logo
‘Disgraceful': Fury over controversial cuts

‘Disgraceful': Fury over controversial cuts

Yahoo26-05-2025

Workers have rallied outside NSW parliament and in regional centres across the state, warning that the Minns government's proposed changes to workers compensation laws would leave injured employees without adequate support.
The protest, led by Unions NSW on Monday, drew supporters from the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association, the Teachers Federation, and a broad coalition of workers furious over what they say is a betrayal by the Labor government.
Protests were also held in Tweed Heads, Wagga Wagga, and Newcastle as part of a co-ordinated campaign against the Exposure Workers Compensation Bill, which unions claim will gut access to compensation for psychological injuries.
Among the proposed changes is a plan to lift the permanent impairment threshold for psychological injury to 31 per cent – a move Unions NSW and the Teachers Federation say would prevent up to 95 per cent of workers from receiving damages.
There is also outrage over a proposal requiring workers alleging psychological injury caused by bullying, racial abuse, or sexual harassment to obtain a court determination before being eligible for compensation.
Sue Walton, an aged care assistant-in-nursing with more than 20 years' experience and a history of workplace injuries, attended the rally, arguing the changes would prevent people like her from accessing workers compensation.
'You'll be sitting at home without any support or any medical help through workers compensation if this Bill goes through,' she said.
'You get penalised when you're on workers comp anyway because you don't get your full wage, but now they want to take that away from every single worker. It's disgraceful.'
Retired union worker Kenneth, who spent 20 years in the manufacturing industry, said the proposed changes would undo hard-fought gains.
'To have governments breaking their pledge is not a good thing and this is a big issue for everybody,' he said.
'You have to assist workers, not cut their rights.'
He said anyone injured at work, either physically or mentally, knew how difficult it could be to access compensation.
'I've had lots of injuries in my time and it's always been a hard battle,' Kenneth said.
'We made some progress over the years and we don't need them to be stripped back; if anything, you need more help.'
Unions NSW secretary Mark Morey said frustration among workers was turning to anger.
'There is a growing anger around why (the NSW government) are doing this,' he said.
Mr Morey acknowledged the Minns government had made progress in other areas but said these proposed reforms were undermining its credibility.
'These sorts of fights detract from them being seen as a positive Labor government to a government that's fighting with all its workforce,' he said.
'I think they're getting a name for themselves of always fighting with their workforce.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What we know about pro-Palestine Action protest today
What we know about pro-Palestine Action protest today

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What we know about pro-Palestine Action protest today

