An Iran deal in two weeks? Hard to achieve, even if Trump really wants one

President Donald Trump told reporters that he is interested largely in the coercive part of coercive diplomacy at Morristown Airport in New Jersey on June 21. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES
News analysis An Iran deal in two weeks? Hard to achieve, even if Trump really wants one
WASHINGTON – Ask diplomats who have negotiated with Iran, and they usually describe it with some variant of: Brace yourself, it takes a long time.
It took the better part of two years to put together the Obama-era agreement that all but halted Iran's nuclear program. After President Donald Trump scrapped that deal in his first term, it took 15 months for the Biden administration to negotiate a way to piece it back together – at which point Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vetoed the near-final agreement. So what could Mr Trump, dangling the possibility that last-minute diplomacy could provide an alternative to bombing Iran's main uranium enrichment facility, hope to accomplish in the two-week window he has given himself to make a decision?
Not much, the veterans of such negotiations warn. But then again, the environment is very different this time.
Ayatollah Khamenei is the final word in all foreign policy issues – but he is also most likely in hiding, US intelligence officials say.
Iran's foreign minister and lead negotiator Abbas Araghchi says he is open to placing limitations on Iran's nuclear output similar to what he and his colleagues negotiated with the United States a decade ago.
But on June 20 , he told his European counterparts in Geneva that Iran would never negotiate as long as Israel was dropping missiles on its military bases and nuclear facilities, and carrying out targeted killings of Iran's Revolutionary Guard officers and nuclear scientists.
Mr Trump, for his part, made clear to reporters on June 20 that he is interested largely in the coercive part of coercive diplomacy. Iran, he insisted, had only minutes left on the clock. 'I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum,' he said.
And he dismissed the idea that the meeting in Europe would do anything but slow things down. 'Iran didn't want to speak to Europe,' he said. 'They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help.'
Whether Mr Trump is serious about negotiations or just buying time to better prepare for a military assault and its aftermath remains unclear.
But there was no public evidence yet that the contacts between Mr Araghchi and the president's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff could lead to a meeting, much less a deal that would satisfy Mr Trump. Or even that such a deal would be enough to hold back Israel's determination to wipe out Iran's nuclear facilities.
Mr Araghchi knows every inch of the Iranian nuclear complex and was a central player in negotiating the 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump exited three years later. But even today , US officials do not know how much sway he holds with Ayatollah Khamenei .
Mr Witkoff is the mirror opposite: He knew virtually nothing about the Iranian programme and has spent the past few months cramming on the details of nuclear enrichment and Iranian negotiating history. But he has a tight relationship with Mr Trump that goes back to their New York real estate days and holds considerable sway over what constitutes an acceptable deal.
If the two men were able to come to the kind of agreement that has eluded them through two and a half months of negotiations, they would still have to sell it back home.
'These are not normal times,' said Dr Richard Haass, who oversaw Iran policy for President George H.W. Bush and was a senior State Department official for President George W. Bush. 'The pressure on Iran, since they are losing, is more intense than it has ever been. And the pressure on Trump to use military force if it looks like the Iranians are trying to buy time rather than reach an agreement will be huge.'
Success may depend on exactly what Mr Trump demands: the 'unconditional surrender' that he keeps talking about or a narrower, face-saving halt in remaining nuclear enrichment, with the understanding that while Iran may retain what it views as its 'right' to produce nuclear fuel, it will never again exercise that right.
'Two weeks may be enough time for an unconditional capitulation. A day suffices for that,' said Mr Robert Malley, who participated in the negotiations that led to the 2015 agreement and then led the failed Biden-era effort to reconstitute some version of that deal.
But, Mr Malley added, 'that may be what President Trump wants, but it is almost certainly not what he will get. As the Islamic Republic sees it, it's tantamount to being offered the choice between committing suicide and taking their chances at being killed. History suggests they will take their chances.'
Mr Malley noted that there might be room for a diplomatic off-ramp, one in which 'Iran agrees to 'voluntarily' and 'temporarily' stop enriching uranium, which is much easier now that its enrichment capacity is a shadow of its former self.' That, he added, could 'give space for US -Iranian negotiations and halt the mad dash to a US war'.
It is the kind of creative approach that, when missiles were not flying, might be wordsmithed over weeks or months in Vienna, then taken back to Tehran and Washington for formal sign-off . Clearly, no one has time for that process now. As he emerged from the talks in Geneva on June 20, Mr Araghchi did not sound in the mood for even starting down that road, any more than Mr Trump sounded very interested in negotiating.
The Iranian foreign minister suggested that, in retrospect, perhaps his talks with Mr Witkoff had been an elaborate US -engineered shadow play, a cover for the Israelis as they prepared for war.
'So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Mr Araghchi told NBC's Andrea Mitchell . 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was in fact a betrayal to diplomacy.'
Iran, he said, would never entirely stop making nuclear fuel. 'Zero enrichment is impossible,' he said. 'This is an achievement of our own scientists. It is a question of national pride.' NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Straits Times

