May U.S. wholesale inflation rose 0.1%; less than expected
Wholesale U.S. inflation measured by the PPI inched up 0.1% in May, according to a Thursday report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Cargo shipping containers sit at Port Jersey container terminal in Jersey City, New Jersey April 10, 2025. File Photo by Angelina Katsanis/UPI | License Photo
June 12 (UPI) -- Wholesale U.S. inflation measured by the PPI inched up 0.1% in May, according to a Thursday report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
It shows no inflation surge yet from tariffs and was lower than Wall Street economists forecast. Both May PPI and core PPI excluding food and energy rose 0.1% in May.
The BLS said the May PPI increase was "led by prices for final demand services, which advanced 0.1%."
"The Producer Price Index for final demand advanced 0.1% in May, seasonally adjusted," the BLS said in a statement. "Final demand prices declined 0.2% in April and 0.1% in March. On an unadjusted basis, the index for final demand rose 2.6% for the 12 months ended in May."
Core annual PPI was 2.7%.
Increases in PPI services costs drove the small May increase.
Both May consumer prices and wholesale prices showed lower than expected inflation. The annual consumer inflation rate in May was 2.4% before seasonal adjustment.
Economists and the Federal Reserve both anticipate that trade wars will trigger some inflation, but for now the pressure seems to have eased.
It will still take a couple more months of positive inflation data for the Fed to consider resuming interest rate cuts because the full impact of tariffs on both the economy and job market isn'tt yet clear.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Living Wage a Family of Four Needs in All 50 States
If you're raising a family of four in 2025, you'll need a six-figure income in 26 states. That's more than half of America where you'll need to earn $100,000 or more annually to budget for and comfortably raise a family. Check Out: Learn More: GOBankingRates surveyed annual living expenses for a family of four across the United States using data from the 2023 Consumer Expenditure Survey and for a married couple with children from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'Living wage' is defined as the income required to cover 50% necessities, 30% discretionary spending and 20% for savings. Using the 50-30-20 budget rule, the study doubled the total annual expenditure on necessities to determine the 'living wage' for a family of four in each state. Ranked in order from states from the lowest to highest earnings, here's how much living wage is necessary for families of four. Living wage for a family of four: $82,338 Annual cost of housing: $13,454 Annual cost of groceries: $5,731 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,465 Also See: Discover More: Living wage for a family of four: $87,564 Annual cost of housing: $15,846 Annual cost of groceries: $6,750 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,373 Explore More: Living wage for a family of four: $87,607 Annual cost of housing: $15,670 Annual cost of groceries: $6,675 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,949 Living wage for a family of four: $87,944 Annual cost of housing: $15,517 Annual cost of groceries: $6,610 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,141 Living wage for a family of four: $88,312 Annual cost of housing: $16,504 Annual cost of groceries: $7,030 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,617 Living wage for a family of four: $90,659 Annual cost of housing: $16,394 Annual cost of groceries: $6,984 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,658 Living wage for a family of four: $91,667 Annual cost of housing: $16,548 Annual cost of groceries: $7,049 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,458 Find Out: Living wage for a family of four: $91,669 Annual cost of housing: $17,250 Annual cost of groceries: $7,348 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,064 Living wage for a family of four: $92,179 Annual cost of housing: $18,172 Annual cost of groceries: $7,741 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,756 Living wage for a family of four: $93,349 Annual cost of housing: $17,075 Annual cost of groceries: $7,274 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,820 Living wage for a family of four: $93,544 Annual cost of housing: $16,965 Annual cost of groceries: $7,227 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,535 Living wage for a family of four: $93,807 Annual cost of housing: $17,228 Annual cost of groceries: $7,339 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,987 See More: Living wage for a family of four: $94,102 Annual cost of housing: $17,448 Annual cost of groceries: $7,432 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,820 Living wage for a family of four: $94,682 Annual cost of housing: $17,382 Annual cost of groceries: $7,404 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,550 Living wage for a family of four: $94,752 Annual cost of housing: $17,514 Annual cost of groceries: $7,461 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,152 Living wage for a family of four: $95,480 Annual cost of housing: $18,523 Annual cost of groceries: $7,891 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,342 Living wage for a family of four: $95,763 Annual cost of housing: $17,843 Annual cost of groceries: $7,601 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,319 Read More: Living wage for a family of four: $96,130 Annual cost of housing: $18,633 Annual cost of groceries: $7,937 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,105 