The head of the Metropolitan Police has said he is "shocked and frustrated" about a planned protest in London on Monday in support of Palestine Action. The group is on the verge of being proscribed by the government, effectively branding it a terrorist organisation. Last week, Palestine Action activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two British military planes with red paint in protest against support for Israel in the war in Gaza. The group has called the government plan to proscribe it as "absurd", but home secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to outline the plan in Parliament on Monday. Palestine Action is a protest network in support of Palestine that takes direct action against Israeli weapons factories based in the UK, often occupying premises, or causing criminal damage and vandalism. Palestine Action was founded by Huda Ammori, 31, and Richard Barnard, 51, and was established on 30 July 2020 when activists broke into the UK headquarters of Israeli weapons company Elbit Systems in London and sprayed red paint in the interior. Ammori, from Bolton, was born to a Palestinian father and an Iraqi mother, and graduated from the University of Manchester, and was a supporter of the Labour Party when it was led by Jeremy Corbyn. Barnard, raised Catholic, is a former member of the radical Catholic Worker movement and Extinction Rebellion. Palestine Action has staged a number of protests in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli weapons company Elbit, as well as vandalising Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland. A spokesperson for Palestine Action said: 'When our government fails to uphold their moral and legal obligations, it is the responsibility of ordinary citizens to take direct action. The terrorists are the ones committing a genocide, not those who break the tools used to commit it.' A protest in support of Palestine Action is set for midday on Monday in central London. Originally, protesters had been told to gather at the Houses of Parliament, but this was changed on Monday morning to Trafalgar Square. But Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said on Sunday: 'I'm sure many people will be as shocked and frustrated as I am to see a protest taking place tomorrow in support of Palestine Action. 'This is an organised extremist criminal group, whose proscription as terrorists is being actively considered. 'The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest." Rowley said that until the group is proscribed the Metropolitan Police has 'no power in law' to prevent the protest taking place, adding that breaches of the law would be 'dealt with robustly'. On Monday, home secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to deliver a statement to be put before Parliament to proscribe Palestine Action, which would effectively brand it a terror group. She has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. After laying out an order in Parliament, it would need to be backed by MPs and the House of Lords for the group to be banned. If passed, it would make it a criminal offence to belong to Palestine Action or support it. There are currently 81 organisations that are proscribed, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida. Palestine Action member Saeed Taji Farouky told the BBC the government plan to proscribe the group was "absurd". He said it "rips apart the very basic concepts of British democracy and the rule of law" and added: "It's something everyone should be terrified about." On Friday, Palestine Action posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. In the clip, one person rides an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appears to spray paint into its jet engine. The incident is being investigated by counter-terror police. However, former justice secretary Lord Charlie Falconer said vandalising aircraft at RAF Brize Norton would not solely provide legal justification for proscribing the group. He told Sky News: "Generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn't justify proscription so there must be something else that I don't know about.' The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) welcomed the government's stance, with chief executive Gideon Falter saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.' The group has previously targeted Jewish-owned businesses that it says are linked to Elbit Systems, commenting: "We treat all businesses which work with Israel's biggest weapons firm equally, whether they're 'Jewish-owned' or not." Former home secretary Suella Braverman said banning the group was 'absolutely the correct decision'. However, Tom Southerden, from Amnesty International UK, said: 'Terrorism powers should never have been used to aggravate criminal charges against Palestine Action activists and they certainly shouldn't be used to ban them. 'Instead of suppressing protest against the UK's military support for Israel, the UK should be taking urgent action to prevent Israel's genocide and end any risk of UK complicity in it.' And former shadow attorney general Baroness Shami Chakrabarti told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Monday: 'They certainly committed acts of criminal trespass and criminal damage, painting planes at Brize Norton and so on, but I think that's not what most people would understand as terrorism, and to proscribe Palestine Action on the information that we have all seen, I think would be a new departure."

Banning Palestine Action may be ‘escalation too far', says Labour peer
Banning Palestine Action may be ‘escalation too far', says Labour peer

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Banning Palestine Action may be ‘escalation too far', says Labour peer

Banning Palestine Action may be 'escalation too far', says Labour peer Plans to ban protest group Palestine Action would mark a very serious step that may go too far, a former shadow attorney general has said. Baroness Shami Chakrabarti told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that it is 'one thing' to be a threat to property, or to be a nuisance, but it is 'another thing altogether' for a whole group to be proscribed as terrorists. She said: 'From what I can tell, this is a militant protest group that engages in direct action and that includes criminality, no question, but to elevate that to terrorism so anybody who attends a meeting, or who promotes the organisation, or is loosely affiliated with it, is branded a terrorist – that is a serious escalation I think.' The former director of the Liberty human rights group added: 'No doubt the Home Secretary will come to Parliament today and she will explain her reasoning and announce what she is actually going to do. ADVERTISEMENT 'I think this is a very serious step and I would share the concerns of Amnesty International, of Liberty, my former group, and others that this may be an escalation too far.' The Labour peer's concerns come as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper will update Parliament on Monday on the Government's plan to ban Palestine Action following the group's vandalism of two planes at an RAF base. The group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on Friday morning. The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. The incident is being investigated by counter-terror police. Meanwhile, a protest in support of Palestine Action is due to take place in Westminster on Monday. ADVERTISEMENT Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said he was 'shocked and frustrated' at the move supporting the 'organised extremist criminal group'. He said that until the group is proscribed the force has 'no power in law' to prevent the protest taking place, adding that breaches of the law would be 'dealt with robustly'. In a statement on Sunday, Sir Mark said: 'I'm sure many people will be as shocked and frustrated as I am to see a protest taking place tomorrow in support of Palestine Action. The act of vandalism committed at RAF Brize Norton is disgraceful. Our Armed Forces represent the very best of Britain and put their lives on the line for us every day. It is our responsibility to support those who defend us. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 20, 2025 'This is an organised extremist criminal group, whose proscription as terrorists is being actively considered. ADVERTISEMENT 'Members are alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage, assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer and last week claimed responsibility for breaking into an airbase and damaging aircraft. 'The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest.' A spokesperson for Palestine Action previously accused the UK of failing to meet its obligation to prevent or punish genocide. The spokesperson said: 'When our Government fails to uphold their moral and legal obligations, it is the responsibility of ordinary citizens to take direct action. The terrorists are the ones committing a genocide, not those who break the tools used to commit it.' Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds said he could not rule out the possibility of a foreign power being behind Palestine Action. ADVERTISEMENT The Business and Trade Secretary told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'It is extremely concerning they gained access to that base and the Defence Secretary is doing an immediate review of how that happened. 'The actions that they undertook at Brize Norton were also completely unacceptable and it's not the first. It's the fourth attack by that group on a key piece of UK defence infrastructure.' The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Proscription will require Ms Cooper to lay an order in Parliament, which must then be debated and approved by both MPs and peers. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group. Pro-Palestinian activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire (Palestine Action/PA) On Sunday, former justice secretary Lord Charlie Falconer said vandalising aircraft at RAF Brize Norton would not solely provide legal justification for proscribing the group. He told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton, they may have done other things I didn't know. 'But generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn't justify proscription so there must be something else that I don't know about.' But former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf said the Government was 'abusing' anti-terror laws against pro-Palestine activists, as tens of thousands of protesters marched in London on Saturday. Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomed the news that Ms Cooper intended to proscribe Palestine Action, saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.' Former home secretary Suella Braverman also said it was 'absolutely the correct decision'. Palestine Action has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.