20 minutes ago

• Straits Times

‘We're all in shock': Iranians react to US attack on nuclear sites

The Israel-Iran war that broke out over the past week has already upended life for Iran's 90 million people. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Follow our live coverage here. TEHRAN - The Israel-Iran war that broke out over the past week has already upended life for Iran's 90 million people, killing more than 400 and injuring more than 3,000, according to the country's Health Ministry. Countless others have fled to safety in the countryside or neighbouring states. Now, after a direct American attack on three of Iran's nuclear facilities, many Iranians said in phone interviews that they faced an uncertain and frightening future. 'We're all in shock – none of us expected that, within six or seven days, we'd reach this point,' said Peyman, a 44-year-old business executive who asked that his last name not be used because of concern over reprisals from the authorities. After Israel launched its military assault last week, a missile hit nearby on his commute to work, and he decided to escape Tehran. Now his immediate family, parents, in-laws and brother's family are all sheltering in one house in northern Iran. His primary concern is for his 9-year-old daughter. 'I grew up in war, so the sound of bombardment doesn't scare me, but I left because of my daughter,' he said. 'I fear soon we're going to have a shortage of water and food.' Iranians awoke to the news of the American attack June 22 feeling a combination of sorrow and anger. 'I really hope there's a ceasefire, because this is not OK,' said Dr Parsa Mehdipour, 29, a general practitioner in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, who flew home to Tehran for a visit in late May and has been trapped there since the war began and flights into and out of Iran were suspended. Dr Mehdipour said he had no idea how he would get back to Dubai. His options include travelling by road and then taking a ship across the Persian Gulf or crossing into a neighbouring country where he can catch a flight. 'These tensions will cause a lot of problems for civilians,' he said. 'This is honestly a breach of international law,' he said, adding that attacking nuclear facilities 'could have catastrophic consequences for the people.' One 44-year-old mother of two, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect her family from reprisals, described how she and her children left everything behind after Israel began its military campaign and Iranian authorities issued an evacuation order for her neighbourhood in Tehran. They packed a few small bags, locked the door and left, travelling on a pothole-filled road to the border and crossing into Armenia, where they have been staying in hotels. By day, her sons live a normal life. But as night falls their crying and nightmares begin, and they awaken at the slightest sound, she said. When she mentioned that they were on a vacation, her 7-year-old son corrected her, saying that he knew that they had escaped from a war. The woman said that leaving Iran was the worst feeling, but that she had lived through the Iran-Iraq War and did not want her children to experience the same trauma. She does not care about the nuclear sites, she said, but feels sad for regular Iranians who are stuck between two fronts: their own government, and the countries attacking them. Since the Israeli attacks, which appeared to have involved intelligence breaches deep inside Iran's government, Iranian news media have reported that officials have cracked down on people they accuse of being 'collaborators' with Israel. Iranian authorities arrested 53 people who they said were linked to Israel and charged them with disturbing public opinion, possessing and operating drones, filming sensitive locations and sending that footage to 'hostile media outlets,' Fars, an Iranian news agency affiliated with Iran's Revolutionary Guard, reported on June 22. Iranian authorities also arrested a European citizen accused of espionage in the western province of Kermanshah, the Tasnim news agency, which is closely affiliated with the government, reported Sunday. The report did not say what country the person was from. The New York Times was not able to independently verify the Iranian news media reports. Peyman, the executive, said that he was no fan of President Donald Trump or Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – 'not at all' – but that he nonetheless found himself blaming his own government for the war and its heavy toll. 'The feeling I have is a feeling of 40 years of hatred toward this foolish government,' he said, lamenting the money that had been spent to develop Fordo, a uranium enrichment site that the United States targeted. 'All these years of slogans and chest beating, saying we have a strong defence system and that no enemy could ever attack our soil.' 'That's not even counting how much the value of our currency has dropped, how much of our human capital has fled the country, how much chaos has been created,' he added. 'The psychological, financial and cultural toll on the country is immense.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Business Times

37 minutes ago

• Business Times

Oil hits five-month high after US hits key Iranian nuclear sites

[TOKYO] Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January as Washington's weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply worries. Brent crude futures rose US$1.88 or 2.44 per cent at US$78.89 a barrel as of 1122 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude advanced US$1.87 or 2.53 per cent at US$75.71. Both contracts jumped by more than 3 per cent earlier in the session to US$81.40 and US$78.40, respectively, five-month highs, before giving up some gains. The rise in prices came after U.S. President Donald Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is Opec's third-largest crude producer. Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on the move. 'The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied,' said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh. Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volumes that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added. Brent has risen 13 per cent since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10 per cent. The current geopolitical risk premium is unlikely to last without tangible supply disruptions, analysts said. Meanwhile, the unwinding of some of the long positions accumulated following a recent price rally could cap an upside to oil prices, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, wrote in a market commentary on Sunday. REUTERS

Straits Times

an hour ago

• Straits Times

Russia may be ‘a friend' of Iran, but Moscow seems unlikely to offer Tehran much help

There's little sign that Russia will provide military aid to Iran as it prioritises the Ukraine war. PHOTO: REUTERS Russia may be 'a friend' of Iran, but Moscow seems unlikely to offer Tehran much help Follow our live coverage here. The Iranian foreign minister said on June 22 that he was heading to Russia to meet President Vladimir Putin on June 23, as Iran weighed a response to a wave of US strikes on its nuclear sites. There was little sign that Russia was prepared to provide military assistance to Iran, its closest remaining Middle East ally, as it prioritised its own war against Ukraine. Iran has not received concrete support from any allies through 10 days of war with Israel. In announcing the trip to Moscow, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called Russia 'a friend of Iran' and said that the two countries 'enjoy a strategic partnership and we always consult with each other and coordinate our positions'. The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned the American military intervention in Iran, saying it had undermined global efforts to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons. But the Kremlin has not publicly commented on the attacks, and it has not announced any tangible steps to help Iran. The guarded reaction reflects Mr Putin's limited resources, with Russia in its fourth year of war in Ukraine. Russia is trying to maintain warm relations with Iran's Middle Eastern rivals, including Saudi Arabia. The Kremlin is also likely to tread carefully on issues that may alienate US President Donald Trump, whose support – or, at least, acquiescence – it needs to secure a peace deal in Ukraine on its own terms. In addition, Russia has benefited from a rise in oil prices caused by the growing unrest in the Middle East. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.