senate confirmation. That experience will be nothing compared to the congressional buzzsaw that is sure to materialize once he has actually specified which Pentagon programs he seeks to cut.
He will not find it a pleasant experience.
Dov S. Zakheim is a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and vice chairman of the board for the Foreign Policy Research Institute. He was undersecretary of Defense (comptroller) and chief financial officer for the Department of Defense from 2001 to 2004 and a deputy undersecretary of Defense from 1985 to 1987.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Washington Post

an hour ago

• Washington Post

After Virginia elections, governor's race begins a new phase

RICHMOND — Virginia's election season kicked into high gear Saturday as the newly formed Democratic lineup for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general launched a statewide bus tour on a blistering hot afternoon while their Republican rivals kept to a far more low-key campaign approach. 'Everywhere we travel, people get to hear from us about the things we are for,' gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger said at an afternoon rally at Richmond's Abner Clay Park with her ticket mates, state Sen. Ghazala F. Hashmi (Richmond) for lieutenant governor, and former Norfolk delegate Jerrauld C. 'Jay' Jones for attorney general.

Yahoo

3 hours ago

• Yahoo

Palantir, Meta, OpenAI, And Thinking Machines Just Had Their Executives Sworn Into The US Army Reserve

Four top tech executives have joined the U.S. Army Reserve as lieutenant colonels, skipping basic training and stepping directly into roles aimed at helping modernize the military. The initiative is part of a broader push by the Army to bring in private-sector innovation and reshape how the service approaches technology, talent, and modernization. The executives—Palantir (NYSE:PLTR) Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar, Meta (NASDAQ:META) CTO Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI Chief Product Officer Kevin Weil, and advisor at Thinking Machines Lab and former OpenAI Chief Research Officer Bob McGrew — will serve in a new unit called Detachment 201, also known as the Army's Executive Innovation Corps. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can 'Detachment 201 is being created to bring in tech innovation executives to help the Army ... on broader conceptual things like talent management, how do we bring in tech-focused people into the ranks of the military, and then, how do we train them,' Army Chief of Staff spokesperson Col. Dave Butler, told Breaking Defense on June 13. Unlike traditional recruits, these executives will not attend boot camp. Instead, they will go through an express training program that covers marksmanship, physical fitness, Army history, and protocols. They will be expected to serve about 120 hours per year and pass annual fitness tests. 'You could think of it as a pilot' of a lighter version of basic training, Butler told Business Insider. The detachment's name, 201, references the HTTP status code indicating a newly created resource—a fitting metaphor for a new kind of Army asset. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . According to an Army statement, the new officers will work on 'targeted projects to help guide rapid and scalable tech solutions to complex problems.' Their advisory roles will include input on AI-powered military systems and optimization tools for soldier fitness. However, safeguards will be in place to avoid conflicts of interest with their current or former employers. 'We've done this over and over when our nation needed top talent,' Butler told Breaking Defense. 'The difference is we used to do it in wartime. Now we're doing it ahead of wartime so that we can prepare and deter.' This marks another move by the Trump administration to align more closely with Silicon Valley. Palantir, Anduril, and other VC-backed defense tech startups have increasingly become major players in national security. Meta recently partnered with Anduril to develop augmented reality tools and AI systems for military direct commissioning has been used to bring in specialized talent, such as doctors or chaplains, during times of war. This move represents a peacetime shift aimed at long-term transformation. 'Their swearing-in is just the start of a bigger mission to inspire more tech pros to serve without leaving their careers,' the Army statement said. 'Showing the next generation how to make a difference in uniform.' Read Next: How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?.UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES (PLTR): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Palantir, Meta, OpenAI, And Thinking Machines Just Had Their Executives Sworn Into The US Army Reserve originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

CNN

4 hours ago

• CNN

US moves B-2 bombers as Trump weighs Iran options

Multiple US B-2 bombers appear to have taken off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on Friday night and are heading west, according to flight tracking data CNN has reviewed, as President Donald Trump weighs his military options over a potential airstrike in Iran. A US defense official said there has been no order given to move forward with any kind of operation against Iran using the B-2s. As of Saturday, the planes are flying over the Pacific and appear to be headed toward Guam. Two US defense officials cautioned that any movement of B-2s does not mean an operation is imminent but rather is intended to provide the president with options. Another US official said moving aircraft can be a show of force and a deterrent as Trump deliberates. B-2 bombers are the only plane capable of carrying the Massive Ordinance Penetrator, which experts have highlighted as the only type of bomb potentially capable of destroying Iran's underground Fordow nuclear facility. Each B-2 bomber is able to carry two of these 'bunker buster' bombs, which weigh an impressive 30,000 pounds each. The movement of the B-2 bombers comes as Trump has spent much of the past week in the Situation Room, reviewing attack plans and quizzing officials about the potential consequences of each. The president indicated that his two-week timeline for a decision on US military involvement in Iran is the 'maximum' amount of time — and that he could make up his mind sooner. Trump is set to hold a meeting with his national security team in the Oval Office on Saturday and Sunday evening. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. On Friday night, eight US Air Force KC-135 Stratotankers took off from Altus, Oklahoma, according to data from FlightRadar24. Over Kansas the tankers refueled two groups of planes, identified on air traffic control audio by their callsigns MYTEE11 FLT and MYTEE21 FLT. The callsign MYTEE has previously been associated with special activity flights by B-2 bombers, and multiple flight trackers on social media said the planes being refueled were B-2 bombers out of Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Flight tracking data and air traffic control audio reviewed by CNN show the bombers refueled again off the coast of California, and over Hawaii. Satellite imagery taken on Thursday showed six KC-135 refueling planes stationed at Diego Garcia, a remote island in the Indian Ocean that could be used to refuel the bombers should they continue onward to Iran.