Pentagon Insiders Reveal Hegseth Is Angry and Unshaven Post Leak Scandal
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has appeared angry, unkempt, and tentative since March's Signalgate scandal, Pentagon insiders told New York magazine.
Six sources close to Hegseth described a changed man after the defense secretary shared war plans on a Signal group chat that mistakenly included Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic.
'He was more prone to anger and less likely to be clean-shaven in the morning,' New York's story reads. 'He seemed reluctant to make decisions; scared of doing the wrong thing, paralyzed as he awaited orders from the White House.'
Until the Signalgate scandal broke, Hegseth had been eager to execute his vision for the military. Afterward, the Pentagon chief has been less 'creative,' the sources said. The department became a 'mechanism for implementing executive orders.'
The New York profile reveals new details of the well-documented chaos, infighting, and scandals of Hegseth's shaky tenure atop the Department of Defense.
Sources said that Joe Kasper, who was until late April Hegseth's chief of staff, rankled other Pentagon staffers for his occasional refusal to wear socks—even in a meeting with the Japanese prime minister.
Kasper, who was ousted from his top role in April after a 'knife-fight' battle with other Pentagon aides, defended his unconventional wardrobe decisions to the magazine.
'Rare for me to wear no socks!' he said. 'It's gotta be the right shoe, man. There are people in there wearing SpongeBob socks.'
Kasper, whom Hegseth tasked with investigating Pentagon leaks, also faced swirling rumors of his drug use, which he has vehemently denied.
As news reports citing inside sources continued to pile up, Kasper appeared 'jittery,' like he was 'bouncing off the walls,' the insiders said.
Kasper was locked in a power struggle with the other aides to win Hegseth's ear. The battle reached its culmination when three top aides—Dan Caldwell, Colin Carroll, and Darin Selnick—were fired in the leak investigation.
Soon after, the three men jointly declared their ouster 'unconscionable,' hinting that it wasn't actually because of the leaks.
Carroll revealed to New York that it didn't take long for him to form an opinion of Kasper. 'I knew he was a moron within 30 seconds of meeting him,' Carroll said.
The six sources told New York that this was the prevailing opinion of Kasper inside the Pentagon—that he was ineffective, struggling to schedule meetings and refusing to arrive early or stay late.
While Carroll, Caldwell, and Selnick all complained to Hegseth about Kasper, the secretary refused to fire him. One source said this was because Hegseth 'sees everything through the lens of media' and worried that ditching Kasper would be viewed as 'an early L.'
At the same time, Hegseth was becoming more and more paranoid about the leaks. The situation was 'consuming his whole life,' an insider told New York, 'when he should have been focused on, you know, our national security.'
One by one, the trio of aides—Caldwell, then Selnick, then Carroll—were escorted out of the Pentagon in April.
Afterward, Carroll confronted Kasper about his firing over text, calling him a 'f---ing coward,' according to New York.
'Hey man,' Kasper reportedly wrote back, 'I previously delegated the investigation stuff and have nothing to do with decisions … I have zero insight into the decision space here.'
It wasn't long before Kasper was gone as well.
Caldwell and Selnick, both longtime friends of Hegseth's, told New York that they were 'devastated' when he turned on them.
'He was a good friend of mine for 13 years,' Selnick said. 'How could he so callously throw us under the bus like this?'
Asked for comment on New York's story, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell pushed back.
'Claims of chaos at the Pentagon under Secretary Hegseth are false, and the American people are tired of this debunked narrative,' he told the Daily Beast. 'When members of the legacy media lie, they disrespect the brave servicemembers and civilians who selflessly serve our country at the Department of Defense.'
The White House dismissed the story and asserted its unwavering commitment to Hegseth as defense secretary.
'While New York magazine is focused on propagating gossip, Secretary Hegseth is focused on restoring military readiness and lethality, which is why he has President Trump's full support,' said spokesperson Anna Kelly.
Over the last week, Hegseth has helped carry out Trump's push to deploy the National Guard and Marines against protestors in Los Angeles.
