logo
#

Latest news with #Signalgate

Genasys Inc. Reports Increasing Demand for CONNECT in Wake of 'Signalgate'
Genasys Inc. Reports Increasing Demand for CONNECT in Wake of 'Signalgate'

Business Wire

time9 hours ago

  • Business
  • Business Wire

Genasys Inc. Reports Increasing Demand for CONNECT in Wake of 'Signalgate'

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Genasys Inc. (NASDAQ: GNSS), the global leader In Protective Communications, today announced increasing interest and orders for CONNECT, the company's fully compliant, mission-critical communications platform for government and law enforcement. 'Greater demand for CONNECT has been spurred by the 'Signalgate' controversy, where several members of the federal government used the Signal messaging app for sensitive information sharing,' said Chief Jeff Halstead (Ret.), Genasys Senior Director of Strategic Accounts. 'Since the controversy, we are experiencing increasing demand for CONNECT information, demonstrations and orders from public safety leaders in small towns and large metro areas across the United States.' To date, strong order demand and contract renewals have grown CONNECT coverage in 41 states and more than 500 agencies, with other states and multiple agencies in deployment trials. 'Many public safety leaders now understand the importance and legal requirements of owning and controlling Interactions when planning and responding to crisis events,' Chief Halstead continued, 'During the last two weeks of national protests, I was contacted by more than a dozen police chiefs thanking me for helping them elevate their communication networks. Through CONNECT, many of them were able to regionally respond to mass protests in just a few minutes.' CONNECT Platform Advantages Heavily encrypted messaging from any device to all devices All messages and data are fully owned and controlled by the agency (Genasys has no access to data, chats, or information) Fortified Team chats where it is impossible for any person to be mistakenly added Nothing can be deleted or altered to maintain compliance Unlimited data sharing, photos, videos and documents Screenshot protection No push/share features prevent secure communications from being posted on social media All persons added to CONNECT are logged and tracked (they can only be added by sending an encrypted invitation directly to them) All data, chats and attachments are owned by the agency and can be easily reviewed in 30 seconds Complete transparency and accountability from all elected officials and law enforcement agencies Full compliance with FOIA, CJIS/FBI, public records retention laws and HIPAA Encrypted communications platforms like Signal are designed to allow users to hide or delete communications. Using CONNECT, a fully compliant encrypted communications platform specifically created for governmental operations, local, state, and federal governments/agencies can avoid the problems and fallout created by using non-FOIA-compliant consumer apps. About Genasys Inc. Genasys Inc. (NASDAQ: GNSS) is the global leader in Protective Communications. Incorporating the most comprehensive portfolio of preparedness, response, and analytics software and systems, as well as the Company's Long Range Acoustic Devices® (LRAD®) the Genasys Protect platform is designed around one premise: ensuring organizations and public safety agencies are 'Ready when it matters™.' Protecting people and saving lives for over 40 years, Genasys covers more than 155 million people in all 50 states and in over 100 countries worldwide. For more information, visit Forward-Looking Statements Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not place undue reliance on these statements. We base these statements on particular assumptions that we have made in light of our industry experience, the stage of product and market development as well as our perception of historical trends, current market conditions, current economic data, expected future developments and other factors that we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statement. The risks and uncertainties in these forward-looking statements include without limitation the business impact of geopolitical conflicts and other causes that may affect our supply chain, and other risks and uncertainties, many of which involve factors or circumstances that are beyond the Company's control. Risks and uncertainties are identified and discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are based on information and management's expectations as of the date hereof. Future results may differ materially from our current expectations. For more information regarding other potential risks and uncertainties, see the 'Risk Factors' section of the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024. Genasys Inc. disclaims any intent or obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, except as otherwise specifically stated.

