logo
Five bats fantasy baseball managers can actually drop, based on projections

Five bats fantasy baseball managers can actually drop, based on projections

New York Times10 hours ago

If you stick closely to projections (as I do) and play a lot of keeper leagues (as I do), you take the long view on hitters most of the time. They'll come back around and play to the talent levels they've shown before, of course, why wouldn't they? Projections look at the sum of a player and put together the good times and the bad times and produce the most likely outcomes, and usually, those are about as rosterable as they were when you acquired the player.
Advertisement
But sometimes even the projections move enough on a player that we should recalibrate our feelings. If you've lost the projection systems, you've lost your last defender.
To see which players have seen their projections move the most, I took preseason OOPSY projections from Jordan Rosenblum and compared them to his rest-of-season projections. Here are the 15 players who have seen their projections move downward the most compared to preseason expectations. I've listed them along with their Yahoo roster rates.
There are already some obvious flaws with this approach. There are the hitters who might have taken a haircut but are still projected among the best hitters in the game, like Juan Soto, Mike Trout, and Gunnar Henderson. Nobody is advocating dropping these players. League average OPS is .712, and they're all 100-plus points clear of that, even with their reduced projections. There are also hitters here who will provide fantasy value with their legs, as Matt McLain, Michael Harris II, and, to a lesser extent, Kristian Campbell and Spencer Steer are non-zeroes on the basepaths. And then there are players who nobody had rostered anyway, like Joey Ortiz. Ahem.
So let's try this another way. Which hitters have seen their OPS projections drop at least 10 points, but are sorted by the worst OPS projections (minimum 250 projected plate appearances)? Surely these players are not great, and maybe also on the precipice of losing their jobs?
Nobody on this list was projected to have a league average OPS, and then they played so poorly that they saw their projections drop further. Speed once again is a complicating factor, but it's still instructive to note that while Parker Meadows has the defensive chops to keep his job despite poor OPS projections, the Miami Marlins just moved Xavier Edwards to second base. He's a sell in keeper formats if he has any value, because legs can only take a player so far. The next problem is that once you scan over to the roster levels, you'll see that nobody was really all-in on these players anyway, with a notable exception or two.
Advertisement
We still have the stolen base problem. Let's try one last way. Here are the players who have lost the most projected fantasy value since the preseason, using OOPSY in the FanGraphs auction calculator with 15-team Roto 5×5 settings. I've removed players who are currently in the minors or suffering from long-term injury, or who were projected for negative value to begin the season, in order to make this list more useful.
This once again has some less-than-useful information. Nobody is still holding on to Orlando Arcia at this point since he lost his starting job and is a utility player, and ownership levels in a lot of the other categories are pretty low. Nobody is dropping Yordan Alvarez despite the change in projected outcomes. But there are also some interesting names on here for those who were holding out hope for players like Brandon Marsh and Lane Thomas — if they are basically underwater in 15-teamers with five outfielders, by sober projections, then there's no reason to keep holding them for the future in most leagues.
Let's highlight five bats who have shown up on a lot of these lists but aren't slam-dunk drops at first glance.
Recently, Adames has performed a little better, and that coincides with his rolling swing speed finally poking about the 75th percentile for the first time this season. But it's a long swing, and if you judge him instead by swing acceleration (which considers contact point), he just nudged above the 10th percentile. The thing is, we've seen this from Adames before, so it's not too surprising. Many of his numbers seem right in line with what he did in 2023, when he had a .217 average and hit 24 homers (except worse in the power department, really). That year, he was the 20th-best shortstop when all was said and done. Even if he picks it up and ends up near those numbers, the stolen bases aren't going to be there like last year, and maybe there's someone out there who can be better than 20th for you at the position?
He's still a $3 player in 12-team leagues with a middle infield slot, according to OOPSY rest-of-season projections, but that's droppable territory if you see something better out there. Of the players highlighted here, McLain is the toughest drop for a couple of reasons, though. First, second base is a really tough position this year. It's only produced six players who would be above-replacement players without the positional adjustment (shortstop has 16), and the lesser-rostered, better-projected second basemen ahead of McLain (Jonathan India, Luis Garcia Jr.) aren't slam-dunk decisions. Second, he's stealing bases and likely to finish the season with at least a shot at a 20-20 season. But the batting average isn't going to be great, and the power, which wasn't supported fully by his batted-ball stats, has not returned (and wasn't helped by a loss of bat speed). If the steals won't mean that much to you, McLain could be a drop in shallower leagues.
Advertisement
Everything has gone badly for Santander in Toronto. The strikeout rate went up (career-worst), the fly-ball rate went down, the hard-hit rate went down (five-year low), as did his barrel rate (career-worst) and max exit velocity (career-worst). His bat has lost over a mile per hour of bat speed (to the point that it's almost average from the left side), and his swing has gotten flatter in terms of tilt, so he's just pulling balls on the ground now. Jorge Soler, who is rostered in a third of the leagues as Santander, is projected to be better. In the deepest leagues, you just have to hold and hope, but projections have him under $3 going forward in 15-team leagues with players like Alec Burleson and the returning Luke Raley ranked higher. You probably have a better option on your wire versus waiting for him to get healthy.
Steer's lack of bat speed this year can indeed be most likely attributed to his spring injury to the shoulder, but it's also true that there's no evidence in his rolling swing speed graphs that the joint is feeling any better in recent days. Keeper league players have a harder decision — Steer could use a full healthy offseason, most likely, and any return of bat speed could make him a viable 20-10 guy again — but in leagues playing just for 2025, the four stolen bases aren't enough to hang around for. Christian Encarnacion-Strand projects better and is out there in nearly three-quarters of Yahoo leagues, and if you need some stolen bases, Jake Cronenworth is rostered in fewer leagues and projects better. There are better options than Steer right now in all but the deepest leagues.
In 12-team leagues with a middle infielder slot, OOPSY projects Story to be below replacement, which might be surprising at first. He has double-digit homers and steals and has had his moments this year. But the real tragedy of leaving Coors Field behind is that his batting average is no longer buoyed by altitude. Now he strikes out 30 percent of the time and has the batting average to match. It's a bit like McLain — how much batting average do you want to pay for your 20/20 season — but at a position where there are more options. Even if you want power and speed, Masyn Winn and Ezequiel Tovar might be able to help you without hurting in batting average as much. Looking at roster rates, though, Story has probably already been dropped in most leagues where he should have been, and is a tentative hold in the deepest leagues.
(Photo of Willy Adames: Michael Reaves / Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2025 INDYCAR Odds: Alex Palou Favorite For Road America; Josef Newgarden Second
2025 INDYCAR Odds: Alex Palou Favorite For Road America; Josef Newgarden Second