However, Hegseth still remains without a chief of staff or a deputy chief of staff. This is reportedly because people keep turning top defense jobs down—and also because Hegseth has vetoed the White House's candidates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
As a gay man, I'm finally flying a pride flag. I don't know what took so long.
As a gay man, I'm finally flying a pride flag. I don't know what took so long. | Opinion Having witnessed one attempt after another by the current administration to erase LGBTQ+ people, I'm no longer OK with being a quiet gay. Show Caption Hide Caption WorldPride marched through DC for Pride month, in defiance of Trump WorldPride, The global festival promoting LGBTQ+ visibility, held it's anniversary parade in D.C. I'm embarrassed to admit that I've never bought a pride flag, much less displayed one, in my 60-some years. I've been gay for all those years, and openly, publicly so for almost all of them, but have never flown the rainbow flag. But recently, lost in thought on my front lawn here in a small town in central North Carolina, I looked up at the American flag I fly from the front porch. Five years ago, I wrote why I decided to hang the Stars and Stripes, reclaiming it as a flag of all the people, not just some. I remember thinking I was making a statement about inclusion, equality under the law and, yes, patriotism. No one, no political party, should hold the U.S. flag hostage. When people ask me where I live, I proudly tell them, 'It's the house with the Stars and Stripes. You can't miss it.' A friend's flag helped me find a reason to show my pride Then, my neighbor and friend Pier Carlo Talenti, also a gay man, posted a photo of his charming cottage with a big pride flag hung on the front porch, seeming to wave at anyone passing by. He wrote, 'For the first time ever, I'm flying a Pride flag.' And then he went on to tell us why. Talenti was angry that the Department of Defense had decided to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, erasing the gay civil rights leader from the Navy vessel that has borne it since 2021. Milk was assassinated in 1978 because of his sexual orientation; Talenti was sure the announcement of the change had been made specifically to coincide with Pride Month. 'So petty and hateful,' he wrote. He added, 'I need my neighbors who … represent a broad political spectrum (to understand) that there's a gay man living and working here and making their community better. America belongs to all of us.' In just a few hours, dozens of his friends and neighbors had commented, all of them echoing this one: 'I support this message.' A friend in Washington, DC, added, 'Maybe a few of your friends will even join you.' Well, it didn't take long. A Louisville friend posted, 'We've never flown flags either until now. We've got one, too.' That's when I went online and purchased what's known as the 'Progress Pride Flag," which includes five half-size stripes in an arrow shape representing trans and nonbinary individuals, marginalized communities of color and those living with HIV/AIDS on top of the traditional rainbow flag. That particular flag makes a clear statement in support of everything the Trump administration has tried to erase. Opinion: I wrote a book on finding joy. Even now, it's easier than you think. Trump administration trying to erase LGBTQ+ community President Donald Trump and Republicans have made their own statement on the LGBTQ+ community. It started with Trump's anti-transgender attacks, central to his reelection campaign in 2024. Once back in the Oval Office, he called on Congress to pass a bill stating that there are "only two genders' and signed an executive order in January halting federal funding for hormonal and surgical intervention for trans minors. Erased. Anti-trans decision: Supreme Court turned its back on trans youth. Our community never will. | Opinion Then, Trump fired members of the Kennedy Center Board of Trustees, became chairman and canceled all the events planned to celebrate LGBTQ+ rights for June's World Pride festival in the nation's capital. Erased. Not having done enough damage, Trump has now banned transgender people from serving in the military. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that he'd scrub the name of the USNS Harvey Milk, who served as a Navy operations officer on rescue submarines during the Korean War then went on to become the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. If all that wasn't enough, the administration announced plans to end a suicide hotline explicitly created for LGBTQ+ youth. Why haven't I flown a pride flag before? But it made me wonder why I had never done this before. I have been writing about LGBTQ+ issues for decades: books, columns, public talks. I'm no shrinking violet (one of the seven colors in the rainbow flag, and one of many more on some of the newer variations). My identity is no secret. Still, I had my reasons for not identifying my house. I live not far from Ku Klux Klan country, and in recent years KKK members have visited our town, white