After Tulsi Gabbard, Trump shuts out Pete Hegseth in Iran war plans, fuels concerns of rogue military moves
After Tulsi Gabbard, Trump shuts out Pete Hegseth in Iran war plans, fuels concerns of rogue military moves

Time of India

time12 hours ago

  • Politics
  • Time of India

After Tulsi Gabbard, Trump shuts out Pete Hegseth in Iran war plans, fuels concerns of rogue military moves

Trump reportedly freezes out his defense secretary in Iran strike talks as tensions rise- President Donald Trump, currently weighing a possible U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, has reportedly sidelined Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth from key war planning discussions. As Israeli forces intensify attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump is increasingly relying on a select group of advisors—leaving Hegseth out of critical decision-making circles, according to a report by The Washington Post . Though Hegseth was confirmed earlier this year and initially played a central role, his influence has dropped significantly following an internal scandal dubbed 'Signalgate.' The controversy began when Hegseth allegedly shared classified operational details in a private chat that mistakenly included a journalist. Since then, White House insiders say the Pentagon chief has been shut out from real-time military planning—raising big questions about who's actually shaping U.S. strategy toward Iran. Is the Iran-Israel war spiraling out of control? Trump sidelines top defense officials amid major moves The ongoing Iran-Israel conflict is no longer just a shadow war—it's turned into a direct and dangerous confrontation. And now, President Donald Trump's decision to shut out key military voices like Pete Hegseth from crucial war planning is raising red flags about what could happen next. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo Why is Trump sidelining his own defense secretary in Iran planning? The core issue appears to be trust—and control. Officials told The Washington Post that "nobody is talking to Hegseth" when it comes to Iran strike planning. Instead, Trump is reportedly getting direct input from what's being called the 'Tier One' group: Vice President JD Vance Secretary of State Marco Rubio CIA Director John Ratcliffe Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine This tight-knit group is said to be leading all major military and intelligence briefings. Meanwhile, Hegseth has not been part of the operational interface with the White House, according to three current U.S. officials. That disconnect suggests a breakdown between the Pentagon and Trump's national security inner circle. Live Events What happened with the 'Signalgate' controversy? Hegseth's fall from favor can be traced back to 'Signalgate,' an incident earlier this year where he reportedly leaked sensitive military information in a group chat that included a journalist. The leak involved a U.S. airstrike plan targeting Yemen's Houthi rebels. Though the damage control was swift, it reportedly rattled confidence inside the administration, especially in a time of rising conflict. While no formal action was taken against Hegseth, insiders claim the president 'lost confidence' in his ability to manage high-stakes national security operations. Since then, top-level briefings have been conducted without Hegseth or his staff present. What's really happening between Iran and Israel? Things escalated fast after Israel launched Operation Rising Lion on June 13, a series of deadly airstrikes and Mossad-led sabotage missions targeting Iran's nuclear and missile facilities. Senior Iranian military leaders and nuclear scientists were among those killed. Iran responded with a heavy barrage of ballistic and hypersonic missiles, though Israel's Iron Dome and David's Sling systems have intercepted much of the incoming fire. Still, the level of open warfare between these two powers hasn't been seen in decades. Who is leading U.S. military planning if not the defense secretary? The actual planning appears to be in the hands of General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and General Erik Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command. Both are leading direct military coordination with Israel as Iranian facilities come under increased fire. Notably, Caine is said to have Trump's full backing, providing detailed briefings alongside CIA Director Ratcliffe. While the Pentagon insists Hegseth remains 'closely involved,' officials on the ground say otherwise. 'There is no operational coordination involving Hegseth,' one official told The Washington Post . This puts a major spotlight on the current structure of Trump's war cabinet, which is now more informal and centered around personal trust and loyalty. What role does Tulsi Gabbard play now in national security? Tulsi Gabbard, who was confirmed alongside Hegseth and now leads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), is also facing reduced influence. After releasing a public video warning about the risk of nuclear conflict, she reportedly upset Trump and key advisors. The video, which stressed caution in escalating conflict with Iran, was seen by some in the administration as undermining ongoing strategy. Now, her role appears mostly advisory, with few high-level briefings involving her directly. Her message of restraint reportedly clashed with Trump's current push for a tougher stance on Iran. Is something even bigger brewing? 1. U.S. military moves spark fears of escalation The U.S. is not sitting idle. Reports confirm that Trump is considering greenlighting direct military aid to Israel, including high-impact bunker-buster bombs that could take out Iran's underground facilities. These moves come despite Hegseth's opposition, raising questions about how centralized and controlled America's response really is. 2. No sign of diplomacy—just more firepower Any hope for a diplomatic breakthrough appears to be fading fast. Israel reportedly demands that Iran halt its uranium enrichment and dismantle missile bases and proxy militias—conditions Tehran is unlikely to meet. Meanwhile, Iran's retaliation remains fierce, with proxy groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis stepping up activity. 3. Experts fear regional war is around the corner Foreign policy experts warn that this is no longer a backchannel fight—it's a real war that could spiral across the region. With the U.S. potentially entering the fray, the chances of a broader Middle East conflict are growing by the day. Already, analysts are tracking possible sleeper cell activity and cyberattacks that could expand the war's reach. Could this internal shake-up affect Trump's Iran strategy? With U.S. forces continuing to move into the region, and Israel pressing forward with targeted strikes, the exclusion of Hegseth from war planning could have real consequences. Some national security experts are questioning whether a defense secretary shut out of planning can effectively lead the Pentagon during a potential war. Meanwhile, Trump is said to be relying heavily on a mix of instinct and advice from his tight circle. His decision on whether to officially join Israel's offensive could come in days, if not hours. Are we witnessing the start of a bigger war? What started as covert operations and proxy clashes has now turned into a full-blown confrontation. With Donald Trump pushing aside top Pentagon voices and leaning on a hawkish inner circle, the risk of rogue military actions or U.S. involvement is rising sharply. The Iran-Israel war is already intense—but with each passing day, it looks more and more like the early stages of something much bigger. The question now is not just whether Trump will strike Iran, but who will actually shape the execution of that strategy—and what happens when critical voices like Hegseth and Gabbard are left out of the room. FAQs: Q1: Why is Trump excluding Pete Hegseth from Iran planning? Because of a loss of trust after the "Signalgate" incident involving a sensitive military leak. Q2: Who is advising Trump on Iran strike decisions now? Trump now relies on JD Vance, Marco Rubio, John Ratcliffe, and Gen. Dan Caine.

