Settle in for the Latest on Prince Harry and King Charles' Never-Ending Drama

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Please put on the soundtrack to The Never Ending Story and settle in, because we're bringing you an exhaustive (some might say exhausting) timeline of Prince Harry and King Charles' years-long feud. This drama started back in 2020—when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down from senior royal duties and left England—and shows no signs of slowing down five years later. In fact, the updates are coming so fast and furious that we're putting them in one place for our own personal sanity.
Meghan and Harry were busy settling into the royal family as a newly married couple, and apparently Prince William and Kate Middleton were...less than welcoming. To the point where Prince Charles (reminder: he wasn't king yet) had to step in.
Per royal reporter Katie Nicholl, "Harry felt William wasn't rolling out the red carpet for Meghan and told him so. They had a bit of a fallout, which was only resolved when Charles stepped in and asked William to make an effort. That's when the Cambridges invited the Sussexes to spend Christmas with them."
The fated month that Meghan and Harry announced their plans to step back from royal duties. As you can see in their since-deleted statement, they indicated that the decision was made with Harry's family:
"After many months of reflection and internal discussions, we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution. We intend to step back as 'senior' members of the Royal Family and work to become financially independent while continuing to fully support Her Majesty The Queen. It is with your encouragement, particularly over the last few years, that we feel prepared to make this adjustment. We now plan to balance our time between the United Kingdom and North America, continuing to honour our duty to the Queen, the Commonwealth, and our patronages."
However, BBC News royal correspondent Jonny Dymond tweeted, "BBC understands that no other member of the Royal Family was consulted before Harry and Meghan issued their personal statement tonight. The Palace is understood to be 'disappointed.'"
Harry later denied this during his Oprah interview, saying "I would never blindside my grandmother. I have too much respect for her."
Speaking of Oprah, the Sussexes sat down with her to give what can only be described as a truly bombshell interview. At one point, Prince Harry claimed Charles stopped taking his calls. Ahem:
"When we were in Canada, I had three conversations with my grandmother and two conversations with my father before he stopped taking my calls."
Gayle King gave everyone an update following all ^ this ^, confirming that Harry had since spoken to his family: "I did actually call them to see how they were feeling, and it's true, Harry has talked to his brother and he has talked to his father too," Gayle said, in part. "The word I was given was that those conversations were not productive. But they are glad that they have at least started a conversation."
Prince Phillip passed away, and Harry flew home to England for the funeral—his first time reuniting with the family since their drama.
"Truth be told, Harry didn't really know what to expect before he came home, which is why he reached out before seeing everyone," a source told the Mirror. "He wrote a deeply personal note to his dad to try and set things straight but tensions are still running high and things haven't exactly ironed out the way he had hoped."
Following the royal family's meeting, The Sun spoke to a source who said that "Harry, William, and Charles focused on reaching some form of peace and stability within the family moving forward. The conversations were focused less on what has happened and what was said with Oprah and more on how to move forward as a family. And that is not an easy path, it requires time and understanding. Charles felt aggrieved at how the family's personal affairs and family dramas were expressed in such an 'insensitive' way."
Buuut later that month, Harry went onto Armchair Expert and said his dad had passed a cycle of pain onto him:
"I don't think we should be pointing the finger or blaming anybody, but certainly when it comes to parenting, if I've experienced some form of pain or suffering because of the pain or suffering that perhaps my father or my parents had suffered, I'm going to make sure I break that cycle so that I don't pass it on, basically. It's a lot of genetic pain and suffering that gets passed on anyway so we as parents should be doing the most we can to try and say, 'You know what, that happened to me, I'm going to make sure that doesn't happen to you.'"
An anon friend told People that Charles was "shell-shocked" and "very hurt and upset" by the situation with Harry.
Things were looking slightly up as of early 2022, when a source told The Sun (via The Mirror), "There has been a definite thaw in relations between Harry and Charles. They are on much better terms and have been having friendly chats and video calls."
Harry went to England to visit the Queen, and ended up having a "cordial but slightly awkward" meeting with his dad that lasted 15 minutes. But then he sat down for a Today interview about said meeting, and said "I'm just making sure that she's, you know, protected and got the right people around her."