Fox News

time10 minutes ago

  • Fox News

2025 INDYCAR Odds: Alex Palou Favorite For Road America; Josef Newgarden Second

INDYCAR heads to Wisconsin for the XPEL Grand Prix at Road America this weekend and fans can watch the exciting action on FOX. Fans can also dive into the odds for this weekend's race and wager on which driver they think has what it takes to get into victory lane. Kyle Kirkwood won the most recent race at St. Louis. It was his third win of the season. Alex Palou, however, has won five of the first eight — including the Indy 500. And Palou is the favorite to win this weekend, too. Will Kirkwood or Palou get into victory lane again this weekend? Or will Josef Newgarden — the second driver on the board — take the checkered flag? Let's dive into the odds at DraftKings Sportsbook as of June 20. Alex Palou: 33/20 (bet $10 to win $26.50 total)Josef Newgarden: 9/2 (bet $10 to win $55 total)Scott McLaughlin: 6/1 (bet $10 to win $70 total)Colton Herta: 6/1 (bet $10 to win $70 total)Kyle Kirkwood: 13/2 (bet $10 to win $75 total)Pato O'Ward: 15/2 (bet $10 to win $85 total)Will Power: 9/1 (bet $10 to win $100 total)Christian Lundgaard: 15/1 (bet $10 to win $160 total)Scott Dixon: 16/1 (bet $10 to win $170 total)David Malukas: 25/1 (bet $10 to win $260 total)Marcus Armstrong: 30/1 (bet $10 to win $310 total)Marcus Ericsson: 40/1 (bet $10 to win $410 total)Felix Rosenqvist: 40/1 (bet $10 to win $110 total)Alexander Rossi: 40/1 (bet $10 to win $410 total)Santino Ferrucci: 50/1 (bet $10 to win $510 total)Graham Rahal: 50/1 (bet $10 to win $510 total)Devlin DeFrancesco: 80/1 (bet $10 to win $810 total)Rinus Veekay: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)Louis Foster: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)Kyffin Simpson: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)Conor Daly: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)Christian Rasmussen: 100/1 (bet $10 to win $1,010 total)Sting Ray Robb: 200/1 (bet $10 to win $2,010 total)Robert Shwartzman: 200/1 (bet $10 to win $2,010 total)Nolan Siegel: 200/1 (bet $10 to win $2,010 total)Jacob Abel: 200/1 (bet $10 to win $2,010 total)Callum Ilott: 200/1 (bet $10 to win $2,010 total) Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!

