HC cancels order appointing administrator in Diocesan Trust Association
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court has struck down an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner (JCC), appointing an administrator on the Bombay Diocesan Trust Association (BDTA), and directed the Charity Commissioner to expeditiously decide all pending change reports submitted by the Association.
The Association holds and manages Anglican Trust properties like churches, institutions, schools, cemeteries spread over Western India - across Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa and North Karnataka.
It had approached the high court, challenging the order passed by JCC on December 18, 2019, based on complaints, alleging mismanagement and illegalities, including pilfering of funds and transfer of Trust properties.
Recording that the term of the last elected body had ended on October 14, 2018, but it was continuing to manage the affairs of the Trust, the JCC appointed an assistant charity commissioner as administrator for the Association and ordered him to prepare a voters list and take steps for holding elections in consonance with the Memorandum of Association and applicable rules and regulations.
The administrator, however, could not take charge of the affairs of the Association, as the high court had passed an interim stay on the JCC order and the Association continued to manage and administer their affairs and properties.
A bench of justice MS Sonak and justice Jitendra Jain on Friday struck down the JCC order after noticing that under the Memorandum of Association, the initial directors were termed as ex-officio directors and under the scheme of the Association, one-third of the other directors retire every year and the vacancies are filled in the annual general meeting.
Therefore, the court said that the statement that the term of the elected body expired on October 14, 2018 was not entirely correct. 'At the highest, it could be said, the term of one third of the Board of Directors expired on the said date and therefore, there was a necessity to hold an election to fill in the vacancies caused by the retirement of one third of the directors,' said the bench.
As regards the appointment of the administrator, the court said that the JCC simply took note of the allegations of mismanagement and illegal activities made in the applications filed before him and concluded that there was a need to appoint a suitable person as administrator.
'It is apparent the Joint Charity Commissioner has not himself examined the allegations to determine whether even prima-facie, they have any substance or not,' said the court. 'Merely because there are allegations, the Joint Charity Commissioner has concluded that it would be unfair for the office bearers to continue and has proceeded to appoint the Administrator,' it added.
After the petitioner body pointed out that during the pendency of the petition, there have been regular annual general meetings and vacancies filled in, but several change reports have been pending with the JCC, the court directed the authorities to dispose off the change reports in six months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
HC cancels order appointing administrator in Diocesan Trust Association
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court has struck down an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner (JCC), appointing an administrator on the Bombay Diocesan Trust Association (BDTA), and directed the Charity Commissioner to expeditiously decide all pending change reports submitted by the Association. The Association holds and manages Anglican Trust properties like churches, institutions, schools, cemeteries spread over Western India - across Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa and North Karnataka. It had approached the high court, challenging the order passed by JCC on December 18, 2019, based on complaints, alleging mismanagement and illegalities, including pilfering of funds and transfer of Trust properties. Recording that the term of the last elected body had ended on October 14, 2018, but it was continuing to manage the affairs of the Trust, the JCC appointed an assistant charity commissioner as administrator for the Association and ordered him to prepare a voters list and take steps for holding elections in consonance with the Memorandum of Association and applicable rules and regulations. The administrator, however, could not take charge of the affairs of the Association, as the high court had passed an interim stay on the JCC order and the Association continued to manage and administer their affairs and properties. A bench of justice MS Sonak and justice Jitendra Jain on Friday struck down the JCC order after noticing that under the Memorandum of Association, the initial directors were termed as ex-officio directors and under the scheme of the Association, one-third of the other directors retire every year and the vacancies are filled in the annual general meeting. Therefore, the court said that the statement that the term of the elected body expired on October 14, 2018 was not entirely correct. 'At the highest, it could be said, the term of one third of the Board of Directors expired on the said date and therefore, there was a necessity to hold an election to fill in the vacancies caused by the retirement of one third of the directors,' said the bench. As regards the appointment of the administrator, the court said that the JCC simply took note of the allegations of mismanagement and illegal activities made in the applications filed before him and concluded that there was a need to appoint a suitable person as administrator. 'It is apparent the Joint Charity Commissioner has not himself examined the allegations to determine whether even prima-facie, they have any substance or not,' said the court. 'Merely because there are allegations, the Joint Charity Commissioner has concluded that it would be unfair for the office bearers to continue and has proceeded to appoint the Administrator,' it added. After the petitioner body pointed out that during the pendency of the petition, there have been regular annual general meetings and vacancies filled in, but several change reports have been pending with the JCC, the court directed the authorities to dispose off the change reports in six months.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Min asked to provide more autonomy to municipal corporation