Apparently this didn't go over well with Charles, who was said to be "at a loss."
Meanwhile, Harry was also advocating for an impartial mediator to help deal with the family rift. Per royal expert Katie Nicholl in Entertainment Tonight, "Harry, I'm told, suggested perhaps that they might get some sort of a mediator in on sort of these talks, to make some progress. It was something that he had suggested to his father. He's made it very clear that he wants to sort things out. He wants things to be improved."
With news of Harry's upcoming memoir dominating headlines, royal expert Neil Sean told The Express that Charles had "iced out" his son for not giving him details:
"The fact they are remaining so tight-lipped means there have to be some bombshells in the memoir. Charles then iced his younger son with a very short meeting. He wanted to have a mature, adult conversation about what the book will contain, and whether the royals should be concerned about anything."
Charles allegedly invited the Sussexes to Balmoral, but sources told The Mirror that they declined: "The Prince of Wales reiterated his invitation for Harry and Meghan, and the whole family if they wished, to come and stay with him this summer while he is at his home on the Balmoral estate. He thought it might be a good opportunity for everyone to take stock and relax, but the invitation was declined."
The Queen then passed away on September 8, and Harry and Meghan flew to England to take part in her funeral.
Amid all this, The Times reported that Charles hadn't decided whether or not to allow Archie and Lilibet to use their titles, which was "heightening tensions" with the Sussexes.
Meanwhile, The Telegraph spoke to a source who said the newly minted King saw "tremendous flickers of hope" after spending some time with Meghan and Harry. Direct quote: "It remains the case that the King loves both of his children. Over the last 16 days or so, there were tremendous flickers of hope. In terms of the future, there is hope of a cause for unity."
A friend of Queen Camilla's spoke to the Daily Beast and said "Almost everything Charles has done over the past 20 years has, in one way or another, been about getting Camilla accepted by the public. He loves her. He is incredibly protective of her and he couldn't do it without her. Even the Queen finally accepted that. It is one thing for Harry to attack Charles, he can take it on the chin, but if Harry forces him to choose by laying into Camilla in his book, I have no doubt he will choose Camilla."
The Daily Beast added that there was "tremendous nervousness" within Charles' inner circle about what might be written in Spare.
Ahead of Spare's publication, Royal expert Tom Bower told The Sun that "[Charles] has made various threats to Meghan and Harry" and that the couple needed to "consider their own titles, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, could be taken away by Charles if they misbehave."
Harry and Meghan's Netflix special dropped, and Harry seemingly took a swipe at Charles...and William:
"For so many people in the family, especially obviously the men, there can be a temptation or an urge to marry someone who would fit the mold as opposed to somebody who you are perhaps destined to be with. The difference between making decisions with your head or your heart. My mom certainly made most of her decisions, if not all of them, from her heart, and I am my mother's son."
The Guardian got its hands on a leaked copy of Spare, and revealed the conversation Prince Harry had with King Charles and Prince William at Prince Philip's funeral. Charles allegedly stood between his kids "looking up at our flushed faces" and said "Please, boys. Don't make my final years a misery."Spare then dropped in full on January 10, and Harry wrote about his dad extensively. More significantly, given what we know about Charles' concerns, he wrote about Queen Camilla:
"She was the villain, she was a third person in the marriage, she needed to rehabilitate her image. The need for her to rehabilitate her image…that made her dangerous because of the connections that she was forging within the British press. And there was open willingness on both sides to trade information and with a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being Queen Consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street because of that."
Following this, a source told Us Weekly that "Charles is distraught. He's angry and outraged that Harry's aired so many embarrassing and damaging assertions, and it's put him in a terrible position with [Queen Consort] Camilla of course now that she's been dragged into the equation. That's really crossed the line in more ways than one, but there are so many egregious comments and revelations from Harry that his father doesn't know where to start. He has hope that in time the dust will settle and Harry will soften his heart toward his family, at least he hopes so. But he's not going to push or apologize."
There were even claims that Charles was "in talks" to issue a response to Harry in a landmark BBC interview to dish his side of the story.
Meghan and Harry were evicted from Frogmore Cottage.