Trump Reportedly Freezes Out His Defense Secretary in Iran Planning: 'Nobody Is Talking to Hegseth'
Trump Reportedly Freezes Out His Defense Secretary in Iran Planning: 'Nobody Is Talking to Hegseth'

Int'l Business Times

time15 hours ago

  • Politics
  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Reportedly Freezes Out His Defense Secretary in Iran Planning: 'Nobody Is Talking to Hegseth'

As Donald Trump edges closer to a decision on whether to strike Iran 's nuclear facilities, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been reportedly been excluded from high-level deliberations. "Nobody is talking to Hegseth," an official told The Washington Post. Hegseth was confirmed as defense secretary earlier this year alongside Tulsi Gabbard, who now leads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Despite early involvement, Hegseth's role appears to have diminished over time, especially following the fallout from "Signalgate"—an incident in which he reportedly shared sensitive information regarding an incoming attack against Yemen's Houthi rebels in a group chat that had mistakenly included a journalist. Now, as Israel bombards Iranian nuclear facilities and Trump weighs joining the offensive, Hegseth is out of the team is advising him: Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine. These four officials, described by insiders as "Tier One," have taken the role as the president's primary military and intelligence counselors, the Washington Post added. Although the Pentagon has claimed Hegseth remains closely involved, three current U.S. officials confirmed that key briefings and war planning are being led by Generals Kurilla and Caine, with no operational coordination involving Hegseth or his staff. "Nobody is talking to Hegseth," one official said. "There is no interface operationally between Hegseth and the White House at all." With the U.S. deploying additional forces to the Middle East and tensions with Iran rising, Trump has relied increasingly on military brass and gut instinct over his formal Cabinet. Gabbard, too, has reportedly fallen out of favor, her recent video warning of nuclear conflict was said to have angered Trump, further fracturing her influence within the national security circle. Originally published on Latin Times

Pentagon Insiders Reveal Hegseth Is Angry and Unshaven Post Leak Scandal
Pentagon Insiders Reveal Hegseth Is Angry and Unshaven Post Leak Scandal

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Pentagon Insiders Reveal Hegseth Is Angry and Unshaven Post Leak Scandal

