Cabbies reach transport dept to push back against apps
Panaji:
An attempt by taxi owners to show 'the power of taxikars' at the transport department office fizzled out after Goa police deployed a huge cordon around Junta House, where the transport department has its office.
While the taxi unions of the state had exhorted at least 2,000 taxi operators to show up, just a handful of them arrived to submit their objections against the draft Goa Transport Aggregator Policy.
'Govt says it welcomes suggestions and objections, but then it brings out a huge police force to scare our members away,' said North and South Goa Taxi Association president Sunil Naik.
He said taxi operators came to the directorate of transport office to submit their concerns about the aggregator guidelines and the proposal to bring in app-based taxi services.
Thursday was the last day to file objections.
As a precautionary measure, the North Goa collector imposed prohibitory orders around Junta House, banning gatherings, protests, and processions under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
The collector's order prohibits the assembly of five or more persons, processions, protests, or morchas, and the carrying of arms, sticks, banners, placards, loudspeakers, or any such item that could be used for an unlawful assembly.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
'Govt is trying to scare taxi operators by imposing the BNS and deploying a huge police force. If you see today, many of our members did not come here because of the police presence,' Naik said. 'We came here only to file our objections; we have not brought any weapons or flags or black T-shirts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will Donald Trump win the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize? Here is what students must know about the history of this award
Will Donald Trump win the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize? In June 2025, Pakistan officially nominated U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his role in de-escalating a dangerous military standoff with India. The announcement immediately sparked global debate. Could one of the most polarizing political figures of our time be awarded the world's most prestigious honor for peace? Pakistan claims Trump played a behind-the-scenes role in preventing a full-scale conflict, calling it a moment of decisive diplomacy. Supporters see the nomination as deserved recognition; critics argue that one diplomatic act cannot outweigh a legacy marked by international withdrawals and domestic division. Yet Trump wouldn't be the first surprise nominee—or winner. Former U.S. President Barack Obama received the Peace Prize in 2009, just months into office. In 2019, Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed won for making peace with Eritrea, though he later faced backlash over internal conflict. The prize has always sparked questions about who deserves it and why. For students today, Trump's nomination is more than just a headline—it's an invitation to explore what the Nobel Peace Prize stands for, how it has evolved, and what it reveals about leadership, diplomacy, and the changing face of peace in the modern world. What is the Nobel Peace Prize? The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most recognized international awards, established in 1901 by Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What Is Your Writing Missing? Grammarly Install Now Undo It was meant to honor those who have contributed most to advancing peace, reducing armed conflict, and promoting diplomacy and humanitarian progress. Unlike other Nobel Prizes, the Peace Prize is awarded in Oslo, Norway, by a committee selected by the Norwegian Parliament. For over a century, the award has honored a wide variety of individuals and organizations—leaders who forged peace treaties, journalists who risked their lives for truth, survivors who turned their trauma into activism, and movements that reshaped global policy. For students and young changemakers, the Peace Prize serves as a real-world guide to the values that define global leadership, advocacy, and collective progress. Historic peace laureates One of the most legendary winners is Martin Luther King Jr., who received the prize in 1964 for his leadership in the nonviolent civil rights movement in the United States. His legacy continues to inspire youth-led protests and movements for racial justice around the world. In 1979, Mother Teresa was awarded for her humanitarian work with the poor and dying in Kolkata, India. Her selfless service became a global symbol of compassion in action. Malala Yousafzai, the youngest-ever Peace Prize recipient, won in 2014 at the age of 17. After surviving an assassination attempt by the Taliban, she became a powerful voice for girls' education and youth empowerment, making her an icon for student activism across the globe. In 1993, Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk were jointly awarded for their efforts to end apartheid in South Africa. Mandela's lifelong fight for equality and reconciliation transformed not just a nation, but global conversations about justice and healing. The prize has also gone to organizations like the United Nations , the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, and the World Food Programme, showing that peace is often achieved by collective effort—not just individual heroism. How winners have defined peace The Peace Prize isn't just for heads of state. In fact, many recent winners weren't politicians at all. In 2024, Japan's Nihon Hidankyo, a group of atomic bomb survivors, was honored for its powerful advocacy against nuclear weapons. In 2023, Narges Mohammadi, an Iranian human rights activist, won while imprisoned for her fight for women's rights and civil liberties. Their stories remind students that peace often begins with personal conviction, not public office. In 2021, journalists Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia were recognized for defending press freedom in authoritarian regimes. In 2020, the World Food Programme was awarded for feeding communities in war zones and disaster areas—showing that fighting hunger is also a form of peacekeeping. These winners teach us that peace is not limited to treaties. It includes the pursuit of justice, access to truth, and compassion during crises. Their work is a powerful lesson for students who want to create impact, regardless of their field of study or background. A history of controversial choices Trump's nomination may seem unconventional, but so were many before him. Barack Obama's 2009 Peace Prize was awarded just nine months into his presidency, sparking criticism that it was based more on hope than achievement. Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed was hailed in 2019 for ending a decades-long conflict with Eritrea, yet his later involvement in internal war led some to question the timing of his award. There have also been high-profile omissions—most notably Mahatma Gandhi, who never received the Nobel Peace Prize despite being the face of nonviolent resistance. These examples show that the Nobel Peace Prize is as much about global context and symbolism as it is about accomplishment.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Telangana HC notice to CS over delay in releasing retirement benefits; warns of ex-parte action if no reply by July 11, retired officer alleges govt ignored court order
HYDERABAD: The Telangana high court has directed the chief secretary to appear in person or through his counsel in a contempt case over release of retirement benefits of a court officer on July 11. The court also made it clear that failure to respond would result in the case being heard and determined ex parte. The court issued the directions while dealing with a contempt petition filed by MKM Saleem, a retired chief administrative officer (CAO) of Rangareddy district court, alleging that the state failed to comply with the HC's earlier directions in connection with releasing his retirement benefits. He had earlier moved the HC alleging that the state govt had not released his retirement benefits. In his Feb 2025 petition, Saleem claimed that he retired from service in June 2024 but his retirement benefits, including payment of general provident fund amounts and encashment of earned leave, were not released. He claimed that due to the delay, he was put to hardship in his day-to-day life and urged the court's immediate intervention. The govt pleader had then submitted that due to dearth of funds the amounts could not be released on time and assured the court it would soon be released. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The HC disposed of the petition, directing the govt to release all eligible benefits to Saleem as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the court order. With no sign of govt releasing his benefits, Saleem moved the court again. Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, while directing the chief secretary to appear on July 11, also ordered that a copy of the petition and affidavit be sent to him through registered post. He further directed the city civil court, Hyderabad, to ensure it is served to the chief secretary.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tokyo snubs Washington: Japan pulls plug on 2+2 security talks with US; defence budget demand sparks row
Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba (left) and US President Donald Trump (PTI) Japan has cancelled a high-level meeting with its closest ally United States, after the Trump administration abruptly demanded Tokyo to spend more on defence, reported The Financial Times on Friday. US secretary of state Marco Rubio and defence secretary Pete Hegseth were expected to meet their Japanese counterparts, defence minister general Nakatani and foreign minister Takeshi Iwaya in Washington on July 1, for an annual 2+2 security talks. However, Tokyo called off the meeting after the US asked Japan to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, up from an earlier request of 3 per cent, according to three sources familiar with the discussions, including two officials based in Tokyo, cited by the newspaper. A senior Japanese official stated that the decision to cancel the July 1 meeting was also influenced by the upcoming upper house elections on July 20, where the ruling Liberal Democratic Party is anticipated to lose seats. Reuters quoted a US government official confirming, Japan had 'postponed' the meeting and the decision was made weeks earlier, though no reason was provided. Meanwhile, a non-government source familiar with the matter confirmed hearing about Japan's withdrawal from the talks but was also unaware of the motive behind the move. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo The Financial Times said, the new, increased demand came in recent weeks by Elbridge Colby, the third-most senior official in the Pentagon, who also recently stirred tensions with another major US ally in the Indo-Pacific by initiating a review of AUKUS, the nuclear-powered submarine deal with Australia. The tensions of security come as Japan and other US allies have been engaged with the United States in a tough trade talk over US President Donald Trump 's worldwide tariff onslaught. While speaking at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue defence forum in Singapore last month, Hegseth urged Asia-Pacific allies to follow the 'newfound example' set by Europeans in boosting defence spending, pointing to regional threats from China and North Korea. 'The US is now playing hardball with allies in the Asia-Pacific,' one defence official was quoted. In March, Elbridge Colby's call for Japan to boost its defense spending, at his Senate confirmation hearing for under secretary of defense for policy, prompted a sharp response from Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who asserted that Japan's defense budget would be determined by Tokyo alone, not by outside pressure.