The Telegraph reported that Harry and Charles had been holding peace talks ahead of Charles' coronation.
Harry showed up at the coronation and things went...fine?
The Sun reported that the Sussexes weren't invited to a royal gathering marking the one-year anniversary of the Queen's passing "despite being in Europe for the Invictus Games a day after the anniversary."
King Charles was diagnosed with cancer and The Guardian reported that "The Duke of Sussex has spoken with the King about his cancer diagnosis and will travel to the UK to see him soon."
Harry ended up visiting his father the day after his diagnosis was made public, and then made an appearance on Good Morning America while in Canada. When asked, "How was that visit for you, emotionally?" Harry said, "Look, I love my family. The fact that I was able to get on a plane and go and see him and spend any time with him, I'm grateful for that."
Meanwhile, news broke that Harry had reportedly told friends he'd be willing to take on official duties, but a source told the Mirror "Whatever has been discussed between William and the King is private, but it is absolutely and categorically clear that [William] would not allow Harry to return."
Royal biographer Ingrid Seward said (via People), "Of course [Charles] would like Harry to be the prodigal son and come back and would be much happier if William and Harry were friends again. But he realizes that is just not about to happen."
Royal author Tom Quinn told The Mirror that "Harry has been asked directly by his father not to write or say publicly anything further about the family or his brother that might cause trouble. And everyone knows that when a King asks you to do something, there are going to be consequences if you do not obey."
A friend of Prince Harry's told People that King Charles wasn't answering his son's calls, saying "He gets 'unavailable right now.' His calls go unanswered. He has tried to reach out about the King's health, but those calls go unanswered too."
A source told Entertainment Tonight that "Prince Harry's relationship with his father has deteriorated to a new low level" and if you're wondering why, apparently it's because they were "at loggerheads over Harry's security requests."
"Harry has genuine security concerns about the safety of his family in light of Princess Diana's death and feels that his father can help him in his ongoing battle with RAVEC (the entity that oversees security)," the insider said, adding "Their rift is not only just tied to security but also the family's distrust of Harry and Meghan, including Harry's tell-all bestselling memoir."
King Charles was hospitalized due to side effects from his ongoing cancer treatment, and the Palace failed to inform Prince Harry. According to The Sun's royal correspondent Sarah Hewson, "Harry only found out about his father's recent visit to hospital through the media," and "he doesn't know what his father's prognosis is."
Meanwhile, Harry was in England for his legal battle regarding security in the UK. Per Hewson, Charles avoided him on purpose due to the case:
"There is absolutely no way that the King could be seen to be intervening in this at all. Even any innocuous comment that could have been interpreted in a way and find its way into evidence in the court by Prince Harry's barrister. The King can't have conversations with him. And we're learning that the distance between them is perhaps greater than ever."
(Note: Harry denied asking his dad to intervene.)
Prince Harry told the BBC that he wants to reconcile with his father, and doesn't feel safe in the UK. "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight any more, life is precious" he said, adding "I can't see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to the U.K. at this point...I miss the U.K... I think it's really quite sad that I won't be able to show my children my homeland."
The royal family's reaction to Harry's BBC interview? According to a "close source" who spoke to Page Six "Nobody trusts him and that's the bottom line. The royal family has major trust issues with him and that's what's at the heart of everything. They don't trust him and Meghan and that's why they can't have a relationship….Maybe there's room to forgive, but they won't forget. Forgiveness and trust are two different things."
They added, "Harry messaged Charles and he never heard back. He wanted to talk to his dad about security stuff then, but his dad wouldn't speak to him. He really felt like his dad could overturn things."
The royals also took issue with Harry mentioning that he doesn't know what's going on with Charles' health. As a source told The Daily Mail "I don't know what's more disgusting–Harry's comment about his father's health or his suggestion that people want him dead. It's very sad, but we all know that he doesn't want to hear things he disagrees with."
At this point, you might think that Charles might reach out to Harry again, but the Daily Beast reported that "William's team has argued that Charles cannot bequeath his heir a settlement with Harry that William cannot live with."
That brings us up to date, but we'll keep this updated!
You Might Also Like
Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding
Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