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has appeared angry, unkempt, and tentative since March's Signalgate scandal, Pentagon insiders told New York magazine. Six sources close to Hegseth described a changed man after the defense secretary shared war plans on a Signal group chat that mistakenly included Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. 'He was more prone to anger and less likely to be clean-shaven in the morning,' New York's story reads. 'He seemed reluctant to make decisions; scared of doing the wrong thing, paralyzed as he awaited orders from the White House.' Until the Signalgate scandal broke, Hegseth had been eager to execute his vision for the military. Afterward, the Pentagon chief has been less 'creative,' the sources said. The department became a 'mechanism for implementing executive orders.' The New York profile reveals new details of the well-documented chaos, infighting, and scandals of Hegseth's shaky tenure atop the Department of Defense. Sources said that Joe Kasper, who was until late April Hegseth's chief of staff, rankled other Pentagon staffers for his occasional refusal to wear socks—even in a meeting with the Japanese prime minister. Kasper, who was ousted from his top role in April after a 'knife-fight' battle with other Pentagon aides, defended his unconventional wardrobe decisions to the magazine. 'Rare for me to wear no socks!' he said. 'It's gotta be the right shoe, man. There are people in there wearing SpongeBob socks.' Kasper, whom Hegseth tasked with investigating Pentagon leaks, also faced swirling rumors of his drug use, which he has vehemently denied. As news reports citing inside sources continued to pile up, Kasper appeared 'jittery,' like he was 'bouncing off the walls,' the insiders said. Kasper was locked in a power struggle with the other aides to win Hegseth's ear. The battle reached its culmination when three top aides—Dan Caldwell, Colin Carroll, and Darin Selnick—were fired in the leak investigation. Soon after, the three men jointly declared their ouster 'unconscionable,' hinting that it wasn't actually because of the leaks. Carroll revealed to New York that it didn't take long for him to form an opinion of Kasper. 'I knew he was a moron within 30 seconds of meeting him,' Carroll said. The six sources told New York that this was the prevailing opinion of Kasper inside the Pentagon—that he was ineffective, struggling to schedule meetings and refusing to arrive early or stay late. While Carroll, Caldwell, and Selnick all complained to Hegseth about Kasper, the secretary refused to fire him. One source said this was because Hegseth 'sees everything through the lens of media' and worried that ditching Kasper would be viewed as 'an early L.' At the same time, Hegseth was becoming more and more paranoid about the leaks. The situation was 'consuming his whole life,' an insider told New York, 'when he should have been focused on, you know, our national security.' One by one, the trio of aides—Caldwell, then Selnick, then Carroll—were escorted out of the Pentagon in April. Afterward, Carroll confronted Kasper about his firing over text, calling him a 'f---ing coward,' according to New York. 'Hey man,' Kasper reportedly wrote back, 'I previously delegated the investigation stuff and have nothing to do with decisions … I have zero insight into the decision space here.' It wasn't long before Kasper was gone as well. Caldwell and Selnick, both longtime friends of Hegseth's, told New York that they were 'devastated' when he turned on them. 'He was a good friend of mine for 13 years,' Selnick said. 'How could he so callously throw us under the bus like this?' Asked for comment on New York's story, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell pushed back. 'Claims of chaos at the Pentagon under Secretary Hegseth are false, and the American people are tired of this debunked narrative,' he told the Daily Beast. 'When members of the legacy media lie, they disrespect the brave servicemembers and civilians who selflessly serve our country at the Department of Defense.' The White House dismissed the story and asserted its unwavering commitment to Hegseth as defense secretary. 'While New York magazine is focused on propagating gossip, Secretary Hegseth is focused on restoring military readiness and lethality, which is why he has President Trump's full support,' said spokesperson Anna Kelly. Over the last week, Hegseth has helped carry out Trump's push to deploy the National Guard and Marines against protestors in Los Angeles. However, Hegseth still remains without a chief of staff or a deputy chief of staff. This is reportedly because people keep turning top defense jobs down—and also because Hegseth has vetoed the White House's candidates.

'I've put a lot of thought into this, and I think he was just trying to sound cool.'
'I've put a lot of thought into this, and I think he was just trying to sound cool.'

The Verge

time7 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • The Verge

'I've put a lot of thought into this, and I think he was just trying to sound cool.'

I couldn't possibly single out the best of many perfect lines in Kerry Howley's detailed and morbidly funny exposé of chaos at the Pentagon, where Signalgate was just the tip of the iceberg. But this part is pretty good: Carroll encountered many people as he walked through the hallway, onto the escalator, off the escalator, through the mess hall, to the basement, where he was interrogated for an hour. On the way out, in the Pentagon lobby, he saw General Michael Guetlein. 'Mike,' Carroll said, 'I got fired.' 'That's really funny,' said the general.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store