Living wage for a family of four: $96,640 Annual cost of housing: $17,623 Annual cost of groceries: $7,507 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,090 Living wage for a family of four: $96,870 Annual cost of housing: $18,567 Annual cost of groceries: $7,909 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,450 Living wage for a family of four: $98,082 Annual cost of housing: $18,962 Annual cost of groceries: $8,078 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,203 Living wage for a family of four: $98,427 Annual cost of housing: $18,326 Annual cost of groceries: $7,806 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,072 Read Next: Living wage for a family of four: $98,585 Annual cost of housing: $18,040 Annual cost of groceries: $7,685 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,110 Living wage for a family of four: $99,453 Annual cost of housing: $19,226 Annual cost of groceries: $8,190 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,488 Living wage for a family of four: $100,000 Annual cost of housing: $19,686 Annual cost of groceries: $8,386 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,805 Living wage for a family of four: $100,332 Annual cost of housing: $18,479 Annual cost of groceries: $7,872 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,758 Living wage for a family of four: $100,750 Annual cost of housing: $19,774 Annual cost of groceries: $8,423 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,751 Find More: Living wage for a family of four: $104,582 Annual cost of housing: $20,981 Annual cost of groceries: $8,938 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,044 Living wage for a family of four: $107,042 Annual cost of housing: $21,179 Annual cost of groceries: $9,022 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,828 Living wage for a family of four: $107,324 Annual cost of housing: $21,618 Annual cost of groceries: $9,209 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,128 Living wage for a family of four: $107,412 Annual cost of housing: $21,749 Annual cost of groceries: $9,265 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,820 Living wage for a family of four: $111,303 Annual cost of housing: $22,781 Annual cost of groceries: $9,704 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,198 Explore Next: Living wage for a family of four: $112,401 Annual cost of housing: $23,637 Annual cost of groceries: $10,069 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,350 Living wage for a family of four: $112,828 Annual cost of housing: $23,615 Annual cost of groceries: $10,060 Annual cost of healthcare: $7,982 Living wage for a family of four: $112,965 Annual cost of housing: $23,439 Annual cost of groceries: $9,985 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,486 Living wage for a family of four: $123,298 Annual cost of housing: $25,107 Annual cost of groceries: $10,695 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,260 Living wage for a family of four: $123,863 Annual cost of housing: $25,502 Annual cost of groceries: $10,864 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,506 For You: Living wage for a family of four: $126,753 Annual cost of housing: $25,722 Annual cost of groceries: $10,957 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,661 Living wage for a family of four: $128,484 Annual cost of housing: $28,465 Annual cost of groceries: $12,126 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,925 Living wage for a family of four: $131,024 Annual cost of housing: $27,807 Annual cost of groceries: $11,845 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,977 Living wage for a family of four: $131,102 Annual cost of housing: $29,848 Annual cost of groceries: $12,715 Annual cost of healthcare: $6,918 Living wage for a family of four: $131,824 Annual cost of housing: $28,904 Annual cost of groceries: $12,313 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,637 Trending Now: Living wage for a family of four: $131,996 Annual cost of housing: $29,211 Annual cost of groceries: $12,444 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,738 Living wage for a family of four: $134,990 Annual cost of housing: $30,331 Annual cost of groceries: $12,920 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,229 Living wage for a family of four: $135,943 Annual cost of housing: $29,804 Annual cost of groceries: $12,696 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,707 Living wage for a family of four: $136,990 Annual cost of housing: $25,854 Annual cost of groceries: $11,013 Annual cost of healthcare: $11,290 Living wage for a family of four: $155,738 Annual cost of housing: $37,354 Annual cost of groceries: $15,912 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,607 Discover More: Living wage for a family of four: $188,269 Annual cost of housing: $45,891 Annual cost of groceries: $19,549 Annual cost of healthcare: $8,213 Living wage for a family of four: $199,671 Annual cost of housing: $49,600 Annual cost of groceries: $21,129 Annual cost of healthcare: $10,033 Living wage for a family of four: $258,918 Annual cost of housing: $66,412 Annual cost of groceries: $28,290 Annual cost of healthcare: $9,540 Heather Taylor contributed to the reporting for this piece. Methodology: GOBankingRates surveyed annual living expenses for a family of four in all 50 states, using the 2023 Consumer Expenditure Survey (latest available) data for a married couple with children (oldest child 6-17) from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The itemized costs of living evaluated were housing, groceries, utilities, healthcare and transportation, collectively termed 'necessities.' Based on each state's respective cost-of-living index for each category, sourced from the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center's 2024 Q3 Cost of Living Data Series, the study calculated the annual cost of each necessity and summed them up to find total annual expenditure on necessities. Using the 50-30-20 budget rule, which allocates 50% of income for necessities, the study doubled the total annual expenditure on necessities in order to determine the 'living wage' for a family of four in each state. 