5 hours ago

• Yahoo

Shubh Speaks: The First Interview with Punjabi Music's Fastest Rising Star

Shubh's rise has happened faster than he could have ever expected. In a quiet moment, Shubh softly remarks in Punjabi, 'I didn't think I would ever chart.' He's done more than that. The 27-year-old Brampton, Ontario-based Punjabi artist has become one of the most talked-about names in global music, amassing over 3 billion total streams across platforms, a fiercely loyal fanbase and a debut North American tour on the horizon, including arena dates in Oakland, Vancouver and Toronto. That's all without a label or a single dollar spent on ads. More from Billboard Rachel Zegler Serenades Crowd Outside Theater for Free in a New London Production of 'Evita' Jimmy Jam & Terry Lewis to Receive Vanguard Award at The Guitar Center Music Foundation Gala & Benefit Concert Shakira Announces Two More Dates in Mexico, Extending Record to 28 Around him, a pair of his close friends and Brampton housemates, Prince and Vicky, and his longtime manager, Shivam Malhotra, lean in, smiling – not just because the comment is modest, but because the reality couldn't be more different. This is his first interview. It's the first time he's publicly reflecting on a journey that, in just a few years, has taken him from scribbling verses in a notebook to performing on arena stages across North America. His breakthrough came when his debut album, Still Rollin, debuted at No. 16 on the Billboard Canadian Albums Chart in June 2023 and his sophomore album, Sicario, entered the Top 25 at No. 24 in January 2025. When he speaks to Billboard Canada, his single 'Supreme' is making a splash on the Billboard Canadian Hot 100 chart following a No. 13 debut for the 2024 single 'King Shit.' But today, Shubh isn't on stage, thinking about charts, or in the recording studio. He's seated calmly at the studio for his first cover shoot for Billboard Canada, surrounded by the same team that's been with him since day one. He answers slowly and thoughtfully, sometimes in Punjabi and sometimes in English. His friends and manager step in to help translate and interpret, not because he can't speak the language, but because he's never done this before and wants to express his clearest feelings. Long before his tracks topped charts or racked up hundreds of millions of streams, Shubh was just a teenager filling notebooks with verses. 'I started writing when I was really young,' he recalls. 'I've been writing for 12 to 13 years. I've always carried notebooks – almost like diaries – and that writing became the foundation of everything.' At the time, music wasn't a professional ambition for Shubh. It was an outlet, a private ritual shaped by observation, emotion and self-reflection. Today, that introspective process has evolved into a discography that's earned him billions of streams, including nearly 400 million streams for his breakout single 'No Love' and over 370 million for 'Cheques.' More than ten years later, that habit hasn't faded. He still carries notebooks and pens wherever he goes, staying connected to the handwritten process that shaped his earliest songs. To this day, all of his songs begin on paper first. Shubh's path to this moment didn't follow a script of a typical success story. He didn't go chasing viral fame or visibility. In fact, much like fellow Toronto artist The Weeknd, he kept his face and his identity hidden in the early stages, letting the music speak entirely for itself. There were no flashy rollouts or trend-driven moves. Instead, he spent those years in quiet focus, writing relentlessly, experimenting with sounds and perfecting each track in solitude. 'My aim wasn't attention, it was precision,' the singer says. Much of that focus and clarity comes from where it all began. Growing up in Punjab, Shubh was surrounded by music at home, often hearing his father sing during family gatherings or daily routines. His father and older brother (Ravneet Singh, a well-known actor and singer) have been his biggest inspirations. They're still in India, and he carries those memories with him everywhere. It's that sense of home, that emotional imprint from his upbringing, that continues to drive him. It's the quiet force behind the fire in his work. In 2014, Shubh moved to Canada to pursue a degree in mechanical engineering at Sheridan College. 'I came here as a student on a study visa,' he says. The early days weren't easy. 'I was a little bit nervous.' Like many international students, he juggled homesickness, new responsibilities and the weight of starting over. Music wasn't the goal then. It was more of a quiet companion. It wasn't until 2021 that he decided to release his first song. His debut track 'We Rollin' dropped without a music video and no press push. He didn't even show his whole face, wearing a scarf over his nose and mouth. He wanted his music to reach people first. And it did. Within weeks, the song was blowing up globally, with fans reaching out from countries like Japan and across Latin America. Now, 'We Rollin' has surpassed 265 million views on YouTube alone, becoming the spark that launched Shubh into international recognition. That initial wave of love changed everything. 'That first song made me realize something special was happening.' But Shubh didn't run to capitalize on it. He stayed in the studio, quietly focused on making better songs. 'Sometimes I take two to three months to make just one song,' he explains. 