Kanpur: The Corporators Welfare Association of Kanpur Municipal Corporation on Wednesday presented their stand on three key issues before urban development minister Arvind Kumar Sharma and principal secretary, urban development Amrit Abhijat. The discussions took place on the Sambhav portal, with municipal commissioner Kanpur Nagar, Sudhir Kumar, also in attendance to submit KMC's standpoint. According to the KMC officials, a meeting was previously conducted between the urban development minister, and Naveen Pandit, president of the Corporators Welfare Association, along with patron Amit Pandey on June 16 at Lucknow. The Association had provided three written submissions to the minister during the meeting. The Association emphasised that the disputes between the KMC and Kanpur Development Authority are forwarded to the commissioner, Kanpur division, where decisions are consistently made in favour of KDA because the commissioner is also the chairman of KDA. The Association has requested appointment of a different officer, instead of the commissioner for resolving disputes between KMC and KDA. The second issue raised relates to the sewage farm. The municipal corporation possesses 1200 acres of sewage farm land, which officially belongs to it. However, KDA has approved two projects for this land during its board meeting. Despite the fact that this land's use cannot be changed due to a previous order from the Allahabad high court, KDA is allegedly proceeding with these projects without adhering to the court's decision. Further disputes regarding land have also emerged in the Smart City project. KDA has been granted rights over land from the gram samaj and Improvement Trust, an arrangement unique to Kanpur and not found in the other 16 municipal corporations. It was highlighted that cities in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra are advancing. Kanpur, formerly the largest city in Uttar Pradesh, has now fallen behind. The Association attributes this setback to Kanpur Municipal Corporation's lack of authority. Regarding these three issues, the Welfare Association had submitted its position and urged that authority be granted to municipal corporations, Naveen Pandit said.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Official involvement strong in Aranmula project
T'puram: As criticism over the state's renewed push for a township project on the controversial Aranmula land grows, internal documents accessed by TOI expose the depth of official involvement. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Far from being a routine proposal, the plan by M/s TOFL Pathanamthitta Infra Ltd was seriously pursued across multiple departments — including IT, finance, law, industries and revenue — with Technopark even clearing it for co-branding under Kerala's flagship IT identity. The IT department's internal note clearly establishes that the proposal was not confined to Kerala State Information Technology Infrastructure Ltd (KSITIL) or its boardroom. The industries department noted that it was already examining the proposal to set up an electronics manufacturing cluster (EMC) as a joint venture through Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation (KSIDC) and added that the matter was currently pending before the revenue department due to land-related concerns. The seriousness of intent becomes even more evident in the next set of communications. The IT department sought detailed responses from the finance and law departments on two specific aspects: KSITIL holding sweat equity shares in TOFL and nominating a govt director to its board. The finance department demanded key documentation: a detailed project report, KSITIL board approvals, remarks from revenue, environment, industries and law departments and a formal statement on whether the proposal aligned with the state's IT policy. The law department, in its reply, offered an interpretation grounded in the Companies Act. It said sweat equity shares can only be issued to a company's directors or employees and added that no policy decision was yet taken on whether a public limited company like KSITIL could hold sweat equity in a private entity like TOFL. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The law department further instructed that the matter must be legally examined considering the Articles and Memorandum of Association of KSITIL. Acting on this, KSITIL placed the issue before its board and got three resolutions passed in its 66th meeting, including formally approving the acceptance of sweat equity and the creation of a nominee director post. But the institutional push didn't stop there. The Technopark CEO weighed in with an extensive recommendation supporting co-branding of the project under its affiliation programme. According to the note, the CEO stated that once the project achieved basic legal clearances and development milestones, it could be included under the affiliation programme "which is more suited to complete developments than greenfield projects. " The CEO went on to assert that Technopark could provide visibility via its social media handles and even offer TOFL support in terms of consultancy and guidance for infrastructure development "if required." The note also confirms that Technopark expressed confidence that the project would adhere to environmental and legal compliance norms and that such ventures could enhance the brand value of IT parks in Kerala. The CEO also mentioned that TOFL's township consultancy might be shaped to meet the minimum requirements of an IT park and that the terms of such collaboration could be mutually agreed upon later. Put together, these revelations debunk any notion that the township proposal was just another file doing the rounds in govt corridors. The fact that so many departments were mobilised, that KSITIL passed official board resolutions, that the law department weighed in on corporate structure, and that Technopark was preparing to allow the use of its branding, all point to a system-wide coordination effort—suggesting that the govt was well past the exploratory phase and began constructing the institutional framework needed to partner with TOFL on a massive, politically sensitive project. This comes in the backdrop of the govt already facing flak for entertaining a project on the same 335 acres of ecologically fragile land once earmarked for the scrapped Aranmula airport—land the LDF govt itself claimed needed to be protected. The latest disclosures may add fuel to that criticism, not just for their implications on environmental policy, but also for the apparent policy U-turn in aligning with a private player it once publicly opposed, now with deeper institutional ties and branding alliances. The questions now go beyond policy consistency and touch upon the transparency and process by which such large-scale partnerships are constructed — with sweat equity, brand sharing and public sector endorsement all being considered for a project that rests on ecologically and politically volatile terrain.