'Living wage' is defined as the income required to be able to cover 50% necessities, 30% discretionary/luxury spending and 20% for savings. All data was collected on and is up to date as of Dec. 11, 2024. More From GOBankingRates 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on The Living Wage a Family of Four Needs in All 50 States Sign in to access your portfolio
UPI
8 hours ago
- UPI
Supreme Court OKs challenge to California stricter emission standards
1 of 2 | Electric cars sit on a Tesla parking lot in Fremont, Calif. (May 2020). Fossil fuel companies can challenge California's stricter standards to reduce pollution from vehicles, the U.S Supreme Court ruled Friday. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo June 20 (UPI) -- Fossil fuel companies can challenge California setting stricter emissions standards for cars, the U.S Supreme Court ruled Friday. California has stipulated that only zero-emission cars will be able to sold there by 2035, with a phased increase in ZEV requirements for model years 2026-2035. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has set a fleet-wide average of 49 mpg by model year 2026, with higher standards in the following years. In the 7-2 opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court ruled that oil producers have legal standing to sue over California's clean car standards approved by the U.S. EPA. Dissenting were Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, two of the court's three Democratic-appointed justices. "This case concerns only standing, not the merits," Kavanaugh wrote in the 48-page opinion that included two dissents. "EPA and California may or may not prevail on the merits in defending EPA's approval of the California regulations. But the justiciability of the fuel producers' challenge to EPA's approval of the California regulations is evident." The Clean Air Act supersedes state laws that regulate motor vehicle emissions, but it allows the EPA to issue a waiver for California. Other states can copy California's stricter standard. The states are Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia. The EPA, when Barack Obama was president, granted a waiver for California, but President Trump partially withdrew it during his first term. When Joe Biden became president in 2021, the EPA reinstated the waiver with the tougher emissions. Last week, Trump signed a bi-partisan congressional resolution to rescind California's electric vehicle mandate. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, called this move illegal and will sue over this order. "You couldn't buy any other car except an electric-powered car, and in California, they have blackouts and brownouts," Trump said last week. "They don't have enough electricity right now to do the job. And, countrywide, you'd have to spend four trillion dollars to build the firing plants, charging plants." Gasoline and other liquid fuel producers and 17 Republic-led states sued, arguing California's regulations reduce the manufacturing of gas-powered cars. The lead plaintiff was Diamond Alternative Energy, which sells renewable diesel, an alternative to traditional petroleum-derived diesel. Valero Energy Corp. also joined in the suit. Automakers were involved in the case. California lawyers argue the producers have no legal standing, which requires showing that a favorable court ruling would redress a plaintiff's injury. The EPA said consumer demand for electric cars would exceed California's mandate and hence the regulations wouldn't have an impact. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected the lawsuit. "If invalidating the regulations would change nothing in the market, why are EPA and California enforcing and defending the regulations?" Kavanaugh wrote. "The whole point of the regulations is to increase the number of electric vehicles in the new automobile market beyond what consumers would otherwise demand and what automakers would otherwise manufacture and sell." Sotomayor and Jackson separately wrote the case may become moot. "I see no need to expound on the law of standing in a case where the sole dispute is a factual one not addressed below," Sotomayor wrote. She said she would have sent the case back to the lower court to look at the issue again. Jackson said her colleagues weren't applying the standing doctrine evenhandedly and it can erode public trust in judges. "This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this Court than ordinary citizens. Because the Court had ample opportunity to avoid that result, I respectfully dissent," Jackson wrote. The ruling does not prevent California and other states from enforcing standards, Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund, told The Guardian. "The standards have saved hundreds of lives, have provided enormous health benefits, and have saved families money," Patton said. "While the Supreme Court has now clarified who has grounds to bring a challenge to court, the decision does not affect California's bedrock legal authority to adopt pollution safeguards, nor does it alter the life-saving, affordable, clean cars program itself."