'He gets into that shell, and he only comes out when it's ready,' the artist's manager Malhotra explains. For instance, the mixing process for his 2022 single 'Baller,' one of his most iconic tracks, was so intense, it reached 29 versions before he was ready to put it out. 'We did 28 mixes,' Shubh says, cracking a rare smile. 'The 29th was okay, I guess. I still didn't like it.' He only released it, he adds, because 'deadlines' forced his hand. Shubh puts his music through a rigorous test. He listens to each track hundreds of times. If he's still not tired of it after 200 plays, that's when he knows it's ready for the world. 'Some of his songs average eight streams per user on Spotify,' Malhotra points out. 'The industry standard is two or three – that's more than double. It shows people aren't just listening once, they're coming back again and again.' But it's not just the replay value that sets him apart. Shubh isn't just focused on lyrics and production. He's also expanding the vocabulary of Punjabi music. 'Every time, I try to bring something fresh,' he says. A clear example is 'One Love,' a reggae-leaning track inspired by Bob Marley's legacy. 'I used to listen to Bob Marley. Yeah, big Marley fan,' he says. The track, which dropped without a music video, has already crossed 400 million streams on Spotify. Next on his radar? 'I think I'll try rock in the next two to three months,' he says. It's not a stretch – he already performs live with a full band and skips backing tracks entirely. 'I don't believe in doing minus,' he says. 'Everything is done live, start to finish.' Musically, Shubh's influences span decades and continents: Eminem, 2Pac, The Notorious B.I.G., 50 Cent, Dr. Dre. He speaks about them with deep respect, connecting their influence to his own path. Being in Toronto exposed him to global music culture, and Drake – another hometown hero – has had a huge impact. 'I've seen how an entire culture has been built around Drake,' he says. Living in Toronto has helped shape a global sound that can cross borders. Even though Shubh sings in Punjabi, the themes in his music – migration, longing, identity, his journey, perseverance – resonate far beyond the diaspora. 'I write about what it feels like to leave home, move to a new country, and figure things out alone,' he explains. 'It's something a lot of people can relate to.' Fans who don't understand the language still find something real in the flow and production. 'People feel the vibe.' He's incredibly selective about what he puts out. No matter how polished a track is, if it doesn't sit right with him, he won't release it. That personal compass is why Shubh's fans trust him. 'For me, my fans are like family,' he says. 'I reply to them online. I see everything.' Despite avoiding public events and the spotlight, he's always connected, just on his own terms. 'Shubh has never spent a dollar on ads or marketing,' Malhotra says. 'Everything has grown organically.' Now, he's preparing for his first North American tour, and he's skipping the usual small venues to perform in massive arenas. 'I never expected this,' he admits. 'But I'm very happy that we're performing in arenas.' The first venue? Oakland Arena on August 22, followed by Rogers Arena in Vancouver on August 23, and then Scotiabank Arena on September 5, where some of his heroes, including Eminem, have performed. He finishes the tour at the Prudential Center in New Jersey on September 7. Shubh had never even been to a concert before stepping on stage for his sold-out show at Indigo at the O2 in London in 2023. 'My voice was shaking,' he remembers. 'I was very hyped up, but it also humbled me down.' The surreal experience of performing live for the first time, without ever having seen a show from the audience's side, marked a memorable moment in his journey. He was supposed to go on a 2023 tour of India, but it was cancelled after backlash against a social media post he felt was politically misinterpreted. At the time, Shubh called the cancelled shows 'disheartening,' and he's been conceptualizing how to make his concerts even stronger since. A short tour in Australia and New Zealand the same year brought him to major venues – something he's looking to build on in Canada and the U.S. Now that he's ready to embark on his first North American tour, he's been putting serious thought into every detail of his live shows: stage setup, sound, lighting, all of it. 'I'm building something really special,' he says. 'It's never been done before in our scene.' The tour is a statement. As an independent artist, he wants to pave the way for others. 'If I can buy a beat for $80 and get 300 million streams out of it, I believe anyone can do it,' Shubh says simply. Now, Shubh already has his sights set even higher. 'After this, I want to go to stadiums,' he says. 'Then, I want to pack entire cities. That's the vision.' It's clear he's already thinking well beyond the present. Not because he's in a hurry, but because he knows where this could go. He's seen what happens when you lead your life creatively and with sincerity. He's living proof that letting the music take center stage can open doors. One phrase he keeps returning to during the conversation is simple but powerful: 'keep trying, keep hustling, be consistent.' As he puts it, 'If you bring honesty to your work, anything is possible.' This Billboard Canada cover story originally appeared on Billboard Canada. Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart

Atlantic

8 hours ago

• Atlantic

A Love Story That's Afraid of Romance

Modern dating, experts have lamented, has become a numbers game; the more matches you make, the more likely you are to land a mate. But in the new film Materialists, the only number that really matters is a suitor's net worth. Take Harry (played by Pedro Pascal), for example: He's a partner in a private-equity firm and the owner of a $12 million penthouse apartment in Manhattan. John (Chris Evans), meanwhile, lives paycheck to paycheck as an aspiring actor and part-time cater waiter who splits his rent with roommates. Between the two of them, Harry's the obvious 'unicorn'—the most desirable kind of bachelor, according to Lucy (Dakota Johnson), a professional matchmaker and the film's protagonist. Lucy sees dating as a marketplace of potential spouses whose worth is determined by their income as much as their looks. Never mind their interests or how they'd treat a partner; a guy like Harry is inherently more valuable than someone like John. Lucy isn't heartless. Rather, she sees herself as pragmatic about modern romance. Materialists, the writer-director Celine Song's follow-up to her sensitive Oscar-nominated feature, Past Lives, tracks Lucy as she finds matches for her clients, many of whom also think about future partners as commodities. The men tell her that they want women under a certain BMI and age; the women want men above a certain height and tax bracket. As amused as she might sometimes be by their demands, Lucy promises to introduce them to their 'grave buddy.' To her, finding love should be easy—it's just math, she likes to say—yet Lucy's own love life has remained stagnant. She asserts to anyone who asks that she'll either marry rich or die alone. This being a romantic dramedy, Lucy ends up in something of a love triangle anyway: She falls for Harry while harboring a lingering affection for John, who happens to be her ex. But her predicament isn't really about which suitor she'll choose; instead, she's caught between two versions of herself—the cash-strapped idealist who once pursued acting alongside John, and the polished working girl she's become. The core conflict of Materialists is similar to that of Past Lives, yet Song renders it less successfully here. Lucy's journey takes too many cynical turns to be satisfying, and the film's ideas are too scattershot to be convincing. Materialists falters most when it tries to mesh its competing aims: to deliver a throwback love story while also deconstructing the reality of modern dating. Instead, in the end, the film resembles the very world it tries to critique, offering a litany of observations about finding The One without ever substantially arguing for any of them. The film's glossy veneer of confidence, much like that of its lead, belies an uncertainty. Apart from some punchy dialogue probing the economy of marriage, its tale is shallow, with almost nonexistent stakes. John and Harry pose little challenge to Lucy's notions about partners needing to check each other's superficial boxes; both are handsome and smitten with her, and the disparity in their wealth never presents much of an obstacle for Lucy either. She had taken issue with John's poverty when they were together, as shown in a clunkily inserted flashback, but his finances are a mere asterisk to their present-day dynamic. Lucy is as thinly written as her suitors—a nod, maybe, to the threadbare profiles of app-fueled dating, but one that makes her a frustratingly inscrutable romantic lead. It doesn't help that Johnson, whose flat affect can be an asset in enigmatic dramas such as The Lost Daughter, isn't particularly believable as a woman with hang-ups about money. (If she's the provenance behind ' iPhone face ' in the misguided Netflix adaptation of Jane Austen's Persuasion, here she has what I call 'property-portfolio face.') The bigger problem, however, lies in Lucy's inelegant transformation from a skeptic about love to a wholehearted believer in it. When her most persistent client, Sophie (Zoë Winters), is sexually assaulted on a date, Sophie alternates between being furious at and grateful for Lucy, leaving the third act a confused mess. Although Winters captures Sophie's despair, her character gets compressed into a plot point and her arc produces a jarring shift in mood. Lucy's realization that she should, as Sophie advises her, treat her clients as more than 'merchandise' rings hollow as a result. Not to sound like someone still pining for an ex, but Materialists made me miss the work Song did in Past Lives. In that film, which followed a married woman yearning for the person she used to be after reconnecting with her childhood crush, Song used intimate specificity to unearth reflections about love—romantic, platonic, and otherwise. In Materialists, the director has essentially done the opposite: Her characters are mouthpieces for broad philosophies about connection, while their stories end up getting buried. The effect is a work that's tonally at odds with itself. Though Materialists is similarly packed with insightful monologues, it's heavy-handed in a way that Past Lives never was. Song bookends her latest with sappy scenes of prehistoric humans falling in love, and she injects flippancy into moments that call for sentimentality: When Lucy and Harry finally have a much-needed conversation, the script incorporates an absurd bit of physical comedy that undermines the poignancy of their heart-to-heart. There's much about Song's movie that I enjoyed. The fizzy sequences of Lucy meeting one client after the next, inspired by the director's own experience as a matchmaker, remind me of classics such as Broadcast News; they offer a glimpse into a gig that consumes a person whole. Besides, there's a real pleasure in seeing Hollywood stars fall for each other. But in trying to both critique and poke fun at the costs of modern love, Materialists never coheres into an emotionally potent tale. To put it in Lucy's terms: The film is beautiful and smart, and it clearly contains enough appeal to make it stand out in the marketplace. It's just no unicorn.