CMR in MINOCA Linked to Improved Diagnosis and Management
CMR in MINOCA Linked to Improved Diagnosis and Management

Medscape

time6 hours ago

  • Medscape

CMR in MINOCA Linked to Improved Diagnosis and Management

TOPLINE: In a prospective study of over 300 patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was associated with meaningful changes in clinical diagnosis and/or management in 63% of patients and a similar increase in diagnostic certainty. METHODOLOGY: Previous CMR studies in MINOCA have focused on radiologic yield — a limited metric that does not reflect real‐world clinical utility. Prospective data on patient care are lacking. This prospective study conducted in Australia and the UK assessed the impact of CMR on diagnosis and management in 320 patients with MINOCA (mean age, 55.6 years; 52% men) recruited between January 2019 and July 2023. Patients were included if they had a hospital admission with acute features consistent with the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, no obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography, and a clinician assessment indicating acute myocardial infarction as the most likely presentation. The treating cardiologists completed a questionnaire before and after CMR to record their working diagnosis, rate diagnostic certainty on a 1-10 scale (10 = most certain), and specify intended management, including medications and follow-up testing. The primary endpoint was a composite of change in clinical diagnosis or management after CMR. TAKEAWAY: CMR was associated with a change in diagnosis or management in 63% of patients (P < .001), with diagnosis revised in 38% and management changed in 50%. Diagnostic certainty increased significantly from a median score of 6-8 after CMR (P < .001), and diagnostic confidence numerically increased in 63% of patients. The absence of coronary atheroma, a pre-CMR diagnostic certainty score ≤ 5, and early CMR (performed within 14 days of hospital presentation) independently predicted a change in diagnosis or management, with 80% of patients with all three predictors vs 40% of those with none meeting the primary outcome. Of 172 patients initially prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy, 66 (38%) had it deprescribed following CMR, yielding a number needed to test of 3. IN PRACTICE: 'Integration of CMR into diagnostic imaging pathways may be reasonable to augment clinical diagnosis and management; however, further cost-effectiveness analyses are now warranted,' the study authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Adil Rajwani, PhD, of the Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia. It was published online on June 13, 2025, in Heart. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by the impracticality of conducting a bias-free randomized trial of CMR vs no CMR. It was also limited by the assessment of CMR's impact only immediately after imaging, potentially missing later clinical insights. Medication protocols were not standardized, and the limited use of additional diagnostics such as optical coherence tomography may have influenced the findings. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by a grant from the Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation in Australia. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store