UPI
9 hours ago
- UPI
Colombia joins BRICS-backed bank in shift toward new financial order
June 20 (UPI) -- Colombia's recent entry into the BRICS-backed New Development Bank marks a significant shift in its foreign and economic policy. With the move, President Gustavo Petro's administration aims to reduce the country's long-standing reliance on Western financing and attract new investment for strategic infrastructure projects. "Colombia officially joins the BRICS New Development Bank. This membership opens new financing opportunities for strategic projects and is a key step toward diversifying alliances and strengthening the country's economy," the Colombian presidency announced Thursday in a post on X. Colombia's membership involves an initial $512 million commitment and makes it the first South American nation to formally join the bank, which is backed by 11 BRICS full members, including China, Russia, India, South Africa and Brazil. Foreign Minister Laura Sarabia welcomed the announcement, saying the move goes beyond financial strategy and reflects broader national goals. "We continue to pave the way for new opportunities for the country," she wrote on X. Beyond access to loans with fewer conditions, the move carries significant symbolic weight. It reflects the Petro administration's interest in redefining Colombia's international role, shifting away from the traditional Washington-Bogotá axis to pursue a more independent path aligned with the Global South. The announcement has sparked both enthusiasm and skepticism among Colombian analysts, who warn of financial risks, geopolitical consequences and the delicate balance Bogotá must maintain with the United States, its primary trading and military partner. The Petro government has defended the move as a pragmatic step amid global economic volatility and the weakening of the traditional multilateral order. Officials also see it as an opportunity to advance strategic projects such as the interoceanic railway -- an ambitious infrastructure initiative aimed at positioning Colombia as a commercial hub between Asia and the Caribbean. Colombia's Foreign Ministry and Finance Ministry officials emphasized that joining the New Development Bank does not signal a break with the Inter-American Development Bank or the International Monetary Fund. "This is about having more options, not replacing allies," Finance Minister Ricardo Bonilla said. Still, reactions in Colombia remain divided. While lawmakers from the ruling coalition praised what they called the country's "financial emancipation," opposition groups and business associations raised concerns about the fiscal burden and reputational risks of aligning with a bloc that includes China and Russia. "Do we want to depend on the yuan or the ruble? What guarantees does a bank dominated by authoritarian regimes offer?" conservative senator and former presidential candidate Enrique Gómez asked. Colombia has long been one of the United States' closest allies in the fight against drug trafficking and in supporting the liberal economic model promoted by Washington. Against that backdrop, closer ties with China have raised tensions. The U.S. State Department has said it will firmly oppose financing for Latin American projects tied to China's Belt and Road Initiative, a global investment strategy backed by Beijing that aims to expand its economic influence through critical infrastructure development around the world. Founded in 2015, the New Development Bank aims to provide financing for infrastructure and sustainable development in emerging economies, with fewer political conditions than the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. To date, it has approved more than $40 billion in funding for 122 infrastructure projects in sectors such as transportation, clean energy and sanitation.