Yahoo

9 hours ago

• Yahoo

Tom Hardy's 'MobLand' just wrapped up with a stunning finale — and I can't wait for a season 2

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. After the premiere of "MobLand," I felt the Paramount Plus show had a major problem, but showed a lot of promise. Fast forward to today's (June 1) season finale, and I can confirm the show wound up delivering on that promise — and then some. No, the show's not perfect by any means. Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren are incredible actors ... just not in this show. They're such caricatures of Irish gangsters that I'm still surprised they agreed to perform their roles the way they did. Then again, there is something very "Guy Ritchie" about their performance, and given the English director's involvement in the show's talented creative team, maybe Brosnan's and Mirren's performance was directed by him in particular. Even though this show isn't technically a Guy Ritchie series — he's an executive producer and director, but "The Day of the Jackal" creator Ronan Bennett is the creative lead behind "MobLand" — it has Ritchie's fingerprints all over it, including the finale. You don't even have to go back far to find a Guy Ritchie movie that feels related to "MobLand." I couldn't stop thinking about "The Gentlemen" while watching this show, especially how much Tom Hardy's Harry Da Souza reminds me of Charlie Hunnam's Raymond Smith. Also, there's plenty of violence. Spoilers for 'MobLand' beyond this point All season long, "MobLand" has been building toward an all-out gang war between the Harrigans and the Stevensons. To call it a simmering conflict would be an understatement. There's been dismemberment, car bombings and much more violence besides. But things go up a notch in the finale. The entire Stevenson crime family gets wiped out in a brilliant move by Harry that involves luring all of Richie Stevenson's (Geoff Bell) soldiers away from the rival gang leader, eliminating them in a hail of gunfire, grenades and bombs. Then, of course, Harry and Kevin (Paddy Considine) kill Richie and the Harrigan family lawyer, O'Hara (Lisa Dawn), who turned out to be a rat. It may be cliche, but this was my favorite part of the episode. First, seeing Harry's move play out in a way that lets you know what's coming just enough for you to get excited for the payoff. Second, Kevin delivering the line 'The Harrigans say hello' right before killing Richie is excellent. Yes, the killer delivering a final line right before the kill has been done before, but it still works. This show may have started slow, but now that the season is over, I can freely admit I've fallen for "MobLand." It's the perfect role for Hardy, who is great on screen with Conisidine. It's just the right blend of clever dialogue, brooding, double crossing and violence, even if the show definitely has some flawed performances and occasionally devolves into cliche. So, Paramount, give us "MobLand" season 2. I'm shocked that the show hasn't been renewed already, even after the finale's release on Paramount Plus. The show is clearly setting up a season 2 with Harry versus the notorious Kat McAllister (Janet McTeer) or a lieutenant of hers we have yet to meet. If we get that showdown, it could genuinely produce a great season of television. Watching Hardy and McTeer on screen this episode gave me real Timothy Olyphant and Margot Martindale in "Justified" season 2 vibes, and that might be one of the greatest seasons of television ever made. Paramount owes it to us and the show to give it the chance to build on a season that's gotten better and better with every episode. Stream "MobLand" on Paramount Plus 'Your Friends and Neighbors' season finale proves there are no consequences as long as you're rich and look like Jon Hamm 'Hacks' shocking season 4 finale has me hopeful season 5 could be the show's best yet — here's why 'The Last of Us' season 2 finale live — reactions, who survived, recap and more