robes flowing and Confederate flags flying. They've made threats. They've left abhorrent literature on people's front porches. A 2019 invasion frightened many in town, especially my Black and Brown neighbors, who witnessed a hate they thought belonged to another time. I'd been fearful, too, and did not want my house to become a target. As a journalist, I'd already faced a home invasion from a reader who stalked me online for months, finally deciding to confront me by trying to break down my front door. This was in 2018, just before five journalists were killed in Annapolis, Maryland. There was another reason, too, which has only congealed for me. Over the years ‒ decades ‒ I'd changed. At one time, I had enthusiastically and regularly marched in San Francisco Pride, but I hadn't participated in years. I'd once lived in the Castro District (one of this nation's gay meccas), but I'd moved to the suburbs and then to North Carolina. I had once been single, but I'd married my husband and committed to our two dogs. My god, I even got rid of the flashy fake diamond stud that I'd sported for many years. Was it just age, my older self not being as out there as my younger one? Or had something else happened, and I just wasn't 'that kind of gay' anymore? I wasn't even sure what that meant, but it seemed I'd become the kind of gay who didn't hang a pride flag from his front porch. Well, I am again. Like Talenti and other friends, it's time for me to step it up. Having witnessed one attempt after another by the current administration to erase LGBTQ+ people, I'm no longer OK with being a quiet gay. It's time to be a more visible and vocal member of our community ‒ to be counted and to be seen. I've said for many years that I refuse to let fear drive how I live, not realizing I'd already succumbed in this very important way. I think of others in the LGBTQ+ community who live lives at much greater risk than I do, thanks to their sexual identity and the color of their skin, and I know that I need to step into the light on behalf of those who must still live in the shadows. That's why I've hung the pride flag on my front porch, for everyone to see. It's a beacon in these dark times. Now, when people ask me where I live, I tell them, 'It's the house with the pride flag. You can't miss it.' Steven Petrow is a columnist who writes on civility and manners and the author of seven books, including 'The Joy You Make' and "Stupid Things I Won't Do When I Get Old." Follow him on Threads: @
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Canadian tariffs on US steel and aluminum could rise depending on trade talks, Carney says
He added: 'In parallel, we must reinforce our strength at home – and safeguard Canadian workers and businesses from the unjust U.S. tariffs. That's why today we are announcing Canada will be introducing a series of countermeasures to protect Canadian steel and aluminum workers and producers. 'First, Canada will adjust its existing counter-tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum products on July 21 to levels consistent with progress made in the broader trading agreement with the United States.' Carney said Trump's trade war is running the risk of a global recession. Advertisement 'The world is in the middle of a trade war and several wars, actual wars, including wars that can have quite significant implications for commodity prices and global growth,' said Carney, who led the central banks of both Canada and the United Kingdom. Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum as well as 25% tariffs on autos. Trump is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period set by him would expire. Canada and Mexico face separate tariffs of as much as 25% that Trump put into place under the auspices of stopping fentanyl smuggling, through some products are still protected under the 2020 U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement signed during Trump's first term. Advertisement Canada is the largest foreign supplier of steel, aluminum and uranium to the U.S. and has 34 critical minerals and metals that the Pentagon is eager for. Nearly $3.6 billion Canadian dollars ($2.6 billion) worth of goods and services cross the border each day. Canada is the top export destination for 36 U.S. states. 'We need to stabilize the trading relationship with the United States. We need to have ready access to U.S. markets,' Carney said. Trump announced with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that they had signed a trade framework Monday that was previously announced in May. The trade framework included quotas to protect against some tariffs, but the 10% baseline would largely remain as the Trump administration is banking on tariff revenues to help cover the cost of its income tax cuts. Carney didn't say if he would sign a deal with the U.S. if any tariffs remain in place on Canada. 'This a negotiation, and it is better for the Americans, and of course for Canada, to have true free trade between our countries, particularly in the steel, aluminum and auto sectors,' he said.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