Wisconsin files lawsuit against Miami, alleging tampering led to Xavier Lucas' transfer
Wisconsin files lawsuit against Miami, alleging tampering led to Xavier Lucas' transfer

New York Times

time10 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Wisconsin files lawsuit against Miami, alleging tampering led to Xavier Lucas' transfer

The University of Wisconsin and its name, image and likeness collective sued the University of Miami on Friday, alleging it interfered with what it said were binding NIL revenue-sharing contracts with former cornerback Xavier Lucas. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Dane County (Wis.) Circuit Court, alleges Miami made 'impermissible contacts with (Lucas) and his representatives this past December and January, leading to Lucas' withdrawal from Wisconsin and enrollment at Miami. Advertisement 'As a result of Miami's actions, (Lucas) abruptly left UW-Madison's football program and enrolled at Miami, causing plaintiffs to suffer substantial pecuniary and reputational harm,' the lawsuit states. The lawsuit, which Yahoo Sports first reported on, does not name Lucas but refers to him as 'Student-Athlete A.' The suit adds another layer to the power struggle between schools, conferences and athletes, as athletes sign NIL deals but abandon those contracts to enter the transfer portal. The House v. NCAA settlement, which will allow schools to directly compensate athletes through revenue sharing for the first time, was approved June 6. For months, schools have signed players to revenue-sharing deals contingent on the settlement's approval, with the intention it would eliminate tampering and slow player movement. The two-year revenue-share agreement Lucas signed shortly after the end of his freshman season in Madison was set to begin July 1, the first day schools can begin directly compensating athletes. In January, Wisconsin released a statement accusing Miami of tampering, citing 'credible information' and threatening to pursue legal action. The Big Ten backed Wisconsin in a statement Friday. 'As alleged, the University of Miami knowingly ignored contractual obligations and disregarded the principle of competitive equity that is fundamental to collegiate athletics,' the Big Ten said. 'The Big Ten Conference believes that the University of Miami's actions are irreconcilable with a sustainable college sports framework and is supportive of UW-Madison's efforts to preserve it.' A Miami representative declined to comment on the report of Friday's lawsuit because the school had not been served papers yet. Wisconsin is seeking unspecified damages in the lawsuit, as well as 'a declaration that Miami's conduct directed towards (Lucas) constituted tampering.' Lucas unenrolled from Wisconsin after school officials denied multiple requests from him and his attorney, Darren Heitner, to place his name in the transfer portal during the 20-day winter window (Dec. 9-28). Wisconsin maintains it told Lucas and his mother it would not put his name into the portal because of the two-year NIL contract he signed in December. Advertisement In the lawsuit filed Friday, Wisconsin alleges Miami's 'wrongful conduct' led to Lucas' reaching out to a Wisconsin assistant coach on the evening of Dec. 17 — two days after returning home to South Florida for winter break — and asking to be placed in the transfer portal. A day later, Lucas 'offered a personal, family-related reason for wanting to enter the transfer portal' in a text message. Three days later, however, a relative of Lucas' contacted a Wisconsin coach and provided information 'inconsistent with his family-related rationale for seeking to transfer,' the lawsuit says. The lawsuit alleges Lucas told his position coach before heading home for winter break that he had been contacted by other schools to enter the portal but 'reaffirmed that he was committed to UW-Madison.' Wisconsin said it obtained information indicating that Miami had impermissible contact with Lucas and his representatives on multiple occasions in December and January, including sending a coach and 'prominent Miami alumnus' to Lucas' South Florida home; and offering him a 'more lucrative' compensation package than the one Wisconsin was paying him. Lucas enrolled in classes at Miami in January and participated in the Hurricanes' spring football practice in March and April. The sophomore, who had 18 tackles as a freshman, is expected to be one of Miami's best defensive players this fall. The NCAA said in January that its rules 'could not prevent a student-athlete from unenrolling from an institution, enrolling at a new institution and competing immediately.' Wisconsin, though, was not punished for keeping Lucas' name out of the portal. 'Enforcement is shaky — schools can block portal entry, even if it is against NCAA rules, as seen with Lucas,' Heitner told The Athletic earlier this month. 'Wisconsin appears to have escaped punishment, at least for the time being, despite the clear rules violation.' Advertisement Wisconsin's lawsuit also alleges Miami's conduct toward Lucas was not an isolated event but part of a broader pattern of Miami's tampering with student-athletes. 'Now more than ever, it is imperative to protect the integrity and fundamental fairness of the game, including in connection with NIL contracts,' the lawsuit states. 'Indeed, student-athletes' newfound NIL rights will be rendered meaningless if third parties are allowed to induce student-athletes to abandon their contractual commitments.' — The Athletic's Chris Vannini contributed to this report.