US's NATO and Pacific Allies Sail Warships Near China's Coast
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United Kingdom and Japan—United States allies in NATO and the Pacific respectively—have sent naval ships through the Taiwan Strait, which China has long claimed sovereignty over. Regarding the passage of the British patrol vessel HMS Spey on Wednesday, the Chinese military described it as "undermining peace and stability" across the 110-mile-wide waterway. Newsweek has emailed the Chinese and Japanese defense ministries for further comment. Why It Matters Communist China has declared its "sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction" over the Taiwan Strait, which separates its territory from Taiwan and connects two contested seas—the East China Sea and the South China Sea—making it a strategic waterway. Despite never having ruled Taiwan—a security partner of the U.S.—the Communist regime in Beijing has long claimed the self-governed, democratic island as one of its provinces. Xi Jinping, leader of China, has vowed to use force to achieve "reunification," if necessary. As military tensions between China and Taiwan have grown in recent years, the U.S. and its allies and partners have frequently conducted naval and aerial passages through the Taiwan Strait, asserting freedoms of navigation and overflight in accordance with international law. What To Know The Spey—a Royal Navy vessel deployed to the Indo-Pacific region—navigated the Taiwan Strait, according to Taiwanese media citing the British Office in Taipei. Prior to the transit, the ship conducted joint patrols in the East China Sea with the U.S. Coast Guard. The British Office stated that the passage was conducted in accordance with the rights granted under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Taiwan's Foreign Ministry said the transit reaffirmed the strait's status as what it calls "international waters." The Royal Navy patrol vessel HMS Spey is moored pier side during a scheduled port visit at Sasebo naval base in Japan on June 5, 2025. The Royal Navy patrol vessel HMS Spey is moored pier side during a scheduled port visit at Sasebo naval base in Japan on June 5, 2025. Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Kristen Yarber/U.S. Navy The Chinese military's Eastern Theater Command, which oversees military affairs related to Taiwan, confirmed the Spey's transit in a statement on Friday. It claimed its units tracked and monitored the ship in the Taiwan Strait, handling the situation "effectively." This was not the first time a British warship has sailed through the Taiwan Strait. In September 2021, the frigate HMS Richmond—deployed to the western Pacific with an aircraft carrier group—transited the waterway en route to Vietnam after operating in the East China Sea. Meanwhile, Japanese destroyer JS Takanami passed southward through the Taiwan Strait on June 12, Japanese media reported on Thursday, citing unspecified "diplomatic sources." The transit, which was tracked and monitored by the Chinese military, lasted over 10 hours, according to the report. The Japanese warship entered the strait from the East China Sea and proceeded to the Philippines, where it conducted a drill in the South China Sea on June 14. A Philippine naval helicopter hovers above the Japanese destroyer JS Takanami during a joint maritime exercise held in the South China Sea on June 14, 2025. A Philippine naval helicopter hovers above the Japanese destroyer JS Takanami during a joint maritime exercise held in the South China Sea on June 14, 2025. Kyodo via AP Images While the Japanese government does not officially acknowledge naval transits through the Taiwan Strait, the June 12 transit marked the third known passage by Japan's navy. The previous two occurred in September last year and February this year, the report added. What People Are Saying The British Office in Taipei told Taiwanese media on Thursday: "Wherever the Royal Navy operates, it does so in full compliance with international law and exercises its right to freedom of navigation and overflight provided by [United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]." The Taiwanese Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Thursday: "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs encourages like-minded countries such as the United Kingdom to jointly defend peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, promote a free and open Indo-Pacific, and maintain a rules-based international order." Senior Captain Liu Runke, navy spokesperson for the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Eastern Theater Command, said in a statement on Friday: "The troops of the PLA Eastern Theater Command will remain on high alert at all times and resolutely counter all threats and provocations." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether other U.S. allies and partners—both within and beyond the Pacific—will deploy warships to the Taiwan Strait, as China continues to maintain a persistent military presence around Taiwan.