Julio Cesar Chavez Jr Says ‘I Want To End Jake Paul's Career'
Julio Cesar Chavez Jr Says ‘I Want To End Jake Paul's Career'

Forbes

time19 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Julio Cesar Chavez Jr Says ‘I Want To End Jake Paul's Career'

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - MAY 14: Jake Paul, left, gestures towards Julio Cesar Chavez Jr., Mexico's ... More former world champion, right, as Oscar De La Hoya, of Golden Boy Promotions, center, looks on during a boxing news conference at the Avalon Hollywood Theatre in Los Angeles on May 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by) On Saturday, June 28, Jake Paul and Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. will face off in a 10-round boxing match. If Chavez gets his wish, the contest, which will be contested at 200 pounds, will be the final fight of Paul's boxing career. During an interview with Ariel Helwani, Chavez was asked if he was motivated to score a knockout when the two meet at the Honda Center in Anaheim, California, and get Paul out of boxing. 'Yes,' Chávez said. "You know, I still think that I'm better than Jake Paul, so I think after this fight maybe Jake continues to fight and tries to be a better boxer, but I don't think he has the skills and everything to win the fight. Yes, I want to end Jake Paul's career." Chavez, a former WBC middleweight champion, enters the upcoming matchup with a 54-6-1-1 record. He is coming off a July 2024 decision win over former UFC fighter Uriah Hall. The 39-year-old said of his fight against Paul and what he hopes it could lead to. 'I want to make it clear that I'm still here,' said Chavez. "I'm not old, and I take this sport seriously. I train hard. I'm disciplined. I'm 39, so I don't think I'm old. I still feel good in the gym. I want to prove that I'm still here, that I'm still a good fighter. So I want to fight better opposition after this fight, and that's why I take this fight. Chavez has had a hard time shaking the visual of his 2019 loss to Daniel Jacobs. A fight where he came in overweight and quit in the fifth round. Chavez's action on that night left the crowd at Talking Stick Resort Arena in Phoenix, Arizona showering the ring with debris. Chavez is 3-2 since that loss, but he says he will be a different fighter against Paul. "Now I'm disciplined, I'm focused, I want to finish the fight with Paul with a win and take this opportunity to be back in real boxing. That's my goal." Paul (11-1) has not fought since he defeated Mike Tyson by unanimous decision in November 2024. The Paul vs. Chavez Jr. fight card streams on DAZN PPV. Paul vs. Chavez Jr. Main Event 200 lbs.: Jake Paul (11-1) vs. Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. (54-6-1) x 10 Paul vs. Chavez Jr. PPV Main Card 200 lbs.: Gilberto 'Zurdo' Ramirez (47-1) vs. Yuniel Dorticos (27-2) Unified Cruiserweight Championship (WBO & WBA titles) x 12 132 lbs.: Holly Holm (33-2-3) vs. Yolanda Vega (10-0) x 10 135 lbs.: Floyd 'Kid Austin' Schofield (18-0, 12) vs. Tevin Farmer (33-8-1) x 10 147 lbs.: Avious Griffin (17-0) vs. Julian Rodriguez (23-1) x 10 147 lbs.: Raul Curiel (15-0-1) vs. Victor Ezequiel Rodriguez (16-0-1) x 10 Paul vs. Chavez Jr. Preliminary Card 115 lbs.: John Ramirez (14-1) vs. TBD x10 126 lbs.: Victor Morales (20-0-1) vs. Renee Alvarado (34-16) x10 118 lbs.: Alexander Gueche (7-0, 5) vs Vincent Avina (8-1-1) x10 147 lbs.: Joel Iriarte (7-0) vs. Yusuph Metu (11-2) x10 108 lbs.: Naomy Valle (14-0) vs. Ashley Felix (7-3) x 10 We will have more on the Paul vs. Chavez fight and the upcoming fight card as fight night nears.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store